Home Physical Sciences Synthesis and crystal structure of a cyanido-bridged copper(II)–silver(I) bimetallic complex containing a trimeric {[Ag(CN)2]−}3 anion, [Cu(Dach)2-Ag(CN)2-Cu(Dach)2][Ag(CN)2]3 (Dach=cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane)
Article Publicly Available

Synthesis and crystal structure of a cyanido-bridged copper(II)–silver(I) bimetallic complex containing a trimeric {[Ag(CN)2]}3 anion, [Cu(Dach)2-Ag(CN)2-Cu(Dach)2][Ag(CN)2]3 (Dach=cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane)

  • Sidra Nawaz , Abdul Ghaffar , Muhammad Monim-ul-Mehboob , Muhammad Nawaz Tahir , Mshari A. Alotaibi , Anvarhusein A. Isab and Saeed Ahmad EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 19, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A new cyanido-bridged bimetallic copper(II)–silver(I) complex, [Cu(Dach)2-Ag(CN)2-Cu(Dach)2][Ag(CN)2]3 (1) (Dach=cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane), has been prepared and characterized by IR spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray analysis. The crystal structure of complex 1 consists of a centrosymmetric trinuclear cation and three non-coordinated [Ag(CN)2] ions assembled in the form of a trimer, {[Ag(CN)2]}3. The complex ion is made up of two [Cu(Dach)2]2+ units connected by a bridging [Ag(CN)2] anion. The copper atom in the complex ion assumes a distorted square pyramidal geometry with CN nitrogen atoms occupying the apical position. The trinuclear units are joined by hydrogen bonding to form irregular chains.

1 Introduction

The linear and chemically stable dicyanidoargentate anion [Ag(CN)2] is well known as a building block for preparation of multidimensional frameworks. The polymeric structures are formed through covalent and argentophilic interactions mediated by [Ag(CN)2] units [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. The typical range of Ag···Ag contacts for viable argentophilic interactions is ca. 3.0–3.3 Å [1], [6], [7]. In some cases, hydrogen bonding and aromatic π–π stacking interactions also have a profound effect on supramolecular architectures [9], [10], [11], [12]. Some of these compounds exhibit interesting physical properties especially in the context of their luminescence and magnetic behavior [1], [13], [14], [15], [16]. For example, *{[Ag(CN)2]}n species are the first reported homoatomic metal–metal bonded exciplexes in coordination compounds [14]. The synergy between argentophilic interactions and spin crossover has been reported in [Ag(CN)2]-based 3D coordination polymers, where the spin transition is shown by the variation of the Ag···Ag distances [17], [18]. Dicyanoargentate(I) ions undergo significant oligomerization in aqueous and methanolic solutions via ground-state argentophilic bonding [19], [20], and many dimers, trimers, and infinite chains constructed from the [Ag(CN)2] anion have been examined in the solid state [1], [2], [15], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]. In some cases, [Ag(CN)2] does not coordinate to the metal atoms and behaves as a counter ion only [9], [34]. In view of their structural diversity, we have also shown some interest in the structural chemistry of [Ag(CN)2] containing bimetallic compounds [11], [12], [34], [35], [36]. The present report deals with the structural characterization of a new [Ag(CN)2]-based trinuclear Cu(II)–Ag(I) complex, containing 1,2-diaminocyclohexane as a ligand for copper(II), namely [Cu(Dach)2-Ag(CN)2-Cu(Dach)2][Ag(CN)2]3 (1) (Dach=cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane).

2 Experimental section

2.1 Materials

CuCl2·2H2O was obtained from BDH Chemical Co., England. AgNO3 was purchased from Panreac, Spain. Ethylenediamine (en) is a product of Merck Chemical Co., Germany. K[Ag(CN)2] was prepared by reacting AgNO3 with KCN in a 1:2 molar ratio.

