Home Physical Sciences Synthesis and structural characterization of Mn(II) and Cu(II) complexes with bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone ligands
Article Publicly Available

Synthesis and structural characterization of Mn(II) and Cu(II) complexes with bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone ligands

  • Gao-Feng Wang EMAIL logo , Xiao Zhang EMAIL logo , Zhao-Rong Liu , Yu-Chun Wang , Hong-Shi Jiang , Mei-Zhuan Li , Jiao Jiao , Hui-Xuan Ma , Xiu-Ping Jiang and Qiu-Ping Han
Published/Copyright: December 19, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Two complexes, {Mn(hfac)2(BIPMO)}n (1), {Cu(hfac)2(BIPMO)}n (2) [hfac=1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoro-pentane-2,4-dionato(–), BIPMO=bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone], with the V-shaped ligands were synthesized and characterized by infrared spectroscopy, elemental analyses, along with single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. The X-ray diffraction studies have shown that the metal ions in 1 and 2 are both six-coordinated to two nitrogen atoms of two BIPMO ligands and four oxygen atoms of two hfac ligands to form a distorted octahedral geometry. Each BIPMO ligand acts as a bridging ligand to link two adjacent metal(II) atoms to form a helical chain in the crystal structure.

1 Introduction

Over the past few years, the synthesis and characterization of coordination polymers (CPs) has remained an active research field of interest due to their intriguing architectures and potential applications in photochemistry, gas adsorption and separation, and heterogeneous catalysis [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. To date, numerous topological frameworks types, such as NbO, CdSO4, rutile, pyrite, sodalite, quartz, and diamond, have been reported [6], [7], [8]. Generally, the diversity in the architectures of CPs is highly influenced by the central metals, organic anions, N-donor ligands, pH values, reaction temperatures, and other parameters. Among these, the organic ligands play crucial roles in the construction of CPs. In this regard, multidentate N-donor ligands have been extensively used as multifunctional organic linkers due to their reliable and rich coordination modes [9], [10], [11]. Thus, the rational design of novel N-donor heterocyclic ligands is usually a useful and important way to achieve a controllable synthesis of CPs.

In this paper, we report the synthesis and structural characterization of two CPs bridged by the novel V-shaped imidazolyl ligand, {Mn(hfac)2(BIPMO)}n (1), {Cu(hfac)2(BIPMO)}n (2). The structural formula of the V-shaped imidazolyl ligand, bis(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)methanone (BIPMO), used in this study is illustrated in Scheme 1.

Scheme 1: Schematic drawing of BIPMO.
Scheme 1:

Schematic drawing of BIPMO.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Preparation and characterization of the complexes

When the metal precursors M(hfac)2 (M=Mn, Cu) were reacted with BIPMO in EtOH-dichloromethane at room temperature, coordination polymers were obtained in good yields (82%–86%). The complexes are stable in common solvents such as benzene, hexane, ethanol, and dichloromethane.

The composition of 1 and 2 was confirmed by infrared (IR) spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The IR spectra of 1 and 2 were consistent with their formulation. Weak IR bands centered at ca. 3150 cm−1 can be assigned to ν(C–H) of the ligands. A large group of bands in the region 1610–1430 cm−1 are characteristic of ν(C=N) and ν(C=C) stretches of aromatic groups.

2.2 Molecular structures of 1 and 2

The structures of 1 and 2 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Table 1). Selected bond lengths and angles for 1 and 2 are listed in Table 2. The Ortep drawings of 1 and 2 are shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. The results of single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses indicate that the structures of complexes 1 and 2 are similar. Accordingly, the structure of 1 is described representatively here in more detail. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c and the asymmetric unit consists of one Mn(II) atom, one BIPMO, and two hfac ligands. As shown in Fig. 1, each Mn(II) ion is in a distorted octahedral geometry, coordinated by two pairs of oxygen atoms (O2, O3 and O4, O5) from two chelating hfac ligands and two nitrogen atoms (N1 and N4#1) from two BIMPO ligands. The Mn–O distances range from 2.146(2) to 2.259(2) Å, while the Mn–N ones are 2.190(2) and 2.210(2) Å, and the coordination angles around Mn1 are in ranges near 90° and 180°. The BIPMO ligand is V-shaped with a C7–C10–C11 angle of 119.9(2)°. Each BIPMO acts as a bridging ligand to link two Mn(II) atoms to form a helical chain with Mn···Mn distances of 17.346(1) Å and Mn···Mn···Mn angles of 77.30° running along the c axis (Fig. 3). Furthermore, in complex 1, the helical chains are further connected by C–H···O and C–H···F hydrogen bonds, and F···π, C–H···π, π···π, and F···F interactions to produce a three-dimensional (3D) framework (Fig. 4 and Table 3).

