Home Physical Sciences Long-chain alkyl-substituted gentisic acid and benzoquinone derivatives from the root of Micronychia tsiramiramy (Anacardiaceae)
Article Publicly Available

Long-chain alkyl-substituted gentisic acid and benzoquinone derivatives from the root of Micronychia tsiramiramy (Anacardiaceae)

  • Andrianambinina A. Razakarivony , Bruno N. Lenta , Bakolinirina Andriamihaja , Carmela Michalek , Bakonirina Razanamahefa , Dorothée R. Razafimahefa , Maonja Finaritra Rakotondramanga , Rivoarison Randrianasolo , Alain Méli Lannang , Ralinandrianina Randriamiaramisaina , Fekam F. Boyom , Philip J. Rosenthal and Norbert Sewald EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 9, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A new gentisic acid derivative named micronyc acid (1) and a new 1,4-benzoquinone derivative named micronone (2) have been isolated from the root of Micronychia tsiramiramy together with the known compounds gallic acid (3), methyl gallate (4), moronic acid (5), masticadienolic acid (6), and masticadienediol (7). The structures of 1 and 2 were established using MS and NMR. Compound 1 was tested for antiplasmodial activity in vitro against the chloroquine-resistant strain Plasmodium falciparum W2 and displayed moderate antiplasmodial activity in vitro with an IC50 value of 25.6 μm. Compounds 1 and its acetyl derivative 1a were also tested for their cytotoxicity against the human cervix carcinoma cell line KB-3-1 and still showed moderate activity.

1 Introduction

Micronychia is a genus of the Anacardiaceae family, and the species Micronychia tsiramiramy is endemic to Madagascar, where it is found mainly in the south-eastern region, in forests up to 1500 m altitude [1, 2]. According to our ethnobotanical survey the root decoction of this plant is used in traditional medicine to treat several ailments such as malaria, diabetes and hypertension. Plants of the Anacardiaceae family have been extensively investigated from phytochemical and biological points of view. Antifungal, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antimalaria, antiprotozoal, leishmanicidal, hypoglycemic and insecticidal activities have been reported for extracts of different species of the family [3–5]. Several bioactive secondary metabolites, e.g. terpenoids, flavonoids, resorcinols and xanthones, have been isolated from several genera of this family [6–10]. To the best of our knowledge, neither phytochemical nor pharmacological studies have been done on plants of the genus Micronychia. In a continuing search for bioactive compounds from Madagascarian medicinal plants, we have investigated the ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the methanol extract of the root of M. tsiramiramy. We report here the isolation and structure elucidation of two new compounds, micronyc acid (1) and micronone (2) together with cytotoxicity data against the human cervix carcinoma cell line KB-3-1 and the antiplasmodial activity of compound 1.

2 Results and discussion

The investigation of the ethyl acetate soluble fraction of the methanol extract of the root of M. tsiramiramy (Anacardiaceae) led to the isolation of a new gentisic acid derivative, named micronyc acid (1), and a new 1,4-benzoquinone derivative, named micronone (2) (Fig. 1), together with the known compounds gallic acid (3), methyl gallate (4) [11], moronic acid (5) [12, 13], masticadienolic acid (6) [14, 15], and masticadienediol (7) [16, 17].

Fig. 1: Structures of compounds 1, 1a, and 2.
Fig. 1:

Structures of compounds 1, 1a, and 2.

