Home Physical Sciences Ternary aurides RE4Mg3Au10 (RE = La, Ce, Pr) and RE4Cd3Au10 (RE = Y, La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) – ordering variants of the Zr7Ni10 type
Article Publicly Available

Ternary aurides RE4Mg3Au10 (RE = La, Ce, Pr) and RE4Cd3Au10 (RE = Y, La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) – ordering variants of the Zr7Ni10 type

  • Michael Johnscher , Theresa Block , Oliver Niehaus and Rainer Pöttgen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 8, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The intermetallic gold compounds RE4Mg3Au10 (RE = La, Ce, Pr) and RE4Cd3Au10 (RE = Y, La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) were obtained from the elements through high-frequency melting in sealed niobium tubes and subsequent annealing in a muffle furnace. The new aurides crystallize with the Ca4In3Au10-type structure. They were characterized through Guinier powder patterns. The structures of Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10 and Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10 were refined from single crystal X-ray diffractometer data: Cmce, a = 1396.73(6), b = 1009.38(3), c = 1019.51(3) pm, wR2 = 0.0423, 1281 F2 values, 47 variables for Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10 and a = 1362.68(3), b = 995.52(4), c = 1003.79(3) pm, wR2 = 0.0381, 1594 F2 values, F2 47 variables for Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10. The 8e sites of both crystals show substantial Cd/Pr respectively Cd/Tb mixing, indicating small homogeneity ranges for all RE4+xMg3–xAu10 and RE4+xCd3–xAu10 aurides. The gold atoms in these aurides form a pronounced two-dimensional substructure (275–327 pm Au–Au in Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10) which encages the Mg1/Cd1 (coordination number 8) and RE2 (coordination number 11) atoms. These blocks are separated by the Mg2/Cd2 and RE1 atoms with an intergrowth of Mg2/Cd2@Au8 and RE1@Au10 polyhedra. Temperature dependent magnetic susceptibility and specific heat measurements of Tb4Cd3Au10 have shown antiferromagnetic ordering at a Néel temperature of 12(1) K.

1 Introduction

The structures of binary and ternary intermetallic compounds can often be described as ordering variants of (i) an element’s structure or (ii) of a simple binary structure type. Typical examples for the first family of compounds are binaries that derive from the cubic closest packing like Cu3Au and MoNi4 or FeAl, an ordering variant of the bcc structure [1]. Even the more complex structures of Er2RuMg2 and Er2RuMg3 derive from the W type [2]. Simple examples for the second family of intermetallics are the antimonide SrPtSb [3] which derives from the AlB2 type by an ordering of platinum and antimony atoms on the honeycomb network or the stannide AuNiSn2 [4] which shows an ordering of gold and nickel atoms on the nickel sites of NiAs. A major disadvantage of this purely geometrical description lies in the fact that the ordering of different kinds of atoms along with structural distortions strongly changes the bonding pattern. Nevertheless, this geometrical description facilitates the crystal chemical grouping of the respective phase.

Apart from these simple representatives, the huge number of ternary intermetallics shows many examples of more complex ordering and distortion variants of binary structure types. Representative larger families of compounds derive from the BaAl4 [5], the AlB2 [6], and the CaCu5 related phases [7], or from the U3Si2 [8], or the Re3B type [9]. The ordering in these phases can proceed in the anionic or cationic substructure. If the coloring with different atoms forces distortions and/or changes in chemical bonding, those phases are rather isopointal [10, 11] than isotypic. The coloring can also force lowering of the space group symmetry, leading to superstructure formation and a group-subgroup relation [2] between the two phases.

