Abstract
The l-valinates M(Val)2 of M = Ni (1), M = Cu (2) and M = Zn (3) are easily obtained as crystalline hydrates. Their structural reinvestigation resulted in a general enhancement of precision for 1 · 2 H2O and 2 · H2O, in case of the copper complex in the correction of the previously reported space group and in case of the zinc complex 3 in the determination of the structure of a new hydrate 3 · 2 H2O.
1 Introduction
As building blocks of proteins amino acids contribute to central processes of life. Enzymes as nature’s catalysts enable an enormous variety of reactions at physiological conditions. In addition to a peptide backbone, several enzymes feature at least one transition metal atom coordinated by the same [1], for example Ni in urease [2], Cu in amine oxidase [3] and superoxide dismutase [4] as well as Zn in carbonic anhydrase [5] and dehydrogenase [6]. The discovery of the natural appearance of peptide-supported transition metals has inspired the study of related compounds, e.g. the binary compounds consisting of a metal ion and anions of simple amino acids obtained from the natural pool or derivatives thereof. Hence, numerous examples have already been reported in the literature [7, 8].
For educational purposes we have chosen the l-valinato complexes of nickel (1), copper (2) and zinc (3) as an entry into inorganic biochemistry making use of synthesis procedures published with the X-ray crystallographic characterization of these complexes [9–11]. In this context we noticed unresolved questions regarding the published structures, and we now report on a reinvestigation of the crystallography of hydrates of 1, 2 and 3 (Scheme 1) which resulted in significantly enhanced precision of the data for 1 · 2 H2O and 2 · H2O, refinement of the latter in space group P1 as a perfectly ordered structure (whereas the initial report was a disordered structure in space group C2) [10] and the structure of a dihydrate 3 · 2 H2O, which complements the literature known monohydrate 3 · H2O [11].

Ni, Cu and Zn complexes of this study.
2 Results and discussion
Compounds 1 · 2 H2O, 2 · H2O and 3 · 2 H2O were obtained following a procedure that involves a salt metathesis reaction in aqueous solution [12, 13]. These compounds are readily isolated as crystalline material suitable for X-ray diffractometry. Liang et al. [9] published the structure of diaqua-bis(l-valinato)nickel(II) 1 · 2 H2O and mentioned that this compound appears as green block-like crystals, whereas we now obtained this compound as pale blue shiny leaflets. Driven by this color contradiction we characterized our product 1 · 2 H2O by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The data set collected matched the previously reported structure in space group C2 (Tables 1 and 2). The resulting molecular structure is given in Fig. 1. The crystals were twinned according to the twin law (1̅ 0 0 0 1̅ 0 1 0 1) with almost perfect overlap of the diffraction data, thus enabling straightforward refinement with an HKLF4 format data set. Consideration of the twin law afforded a structure of enhanced bond precision (with respect to the structure reported by Liang et al. [9]) and a twin population ratio of 0.509(1):0.491(1). Furthermore, the water molecules were refined in two positions with site occupancies restrained to 0.5. The coordination geometry around Ni may be described as a distorted octahedral arrangement of the donor atoms with the nitrogen atoms in trans positions. Selected geometry data of 1 · 2 H2O are given in Table 1 (for comparison together with the corresponding data for 2 · H2O and 3 · 2 H2O).
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) of 1 · 2 H2O, 2 · H2O and 3 · 2 H2O.
1 · 2 H2Oa | 3 · 2 H2Oa | 2 · H2Ob | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1–M1 | 2.070(1) | 2.130(1) | N1–Cu1 | 2.022(2) | 2.023(2) |
N2–Cu1 | 2.007(2) | 1.998(1) | |||
O1–M1 | 2.072(2) | 2.123(1) | O1–Cu1 | 1.943(1) | 1.951(1) |
O3–Cu1 | 1.951(1) | 1.946(1) | |||
O3–M1 | 2.074(3) | 2.091(2) | O5–Cu1 | 2.311(2) | 2.299(2) |
N1–M1–N1* | 177.3(2) | 176.3(1) | N1–Cu1–N2 | 101.3(1) | 99.7(1) |
O1–M1–O1* | 87.3(1) | 86.2(1) | O1–Cu1–O3 | 88.3(1) | 89.9(1) |
N1–M1–O1 | 98.2(1) | 99.1(1) | N1–Cu1–O1 | 84.3(1) | 84.6(1) |
N1–M1–O1* | 79.9(1) | 78.1(1) | N1–Cu1–O3 | 160.5(1) | 162.2(1) |
N2–Cu1–O1 | 170.0(1) | 172.2(1) | |||
N2–Cu1–O3 | 83.8(1) | 84.1(1) |
aM denotes Ni and Zn for compounds 1· 2 H2O and 3· 2 H2O, respectively. The atoms marked with an asterisk are symmetry equivalents generated by a crystallographic two-fold axis through M.
bFor the two molecules in the asymmetric unit the second column contains the values for the corresponding bond lengths and angles of the second molecule with respect to their analogous positions as shown in Fig. 3.