Compound 1 was obtained as white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula C24H38O4 was deduced from the HR-ESI-MS which showed the pseudo-molecular ion [M+Na]+ at m/z = 413.26689 (calcd. 413.26623) containing six degrees of unsaturation. Its IR spectrum displayed the vibration of one or more hydroxy groups at 3380 cm−1. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 (Table 1) showed two ortho-coupled aromatic protons at δ = 6.92 ppm (1H, J = 8.9 Hz, H-4) and 6.72 ppm (1H, J = 8.9 Hz, H-5); a multiplet assigned to two olefinic methine protons at δ = 5.28 ppm (H-10′, H-11′); another multiplet assigned to the protons of a methylene group attached to an aromatic ring at δ = 2.90 ppm (H-1′), signals of two sets of allylic methylene protons at δ = 1.94 ppm (overlapping, H-9′, H-12′), multiplets of 22 overlapping methylene protons between δ = 1.52–1.18 ppm and a terminal methyl group at δ = 0.81 ppm (t, H-17′). The 13C NMR (Table 1) and DEPT spectra of compound 1 displayed resonances characteristic for a carboxylic group (δ = 173.2 ppm) and an oxygenated aromatic ring (δ = 156.5, 145.4, 130.3, 122.9, 114.9 and 110.0 ppm). The 13C NMR also indicated the presence of an alkyl chain [21–30.9 (CH2)n, 13.1 (CH3)] with a single double bond (δ = 128.8 ppm, 2C). The chemical shift of the carbons at 158.5 ppm and 145.4 ppm indicated that they are linked to hydroxyl groups. All these data indicated that compound 1 possesses a phenolic moiety linked to an unsaturated side chain (Fig. 1). The location of the substituents on the aromatic ring was deduced from the correlations observed in the HMBC spectrum between H-4 (δ = 6.92 ppm) and C-6 (δ = 156.5 ppm), C-3 (δ = 145.4 ppm) and C-2 (δ = 130.3 ppm), as well as between H-5 (δ = 6.72 ppm) and C-6 (δ = 156.5 ppm), C-3 (δ = 145.4 ppm), C-1 (δ = 110.0 ppm), and the carboxylate carbon (δ = 173.2 ppm), suggesting that the two hydroxyl groups are located on the aromatic ring at C-3 and C-6 and the carboxylic group at C-1. The attachment of the alkenyl side chain to C-2 of the aromatic ring was deduced from the HMBC spectrum where cross peaks were observed between H-1′ (δ = 2.90 ppm) and C-3 (δ = 145.4 ppm), C-2 (δ = 130.3 ppm), and C-1 (δ = 110.0 ppm). The presence of the carboxylic group was also confirmed by the peak observed on the EI-MS spectrum at m/z = 346 corresponding to a loss of CO2 [18]. The peak at m/z = 167 corresponds to benzyl cation forming fragmentation. Likewise, a similar benzyl cation giving rise to a peak at m/z = 123 is formed from the decarboxylated compound (m/z = 346). Both cations prove the presence of a C17H33 side chain. The location of the double bond within the C17 side chain between C-10′ and C-11′ was established using the fragmentation patterns of the EIMS with the diagnostic fragment at m/z = 320 ppm corresponding to the formation of [M–C5H10]+ by McLafferty rearrangement (Fig. 2). The cis (Z) configuration of the double bond was concluded from the chemical shifts of the olefinic carbons (below 130 ppm) and of the carbons next to the double bond at δ = 25.9 ppm (C-9′, C-12′). Both the olefinic and the allylic protons in Z-configured double bonds usually are shifted towards higher field compared to E-configured double bonds (128–129 ppm vs. 130–131 ppm and 25–28 ppm vs. 31–33 ppm [19–23]. Hence, the structure of compound 1 was unambiguously assigned to (Z)-2-(heptadec-10-en-1-yl)-3,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid and the compound was given the name micronyc acid.

Table 1:

1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data of compound 1 in CDCl3. Chemical shifts δ are given in ppm.

PositionδH (J in Hz)δC
1110.0
2130.3
3145.4
46.92 (d, J = 8.9)122.9
56.72 (d, J = 8.9)114.9
6156.5
1′2.90 (m)27.0
2′1.51 (m)26.2
3′–8′1.38–1.35 (m)21.2–30.9
9′1.94 (m)25.9
10′5.28 (m)128.8
11′5.28 (m)128.8
12′1.94 (m)25.9
13′–16′1.18–1.25 (m)21.2–30.9
17′0.81 (t, J = 6.9)13.1
COOH173.2
Fig. 2: Mass fragmentation pattern of compound 1. The benzyl cation at m/z = 167 is derived from the molecular ion, while the benzyl cation at m/z = 123 is derived from [M–CO2]+.
Fig. 2:

Mass fragmentation pattern of compound 1. The benzyl cation at m/z = 167 is derived from the molecular ion, while the benzyl cation at m/z = 123 is derived from [M–CO2]+.

