Home Physical Sciences Hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anions adjacent to [S2O7]2− in Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2]: a structural evidence of the increasing acidity of polysulfuric acids with growing chain length
Article Publicly Available

Hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anions adjacent to [S2O7]2− in Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2]: a structural evidence of the increasing acidity of polysulfuric acids with growing chain length

  • Lisa Verena Schindler and Mathias S. Wickleder EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 9, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Rb3[H(HSO4)2][S2O7] (monoclinic, C2/c (no. 15), a=1638.75(6), b=768.52(3), c=1187.88(4) pm, β=106.805(2)°, V=1432.14(9)·106 pm, Z=4) was obtained from the reaction of Rb2[CO3] (99.9%, not dried, 150 mg, 0.6 mmol) with neat SO3 in a torch-sealed glass ampoule. The remaining quantity of water in the starting material was obviously sufficient to lead to an H-containing substance. The structure shows the unprotonated disulfate anion [S2O7]2− adjacent to the hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anion [H(HSO4)2] with the central hydrogen atom located close to a center of inversion.

1 Introduction

Sulfuric acid is a strong acid whose first corresponding base HSO4 reacts still as an acid in aqueous medium. This behavior is reflected by the fact that there are by far more reports on sulfates containing the unprotonated anion SO42− than on acidic sulfates displaying the monoprotonated anion HSO4 [1]. Table 1 summarizes the acidic sulfates of the alkali metals, in the first part – the H2SO4-rich sulfates – ordered by growing H2SO4 content and decreasing H2O content, and in the second part – the SO3-rich sulfates – ordered by growing SO3 content and decreasing H2SO4 content. Theoretical calculations for the first members of the homologous series of polysulfuric acids H2SnO3n+1 show that their acidity increases with growing chain length [26]. Thus, it is not surprising that even for disulfuric acid, H2S2O7, nearly no hydrogen disulfates have been reported, whereas there are more than 50 well-characterized disulfates present in the literature. Just six hydrogen disulfates were obtained, more or less accidentally [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], until we lately presented a systematic study on hydrogen disulfates with cations of low charge [24]. For the salts of trisulfuric acid, the monoprotonated anion was even completely unknown until we recently reported on the stabilization of the hydrogen trisulfate anion [HS3O10] in the crystal structures of Na[HS3O10], K[HS3O10], and Rb[HS3O10] [25]. With respect to the theoretical prediction that the acidity of polysulfuric acids increases with growing chain length, it can be assumed that in acidic compounds containing polysulfate anions of different chain lengths the shorter anion will be the protonated one. The structure of the recently reported K2[S2O7][H2SO4] is an illustrative confirmation for this assumption [23]. It shows the disulfate anion adjacent to a molecule of coordinated sulfuric acid, and the structural data clearly prove that no protonation according to “K2[HS2O7][HSO4]” occurs. Following this line, the palladate Ba2[Pd(HS2O7)2(S3O10)2] is another intriguing example [28]. Here the protonation of the disulfate anion is favored, in accordance with the low basicity of the [S3O10]2− anion. The crystal structure of the now presented rubidium salt Rb3[H(HSO4)2][S2O7] is not only another striking example for the assumptions on the acidity of polysulfuric acids, but it is also one of the very few examples exhibiting the hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anion [H(HSO4)2] that has been reported only twice, the first time by Werner et al. in the crystal structure of Li[H(HSO4)2](H2SO4)2 [19] and the second time by our group in the structure of K3[Pt2(SO4)4H(HSO4)2] [33]. Furthermore, Rb3[H(HSO4)2][S2O7] bridges the gap between acidic sulfates just containing A2SO4 (A: alkali metal), H2SO4, and H2O in a certain ratio (Table 1, first part) and SO3-rich acidic sulfates (Table 1, second part) as it is the SO3-poorest acidic sulfate containing SO3, A2SO4, and H2SO4.