Table 1:

Summary of crystallographic data for complexes C29H16MnF12N4O5 (1) and C29H16F12CuN4O5 (2).

Compound12
Empirical formulaC29H16F12MnN4O5C29H16CuF12N4O5
Formula weight Mr783.40792.01
T, K293(2)293(2)
Crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinic
Space groupP21/cP21/c
a, Å10.6882(2)10.5497(2)
b, Å21.6678(5)21.4383(6)
c, Å16.7479(4)16.5652(4)
β, deg124.615(2)124.005(2)
V, Å−33192.07(12)3105.81(13)
Z44
Dcalc., g cm−31.631.69
μ, mm−10.50.8
F (000), e15641580
θ Range, deg2.96 to 26.02.97 to 25.02
hmin, hmax–12, 13–12, 12
kmin, kmax–26, 26–25, 23
lmin, lmax–20, 20–19, 19
Data/restraints/parameters6271/0/4885499/6/460
Refl. collected/unique14166/627114425/5499
Rint0.03110.0279
Goodness-of-fit on F21.0711.080
R1/wR2 [I>2σ(I)]0.0503/0.12350.0518/0.1145
R1/wR2 (all data)0.0739/0.13770.0647/0.1205
Largest peak/hole, e Å−30.47/–0.390.91/–0.57
Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for 1 and 2.

12
Mn(1)–O(2)2.146(2)Cu(1)–O(3)1.971(2)
Mn(1)–O(4)2.156(2)Cu(1)–N(1)1.979(3)
Mn(1)–O(5)2.164(2)Cu(1)–N(4)2.093(3)
Mn(1)–N(4)2.190(2)Cu(1)–O(2)2.163(3)
Mn(1)–N(1)2.210(2)Cu(1)–O(4)2.166(3)
Mn(1)–O(3)2.259(2)Cu(1)–O(5)2.177(3)
O(2)–Mn(1)–O(4)171.53(8)O(4)–Cu(1)–O(5)83.13(10)
O(2)–Mn(1)–O(5)88.65(8)O(3)–Cu(1)–N(4)92.01(11)
O(4)–Mn(1)–O(5)82.89(8)N(1)–Cu(1)–N(4)96.56(12)
O(2)–Mn(1)–N(4)95.28(9)O(3)–Cu(1)–O(2)88.19(11)
O(4)–Mn(1)–N(4)93.05(9)N(1)–Cu(1)–O(2)91.78(12)
O(5)–Mn(1)–N(4)167.75(10)N(4)–Cu(1)–O(2)92.01(11)
O(2)–Mn(1)–N(1)87.88(8)O(3)–Cu(1)–O(4)87.94(10)
O(4)–Mn(1)–N(1)92.21(9)N(1)–Cu(1)–O(4)92.08(12)
O(5)–Mn(1)–N(1)92.18(9)N(4)–Cu(1)–O(4)87.89(11)
N(4)–Mn(1)–N(1)99.55(9)O(2)–Cu(1)–O(4)176.12(11)
O(2)–Mn(1)–O(3)80.87(8)O(3)–Cu(1)–O(5)82.21(11)
O(4)–Mn(1)–O(3)97.80(8)N(1)–Cu(1)–O(5)89.28(12)
O(5)–Mn(1)–O(3)80.07(8)N(4)–Cu(1)–O(5)169.46(11)
N(4)–Mn(1)–O(3)89.09(9)O(2)–Cu(1)–O(5)96.58(11)
Fig. 1: Coordination environments of complex 1 showing 30% probability ellipsoids. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry code: #1–x, y–1/2, –z+1/2.
Fig. 1:

Coordination environments of complex 1 showing 30% probability ellipsoids. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry code: #1–x, y–1/2, –z+1/2.

Fig. 2: Coordination environments of complex 2 showing 30% probability ellipsoids. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry code: #1–x–1, y–1/2, –z+1/2.
Fig. 2:

Coordination environments of complex 2 showing 30% probability ellipsoids. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry code: #1–x–1, y–1/2, –z+1/2.