Crystal structure data for 1 · 2 H2O, 2 · H2O and 3 · 2 H2O.
1 · 2 H2Oa | 2 · H2Ob | 3 · 2 H2O | |
---|---|---|---|
Empirical formula | C10H24N2NiO6 | C10H22N2CuO5 | C10H24N2ZnO6 |
Mr | 327.02 | 313.84 | 333.68 |
T, K | 150(2) | 150(2) | 150(2) |
Crystal size, mm3 | 0.40 × 0.25 × 0.05 | 0.60 × 0.40 × 0.10 | 0.35 × 0.25 × 0.04 |
Crystal system | Monoclinic | Triclinic | Monoclinic |
Space group | C2 | P1 | C2 |
a, Å | 9.8499(8) | 7.3631(4) | 9.9006(7) |
b, Å | 6.4279(6) | 9.6359(6) | 6.3487(3) |
c, Å | 13.0965(11) | 11.3767(6) | 13.1384(10) |
α, deg | 90 | 67.264(4) | 90 |
β, deg | 112.096(6) | 72.048(4) | 111.290(6) |
γ, deg | 90 | 88.340(5) | 90 |
V, Å3 | 768.29(11) | 704.85(7) | 769.47(9) |
Z | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Dcalcd, g cm–3 | 1.41 | 1.48 | 1.44 |
μ(MoKα), cm–1 | 13 | 16 | 16 |
F(000), e | 348 | 330 | 352 |
hkl range | –12≤ h ≤ +12 | –9 ≤ h ≤ +9 | –14 ≤ h ≤ +14 |
–8 ≤ k ≤ +8 | –12 ≤ k ≤ +11 | –9 ≤ k ≤ +9 | |
–16 ≤ l ≤ +16 | –14 ≤ l ≤ +14 | –19 ≤ l ≤ +19 | |
((sinθ)/λ)max, Å–1 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.75 |
θmax, deg/completeness in % | 27/99.7 | 27/99.7 | 32/99.9 |
Refl. measured | 8223 | 16 121 | 9312 |
Refl. unique | 1680 | 5799 | 2676 |
Rint | 0.0404 | 0.0591 | 0.0269 |
Param. refined | 112 | 376 | 110 |
R(F)/wR(F2)c (I > 2σ(I)) | 0.0156/0.0343 | 0.0364/0.1048 | 0.0196/0.0476 |
R(F)/wR(F2)c (all refls.) | 0.0157/0.0343 | 0.0368/0.1054 | 0.0198/0.0476 |
x(Flack) | 0.011(17) | –0.002(5) | 0.005(8) |
GoF (F2)c | 1.123 | 1.128 | 1.109 |
Δρfin (max/min), e Å–3 | 0.16/–0.13 | 1.00/–0.50 | 0.27/–0.22 |
aThe structure was refined as a twin from the HKLF4 format data set (1̅ 0 0 0 1̅ 0 1 0 1, BASF 0.491(1)).
bThe structure was refined as a twin from an HKLF5 format data set containing isolated and overlapping contributions of the two twin populations (1̅ 0 0 –0.122 0.950 0.100 –0.061 0.975 –0.950, BASF 0.497(1)).
cR(F) = Σ(|Fo| – |Fc|)/Σ|Fo| for the observed reflections [F2 > 2σ (F2)]. wR(F2) = {Σ[w(Fo2 – Fc2)2]/Σw(Fo2)2}1/2; GoF(F2) = {Σ[w(Fo2 – Fc2)2]/(n – p)}1/2, (n = number of reflections, p = number of parameters) with w = 1/[s2(Fo2)+(AP)2+BP] where P = (Fo2 +2Fc2)/3.

Left: molecular structure of 1 · 2 H2O in the crystal. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50 % probability level; C and N bound hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity, and only one of the two alternative water positions is shown. Right: photograph of the crystalline material of 1 · 2 H2O.