Compound 2 was isolated as a yellow oil and its molecular formula C23H36O2 with six double bond equivalents was deduced from the HR-ESI-MS that showed the pseudo-molecular ion [M+Na]+ at m/z = 367.26097 (calcd. 367.26075). The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 2 showed the triplet of one proton at δ = 6.56 ppm (H-3, J = 1.2 Hz) and a multiplet of two ortho-coupled protons between δ = 6.69–6.76 ppm (H-5 and H-6). The spectrum also exhibited characteristic signals of an alkenyl moiety in the side chain; a multiplet corresponding to two olefinic protons between δ = 5.33–5.36 ppm (H-4′, H-5′), a double triplet corresponding to the protons of a methylene group attached to an aromatic ring at δ = 2.41 ppm (J = 1.2, 7.9 Hz, H-1′) with an allyl coupling to H-3, and two allylic methylene groups at δ = 2.00–2.03 ppm (H-3′ and H-6′), together with 22 other overlapping methylene protons in the range δ = 1.32–1.25 ppm and a terminal methyl group at δ = 0.88 ppm (t, H-17′). The 13C NMR spectrum of compound 2 (Table 2) exhibited signals of 23 carbon atoms that where sorted by DEPT and HSQC into three quaternary carbons, among them two carbonyl groups of benzoquinone at δ = 187.8 ppm (C-1) and 188.1 ppm (C-4), five methine groups, among them three benzoquinone carbons at δ = 132.6 ppm (C-3), 136.5 ppm (C-5), 137.0 ppm (C-6), and two olefinic methine carbons at δ = 129.9 ppm (C-4′) and δ = 130.3 ppm (C-5′); 14 methylene groups (δ = 22.9–32.1 ppm) and one methyl group (δ = 14.3 ppm). All these data suggested that compound 2 is an alkenyl benzoquinone (Fig. 1). The correlations observed in the HMBC spectrum between H-1′ (δ = 2.41 ppm) and C-1 (δ = 187.8 ppm), C-2 (δ = 149.9 ppm), and C-3 (δ = 132.6 ppm), showed that the alkenyl chain was connected to the benzoquinone at C-2. The EI mass spectrum features a molecular ion peak at m/z = 346 [M+2H], while the exact mass of the pseudomolecular ion [M+Na]+ was determined to be m/z = 367.26097 according to HR-ESI-MS. Such hydroquinone formation in the MS inlet is a well-known artifact in EI-MS of benzoquinones. The benzyl cation [M+2H–C16H31] giving rise to the base peak at m/z = 123 proves the presence of a C17H33 side chain. The peak at m/z = 124 corresponds to the product of an arene-based McLafferty rearrangement. The location of the double bond within the C17 side chain between C-4′ and C-5′ was established using the fragmentation patterns of the EIMS with the diagnostic fragment at m/z = 136 corresponding to a McLafferty rearrangement leading to the formation of the vinyl hydroquinone [C3H8O2]+.

Table 2:

1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data of compound 2 in CDCl3. Chemical shifts δ are given in ppm.

PositionδH (J in Hz)δC
1187.8
2149.9
36.56 (t, J = 1.2)132.6
4188.1
56.69–6.76 (m)136.5
66.69–6.76 (m)137.0
1′2.41 (dt, J = 1.2, 7.9)28.9
2′1.50 (m)26.6
3′2.00–2.03 (m)25.9
4′5.33–5.36 (m)129.9
5′5.33–5.36 (m)130.3
6′2.00–2.03 (m)25.9
7′–14′1.25–1.3227.3–30.0
15′1.28 (m)32.1
16′1.24 (m)22.9
17′0.88 (t, J = 6.9)14.3

The configuration of the double bond was assigned as Z like discussed for 1 (vide supra) based on the close similarity of the 13C NMR values of the two olefinic carbons and, in addition, of the allylic carbons [24]. Compound 2 was assigned to be (Z)-2-(heptadec-4-en-1-yl)cyclohexa-2,5-diene-1,4-dione, and it was given the name micronone.

Acetylation of the compound 1 gave the monoacetylated compound 1a characterized by an MS peak [M–H] at m/z = 431.3 (Fig. 3), corresponding to the introduction of only one acetyl group. This agrees with the fact that compound 1 contains a chelated hydroxyl group at position 6, which is it less prone towards acetylation.

Fig. 3: Acetylation of compound 1.
Fig. 3:

Acetylation of compound 1.

Compound 1 was tested for antiplasmodial activity in vitro against the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine-resistant strain W2. The compound showed moderate antiplasmodial activity with an IC50 value of 25.6 μm.