Fig. 3: View of the helical chain along the c axis of 1 (a) and 2 (b). The adjacent distances of Mn···Mn is 17.346 Å and the distance Cu···Cu is 17.087 Å.
Fig. 3:

View of the helical chain along the c axis of 1 (a) and 2 (b). The adjacent distances of Mn···Mn is 17.346 Å and the distance Cu···Cu is 17.087 Å.

Fig. 4: (a) View of the helical chain of 1 viewed along the c axis; (b) packing diagram of 1 viewed along the a axis.
Fig. 4:

(a) View of the helical chain of 1 viewed along the c axis; (b) packing diagram of 1 viewed along the a axis.

Table 3:

Intra- and intermolecular interaction for 1 and 2 (Å, deg).a

D–H···Ad(D–H)d(H···A)d(D···A)∠DHASymmetry operations
1C3–H3···O40.932.673.590(4)167x, 3/2–y, 1/2+z
C9–H9···O40.932.573.475(4)163x, 3/2–y, 1/2+z
C12–H12···F30.932.513.420(3)166x–1, y, z
C16–H16···Cg10.932.7673.397(4)1261–x, 1–y, 1–z
F3′···F42.774(3)x+1, 3/2–y, 1/2+z
F2′···F102.881(4)x, 3/2–y,1/2+z
F3···Cg23.327(5)1+x, y, z
F1′···Cg33.656(4)1–x, 1–y, 1–z
Cg···CgDihedral angle
Cg3···Cg33.884(4)0.01–x, 1–y, 1–z
2C2–H2···O40.932.543.035(6)113x, y, z
C18–H18···O40.932.583.042(5)111x, y, z
C22–H22···F30.932.352.720(6)103x, y, z
C27–H27···F90.932..412.749(7)101x, y, z
C27–H27···F120.932.392.746(5)102x, y, z
C6–H6···F40.932.543.474(6)177–x, y1/2, –z+1/2
C13–H13···O50.932.573.463(5)161–x+1, –y1, –z+1
C19–H19···O50.932.713.623(5)167–x+1, –y1, –z+1
C8–H8···Cg10.932.733.380(5)–x+2, –y1, –z+1
F4···Cg23.158(4)–x, –1/2+y, 1/2–z
Cg···CgDihedral angle
Cg2···Cg23.830(4)0.0–x+1, –y1, –z+1

aFor 1, Cg1, Cg2, and Cg3 are rings comprising the atoms of N1–C1–N2–C3–C2, C4–C9, and C11–C16, respectively; for 2, Cg1, Cg2 are rings comprising the atoms of N3–C17–N4–C18–C19 and C11–C16, respectively.

3 Conclusions

In summary, we have reported the syntheses, properties, and crystal structures of two novel coordination polymers with the ligand BIPMO which acts as a bridging unit to link adjacent metal ions into a helical chain. Weak interactions in the crystals link the chains to form a 3D supramolecular array.

4 Experimental section

4.1 Materials and measurements

All solvents and reagents were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation of Shanghai, P.R. China. BIPMO was synthesized according to the literature method [12]. Melting points are uncorrected. Elemental analyses were performed on an Elementar Vario ELIII elemental analyzer. The IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Vector 22 spectrophotometer with KBr pellets in the 4000–400 cm−1 region.

4.1.1 Synthesis of {Mn(hfac)2(BIPMO)}n (1)

To an EtOH solution (20 mL) of Mn(hfac)2·2H2O (50.5 mg, 0.10 mmol), BIPMO (31.4 mg, 0.10 mmol) in CH2Cl2 was added slowly. The mixture was stirred for 10 min and the resulting solution was filtered and kept at room temperature for several days. Pale yellow crystals, suitable for X-ray crystallography, formed upon evaporation of the solvent. Yield: 82% (based on BIPMO). M.p.>300°C. – Anal. for C29H16F12N4O5Mn: calcd. C 44.46, H 2.06, N 7.15; found C 44.24, H 1.90, N 7.07%. – IR (KBr, cm−1): 3167(w), 3142(w), 1647(s), 1607(m), 1554(m), 1525(s), 1493(s), 1432(m), 1335(m), 1310(m), 1256(s), 1203(s), 1185(s), 1138(s), 1059(s), 963(m), 930(s), 856(m), 839(w), 793(s), 763(m), 737(m), 665(s), 581(m), 521(w), 473(w).