Whereas for compound 3 a crystal structure of a monohydrate 3 · H2O with pentacoordinate Zn atom had been published [11], we found a dihydrate 3 · 2 H2O (Fig. 2) which appeared to be isomorphous with 1 · 2 H2O (Table 2). Most geometric features within these structures are comparable (Table 1). Interestingly, significant differences can be found with the oxygen metal separations. Whereas in 1 · 2 H2O the Ni–O bonds are equal within the limits of standard deviation, in 3 · 2 H2O the Zn–O separation to the water molecules is significantly shorter than the Zn–O separation to the carboxylate oxygen donor atom. According to the different ionic radii of Ni2+ and Zn2+ (rNi (coord. numb. = 6) = 0.830 Å, rZn (coord. numb. = 6) = 0.880 Å [14]), one would expect an increase of the interatomic separations for the Zn coordination sphere by 0.05 Å, but for the coordinated water molecules, the Zn–O bonds remain unexpectedly short, being only 0.02 Å longer than the Ni–O bonds. Rombach et al. reported similar Zn–O bond length characteristics for the isoleucinato zinc complex [Zn(Ile)2(H2O)2], i.e. Zn–O = 2.139(5) and 2.070(5) Å for the bonds to the amino acid and water, respectively [15].

Molecular structure of 3 · 2 H2O in the crystal. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50 % probability level; C and N bound hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity, and only one of the two alternative water positions is shown.
The structure of the pentacoordinate copper complex 2 (as the monohydrate 2 · H2O) has previously been reported in space group C2 only [10, 16–18], and these structures were reported with disorder. Now we collected an X-ray diffraction data set of this crystalline compound at 150 K in a unit cell setting which corresponds to the same reduced unit cell as for the previously reported structures but solved the structure in space group P1 with two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit (refinement in space group C2 also produced a disordered structure model with the site occupancies of the disordered isopropyl groups refining to 0.5, thus hinting at an ordered superstructure). The structure was refined to the satisfactory R factor of 0.037 (despite using an HKLF5 data set obtained from a twinned crystal) and appeared to be perfectly ordered (Fig. 3). Selected structural features of 2 · H2O are summarized in Table 1.

Molecular structures of the two crystallographically independent molecules of 2 · H2O in the asymmetric unit in the crystal. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50 % probability level; C and N bound hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
To testify the color characteristics of the reported compounds 1 · 2 H2O (pale blue, see Fig. 1, in accordance with [19]), 2 · H2O (deep blue) and 3 · 2 H2O (colorless) in an unequivocal manner, UV/Vis spectra were recorded using solid-state samples, i.e. 10 % (w/w) powder dispersions in BaSO4 (Fig. 4). Absorption maxima for 1 · 2 H2O are found at 389 nm and 613 nm, respectively. We assign these absorption bands to the d–d transitions 3T1g(P) ← 3A2g and 3T1g(F) ← 3A2g, respectively, as the slight increase of absorbance around 800 nm indicates that the third band (3T2g ← 3A2g), which is expected for d–d transitions in an octahedral d8 system, is located in the infrared. An absorption minimum for 1 · 2 H2O is seen at 477 nm causing its pale blue appearance. For compound 2 · H2O also two absorption maxima are observed, one of which is shifted to the UV region at 250 nm while the other one is found at 645 nm. Whereas we assign the latter to a set of energetically similar d–d transitions of the d9 system, we assign the former to a charge transfer from ligand to metal. Here, an absorption minimum is found at 393 nm. For compound 3 · 2 H2O and l-valine literally no distinct absorbance is observed over the whole visible region as expected for these colorless compounds. As the d10 system of 3 · 2 H2O does not allow for d–d transitions, we attribute the absorption around 200 nm to π–π* transitions of the amino acid (or its anion) for both l-valine and 3 · 2 H2O.

UV/Vis spectra (uncorrected) of 1 · 2 H2O, 2 · H2O, 3 · 2 H2O and l-valine in the solid state measured as 10 % (w/w) powder dispersions with BaSO4 using an integrating sphere.
3 Conclusion
l-Valinates of Ni, Cu and Zn are easily accessible as crystalline compounds and are interesting representatives of amino acid metal complexes. Their simple syntheses enable these candidates to be used for education either in coordination or bioinorganic chemistry. Our crystallographic study of these complexes has delivered significantly improved structural models for the nickel and copper l-valinates 1 · 2 H2O and 2 · H2O, respectively, and has revealed the accessibility of a zinc l-valinate dihydrate 3 · 2 H2O.