2.2 Synthesis of 1

To a solution of 0.170 g (1 mmol) of CuCl2·2H2O in 10 mL water was added 0.224 g (2 mmol) of cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane (Dach) in 15 mL methanol. The solution turned to purple blue color. After stirring for 15 min, 0.40 g (2 mmol) of K[Ag(CN)2] in 15 mL distilled water was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for further 30 min at room temperature. After filtration, the filtrate was kept in air overnight. The blue crystals obtained in the filtrate were washed with methanol and finally dried in air. Yield 30%. M.p. 195–198°C. – IR (cm−1): ν=3247, 3142 (N–H), 2927, 2855 (C–H), 2158, 2130 (C≡N), 1050 (C–N); δ=1587 (Dach, ν=3288 (N–H), 2920, 2851 (C–H), 1092 (C–N); δ=1591).

2.3 X-ray structure determination of 1

Single crystal data collection of 1 was performed at 296 K on a Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer equipped with a four-circle goniometer and using graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation. The refinement and all further calculations were carried out using Shelxl-2014 [37], [38]. All H atoms were placed in calculated positions with C–H=0.97–0.98 Å, N–H=0.89 Å and were refined as riding with Uiso(H)=1.2Ueq(C, N). The N–C and C–C bond distances were constrained to 1.48–1.52 Å. All disordered atoms were treated as anisotropic with equal displacement parameters. In this way the refined occupancy of the alternative sites is 0.685(6):0.315(6). For molecular graphics, Platon [39] was used. Crystal data and details of the data collection are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1:

Crystal and structural refinement data of compound 1.

FormulaC32H56Ag4Cu2N16
Formula weight1223.48
Crystal systemTriclinic
Space groupP
a, Å8.8555(12)
b, Å11.6454(12)
c, Å11.8662(13)
α, deg109.357(4)
β, deg101.337(4)
γ, deg97.437(3)
V, Å31106.7(2)
Z1
ρcalc, g cm−31.84
μ (MoKα ), mm−12.7
F(000), e606
Crystal size, mm0.36×0.3×0.20
Temperature, K296(2)
λ (MoKα ), Å0.71073
θ range, deg1.882–27.000
h, k, l limits–11:10, –14:14, –15:15
Max./min. transmission0.611/0.442
Refl. collected/unique15996/4763
Rint0.0262
Data/restraints/parameters4763/16/230
Final R1/wR2 [I>2σ(I)]a,b0.0564/0.1586
Final R1/wR2 (all data)a,b0.0802/0.1745
S (all data)c1.045
Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å−31.59/–0.73

aR1=Σ||Fo|–|Fc||/Σ|Fo|; bwR2=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2w(Fo2)2]1/2; w=[σ2(Fo2)+(0.0781P)2+3.4148P]−1, where P=(Max(Fo2, 0)+2Fc2)/3; cGoF=S=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2/(nobsnparam)]1/2.

CCDC 1486594 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 IR study

The title complex [Cu(Dach)2-Ag(CN)2-Cu(Dach)2][Ag(CN)2]3 (1) was prepared by the reaction of CuCl2 with cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane (Dach) and K[Ag(CN)2] mixed in a molar ratio of 1:2:2. In the IR spectrum of complex 1, a sharp C–N stretching peak of Dach was observed at 1050 cm−1, while the ν(N–H) vibrations were observed at 3247 and 3142 cm−1. The peak at 1587 cm−1 can be assigned to NH2 bending. The signals at 2927 and 2855 cm−1 due to C–H stretching of Dach were also observed. The appearance of these bands indicates the coordination of the Dach ligand to the metal center. The formation of dicyanidoargentates is confirmed by the strong stretching bands in the region of 2170–2100 cm−1. The ionic non-coordinated cyanide (e.g. KCN) displays this vibration at ν=2080 cm−1, while AgCN and K[Ag(CN)2] exhibit the same vibration at ν=2164 and 2140 cm−1, respectively [40]. A value higher than 2080 cm−1 points to the formation of the coordinative bond, Ag–CN, and the values higher than 2150 cm−1 indicate the formation of the bridge Ag–CN–M and the polymeric nature of the structure. The title compound exhibits both these (C≡N) bands with medium and weak intensity at 2130 and 2158 cm−1, respectively.