Compounds 1 and 1a were tested for cytotoxicity against the human cervix carcinoma cell line KB-3-1, and displayed moderate cytotoxicity with IC50 values of 13.5 μm for 1 and 14.4 μm for 1a, respectively. Although cytotoxicity is observed at a similar concentration as antiplasmodial activity, the compound might still provide useful information regarding parasite biology.

3 Conclusion

The investigation of the root extracts of M. tsiramiramy led to the isolation of new long-chain alkyl substituted gentisic acid and benzoquinone derivatives together with previously described compounds belonging to different classes of natural products. The structural diversity and the previously reported biological activities of some of the isolates highlight the rich potential of this Madagascarian medicinal plant as a source of biologically active ingredients.

4 Experimental section

4.1 General

IR spectra were recorded on a NICOLET 380 FT-IR (Thermo Electron Corporation). The 1H, 13C and 2D NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AMX-500 (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) at 298 °K using CDCl3 as solvent. One-bond 1H/13C connectivities were determined using HMQC. Two and three-bond 1H/13C connectivities were determined using HMBC experiments. Chemical shifts given in ppm were internally referenced to residual undeuterated solvent signals in CDCl3 (1H, δ= 7.26 ppm; 13C, δ= 77.0 ppm). Coupling constants (J) were measured in Hz. EI mass spectra were recorded using an Autospec X magnetic sector mass spectrometer with EBE geometry (Vacuum Generators, Manchester, UK) equipped with a standard EI or CI source. Samples were introduced by push rod in aluminum crucibles if not otherwise noted. Ions were accelerated by 8 kV. High resolution mass spectrometry experiments were performed using a Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometer APEX III (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a 7.0 T, 160 mm bore superconducting magnet (Bruker Analytik GmbH-Magnetics, Karlsruhe, Germany), infinity cell, and interfaced to an external (nano) ESI or MALDI ion source. Nitrogen served both as the nebulizer gas and the dry gas for ESI. Nitrogen was generated by a Bruker nitrogen generator NGM 11. Argon served as cooling gas in the infinity cell and collision gas for MSn experiments. Scan accumulation and Fourier transformation were performed with Xmass Nt (7.08) on a PC Workstation, for further data processing Data Analysis™ 3.4 was used. Column chromatography was carried out on silica gel 60 (70–230 and 240–300 mesh sizes, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and with Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Preparative thin layer chromatography (PTLC) was done on PTLC plates (F254, Merck). TLC was performed on Merck precoated silica gel 60 (F254, Merck) and used to check the purity of compounds; the spots were detected with an UV lamp at 254 and 366 nm and by spraying with 50 % H2SO4 or ceric sulfate solution, followed by heating.

4.2 Plant material

The roots of M. tsiramiramy were collected in November 2012 at Ampanihy Tulear, Madagascar and identified by Dr. Rakotonasolo Franck, botanist at Parc botanique et Zoologique de Tsimbazaza, Madagascar, where a reference voucher has been deposited (number: RFA 1486).

4.3 Extraction and isolation

The air-dried roots (1.5 kg) were ground and extracted with methanol at room temperature for 72 h. The crude extract (100 g) obtained was dissolved in MeOH and then fractionated by sequential liquid–liquid partitioning with petroleum ether, CH2Cl2, EtOAc and n-BuOH to yield 15.2 g, 20.4 g, 18.1 g, and 8.2 g of fractions soluble in petroleum ether, CH2Cl2, EtOAc and n-BuOH, respectively. The resulting EtOAc extract (15 g) was subjected to column flash chromatography on silica gel eluted with CH2Cl2-MeOH of increasing polarity (10:0; 8:2; 6:4) to give 20 fractions. These fractions were combined on the basis of their TLC profile to yield four major fractions labeled H1 to H4. Separation of fraction H2 (3.5 g) by repetitive silica gel column chromatography was performed with petroleum ether-EtOAc (1:0–0:1, v/v) as eluent to afford gallic acid (4, 10 mg), methyl gallate (5, 7 mg), moronic acid (6, 7 mg), masticadienolic acid (7, 10 mg), and masticadienediol (8, 13 mg). Fraction H3 (2.4 g) was subjected to repeated column chromatography on silica gel eluted with CHCl3-MeOH (1:0–0:1, v/v) and followed by purification on a Sephadex LH-20 column; elution with MeOH afforded micronyc acid (1, 25 mg) and micronone (2, 5 mg).