4 Experimental section
Chemicals were used as received without further purification. Complexes were synthesized by a method described by Nakamoto et al. [12] and Bernard et al. [13]. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were grown by slow evaporation of aqueous solutions of 1, 2 and 3 at room temperature. Elemental analyses were performed using an Elementar vario MICRO cube. UV/Vis spectra were recorded on a Jasco V-650 spectrophotometer.
l-Valine (5.86 g, 0.050 mol) was dissolved in 0.5 m NaOH (100 mL). Upon the addition of a solution of NiCl2 hexahydrate (5.96 g, 0.025 mol) in water (250 mL) a light blue solution resulted. Evaporative concentration of the reaction mixture led to the formation of a pale blue crystalline material of 1 · 2 H2O within 1 week. It was separated from the mother liquor by vacuum filtration, washed with ice water (3 × 2 mL) and dried in air at room temperature. Yield 3.47 g (10.6 mmol, 42 %). – C10H24N2NiO6 (327.02): calcd. C 36.73, H 7.40, N 8.57; found C 36.43, H 7.35, N 8.49.
The corresponding complexes of copper and zinc were synthesized similarly utilizing CuCl2 dihydrate and ZnSO4 heptahydrate, respectively. Compound 2 · H2O was obtained as royal blue crystals. Yield 5.90 g (18.8 mmol, 75 %). – C10H22N2CuO5 (313.84): calcd. C 38.27, H 7.07, N 8.93; found C 37.99, H 6.97, N 8.86. Compound 3 · 2 H2O was obtained as colorless crystals. Yield 4.29 g (12.9 mmol, 52 %). – C10H24N2O6Zn (333.68): calcd. C 35.99, H 7.25, N 8.39; found C 36.03, H 7.23, N 8.52.
4.1 X-ray structure determinations
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected on a Stoe IPDS 2/2T diffractometer using MoKα radiation. The structures were solved by Direct Methods using shelxs-97 and refined with full-matrix least-squares methods on F2 of all reflections with shelxl-97 [20–22] in wingx [23, 24]. Graphics of the molecular structures were generated with ortep-32 [25, 26] and pov-ray [27]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. C-bound hydrogen atoms were refined isotropically in idealized positions (riding model). CCDC 999927 (2 · H2O), 999928 (1 · 2 H2O) and 999929 (3 · 2 H2O) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
References
[1] K. D. Karlin, Science1993, 216, 701.10.1097/00000658-199212000-00014Search in Google Scholar
[2] N. E. Dixon, C. Gazzola, R. L. Blakeley, B. Zerner, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1975, 97, 4131.10.1021/ja00847a045Search in Google Scholar
[3] M. R. Parsons, M. A. Convery, C. M. Wilmot, K. D. S. Yadav, V. Blakeley, A. S. Corner, S. E. V. Phillips, M. J. McPherson, P. F. Knowles, Structure1995, 3, 1171.10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00253-2Search in Google Scholar
[4] J. A. Tainer, E. D. Getzoff, K. M. Beem, J. S. Richardson, D. C. Richardson, J. Mol. Biol.1982, 160, 181.10.1016/0022-2836(82)90174-7Search in Google Scholar
[5] M. Lopez, S. Köhler, J.-Y. Winum, J. Inorg. Biochem.2012, 111, 138.10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.10.019Search in Google Scholar
[6] P. C. Sanghani, H. Robinson, W. F. Bosron, T. D. Hurley, Biochemistry2002, 41, 10778.10.1021/bi0257639Search in Google Scholar
[7] Y. Shimazaki, M. Takani, O. Yamauchi, Dalton Trans.2009, 38, 7854.10.1039/b905871kSearch in Google Scholar
[8] W. Beck, Z. Naturforsch.2009, 64b, 1221.Search in Google Scholar
[9] H.-D. Bian, X.-Q. Zhang, X.-E. Yang, Q. Yu, H. Liang, Acta Crystallogr.2005, E61, m2237.10.1107/S1600536805031405Search in Google Scholar
[10] C. A. Steren, R. Calvo, E. E. Castellano, M. S. Fabiane O. E. Piro, Physica B1990, 164, 323.10.1016/0921-4526(90)90819-GSearch in Google Scholar
[11] C.-S. Hwang, N. Lee, Y.-A. Kim, Y. B. Park, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.2006, 27, 1809.Search in Google Scholar
[12] K. Nakamoto, Y. Morimoto, A. E. Martell, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1961, 83, 4528.10.1021/ja01483a009Search in Google Scholar
[13] M. A. Bernard, N. Bois, M. Daireaux, Thermochim. Acta1976, 16, 283.10.1016/0040-6031(76)80021-4Search in Google Scholar
[14] A. F. Holleman, E. Wiberg, N. Wiberg, Lehrbuch der Anorganische Chemie, 102. Auflage, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2007.10.1515/9783110177701Search in Google Scholar
[15] M. Rombach, M. Gelinsky, H. Vahrenkamp, Inorg. Chim. Acta2002, 334, 25.10.1016/S0020-1693(02)00748-XSearch in Google Scholar
[16] J. Weng, C. Liu, X. Zheng, C. Sun, J. Fujian Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci.)2002, 18, 50.Search in Google Scholar