Sometimes the ternary ordering variant and the binary structure just have the same space group type and the same Wyckoff sites are occupied, but the crystal chemistry and the chemical bonding are distinctly different. The pair Ni4B3 [12]/Ca3InAu3 [13] is such an example where the calcium and indium atoms are ordered on the nickel sites of Ni4B3 and the gold atoms take the boron positions. Similar dissimilarities in crystal chemistry have been reported recently for ternary ordered versions of the Zr7Ni10 type [14]: Ca4In3Au10 [15], Ca5Cd2Au10 [16], RE4Mg3Ag10 (RE = Y, La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) [17–19] and RE4Mg3Au10 (RE = Y, Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) [18]. Because magnesium and cadmium show similar crystal chemistry for the RExTyMgz [20] and RExTyCdz [21] phases, we extended our phase analytical work with respect to the RE4Cd3Au10 compounds. Their synthesis and structural characterization is reported herein along with that of some new magnesium phases RE4Mg3Au10 with the large rare earth elements lanthanum, cerium, and praseodymium. The compounds were obtained after longer annealing sequences.

2 Experimental

2.1 Synthesis

Starting materials for the syntheses of the RE4Mg3Au10 and RE4Cd3Au10 phases were pieces of sublimed rare earth elements (Smart Elements, >99.9 %), gold granules (Allgussa AG, >99.9 %), a magnesium rod (Johnson Matthey, >99.5 %), and a cadmium bar (Johnson Matthey, >99.9 %). Smaller pieces of the moisture sensitive rare earth ingots were cut under paraffin oil and washed with cyclohexane. The paraffin oil and cyclohexane were dried over sodium wire. The pieces were then kept under dry argon in Schlenk tubes. The argon was purified over titanium sponge (900 K), silica gel, and molecular sieves.

The low boiling temperatures of magnesium and cadmium requested sealed reaction containers. The ideal elemental mixtures 4RE: 3Cd/Mg: 10Au were thus arc-welded [22] in small niobium ampoules under an argon pressure of ca. 700 mbar. The ampoules were subsequently placed in a water cooled sample chamber of a high-frequency furnace [23] (Typ TIG 2.5/300, Hüttinger Elektronik, Freiburg, Germany). The annealing sequence was similar to that used for the previously synthesized RE4Mg3Au10 phases with the heavier rare earth elements [18]: (i) rapid heating to ca. 1450 K, (ii) keeping that temperature for 1 min, (iii) reducing slowly to 1300 K, (iv) 30 min at 1300 K, (v) cooling to 900 K within 30 min. (vi) 900 K for two hours, and (vii) quenching the annealing sequence by turning off the high frequency generator. The magnesium and cadmium samples were separated from the niobium ampoules by careful mechanical fragmentation. There was no visible attack of the crucible material. The polycrystalline samples are dark gray. Small single crystals appear light gray with metallic luster. The samples are stable in air over several weeks.

The series of RE4Mg3Au10 phases with the heavier rare earth elements [18] formed peritectically. Consequently, also the polycrystalline samples prepared in the induction furnace were sealed in evacuated silica ampoules and annealed at 823 K for 10 days.

2.2 X-ray diffraction

Parts of the annealed RE4Mg3Au10 and RE4Cd3Au10 samples were ground to fine powders and characterized through Guinier powder patterns (Enraf-Nonius camera, type FR 552): imaging plate detector, Fujifilm BAS-1800, CuKα1 radiation and α-quartz (a = 491.30, c = 540.46 pm) as an internal standard. The lattice parameters (Table 1) were deduced from least-squares fits. The experimental patterns were compared to simulated ones [24] to ensure correct indexing. Most samples were obtained in X-ray-pure form. As an example we present the experimental and simulated powder pattern of Tb4Cd3Au10 in Fig. 1.

Table 1

Lattice parameters (Guinier powder data) of the orthorhombic compounds RE4Mg3Au10 and RE4Cd3Au10. Standard deviations are given in parentheses.