3.2 Crystal structure description

The molecular structure of 1 along with the crystallographic numbering scheme is illustrated in Fig. 1. Selected bond lengths and bond angles are gathered in Table 2. The crystal structure of the complex consists of a trinuclear complex cation and three [Ag(CN)2] anions. Each trinuclear complex ion is constituted of two [Cu(Dach)2]2+ units joined by cyanido groups of a bridging [Ag(CN)2] anion. Each copper atom in [Cu(Dach)2]-NC-Ag-CN-[Cu(Dach)2]3+ is pentacoordinated in a distorted square pyramidal environment. The basal plane of the square pyramid is defined by four amine nitrogen atoms of Dach, while the apical position is occupied by a nitrogen atom from the bridging cyanido group at a distance of 2.180(6) Å. The angles around copper show significant distortions from the normal values of square pyramidal geometry. The cis N–Cu1–N angles vary from 84.5(4)° to 101.1(7)°, while the trans N–Cu1–N angles are in the range of 146.4(7)°–176.4(4)°. The central [Ag(CN)2] unit is symmetric and exhibits a regular linear environment around Ag1. While the N–C–Ag1 moiety is nearly linear (175.1(7)°), the Cu1–N–C part is bent with a bond angle of 155.2(7)°. The cyclohexyl ring of Dach attains a chair conformation. One of the Dach molecules of each [Cu(Dach)2]2+ unit is disordered over two positions. Due to this disorder, one of the Cu–N(Dach) distances (Cu–N3B=2.23(2) Å) is somewhat longer than the others, which vary from 1.98(3) to 2.045(12) Å and are in agreement with the average values reported for similar complexes [11], [26], [27], [28], [29], [33], [35] (Table 2). A similar dinuclear structure has been reported for [Cu2(bpca)2(H2O)2{Ag2(CN)3}] (bpca=bis(2-pyridylcarbonyl)amide anion) [33].

Fig. 1: The molecular structure of [Cu(Dach)2-Ag(CN)2-Cu(Dach)2][Ag(CN)2]3 (1) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 40% probability level. The H atoms are drawn as spheres with arbitrary radii. The minor part of the disordered Dach atoms is omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: i=1–x, 1–y, 1–z and ii=–x, –y, 2–z.
Fig. 1:

The molecular structure of [Cu(Dach)2-Ag(CN)2-Cu(Dach)2][Ag(CN)2]3 (1) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 40% probability level. The H atoms are drawn as spheres with arbitrary radii. The minor part of the disordered Dach atoms is omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: i=1–x, 1–y, 1–z and ii=–x, –y, 2–z.

Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for 1.

Bond distanceBond angles
Cu(1)–N(1)2.026(5)N(1)–Cu(1)–N(2)84.7(2)
Cu(1)–N(2)2.019(6)N(1)–Cu(1)–N(3A)96.4(3)
Cu(1)–N(3A)1.993(11)N(1)–Cu(1)–N(3B)84.6(5)
Cu(1)–N(3B)2.23(2)N(1)–Cu(1)–N(4A)176.4(4)
Cu(1)–N(4A)2.045(12)N(1)–Cu(1)–N(4B)167.5(6)
Cu(1)–N(4B)1.98(3)N(2)–Cu(1)–N(3A)150.2(4)
Cu(1)–N(5)2.180(8)N(2)–Cu(1)–N(3B)146.4(7)
Ag(1)–C(13)2.036(8)N(2)–Cu(1)–N(4A)92.8(3)
Ag(2)–C(14)2.047(8)N(2)–Cu(1)–N(4B)101.1(7)
Ag(2)–C(15)2.066(9)N(5)–Cu(1)–N(1)91.2(4)
Ag(3)–C(16)2.044(15)N(5)–Cu(1)–N(2)101.2(3)
Ag(2)–Ag(3)3.2296(8)N(5)–Cu(1)–N(3A)108.5(4)
C(1)–N(1)1.480(8)N(5)–Cu(1)–N(3B)110.7(8)
C(2)–N(2)1.505(8)N(5)–Cu(1)–N(4A)91.8(4)
C(13)–N(5)1.131(10)N(5)–Cu(1)–N(4B)98.5(8)
C(14)–N(6)1.139(10)N(3A)–Cu(1)–N(4A)84.5(4)
C(15)–N(7)1.138(11)N(3B)–Cu(1)–N(4B)84.5(7)
C(16)–N(8)1.139(15)C(13)–Ag(1)–C(13)180
C(14)–Ag(2)–C(15)177.6(3)
C(16)–Ag(3)–C(16)180
Ag(1)–C(13)–N(5)175.1(7)
Ag(2)–C(14)–N(6)178.4(7)
Ag(2)–C(15)–N(7)176.7(9)
Ag(3)–C(16)–N(8)175.9(15)
Cu(1)–N(5)–C(13)155.2(7)
Cu(1)–N(1)–C(1)108.3(4)