Table 1:

Acidic sulfates of alkali metals ordered by growing [H2SO4] content and decreasing [H2O] content (first part) and growing [SO3] content and decreasing [H2SO4] content (second part).

M2[SO4]:[H2SO4]:[H2O]LiNaKRbCs
1:0.33:0Na3[H(SO4)2] [2]K3[H(SO4)2] [3]Rb3[H(SO4)2] [4]
1:0.6:0.2Cs5H3[SO4]4·0.48H2O [5]
1:0.6:0Rb5H3[SO4]4 [6]Cs5H3[SO4]4 [7]
1:0.77:0.22K9H7[SO4]8·H2O [8]
1:0.77:0K9H7[SO4]8 [8]
1:1:2Na[HSO4]·H2O [9]
1:1:0Li[HSO4] [10]Na[HSO4] [11]K[HSO4] [12]Rb[HSO4] [13]Cs[HSO4] [14]
1:3:2Na[H3O][HSO4]2 [15]K[H3O][HSO4]2 [16]
1:3:0Li2[HSO4]2·H2SO4 [10]Na2[HSO4]2·H2SO4 [15]K[HSO4]·H2SO4 [17]Rb[HSO4]·H2SO4 [18]Cs[HSO4]·H2SO4 [18]
1:5:0Na[HSO4]·2H2SO4 [15]
1:7:0Li[H(HSO4)2]·2H2SO4 [19]
M2[SO4]:[H2SO4]:[SO3]
1:1:0.67Rb3[H(HSO4)2][S2O7]
1:0.3:0.6K2[S2O7]·K[HSO4] [20]
1:1:1Li2[S2O7]·H2SO4 [21]K2[S2O7]·H2SO4 [23]
1:1:2Li[HS2O7] [21]K[HS2O7] [24]Rb[HS2O7] [24]Cs[HS2O7] [24]
1:3:4Li[H(HS2O7)2] [21]
1:1:4Na[HS3O10] [25]K[HS3O10] [25]Rb[HS3O10] [25]
1:0.3:4Li3[H(S4O13)2] [22]

2 Results and discussion

Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2] crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with four formula units per unit cell. The crystal structure exhibits two different anions with sulfur atoms on two crystallographically distinguishable positions (Fig. 1). The disulfate anion [S2O7]2− is built up by the vertex connection of two crystallographically equivalent sulfate tetrahedra via the bridging oxygen atom O111 located on the Wyckoff position 4e with site symmetry 2. The S–O distances to the terminal oxygen atoms range between 143.27(7) and 145.67(7) pm, and the bond to the bridging oxygen atom O111 is elongated (163.14(4) pm).

Fig. 1: Anions in the crystal structure of Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2]: the disulfate anion [S2O7]2− and the hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anion [H(HSO4)2]−. For the hydrogen atom H23 (shown as light gray circles with hatched borders) an occupancy of 0.5 is found due to the location close to a center of symmetry. The displacement ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 85%. Bond length (pm): S1–O11 143.27(7), S1–O12 143.74(6), S1–O13 145.67(7), S1–O111 163.14(4), S2–O21 143.90(6), S2–O22 144.01(6), S2–O23 150.60(6), S2–O24 154.99(7).
Fig. 1:

Anions in the crystal structure of Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2]: the disulfate anion [S2O7]2− and the hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anion [H(HSO4)2]. For the hydrogen atom H23 (shown as light gray circles with hatched borders) an occupancy of 0.5 is found due to the location close to a center of symmetry. The displacement ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 85%. Bond length (pm): S1–O11 143.27(7), S1–O12 143.74(6), S1–O13 145.67(7), S1–O111 163.14(4), S2–O21 143.90(6), S2–O22 144.01(6), S2–O23 150.60(6), S2–O24 154.99(7).