4.3.1 Micronyc acid (1)

White amorphous powder. IR (film): νmax= 3380, 2918, 2848, 1653, 1451, 1209 cm−1. – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (125 MHz, CDCl3) see Table 1. – MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 390 (4.50) [M]+, 372 (3.27), 348 (14.30), 346 (73.06) [M–CO2]+, 320 (10.30) [M–C5H10]+, 167 (7.20) [C8H7O4]+, 163 (13.15), 136 (20.05), 123 (100) [C7H7O2]+, 121 (4.11), 81 (8.55) [C6H9]+, 69 (13.88) [C5H9]+, 55 (25.40) [C4H7]+. – HRMS ((+)-ESI): m/z = 413.26689 (calcd. 413.26623 for C24H38O4Na+, [M+Na]+).

4.3.2 Micronone (2)

Yellow oil, IR (film) νmax= 2925, 2854, 1679, 1252, 1053, 847, 722 cm−1. – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (125 MHz, CDCl3) see Table 1. – MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 346 (30.80) [M+2H]+, 344 (12.13) [M]+, 320 (19.26) [M+2H–C2H2]+, 318 (14.18) [M–C2H2]+, 163 (8.48) [C10H11O2]+, 149 (14.02) [C9H9O2]+, 136 (25.74) [C8H8O2]+, 124 (31.20) [C7H8O2]+, 123 (100.00) [C7H7O2], 109 (5.38), 95 (9.74), 83 (9.80), 81 (12.00), 71 (3.21), 67 (14.98). – HRMS ((+)-ESI): m/z = 367.26097 (calcd. 367.26075 for C23H36O2Na+, [M+Na]+).

4.3.3 (Z)-3-Acetoxy-2-(heptadec-10-en-1-yl)-6-hydroxybenzoic acid (1a)

Acetylation of compound 1 (5 mg, 0.013 mmol) using acetic anhydride (2.65 mg, 0.026 mmol) and DMAP (3.18 mg, 0.026 mmol) at room temperature gave compound 1a (4.9 mg, 85 %). – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.89 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, H-17′), 1.39–1.23 (m, 20H, H-3′–H-8′, H-13–H-16′), 1.49 (m, 2H, H-2′), 2.07–1.96 (m, 2H, H-9′, H-12′), 2.26 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 2.98 (m, 2H, H-1′), 5.33 (m, 4H, H-10′, H-11′), 6.67 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, H-5), 6.89 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, H-4). – 13C (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.1 (C-17′), 19.5 (CH3CO), 22.3 (C-16′), 26.8 (C-2′), 28.9–30.9 (C-3′–C-8′ and C-13′–C-14′), 25.9 (C-9′, C-12′) 27.2 (C-1′), 31.7 (C-15′), 113.9 (C-5), 119.0 (C-1), 125.1 (C-4), 129.0 (C-11′), 129.5 (C-10′), 136.9 (C-2), 141.3 (C-3), 158.8 (C-6), 170.6 (CH3CO), 175.4 (COOH). – MS ((–)-ESI): m/z = 431.3 [M–H], 863.4 [2M–H].

4.4 Cytotoxicity in vitro against KB-3-1 cells

Cytotoxicity screening of the isolates was done as described in previous reports [25]. The KB-3-1 cells were cultivated as a monolayer in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with glucose (4.5 g L−1), l-glutamine, sodium pyruvate and phenol red, supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were maintained at 37 °C in 5.3 % CO2-humidified air. On the day before the test, the cells (70 % confluence) were detached with trypsin–ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution (0.05 %; 0.02 % in DPBS) and placed in sterile 96-well plates at a density of 10 000 cells in 100 μL medium per well. The dilution series of the compounds were prepared from stock solutions in DMSO at concentrations of 100 mm, 50 mm or 25 mm. The stock solutions were diluted with culture medium (10 % FBS) down to the pM range. Dilutions prepared from stock solutions were added to the wells. Each concentration was tested in six replicates. Dilution series were prepared by pipetting liquid from well to well. The control contained the same concentration of DMSO as the first dilution. After incubation for 72 h at 37 °C in 5.3 % CO2-humidified air, 30 μL of an aqueous resazurin solution (175 μm) was added to each well. The cells were incubated at the same conditions for 5 h. Subsequently, the fluorescence (excitation 530 nm; emission 588 nm) was measured. IC50 values were calculated from sigmoidal dose response curves using Prism 4.03 (GraphPad).