Compounda (pm)b (pm)c (pm)V (nm3)
Magnesium compounds
 La4Mg3Au101407.4(2)1024.0(1)1020.9(1)1.4712
 Ce4Mg3Au101393.8(2)1012.82(7)1021.0(1)1.4413
 Pr4Mg3Au101388.2(1)1010.09(8)1016.97(8)1.4260
Cadmium compounds
 Y4Cd3Au101362.8(8)996.2(3)1002.4(4)1.3609
 La4Cd3Au101418.2(4)1018.1(5)1027.4(3)1.4834
 Ce4Cd3Au101406.0(4)1013.1(3)1021.9(3)1.4556
 Pr4Cd3Au101396.8(4)1008.6(3)1017.1(4)1.4329
 Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10a1396.73(6)1009.38(3)1019.51(3)1.4373
 Nd4Cd3Au101391.2(4)1007.8(3)1014.8(3)1.4228
 Sm4Cd3Au101379.2(4)1001.8(2)1011.7(3)1.3978
 Gd4Cd3Au101370.2(6)998.3(3)1006.8(3)1.3772
 Tb4Cd3Au101365.7(2)996.3(2)1004.1(2)1.3662
 Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10a1362.68(3)995.52(4)1003.79(3)1.3617
 Dy4Cd3Au101361.4(7)994.6(3)1002.1(3)1.3569

aSingle crystal data.

Fig. 1: Experimental and simulated Guinier powder pattern of Tb4Cd3Au10.
Fig. 1:

Experimental and simulated Guinier powder pattern of Tb4Cd3Au10.

Irregularly shaped single crystals were selected from the crushed Pr4Cd3Au10 and Tb4Cd3Au10 samples and fixed to quartz fibres using bees wax. The crystals were first characterized on a Buerger camera (using white Mo radiation) to check their quality. Intensity data of the Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10 crystal were collected at room temperature on a Stoe IPDS-II image plate system (graphite monochromatized MoKα radiation; λ = 71.073 pm) in oscillation mode. The Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10 data set was measured on a Stoe Stadi Vari diffractometer equipped with a Mo micro focus source and a Pilatus detection system and scaled subsequently due to the Gaussian-shaped profile of the X-ray source. Numerical absorption corrections (along with scaling for the Stadi Vari data set) were applied to the data sets. Details about the data collections and the crystallographic parameters are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2

Crystal data and structure refinement results for Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10, and Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10 with Ca4In3Au10 structure type; space group Cmce, Z = 4; Pearson code oC68.

Empirical formulaPr4.46Cd2.54Au10Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10
Molar mass, g mol–12883.82960.0
a, pm1396.73(6)1362.68(3)
b, pm1009.38(3)995.52(4)
c, pm1019.51(3)1003.79(3)
V, nm31.43731.3617
Calculated density, g cm–313.3214.43
Absorption coefficient, mm–1121.1135.2
Detector distance, mm8040
Exposure time10 min22 s
ω range; increment, deg0–180, 1.0
Integr. param. A/B/EMS12.2/1.7/0.0133.0/0.0/0.012
F(000), e47004802
Crystal size, μm320 × 30 × 6020 × 20 × 50
Transm. ratio (max/min)0.134/0.0200.434/0.107
θ range, deg3–323–36
Range in hkl±20, ±14, ±15±22, ±16, ±16
Total no. reflections467126 484
Independent reflections/Rint1281/0.04101594/0.0703
Reflections with I > 3 σ(I)/Rσ1017/0.01901230/0.0206
Data/parameters1281/471594/47
Goodness-of-fit on F21.171.04
R1/wR2 for I > 3 σ(I)0.0191/0.04100.0176/0.0366
R1/wR2 for all data0.0281/0.04230.0269/0.0381
Extinction coefficient138(5)122(4)
Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å–31.91/–2.181.62/–2.40

2.3 Structure refinements

Both diffractometer data sets showed C-centred orthorhombic lattices and the systematic extinctions were compatible with space group Cmce. The atomic parameters of Gd4.43Mg2.57Au10 were taken as starting values [18] and the structures were refined using jana2006 [25] with anisotropic atomic displacement parameters for all atoms. Since Gd4.43Mg2.57Au10 [18] and the isotypic cadmium compound Ca5Cd2Au10 [16] revealed Gd/Mg, respectively, Ca/Cd mixing on two of the cation sites, we carefully checked the occupancy parameters of the rare earth sites. Crystals of both cadmium compounds revealed Cd/RE mixing only for the 8e site, while all other sites were fully occupied within two standard deviations. The Cd/RE mixed occupancies were refined as least-squares variables in the final cycles, leading to the compositions listed in Table 2. The final difference Fourier syntheses revealed no residual peaks. The refined atomic positions, displacement parameters, and interatomic distances (exemplarily for Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10) are given in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3

Atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters (pm2) of Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10 and Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10. Ueq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor.