4.1.2 Synthesis of {Cu(hfac)2(BIPMO)}n (2)

The complex was obtained as a green crystalline solid using the same procedure as for 1 by replacing Mn(hfac)2·2H2O with Cu(hfac)2·4H2O. Yield: 86% (based on BIPMO). M.p>300°C. – Anal. for C29H16F12N4O5Cu: calcd. C 43.98, H 2.04, N 7.07; found: C 43.72, H 1.93, N,7.21%. – IR (KBr, cm−1): 3148(m), 1663(s), 1651(s), 1605(s), 1553(s), 1526(s), 1481(s), 1431(m), 1337(m), 1309(s), 1284(m), 1257(m), 1184(s), 1151(s), 1134(s), 1059(s), 961(m), 928(m), 841(m), 791(s), 763(w), 737(m), 667(s), 650(m), 623(m), 582(m), 521(m), 480(w), 444(w).

4.2 X-ray crystallography

All measurements were made on an Agilent Technology SuperNova Eos Dual system with a MoKα micro focus source (λ=0.71073 Å) and focusing multilayer mirror optics. The data were collected at a temperature of 293 K and processed using CrysAlisPro [13]. Absorption corrections were applied using the SADABS program [14]. The structures were solved by Direct Methods [15] with the Shelxtl (version 6.10) program [15], [16] and refined by full matrix least-squares techniques on F2 with Shelxtl [15], [16]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The ligand hydrogen atoms were localized in their calculated positions and refined using a riding model. In the structure of 2, command DELU was used to atoms Cu1, O2, O4, and O5 with Hirshfeld errors.

CCDC 1451115 and 1451116 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for financial support from Young Teacher Starting-up Research of Yuncheng University (No. YQ-2015007 to GFW) and Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry (Heilongjiang University), Ministry of Education.

References

[1] Z. Hu, B. J. Deibert, J. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5815.10.1039/C4CS00010BSearch in Google Scholar

[2] J. R. Li, H. C. Zhou, Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 893.10.1038/nchem.803Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. R. Tan, S. H. Yang, N. R. Champness, X. Lin, A. J. Blake, W. Lewis, M. Schröder, Chem. Commun.2011, 47, 4487.10.1039/c1cc10378dSearch in Google Scholar

[4] A. Corma, H. García, F. X. Llabrés i Xamena, Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4606.10.1021/cr9003924Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. H. Xie, X. L. Yang, C. D. Wu, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5521.10.1039/C1CC10461FSearch in Google Scholar

[6] L. Carlucci, G. Ciani, P. Macchi, D. M. Proserpio, Chem. Commun. 1998, 1837.10.1039/a803662dSearch in Google Scholar

[7] B. F. Abrahams, S. R. Batten, M. J. Grannas, H. Hamit, B. F. Hoskins, R. Robson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1475.10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990517)38:10<1475::AID-ANIE1475>3.0.CO;2-3Search in Google Scholar

[8] L. Carlucci, G. Ciani, D. M. Proserpio, S. Rizzato, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 3821.10.1039/b003092iSearch in Google Scholar

[9] L. Fan, X. Zhang, Z. Sun, W. Zhang, Y. Ding, W. Fan, L. Sun, X. Zhao, H. Lei, Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 2462.10.1021/cg400172wSearch in Google Scholar

[10] L. Qin, J. Hu, M. Zhang, Q. Yang, Y. Li, H. Zheng, Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 2111.10.1021/cg400180jSearch in Google Scholar

[11] W.-Q. Kan, B. Liu, J. Yang, Y.-Y. Liu, J.-F. Ma, Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 2288.10.1021/cg2015644Search in Google Scholar

[12] G.-F. Wang, X. Zhang, S.-W. Sun, H. Sun, X. Yang, H. Li, C.-Z. Yao, S.-G. Sun, Y.-P. Tang, L.-X. Meng, Z. Naturforsch. B2016, 71, 869.10.1515/znb-2016-0050Search in Google Scholar

[13] CrysAlisPro (version 1.171.35.19.), Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA (USA) 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[14] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[15] G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxtl (version 6.1), Software Reference Manual, Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[16] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-6-18
Accepted: 2016-7-13
Published Online: 2016-12-19
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0152/html
Scroll to top button