4.5 Antiplasmodial activity

Antiplasmodial activity screening of the isolates was done as described earlier [26] using the W2 strain of P. falciparum, which is resistant to chloroquine and other antimalaria compounds, cultured in sealed flasks at 37 °C, in a 3 % O2, 5 % CO2 and 91 % N2 atmosphere in RPMI 1640, 25 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, supplemented with heat inactivated 10 % human serum and human erythrocytes to achieve a 2 % hematocrit. Parasites were synchronized in the ring stage by serial treatment with 5 % sorbitol (SIGMA) [27] and studied at 1 % parasitaemia.

The compound 1 was dissolved to give a 1 mg mL−1 stock solution in DMSO, which was further diluted as needed for individual experiments, and tested in duplicate. The stock solution was diluted in supplemented RPMI 1640 medium so as to have at most 0.2 % DMSO in the final reaction medium. An equal volume of 1 % parasitaemia, 4 % hematocrit culture was thereafter added and gently mixed thoroughly. Negative controls contained equal concentrations of DMSO, while the positive control contained 1 μm artemisinin (Sigma). Cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h (1 parasite erythrocytic life cycle), beginning at the ring stage. Parasites were thereafter fixed by replacing the serum medium with an equal volume of 1 % formaldehyde in PBS. Aliquots (50 μL) of each culture were then added to 5 mL round bottom polystyrene tubes containing 0.5 mL 0.1 % Triton X-100 and 1 nm YOYO nuclear dye (Molecular Probes) in PBS, and parasitemias of treated and control cultures were compared using a Becton-Dickinson FACSort flow cytometer to count nucleated (parasitized) erythrocytes. Data acquisition was performed using Cell-Quest software. These data were normalized to percent control activity and IC50 values were calculated using Prism 5.0 (GraphPad) with data fitted by non-linear regression to the variable slope sigmoidal dose response formula, y= 100/[1 + 10(log IC50x)H], where H is the Hill coefficient or slope factor.


Corresponding author: Norbert Sewald, Organic and Bioorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Bielefeld University, P. O. Box 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany, Fax: +49-(0)521-106 156963, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by doctoral fellowships from German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD Sandwich Programme, A/10/97011) and the Bielefeld International Graduate School of Chemistry and Biochemistry to A. A. Razakarivony at Bielefeld University. The authors wish to acknowledge the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for providing a fellowship to B. N. Lenta at Bielefeld University. We also thank P. Mester and G. Lipinski for recording NMR spectra and Dr. J. Sproß, S. Heitkamp, and H.-W. Patruck for recording mass spectra (all at Bielefeld University). The authors are grateful to Prof. Dr. D. Kuck for helpful discussions.

References

[1] A. Randrianasolo, Adansonia, sér.3. 2000, 22, 145.Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Randrianasolo, Adansonia,sér.3. 2009, 31, 157.10.5252/a2009n1a10Search in Google Scholar

[3] B. Weniger, C. Vonthron-Sénécheau, G. J. Arango, M. Kaiser, R. Brun, R. Anton, Fitoterapia2004, 74, 764.10.1016/j.fitote.2004.09.015Search in Google Scholar

[4] I. T. S. Gehrke, A. T. Neto, M. Pedroso, C. P. Mostardeiro, I. B. M. D. Cruz, U. F. Silva, V. Ilha, I. I. Dalcol, A. F. Morel, J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 148, 486.10.1016/j.jep.2013.04.043Search in Google Scholar

[5] D. A. Okoth, H. Y. Chenia, N. A. Koorbanally, Phytochem. Lett.2013, 6, 476.10.1016/j.phytol.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[6] K. H. Kim, E. Moon, S. U. Choi, C. Pang, S. Y. Kim, K. R. Lee, J. Ethnopharmacol.2015, 162, 231.10.1016/j.jep.2014.12.071Search in Google Scholar