The positive charge of the trinuclear complex ion is neutralized by three non-coordinated [Ag(CN)2] anions, which are self-associated through argentophilic interactions to form a trimer, {[Ag(CN)2]}3. Such trimers have been detected earlier in chromium(III) and cobalt(III) complexes [9]. The Ag–Ag distance (3.2296(8) Å) is below the sum of the van der Walls radii of two silver atoms (3.44 Å), which is considered as the upper limit for viable argentophilic interactions [6], [7]. The strong argentophilic interactions contribute to the packing forces of the crystal structure. The three Ag atoms of the trimer lie on the same line with an Ag2–Ag3–Ag2 angle of 180°. There exist two types of Ag(I) centers in the trimer; the central Ag(3) atom is equidistant from the two peripheral Ag(2) atoms by symmetry. Ag(3) shows a distorted square planar geometry, while the other two display a T-shaped environment. The C–Ag3–C fragment of the central [Ag(CN)2] ion is linear, while that of C–Ag2–C shows a slight deviation from linearity (∠C–Ag–C=177.6(3)°). The Ag–C distance (2.036 Å) of the central anion is slightly shorter than that of the terminally bound ones (Ag–C=2.044(15)–2.066(9) Å).

The trinuclear complex cation and the non-coordinated [Ag(CN)2] anions are linked to each other through electrostatic forces and hydrogen bonds to form irregular chains. In the crystal packing of the components, the ions are H-bonded via N–H or C–H hydrogens of Dach and nitrogen atoms of non-coordinated [Ag(CN)2] ions. The nitrogen atom (N8) of the central [Ag(CN)2] ion mainly forms bonds with C–H hydrogen atoms because of its perpendicular orientation with respect to the other two [Ag(CN)2] ions. Because of the close proximity of N8 to the Dach ring, the C–H···N hydrogen bonds are of comparable strength to those of N–H···N. A view of the packing of the complex units showing hydrogen bonds is given in Fig. 2. Further details of hydrogen bonding are given in Table 3.

Fig. 2: Packing diagram of 1 showing H bonding interactions.
Fig. 2:

Packing diagram of 1 showing H bonding interactions.

Table 3:

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) of hydrogen bonds in 1.

Donor-H···AcceptorD···HD···AH···A∠ D–H···A
N1–H1A···N70.893.160(9)2.42141.3
N1–H1B···N70.893.169(9)2.32158.9
N2–H2A···N60.893.194(9)2.37154.5
N2–H2B···N80.893.189(12)2.58126.1
N3A–H3C···N70.893.440(14)2.61156.5
N4A–H4C···N60.893.178(13)2.30167.0
N4A–H4D···N60.893.033(15)2.17163.7
N3B–H3E···N70.893.00(2)2.34131.1
N3B–H3F···N70.893.29(3)2.47153.2
N4B–H4F···N60.893.13(3)2.28159.1
C2–H2···N80.983.273(12)2.56129.8
C7A–H7A···N80.983.261(16)2.45139.4
C9B–H9D···N80.973.07(3)2.38127.2

The present study describes the use of dicyanidoargentate(I) as a bridging ligand for the preparation of a new trinuclear copper(II)–silver(I) complex, [Cu(Dach)2-Ag(CN)2-Cu(Dach)2][Ag(CN)2]3 (1), the crystal structure of which was resolved. The copper atom in 1 adopts a distorted square pyramidal geometry having cyanide nitrogen at the apical position. The non-coordinated [Ag(CN)2] anions self-assemble to form trimers and stabilize the structure through H-bonding.