AtomWyckoff sitexyzUeq
Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10
 Pr18d0.29904(5)00123(1)
 Pr28f00.30168(6)0.20409(6)122(1)
 Cd14a000172(3)
 0.77(2) Cd2/ 0.23(2) Pr38e1/40.27198(8)1/4173(3)
 Au116g0.13929(3)0.02962(3)0.20727(3)155(1)
 Au216g0.36187(3)0.29338(3)0.01987(3)162(1)
 Au38f00.09668(4)0.40508(4)116(1)
Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10
 Tb18d0.30061(3)00169(1)
 Tb28f00.30332(4)0.20376(4)178(1)
 Cd14a000208(2)
 0.81(1) Cd2/0.19(1) Tb38e1/40.27337(6)1/4212(2)
 Au116g0.14060(2)0.02706(2)0.20879(3)193(1)
 Au216g0.35976(2)0.29085(2)0.01465(3)196(1)
 Au38f00.09793(3)0.40440(4)164(1)
Table 4

Interatomic distances (pm) of Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10. All distances within the first coordination spheres are listed. Standard deviations are all equal or less than 0.1 pm. Note that the Cd2 site shows mixing with praseodymium (Table 3).

Pr1:2Au2307.3Au1:1Au3288.3
2Au1308.81Cd1288.8
2Au2309.51Au2292.5
2Au1312.11Cd2292.7
2Au3312.51Au2305.6
2Cd2350.21Cd2305.7
2Cd2380.81Pr1308.8
2Pr2402.71Pr1312.1
Pr2:1Au3291.21Pr2314.6
2Au2313.91Au1321.3
2Au1314.61Pr2336.6
1Au3317.91Au2385.1
1Au3321.61Au1389.1
2Au1336.6Au2:1Cd2282.7
2Au2341.31Cd1284.8
2Cd2353.61Au3287.2
1Cd1362.11Au1292.5
1Cd1368.81Au1305.6
2Pr1402.71Pr1307.3
Cd1:4Au2284.81Pr1309.5
4Au1288.81Pr2313.9
2Pr2362.11Cd2323.2
2Pr2368.81Au2327.1
Cd2:2Au2282.71Pr2341.3
2Au1292.71Au1385.1
2Au1305.71Au2385.9
2Au2323.2Au3:1Au3274.9
2Pr1350.22Au2287.2
2Pr2353.62Au1288.3
2Pr2380.81Pr2291.2
2Pr1312.5
1Pr2317.9
1Pr2321.6
1Cd1418.4
2Cd2422.2
1Cd1424.4

Further details of the crystal structure investigations may be obtained from Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: +49-7247-808-666; e-mail: , http://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/request_for_deposited_data.html) on quoting the deposition numbers CSD-429863 (Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10) and CSD-429864 (Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10).

2.4 EDX data

The Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10 and Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10 crystals studied on the diffractometers were semiquantitatively analyzed by EDX using a Zeiss EVO® MA10 scanning electron microscope in variable pressure mode. The rare earth trifluorides, gold, and cadmium were used as standards. The experimentally observed compositions were close to the ideal ones. No impurity elements (especially from the container material) were detected.

2.5 Physical property measurements

The magnetic and heat capacity measurements were carried out on a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) using dc-MS and heat capacity options, respectively. Dc magnetic measurements were performed using the VSM (Vibrating Sample Magnetometer) option. For this measurement 56.323 mg of the powdered Tb4.38Cd2.62Au10 sample were packed in a polypropylene capsule and attached to the sample holder rod. For the heat capacity measurement a piece of a sintered tablet (12.929 mg) was fixed to a pre-calibrated heat capacity puck using Apiezon N grease. Magnetic investigations were performed in the temperature range of 2.5–305 K with magnetic flux densities up to 80 kOe (1 kOe = 7.96 × 104 A m–1). Heat capacity measurements were done in the temperature range of 2.5–310 K.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Crystal Chemistry