The second sulfur atom is the center of a single sulfate tetrahedron which is formally protonated twice at the oxygen atoms O23 and O24 (Fig. 1, right). For H23, a chemical occupancy of 0.5 results due to the location of the hydrogen atom close to a center of inversion and for reasons of charge compensation. This is the same situation as in the crystal structure of Li[H(HSO4)2](H2SO4)2 [19]. A difference Fourier map of the hydrogen bond is represented in Fig. 2, and the details of the hydrogen bonding system are given in Table 2. The difference Fourier map shows clearly the two crystallographically equivalent positions of the hydrogen atom close to the center of inversion and no blurred electron density as often observed for symmetrical hydrogen bonds [25], [34].

Fig. 2: Difference Fourier map of the hydrogen bond O23···H23···O23 in the crystal structure of Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2].
Fig. 2:

Difference Fourier map of the hydrogen bond O23···H23···O23 in the crystal structure of Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2].

Table 2:

Hydrogen bonding system in the crystal structure of Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2].

Donor hydrogen atomD–H distance, pmH·∙∙A distance, pmD–H–A angle, degD·A distance, pmAcceptor atom
O24–H2480.1176.0174.53255.8O13
O23–H2371.6175.6175.58247.1O23

Another indication for the formulation of a [H(HSO4)2] anion is the length of the respective S–O bond to the oxygen atom O23. With 150.60(6) pm it is just between the S–O distance to the fully protonated oxygen atom O24 (154.99(7) pm) and the terminal oxygen atoms O21 and O22 (143.90(6) pm, 144.01(6) pm). Thus, a single proton is found between two crystallographically equivalent HSO4 anions and the grade of protonation of the respective oxygen atoms (0 for O21, O22; 0.5 for O23; 1 for O24) is clearly reflected in the S–O bond lengths. The resulting hydrogen bond (donor acceptor distance: 247.1 pm) is strong according to the classification of Jeffrey and the anion can be described as a hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anion [H(HSO4)2] [35]. Via the hydrogen atom H24 of the fully protonated oxygen atom O24 a second moderately strong hydrogen bond is built to the oxygen atom O13 of the [S2O7]2− unit (donor acceptor distance: 255.8 pm, Table 2) linking the anions to chains proceeding along [101] as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3: Unit cell of the crystal structure of Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2]. Disulfate anions are emphasized in light gray, and hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anions are shown in dark gray. Moderate hydrogen bonds are displayed as dashed lines, and the strong hydrogen bonds in the [H(HSO4)2]− anion as solid lines. The hydrogen bonds link the anions to chains proceeding along [010].
Fig. 3:

Unit cell of the crystal structure of Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2]. Disulfate anions are emphasized in light gray, and hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anions are shown in dark gray. Moderate hydrogen bonds are displayed as dashed lines, and the strong hydrogen bonds in the [H(HSO4)2] anion as solid lines. The hydrogen bonds link the anions to chains proceeding along [010].

Charge compensation is realized by Rb cations which are located on two crystallographically distinguishable sites. Rb1 is located on the Wyckoff position 8f with site symmetry 1, and Rb2 on the Wyckoff position 4e with site symmetry 2. Both [S2O7]2− and [H(HSO4)2] anions are part of the coordination sphere of the cations. Rb1 is surrounded by 11 oxygen atoms belonging to three [S2O7]2− units and three [H(HSO4)2] moieties (Fig. 4, left). Two disulfate anions function as bidentate ligands coordinated via an edge of one sulfate tetrahedron; the third attacks the cation in a monodentate way. The [H(HSO4)2] moieties coordinate to the cation bidentately, two via an edge of one [HSO4] tetrahedron and one by one oxygen atom of each [HSO4] unit. Rb2 is surrounded by 13 oxygen atoms belonging to two disulfate anions and four [H(HSO4)2] anions (Fig. 4, right). One disulfate anion attacks tridentately with the bridging oxygen atom O111 and one oxygen atom of each [SO4]2− moiety; the other one attacks with just one oxygen atom of each [SO4]2− tetrahedron. The [H(HSO4] moieties coordinate bidentately via an edge of one [HSO4] tetrahedron.