References

[1] J. Cernak, M. Orendac, I. Potocnak, J. Chomic, A. Orendacova, J. Skorsepa, A. Feher, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 224, 51.10.1016/S0010-8545(01)00375-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] C. J. Shorrock, B.-Y. Xue, P. B. Kim, R. J. Bachelor, B. O. Patrick, D. B. Leznoff, Inorg. Chem.2002, 41, 6743.10.1021/ic025850pSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] C. Paraschiv, M. Andruh, S. Ferlay, M. W. Hosseini, N. Kyritsakas, J.-M. Planeix, N. Stanica, Dalton Trans. 2005, 1195.10.1039/B500231ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] T. Soma, T. Iwamoto, Inorg. Chem.1996, 35, 1849.10.1021/ic950629gSearch in Google Scholar

[5] L. Triscikova, I. Potocnak, J. Chomic, Trans. Met. Chem.2003, 28, 808.10.1023/A:1026010717297Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. Schmidbaur, A. Schier, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2015, 54, 746.10.1002/anie.201405936Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] P. Pyykko, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 597.10.1021/cr940396vSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] M. A. Omary, T. R. Webb, Z. Assefa, G. E. Shankle, H. H. Patterson, Inorg. Chem.1998, 37, 1380.10.1021/ic970694lSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] D. M. Pham, D. Rios, M. M. Olmstead, A. L. Balch, Inorg. Chim. Acta2005, 358, 4261.10.1016/j.ica.2005.06.033Search in Google Scholar

[10] Y. Guo, Y. Ma, N. Zhou, Z.-Q. Liu, Q.-L. Wang, S.-P. Yan, D.-Z. Liao, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2010, 636, 865.10.1002/zaac.200900371Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. Nawaz, T. Rüffer, H. Lang, M. A. Shaheen, S. Ahmad, J. H. Shah, Z. Naturforsch.2015, 70b, 455.10.1515/znb-2014-0264Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. M. Mehboob, M. Ramzan, T. Rüffer, H. Lang, S. Nadeem, M. Akhtar, S. Ahmad, Z. Naturforsch.2013, 68b, 161.10.5560/znb.2013-2253Search in Google Scholar

[13] I. Dasna, S. Golhen, L. Ouahab, N. Daro, J. P. Sutter, Polyhedron2001, 20, 1371.10.1016/S0277-5387(01)00621-0Search in Google Scholar

[14] H. H. Patterson, S. M. Kanan, M. A. Omary, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 208, 227.10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00294-0Search in Google Scholar

[15] H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, L. Cai, Y. Xie, G. Xue, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2006, 9, 555.10.1016/j.inoche.2006.01.026Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. A. Omary, H. H. Patterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7696.10.1021/ja980256tSearch in Google Scholar

[17] A. Galet, V. Niel, M. C. Munoz, J. A. Real, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14224.10.1021/ja0377347Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] V. Niel, A. L. Thompson, A. E. Goeta, C. Enachescu, A. Hauser, A. Galet, M. C. Munoz, Chem. Eur. J.2005, 11, 2047.10.1002/chem.200400930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] M. A. Rawashdeh-Omary, M. A. Omary, H. H. Patterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2000, 122, 10371.10.1021/ja001545wSearch in Google Scholar