The magnesium and cadmium compounds RE4Mg3Au10 (RE = La, Ce, Pr) and RE4Cd3Au10 (RE = Y, La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) extend the series of intermetallic compounds with ordered Zr7Ni10 type structure, space group Cmce, Pearson symbol oS68 and Wyckoff sequence g2f2eda. The course of the cell volumes within both series (including the data from [18]) is presented in Fig. 2. As expected from the lanthanide contraction, the cell volumes decrease almost monotonically from the lanthanum to the dysprosium compound with larger cell volumes for the cadmium series. Ce4Mg3Au10 and Ce4Cd3Au10 fit into the smooth function, indicating trivalent cerium. Both yttrium phases fit in between the cell volumes of the corresponding terbium and dysprosium phases as frequently observed for rare earth based magnesium and cadmium intermetallics [20, 21].

Fig. 2: Plot of the cell volumes of the RE4Mg3Au10 and RE4Cd3Au10 aurides.
Fig. 2:

Plot of the cell volumes of the RE4Mg3Au10 and RE4Cd3Au10 aurides.

Exemplarily we discuss the structure of Pr4.46Cd2.54Au10. In the first step of the discussion we refer to the ideal composition, neglecting the 23 % praseodymium occupancy on the 8e cadmium site. A projection of the Pr4Cd3Au10 structure along the c axis is presented in Fig. 3. Although the unit cell seems quite complex at first sight, it can easily be subdivided into two substructures.

Fig. 3: View of the Pr4Cd3Au10 unit cell along the crystallographic c axis. Praseodymium, cadmium, and gold atoms are drawn as light grey, magenta, and blue circles, respectively. The two-dimensional gold substructure and the location of the Cd1/Pr2 and Pr1/Cd2 atoms in the different layers are emphasized. Note that the Cd2 site shows mixing with praseodymium (Table 3).
Fig. 3:

View of the Pr4Cd3Au10 unit cell along the crystallographic c axis. Praseodymium, cadmium, and gold atoms are drawn as light grey, magenta, and blue circles, respectively. The two-dimensional gold substructure and the location of the Cd1/Pr2 and Pr1/Cd2 atoms in the different layers are emphasized. Note that the Cd2 site shows mixing with praseodymium (Table 3).

The gold atoms build up a two-dimensional substructure around the mirror planes at x = 0, 1/2 and 1. These blocks show a quite large range of Au–Au distances from 275 to 327 pm, shorter and longer than in fcc gold (288 pm) [26]. Each gold atom has four or five nearest gold neighbors. The blocks leave cages of eight, respectively, 11 gold atoms (Fig. 4) which are filled by the Cd1 and Pr2 atoms.

Fig. 4: Cutout of the Pr4Cd3Au10 structure. Praseodymium, cadmium, and gold atoms are drawn as light grey, magenta, and blue circles, respectively. One layer of the gold substructure along with the Pr2 and Cd1 atoms is drawn. Atom designations and relevant interatomic distances are given.
Fig. 4:

Cutout of the Pr4Cd3Au10 structure. Praseodymium, cadmium, and gold atoms are drawn as light grey, magenta, and blue circles, respectively. One layer of the gold substructure along with the Pr2 and Cd1 atoms is drawn. Atom designations and relevant interatomic distances are given.

The Au–Cd distances within the slightly distorted Cd1@Au8 and the strongly distorted Cd2@Au8 cubes (Fig. 5) range from 283 to 293 pm, slightly longer than the sum of the covalent radii for gold and cadmium of 275 pm [27]. Similar ranges of Au–Cd distances were observed in the [AuCd] network of EuAuCd (288–295 pm) [28] and the [Au7Cd16] network of Na6Au7Cd16 (278–300 pm) [29]. Similar to EuAuCd and Na6Au7Cd16, the Au–Cd interactions certainly play an important role for the stability of the RE4Cd3Au10 phases.