Fig. 4: Coordination sphere of Rb1 (left) and Rb2 (right). Disulfate anions are emphasized in light gray, and hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anions are highlighted in dark gray.
Fig. 4:

Coordination sphere of Rb1 (left) and Rb2 (right). Disulfate anions are emphasized in light gray, and hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anions are highlighted in dark gray.

The compound shows a ratio Rb2[SO4]:H2SO4:SO3 of 1:1:0.67, and thereby it is the SO3-poorest acidic sulfate that already shows an excess of SO3. The next member of the SO3-rich compounds is the double salt K2[S2O7]·K[HSO4] [20] (1:0.33:0.67) and the disulfate sulfuric acid adduct K2[S2O7]·H2SO4 [23] (1:1:1) followed by the hydrogen polysulfates A[HS2O7] and A[HS3O10] (A=alkaline metal) with an even higher SO3 content (A2[SO4]:H2SO4:SO3 ratios of 1:1:2 and 1:1:4) [24], [25].

3 Conclusions

The scarcely communicated hydrogenium-bis-hydrogensulfate anion [H(HSO4)2] has been stabilized adjacent to a disulfate anion [S2O7]2−. In a difference Fourier map of the strong hydrogen bond, the two symmetry equivalent positions of the hydrogen atom close to the center of inversion are explicitly distinguishable and the grade of protonation of the oxygen atoms is reflected in the respective S–O bond lengths. Furthermore, the compound shows the poor basicity of the anion [S2O7]2− as it remains unprotonated next to a strongly acidic species and thus confirms the assumption on the acidity of polysulfuric acid to increase with growing chain length.

4 Experimental section

Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2] was obtained from the reaction of commercial Rb2[CO3] (99.9%, Chempur, 150 mg, 0.6 mmol) with neat SO3 in a torch-sealed glass ampoule. The remaining quantity of water in the starting material was sufficient to lead to an H-containing substance. Rb2CO3 was loaded into an ampoule. A 1000 mL three-necked flask was filled with P4O10 (20 g, 97%), and a dropping funnel filled with fuming sulfuric acid (1 mL, 65% SO3) and the glass ampoule were connected. The ampoule was cooled with liquid nitrogen. The fuming sulfuric acid was dropped onto P4O10 within 5 min while heating the flask with a heat gun. The produced SO3 condensed in the ampoule. The ampoule was torch sealed, placed into a tube furnace, and heated up to 100°C within 12 h. The temperature was maintained for 24 h and the furnace cooled down to room temperature within 120 h. Colorless extremely sensitive crystals were obtained. A small excess of SO3 was removed by cooling the end of the ampoule not containing the crystals in liquid nitrogen before opening the ampoule. A suitable single crystal was selected under protecting oil with the help of a polarization microscope and transferred into the cool nitrogen stream of a single crystal diffractometer (BRUKER APEX II, graphite monochromator). Intensity data were collected and corrected using multiscan techniques. The structure solution was successful applying Direct Methods (Shelxs) [36]. Subsequent refinement with Shelxl yielded the complete crystal structure [36]. Anisotropic displacement parameters were introduced and a numerical absorption correction was applied to the reflection data. For the hydrogen atom H23, an occupancy of 0.5 was defined due to the location close to a center of inversion and for reasons of charge compensation. The other hydrogen atom H24 has been refined without restraints. Table 3 gives details of the data collection and crystallographic data. In Table 4, selected distances are summarized.

Table 3:

Crystallographic data.