[17] Z. Kangjing, H. Jinling, L. Jianmin, Z. Yongfeng, Z. Ping, Chin. J. Struct. Chem.1984, 3, 155.Search in Google Scholar
[18] M. Marković, N. Judaš, J. Sabolović, Inorg. Chem.2011, 50, 3632.10.1021/ic102585fSearch in Google Scholar
[19] J. A. Muir, A. Ortiz, J. Appl. Crystallogr.1977, 10, 489.10.1107/S0021889877014034Search in Google Scholar
[20] G. M. Sheldrick, shelxs-97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1997. VersionWinGX© (release 97-2) 1993–1997.Search in Google Scholar
[21] G. M. Sheldrick, shelxl-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1997. Version wingx© (release 97-2) 1993–1997.Search in Google Scholar
[22] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar
[23] L. J. Farrugia, wingx (version 1.64.05), A MSWindows System of Programs for Solving, Refining and Analysing Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Data for Small Molecules, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland (U.K.) 2003.Search in Google Scholar
[24] L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr.1999, 32, 837.10.1107/S0021889899006020Search in Google Scholar
[25] C. K. Johnson, M. N. Burnett, ortep-III (version 1.0.2), Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot Program for Crystal Structure Illustrations, Rep. ORNL-6895, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN (USA) 1996. Windows version: L. J. Farrugia, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland (U.K.) 1999.Search in Google Scholar
[26] L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr.1997, 30, 565.10.1107/S0021889897003117Search in Google Scholar
[27] pov-ray (version 3.6), Trademark of Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd., Williamstown, Victoria (Australia); Copyright Hallam Oaks Pty. Ltd., 1994–2004. Retrieved from http://www.povray.org/download/ (accessed October 2014).Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Helical chain Ag(I) complexes with a tridentate N-donor ligand: syntheses, structural characterization, and properties
- A 3D mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymer constructed by 2-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline and 1,3-benzenedicarboxylate
- 1,8-Naphthalimide derivative-based turn-off fluorescent probe for the detection of picrate in organic aqueous media
- Fluxional behaviour of tricyclo[2.2.1.02,6]heptaphosphide trisanion: a DFT investigation
- l-Valinate hydrates of nickel, copper and zinc – a structural study
- Pyridinium ylides in the one-pot synthesis of a new quinoline/indolizine hybrid
- Ternary aurides RE4Mg3Au10 (RE = La, Ce, Pr) and RE4Cd3Au10 (RE = Y, La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) – ordering variants of the Zr7Ni10 type
- The structure of a coordination polymer constructed of manganese(II) biphenyl-4, 4′-dicarboxylate
- Alkaline earth-gold-aluminides: synthesis and structure of SrAu3Al2, SrAu2.83Al2.17, BaAu2.89Al2.11 and BaAu7.09Al5.91
- Phosphanchalkogenide und ihre Metallkomplexe. III. Halogenierungsprodukte der Gold(I)komplexe Ph3PEAuX (E = S oder Se; X = Cl, Br oder I)
- Synthesis and structural characterization of the new rare-earth borosilicates Pr3BSi2O10 and Tb3BSi2O10
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Helical chain Ag(I) complexes with a tridentate N-donor ligand: syntheses, structural characterization, and properties
- A 3D mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymer constructed by 2-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline and 1,3-benzenedicarboxylate
- 1,8-Naphthalimide derivative-based turn-off fluorescent probe for the detection of picrate in organic aqueous media
- Fluxional behaviour of tricyclo[2.2.1.02,6]heptaphosphide trisanion: a DFT investigation
- l-Valinate hydrates of nickel, copper and zinc – a structural study
- Pyridinium ylides in the one-pot synthesis of a new quinoline/indolizine hybrid
- Ternary aurides RE4Mg3Au10 (RE = La, Ce, Pr) and RE4Cd3Au10 (RE = Y, La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) – ordering variants of the Zr7Ni10 type
- The structure of a coordination polymer constructed of manganese(II) biphenyl-4, 4′-dicarboxylate
- Alkaline earth-gold-aluminides: synthesis and structure of SrAu3Al2, SrAu2.83Al2.17, BaAu2.89Al2.11 and BaAu7.09Al5.91
- Phosphanchalkogenide und ihre Metallkomplexe. III. Halogenierungsprodukte der Gold(I)komplexe Ph3PEAuX (E = S oder Se; X = Cl, Br oder I)
- Synthesis and structural characterization of the new rare-earth borosilicates Pr3BSi2O10 and Tb3BSi2O10