Fig. 5: Cutout of the Pr4Cd3Au10 structure. Praseodymium, cadmium, and gold atoms are drawn as light grey, magenta, and blue circles, respectively. One layer with the ondensed Pr1@Au10 and Cd2@Au8 polyhedra is emphasized.
Fig. 5:

Cutout of the Pr4Cd3Au10 structure. Praseodymium, cadmium, and gold atoms are drawn as light grey, magenta, and blue circles, respectively. One layer with the ondensed Pr1@Au10 and Cd2@Au8 polyhedra is emphasized.

The gold containing blocks are separated by the Pr1 and Cd2 atoms. One of these layers is presented in Fig. 5. It can be explained as a 1:1 intergrowth of Pr1@Au10 and Cd2@Au8 polyhedra in a checkerboard pattern. The distortion of the Cd2@Au8 unit is much stronger than for the almost regular Cd1@Au8 cubes (Fig. 4). For an alternative description of these structures through a condensation of (Mg/Cd)@Au8RE24 and RE1@Au10(Mg/Cd)4 polyhedra we refer to [18].

Finally we draw back to the homogeneity ranges. Already for the series of RE4Mg3Au10 aurides we observed significant RE/Mg mixing on 4a and 8e sites, leading to the solid solutions RE4+xMg3–xAu10. Single crystal data for Gd4+xMg3–xAu10 revealed the highest x value of 1.61 [18] and a value of x = 1 for the alkaline earth compound Ca5Cd2Au10 [16]. The four available structure refinements showed a strong variation of the occupancy parameters without any systematics. Interestingly Ca4In3Au10 [15] shows complete calcium/indium ordering and the RE4Cd3Au10 aurides show only RE/Cd mixing on the 8e sites, at least for the investigated crystals. These mixed occupancies play an important role for the magnetic behavior and are re-addressed below.

In analogy to the RE4Mg3Ag10 series we also tried the synthesis of the related silver-cadmium phases. The complex powder patterns gave hints for the existence of such phases, but no phase-pure materials could be obtained under the present synthesis conditions. The very small difference in scattering power between silver and cadmium further hampers the structure elucidation of such phases. Synthesis attempts with copper led to the Laves phases RECu4Mg and RECu4Cd which will be reported separately.

3.2 Magnetic behavior of Tb4Cd3Au10

The characterization of the magnetic properties of the RE4Cd3Au10 aurides is a challenging task. The severe problem concerns inhomogeneities within the bulk samples as a consequence of the RE/Cd mixing on the 8e sites (vide supra). We discuss this problem exemplarily for the Tb4Cd3Au10 sample, which has been measured after an annealing period of two and four weeks. All figures shown herein were obtained from the measurement of the four weeks sample.

The top panel of Fig. 6 displays the temperature dependence of the magnetic and inverse magnetic susceptibility (χ and χ–1 data) of Tb4Cd3Au10 measured at 10 kOe. A fit of the χ–1 data above 50 K using the Curie–Weiss law revealed an effective magnetic moment of μeff = 9.74(1) μB per Tb atom and a Weiss constant of θp = 7.9(5) K. The effective magnetic moment fits very well to the theoretical value of 9.72 μB for a free Tb3+ ion. Despite of the Tb/Cd mixing no reduced or enlarged magnetic moment was identified. The observed Weiss constant points towards weak dominating ferromagnetic interactions in the paramagnetic range. Furthermore a significant, but broad increase around 20 K temperature indicates a ferromagnetic ordering.

Fig. 6: Magnetic properties of Tb4Cd3Au10: (top) temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility (χ and χ–1 data) measured at 10 kOe; the inset presents the magnetic susceptibility in zero-field-cooled/field-cooled (ZFC/FC) mode at 100 Oe in the low-temperature range; (bottom) magnetization isotherms at 3, 16, 30, 50 and 100 K.
Fig. 6:

Magnetic properties of Tb4Cd3Au10: (top) temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility (χ and χ–1 data) measured at 10 kOe; the inset presents the magnetic susceptibility in zero-field-cooled/field-cooled (ZFC/FC) mode at 100 Oe in the low-temperature range; (bottom) magnetization isotherms at 3, 16, 30, 50 and 100 K.