[7] N. Belyagoubi-Benhammou, L. Belyagoubi, F. A. Bekkara, J. Med. Plants Res.2014, 8, 1198.Search in Google Scholar

[8] H.-W. Guo, C.-X. Yun, G.-H. Hou, J. Du, X. Huang, Y. Lu, E. T. Keller, J. Zhang, J.-G. Deng, PLoSOne2014, 9, e100394.10.1371/journal.pone.0100394Search in Google Scholar

[9] T. R. Morais, T. A. da Costa-Silva, A. G. Tempone, S. E. T. Borborema, M. T. Scotti, R. M. F. de Sousa, A. C. C. Araujo, A. de Oliveira, S. A. L. de Morais, P. Sartorelli, J. H. G. Lago, Molecules2014, 19, 5761.10.3390/molecules19055761Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Valcic, G. A. Wächter, C. M. Eppler, B. N. Timmermann, J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 1270.10.1021/np020068nSearch in Google Scholar

[11] D. M. N. Hisham, J. M. Lip, J. M. Noh, A. Normah, M. F. N. Nabilah, J. Trop. Agric. Fd. Sc.2011, 39, 279.Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. Kurokawa, P. Basnet, M. Ohsugi, T. Hozumi, S. Kadota, T. Namba, T. Kawana, K. Shiraki, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.1999, 289, 72.Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Ito, F.-R. Chang, H.-K. Wang, Y. K. Park, M. Ikegaki, N. Kilgore, K.-H. Lee, J. Nat. Prod.2001, 64, 1278.10.1021/np010211xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] D. A. Mulholland, J. J. Nair, Phytochemistry1994, 37, 1409.10.1016/S0031-9422(00)90421-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Makino, T. Motegi, Y. Fujimoto, Phytochemistry2004, 65, 891.10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.12.012Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. Caputo, L. Mangoni, P. Monaco, G. Palumbo, Phytochemistry1979, 18, 896.10.1016/0031-9422(79)80046-1Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. M. Tessier, P. Delaveau, N. Piffault, Planta Medica1982, 44, 215.10.1055/s-2007-971450Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] B. Sontag, J. Dasenbrock, N. Arnold, W. Steglich, Eur. J. Org. Chem.1999, 5, 1051.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0690(199905)1999:5<1051::AID-EJOC1051>3.0.CO;2-9Search in Google Scholar

[19] Y. Suzuki, Y. Esumi, H. Hyakutake, Y. Kono, A. Sakurai, Phytochemistry Lett.1996, 41, 1485.10.1016/0031-9422(95)00809-8Search in Google Scholar

[20] K. O. Eyong, K. Krohn, H. Hussain, G. N. Folefoc, A. E. Nkengfack, B. Schulz, Q. Hu, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 53, 616.10.1248/cpb.53.616Search in Google Scholar

[21] N. Fusetani, K. Yasumuro, S. Matsunaga, Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 6891.10.1016/S0040-4039(01)93381-7Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. Tuntiwachwuttikul, Y. Pootaeng-on, P. Phansa, W. C. Taylor, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 27.10.1248/cpb.52.27Search in Google Scholar

[23] T. Yaoita, R. Kakuda, K. Machida, M. Kikuch, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 50, 681.10.1248/cpb.50.681Search in Google Scholar

[24] V. S. P. Chaturvedula, J. K. Schilling, J. S. Miller, R. Andriantsiferana, V. E. Rasamison, D. G. I. Kingston, J. Nat. Prod.2002, 65, 1627.10.1021/np0201568Search in Google Scholar

[25] A. F. Awantu, B. N. Lenta, T. Bogner, Y. F. Fongang, S. Ngouela, J. D. Wansi, E. Tsamo, N. Sewald, Z. Naturforsch.2011, 66b, 624.10.1515/znb-2011-0610Search in Google Scholar

[26] B. M. Mba’ning, B. N. Lenta, D. T. Noungoué, C. Antheaume, Y. F. Fongang, S. A. Ngouela, F. F. Boyom, P. J. Rosenthal, E. Tsamo, N. Sewald, Phytochemistry2013, 96, 347.10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.06.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] C. Lambros, J. P. Vanderberg, J. Parasitol.1979, 65, 418.10.2307/3280287Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-11-19
Accepted: 2016-1-26
Published Online: 2016-3-9
Published in Print: 2016-4-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 12.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2015-0188/html
Scroll to top button