CompoundRb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2]
FormulaH3O15Rb3S4
Formula weight, g mol−1627.67
Temperature, K100
Wavelength, pm71.073
Crystal systemMonoclinic
Space groupC2/c (no. 15)
Unit cell dimensions
a, pm1638.75(6)
b, pm768.52(3)
c, pm1187.88(4)
β, deg106.805(2)
 Volume, ×106 pm31432.14(9)
Z4
 Density (calculated), g cm−32.91
 Absorption coefficient, cm−1108.7
F(000), e1192
 Crystal size, mm30.24×0.14×0.07
 Crystal shapeBlock
 2θ range for data collection, deg5.20–79.92
 Index range−29≤h≤29
−13≤k≤13
−21≤l≤21
 Reflections collected82167
 Independent reflections/Rint/Rσ4530/0.0357/0.0138
 Completeness to theta, %99.87
 Absorption correctionNumerical
 Data/parameters4530/110
R1/wR2 [Io>2 σ(I)]0.0153/0.0338
R1/wR2 (all data)0.0187/0.0344
 Extinction coefficient0.00017(4)
 Goodness-of-fit on F21.092
 Residual electron density min/max, e Å−3−0.39/0.61
 CSD number430319
Table 4:

Bond lengths in the crystal structure of Rb3[S2O7][H(HSO4)2].

S1–O11143.27(7)S2–O21143.90(6)
S1–O12143.74(6)S2–O22144.01(6)
S1–O13145.67(7)S2–O23150.60(6)
S1–O111163.14(4)S2–O24154.99(7)
Rb1–O11283.39(7)Rb2–O21296.14(7) (2×)
Rb1–O12287.41(7)Rb2–O12299.23(6) (2×)
Rb1–O21292.76(7)Rb2–O22300.28(7) (2×)
Rb1–O22293.12(7)Rb2–O111301.74(8)
Rb1–O13295.58(7)Rb2–O24338.64(8) (2×)
Rb1–O21301.77(6)Rb2–O24343.45(7) (2×)
Rb1–O23317.25(6)Rb2–O11370.92(8) (2×)
Rb1–O22330.43(7)
Rb1–O11336.41(9)
Rb1–O23337.80(7)
Rb1–O11355.23(10)

For the creation of the difference Fourier map, the structure was refined without refining the position of the hydrogen atom H23. The remaining electron density was plotted as a difference Fourier map using the program Olex2 [37].

Atomic positions and further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: +49-7247-808-666; e-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de, https://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/leistungen/kristallographie/kristallstrukturdepot/anforderung-deponierter-datensaetze.html) on quoting the deposition number CSD-430319.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Marc Schmidtmann (University Oldenburg) for the collection of the X-ray data.

References

[1] M. S. Wickleder, C. Logemann in Handbook on Chalcogen Chemistry, Vol. 1 (Eds.: F. Devillanova, W.-W. du Mont), Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2013, p. 307.10.1039/9781849737456-00307Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Catti, G. Ferraris, G. Ivaldi, Acta Crystallogr.1979, B35, 525.10.1107/S0567740879004076Search in Google Scholar

[3] Y. Noda, S. Uchiyama, K. Kafuku, H. Kasatani, H. Terauchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.1990, 59, 2804.10.1143/JPSJ.59.2804Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Fortier, M. E. Fraser, R. D. Heyding, Acta Crystallogr.1985, C41, 1139.10.1107/S0108270185006898Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Sakashita, H. Fujihisa, K.-I. Suzuki, S. Hayashi, K. Honda, Solid State Ionics2007, 178, 1262.10.1016/j.ssi.2007.06.005Search in Google Scholar

[6] C. Panithipongwut, S. M. Haile, Solid State Ionics2012, 213, 53.10.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.016Search in Google Scholar

[7] T. Fukami, S. Jin, R. H. Chen, Ionics2006, 12, 257.10.1007/s11581-006-0039-xSearch in Google Scholar

[8] I. Makarova, V. Grebenev, E. Dmitricheva, V. Dolbinina, D. Chernyshov, Acta Crystallogr.2014, B70, 218.Search in Google Scholar

[9] G. E. Pringle, T. A. Broadbent, Acta Crystallogr.1965, 19, 426.10.1107/S0365110X65003547Search in Google Scholar

[10] E. Kemnitz, C. Werner, H. Worzala, S. Trojanov, Y. T. Strutschkov, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1995, 621, 675.10.1002/zaac.19956210429Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. J. Sonneveld, J. W. Visser, Acta Crystallogr.1978, B34, 643.10.1107/S0567740878003672Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. H. Loopstra, C. H. MacGillavry, Acta Crystallogr.1958, 11, 349.10.1107/S0365110X58000943Search in Google Scholar