To obtain more precise information about this magnetic ordering, a low-field measurement with external field strength of 100 Oe was performed in a zero-field- and field-cooled (ZFC/FC) mode. This measurement is depicted in the inset of Fig. 6 (top panel). In contrast to the ZFC measurement with 10 kOe, a Néel temperature of TN = 12(1) K is determined from the FC data. Furthermore it is obvious that a broad shoulder is present around 20 K, which is most likely related to a second magnetic ordering. This might be related to a significant amount of Tb on the different cadmium sites. The related phase width finds expression in significant broadening of both anomalies. The sample with an annealing period of only 2 weeks exhibits even broader peaks and a third anomaly can be identified below 10 K. Due to this complex magnetic behavior we cannot definitely exclude slight amounts of impurity phases, but the overall consistent behavior points towards intrinsic magnetic “impurities”, which are caused by the mixing of Tb and Cd. These would also explain the broad bifurcation of the ZFC and FC curve, which is only observed in the case of non-zero remanent magnetizations and cannot be caused by a simple antiferromagnetic ordering.

The bottom panel in Fig. 6 shows the magnetization isotherms measured at 3, 16, 30, 50, and 100 K. The three latter isotherms (above the magnetic ordering temperature) confirm the paramagnetic character in this temperature range. Only very weak saturation effects can be observed for the 30 K isotherm, while the two others exhibit a totally linear field dependency. The 16 K isotherm exhibits a much steeper increase and more pronounced saturation effects due to the onset of the antiferromagnetic ordering. However, no hint for a wide-range magnetic ordering above this temperature is identified. This underlines the assumption of short range-magnetic phenomena as the reason for the broad anomaly around 20 K. At 3 K the magnetization increases even steeper and a very weak s-shaped character can be identified around 5 kOe, which is attributed to a reorientation of the spins confirming the antiferromagnetic ground state. Furthermore it explains why a ferromagnetic character is observed for the ZFC curve measured at 10 kOe. Around 10 kOe another kink is observed pointing towards a somehow canted magnetic behavior, followed by saturation effects at higher fields. At 3 K and 80 kOe a magnetization of 6.0(1) μB per Tb atom is measured, which corresponds to 67 % of the expected saturation magnetization of 9 μB per Tb atom according to gJ × J. This reduction may be ascribed to the polycrystalline character of the sample. A weak hysteresis observed of the 3 K isotherm indicates again the existence of a non-zero remnant magnetization caused by very weak ferromagnetic interactions.

In Fig. 7 the investigated heat capacity of Tb4Cd3Au10 is displayed for the temperature range of 2.5–300 K. According to the magnified low-temperature area in the inset a weak, broad λ anomaly can clearly be identified at 11.0(5) K. This underlines the observed antiferromagnetic ordering around 12 K as the main magnetic ordering of Tb4Cd3Au10. The absence of a second anomaly definitely excludes the existence of a second, wide range magnetic ordering around 20 K.

Fig. 7: Heat capacity of Tb4Cd3Au10 measured in the temperature range of 2.5–300 K without an applied field. The inset shows the magnified low-temperature area to highlight the observed λ anomaly.
Fig. 7:

Heat capacity of Tb4Cd3Au10 measured in the temperature range of 2.5–300 K without an applied field. The inset shows the magnified low-temperature area to highlight the observed λ anomaly.


Corresponding author: Rainer Pöttgen, Institut für Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 30, 48149 Münster, Germany, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

References

[1] R. Pöttgen, D. Johrendt, Intermetallics, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2014.10.1524/9783486856187Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014, 640, 869.10.1002/zaac.201400023Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Wenski, A. Mewis, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1986, 535, 110.Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Lange, T. Nilges, R.-D. Hoffmann, R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2006, 632, 1163.10.1002/zaac.200500414Search in Google Scholar

[5] D. Kußmann, R. Pöttgen, U. Ch. Rodewald, C. Rosenhahn, B. D. Mosel, G. Kotzyba, B. Künnen, Z. Naturforsch. 1999, 54b, 1155.10.1515/znb-1999-0911Search in Google Scholar