[20] M. A. Rawashdeh-Omary, M. A. Omary, H. H. Patterson, J. P. Fackler Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc.2001, 123, 11237.10.1021/ja011176jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] H. X. Zhang, Z. N. Chen, C. Y. Sue, C. Ren, B. S. Kang, J. Chem. Crystallogr. 1999, 29, 1239.10.1023/A:1009548705677Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. Soma, H. Yuge, T. Iwamoto, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.1994, 33, 1665.10.1002/anie.199416651Search in Google Scholar

[23] H. X. Zhang, B. S. Kang, L. R. Deng, C. Ren, C. Y. Su, Z. N. Chen, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2001, 4, 41.10.1016/S1387-7003(00)00191-XSearch in Google Scholar

[24] Y.-P. Ren, L.-S. Long, R.-B. Huang, L.-S. Zheng, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 19, 1070.10.1002/aoc.735Search in Google Scholar

[25] C. Kappenstein, A. Ouali, M. Guerin, J. Černák, J. Chomič, Inorg. Chim. Acta1988, 147, 189.10.1016/S0020-1693(00)83370-8Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. Černák, J. Chomič, P. Gravereau, A. Orendáčová, M. Orendáč, J. Kováč, A. Feher, C. Kappenstein, Inorg. Chim. Acta1998, 281, 134.10.1016/S0020-1693(98)00156-XSearch in Google Scholar

[27] J. Černák, K. A. Abboud, J. Chomič, M. W. Meisel, M. Orendáč, A. Orendáčová, A. Feher, Inorg. Chim. Acta2000, 311, 126.10.1016/S0020-1693(00)00327-3Search in Google Scholar

[28] L. Triščíková, J. Chomič, K. A. Abboud, J.-H. Park, M. W. Meisel, J. Černák, Inorg. Chim. Acta2004, 357, 2763.10.1016/j.ica.2004.02.008Search in Google Scholar

[29] I. Potocnak, L. Triščíková, C. Wagner, Acta Crystallogr. 2003, C59, m249.10.1107/S0108270103010151Search in Google Scholar

[30] N. Korkmaz, A. Karadag, A. Aydin, Y. Yanar, I. Karaman, S. Tekin, New J. Chem.2014, 38, 4760.10.1039/C4NJ00851KSearch in Google Scholar

[31] W. Han, L. Yi, Z. Q. Liu, W. Gu, S.-P. Yan, P. Cheng, D.-Z. Liao, Z.-H. Jiang, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 2130.10.1002/ejic.200300678Search in Google Scholar

[32] C.-H. Kwak, R. P. John, J.-E. Jee, H. J. Kim, J. Kim, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2006, 9, 533.10.1016/j.inoche.2006.02.026Search in Google Scholar

[33] M.-L. Liu, L.-Z. Zhang, X.-P. Sun, Z.-P. Ma, W. Gu, X. Liu, J. Coord. Chem.2008, 61, 2266.10.1080/00958970801904802Search in Google Scholar

[34] M. Monim-ul-Mehboob, M. Tufail, M. Altaf, H. Stoeckli-Evans, S. Ahmad, S. H. Iftikhar, Acta Crystallogr. 2008, E64, m1379.10.1107/S1600536808031413Search in Google Scholar

[35] S. Ahmad, M. N. Tahir, H. M. Javaid, M. M. Mehboob, M. A. Shaheen, R. Mahmood, J. Chem. Crystallogr.2012, 42, 401.10.1007/s10870-011-0261-xSearch in Google Scholar

[36] S. Ahmad, M. M. Mehboob, M. Altaf, H. Stoeckli-Evans, R. Mehmood, J. Chem. Crystallogr.2007, 37, 685.10.1007/s10870-007-9232-7Search in Google Scholar

[37] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3.Search in Google Scholar

[39] A. L. Spek, Acta Crystallogr. 2009, D65, 148.10.1107/S090744490804362XSearch in Google Scholar

[40] J. Chomič, J. Černák, I. Potocnak, I. Zvereva, N. Savelieva, Chem. Papers1993, 47, 175.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-6-21
Accepted: 2016-7-26
Published Online: 2016-12-19
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0154/html
Scroll to top button