[13] W. Mumme, Acta Crystallogr.1973, B29, 1076.10.1107/S0567740873003894Search in Google Scholar

[14] V. Varma, N. Rangavittal, C. N. R. Rao, J. Solid State Chem.1993, 106, 164.10.1006/jssc.1993.1276Search in Google Scholar

[15] S. Trojanov, C. Werner, E. Kemnitz, H. Worzala, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1995, 621, 1617.10.1002/zaac.19956210930Search in Google Scholar

[16] E. Kemnitz, C. Werner, S. Trojanov, H. Worzala, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1994, 620, 1921.10.1002/zaac.19946201114Search in Google Scholar

[17] E. Kemnitz, C. Werner, H. Worzala, S. Trojanov, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1995, 621, 1075.10.1002/zaac.19956210631Search in Google Scholar

[18] C. Werner, S. Trojanov, E. Kemnitz, H. Worzala, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1996, 622, 380.10.1002/zaac.19966220229Search in Google Scholar

[19] C. Werner, S. Trojanov, H. Worzala, E. Kemnitz, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1996, 622, 337.10.1002/zaac.19966220222Search in Google Scholar

[20] D. Swain, T. N. G. Row, Inorg. Chem.2008, 47, 8613.10.1021/ic801426fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] L. V. Schindler, M. S. Wickleder, New J. Chem.2016, DOI: 10.1039/C6NJ02388F.Search in Google Scholar

[22] L. V. Schindler, A. Becker, M. S. Wickleder, Chem. Eur. J.2016, doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603919.Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Weiz, J. Bruns, M. S. Wickleder, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2014, 640, 27.10.1002/zaac.201300416Search in Google Scholar

[24] L. V. Schindler, M. Daub, M. Struckmann, A. Weiz, H. Hillebrecht, M. S. Wickleder, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2015, 641, 2604.10.1002/zaac.201500287Search in Google Scholar

[25] L. V. Schindler, T. Klüner, M. S. Wickleder, Chem. Eur. J.2016, 22, 13865.10.1002/chem.201602176Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] I. A. Koppel, P. Burk, I. Koppel, I. Leito, T. Sonoda, M. Mishima, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2000, 122, 5114.10.1021/ja0000753Search in Google Scholar

[27] I. D. Brown, D. B. Crump, R. J. Gillespie, Inorg. Chem.1971, 10, 2319.10.1021/ic50104a046Search in Google Scholar

[28] J. Bruns, T. Klüner, M. S. Wickleder, Chem. Asian J.2014, 9, 1594.10.1002/asia.201402067Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] J. Bruns, O. Niehaus, R. Pöttgen, M. S. Wickleder, Chem. Eur. J.2014, 20, 811.10.1002/chem.201303617Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] C. Logemann, H. Kleineberg, J. Ohlert, M. S. Wickleder, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2013, 639, 2796.10.1002/zaac.201300353Search in Google Scholar

[31] K. Rieß, PhD thesis, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg (Germany), 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[32] J. W. M. Steeman, C. H. MacGillavry, Acta Crystallogr.1954, 7, 402.10.1107/S0365110X54001211Search in Google Scholar

[33] M. Pley, M. S. Wickleder, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2005, 631, 592.10.1002/zaac.200400391Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. F. Darlow, W. Cochran, Acta Crystallogr.1961, 14, 1250.10.1107/S0365110X61003648Search in Google Scholar

[35] G. A. Jeffrey, An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[36] G. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] O. V. Dolomanov, L. J. Bourhis, R. J. Gildea, J. A. K. Howard, H. Puschmann, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2009, 42, 339.10.1107/S0021889808042726Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-7-13
Accepted: 2016-8-3
Published Online: 2016-12-9
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0159/html
Scroll to top button