[6] R.-D. Hoffmann, R. Pöttgen, Z. Kristallogr. 2001, 216, 127.10.1524/zkri.216.3.127.20327Search in Google Scholar

[7] E. Parthé, L. Gelato, B. Chabot, M. Penzo, K. Cenzual, R. Gladyshevskii, TYPIX–Standardized Data and Crystal Chemical Characterization of Inorganic Structure Types. Gmelin Handbook of Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry, 8th edition, Springer, Berlin (Germany) 1993.10.1007/978-3-662-10641-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Lukachuk, R. Pöttgen, Z. Kristallogr. 2003, 218, 767.10.1524/zkri.218.12.767.20545Search in Google Scholar

[9] R. Pöttgen, M. Lukachuk, R.-D. Hoffmann, Z. Kristallogr. 2006, 221, 435.10.1524/zkri.2006.221.5-7.435Search in Google Scholar

[10] L. M. Gelato, E. Parthé, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20, 139.10.1107/S0021889887086965Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. Parthé, L. M. Gelato, Acta Crystallogr. 1984, A40, 169.10.1107/S0108767384000416Search in Google Scholar

[12] S. Rundqvist, S. Pramatus, Acta Chem. Scand. 1967, 21, 191.Search in Google Scholar

[13] I. R. Muts, V. I. Zaremba, U. Ch. Rodewald, R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 56.10.1002/zaac.200700305Search in Google Scholar

[14] J.-M. Joubert, R. Černý, K. Yvon, M. Latroche, A. Percheron-Guégan, Acta Crystallogr. C 1997, 53, 1536.10.1107/S0108270197007142Search in Google Scholar

[15] Q. Lin, J. D. Corbett, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 8722.10.1021/ic061767gSearch in Google Scholar

[16] W. Harms, I. Dürr, C. Röhr, Z. Naturforsch. 2009, 64b, 471.Search in Google Scholar

[17] P. Solokha, S. De Negri, V. Pavlyuk, B. Eck, R. Dronskowski, A. Saccone, J. Solid State Chem. 2010, 183, 2995.Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Block, M. Johnscher, S. Linsinger, U. Ch. Rodewald, R. Pöttgen, Z. Naturforsch. 2015, 70b, 135.10.1515/znb-2014-0225Search in Google Scholar

[19] Yu. Verbovytskyy, A. P. Gonçalvez, Solid State Sci. 2015, 40, 84.Search in Google Scholar

[20] U. Ch. Rodewald, B. Chevalier, R. Pöttgen, J. Solid State Chem. 2007, 180, 1720.10.1016/j.jssc.2007.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[21] F. Tappe, R. Pöttgen, Rev. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 31, 5.10.1515/revic.2011.007Search in Google Scholar

[22] R. Pöttgen, Th. Gulden, A. Simon, GIT Labor-Fachzeitschrift 1999, 43, 133.Search in Google Scholar

[23] D. Kußmann, R.-D. Hoffmann, R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1998, 624, 1727.Search in Google Scholar

[24] K. Yvon, W. Jeitschko, E. Parthé, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1977, 10, 73.10.1107/S0021889877012898Search in Google Scholar

[25] V. Petříček, M. Dušek, L. Palatinus, Z. Kristallogr. 2014, 229, 345.10.1515/zkri-2014-1737Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. Donohue, The Structures of the Elements, Wiley, New York, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

[27] J. Emsley, The Elements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[28] R. Mishra, R. Pöttgen, R.-D. Hoffmann, D. Kaczorowski, H. Piotrowski, P. Mayer, C. Rosenhahn, B. D. Mosel, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2001, 627, 1283.10.1002/1521-3749(200106)627:6<1283::AID-ZAAC1283>3.0.CO;2-LSearch in Google Scholar

[29] S. L. Samal, J. D. Corbett, Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 7033.10.1021/ic200501hSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-7-9
Accepted: 2015-8-10
Published Online: 2015-9-8
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 20.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2015-0117/html
Scroll to top button