Home Physical Sciences A 3D mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymer constructed by 2-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline and 1,3-benzenedicarboxylate
Article Publicly Available

A 3D mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymer constructed by 2-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline and 1,3-benzenedicarboxylate

  • Zhi-Guo Kong EMAIL logo , Sheng-Nan Guo , Bo Sun and Seik Weng Ng
Published/Copyright: October 13, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymer, namely, [Cu2(L)(1,3-BDC)]n (1), has been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions (HL = 2-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline and 1,3-H2BDC = 1,3-benzenedicarboxylic acid). Its structure has been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis and powder X-ray diffraction. The crystals are the monoclinic space group P21/c with a = 10.686(4), b = 17.376(8), c = 11.759(4) Å, β = 92.072(14)°, C27H14Cu2FN4O4, Mr = 604.50, V = 2182.1(15) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalcd. = 1.84 g cm–3, R = 0.0588 and wR = 0.1202 (all data). In complex 1, the mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) atoms are linked by L and 1,3-BDC to give a rare 3D (3,3,4)-connected (4.7.9)(7.8.9)(4.7.8.93) framework. The temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility of 1 was investigated in the temperature range of 2–300 K.

1 Introduction

In recent years, intensive attention has been paid to the design and synthesis of new coordination polymers because of their applications in catalysis, sorption, electrical conductivity, magnetism and photochemistry [1–3]. For the syntheses of coordination polymers, the selection of metal ions is of great importance in crystal engineering, as the metal ions have different diameters and coordination numbers [4–8]. Among the transition metals, copper(II) is a good candidate for the assembly of coordination polymers owing to its easily changeable oxidation state and flexible coordination modes [9–14]. In this regard, mixed-valence homometallic copper(I/II) coordination polymers are important because the long-distance electron transfer observed in such entities can enable their application as electrochemical sensors or ferrimagnets [15–17].

Usually, the copper(II) salts are stable under ambient conditions either in solution or in the solid state [18]. The tendency of copper(II)-to-copper(I) reduction at room temperature can be promoted by an increase of the reaction temperature or incorporation of the reducing solvent [19]. Studies have shown that copper(II) can be solvothermally converted into copper(I) in the presence of different heterocyclic species [20]. For example, with auxiliary polydentate N-heterocycle ligands, such as pyrazine, imidazole and pyridine, copper(I) species are accessible from copper(II) salts as starting materials [21]. Therefore, the in situ reduction of copper(II) salts can be an effective method to access mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymers [22].

In contrast to the very common application of the above N-donor ligands for the design of mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymers, the use of 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) derivatives as building blocks still remains unexplored [23, 24]. The rigid ligand 2-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline (HL) with four potential N-coordination sites looks particularly attractive [25]. The two chelating nitrogen atoms of the phen ring and the two nitrogen atoms of the imidazole ring are readily available to coordinate to metal ions for the construction of mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymers with chelating and bridging fashions.

Based on the above consideration, in this work we synthesized a 3D mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymer [Cu2(L)(1,3-BDC)]n (1) based on the multidentate N-donor L and 1,3-BDC (1,3-H2BDC = 1,3-benzenedicarboxylic acid). To the best of our knowledge, compound 1 represents the first mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymer constructed by chelating and bridging a phen derivative. The temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility of 1 was investigated in the temperature range of 2–300 K.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Structure description of 1

Suitable single crystals of 1 were obtained by the in situ hydrothermal redox reaction of Cu(NO3)2, HL and 1,3-H2BDC at 185 °C for 6 days. At high temperature, both water and HL may serve as effective reducing agents for Cu(II) to give Cu(I), and hence to generate a mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) coordination polymer 1. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis has revealed that compound 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c with four formula units [Cu2(L)(1,3-BDC)] in the unit cell. Hence, as shown in Fig. 1, the asymmetric unit of 1 contains one Cu(I) atom, one Cu(II) atom, one L, and one 1,3-BDC. Selected bond lengths and angles are listed in Table 1. The Cu(I) atom (Cu1) is three-coordinated by two nitrogen atoms from two L ligands and one carboxylate oxygen atom from one 1,3-BDC in a trigonal planar mode. The Cu(II) atom (Cu2) displays a square-pyramidal coordination geometry. The base of the square pyramid geometry is provided by two carboxylate oxygen atoms (O1 and O4C) from two different 1,3-BDC and two nitrogen atoms (N1 and N2) from one L. The apical position of the square pyramid is occupied by one carboxylate oxygen atom (O2D) from a third 1,3-BDC with a substantially longer Cu2–O2D distance of 2.351(3) Å. Each 1,3-BDC anion adopts a tetradentate coordination mode: one carboxylate unit bridges two Cu(II) atoms with a Cu2···Cu2D separation of 4.30 Å (Fig. 1), while the other one coordinates with one Cu(I) atom and one Cu(II) atom. In this fashion, the 1,3-BDC anions link the mixed-valence Cu(I)/Cu(II) atoms to generate a layer structure as is illustrated in Fig. 2. Notably, the HL ligand is deprotonated to L with a negative charge when it coordinates to both Cu(II) and Cu(I) atoms. Each ligand L bridges two Cu(I) atoms and chelates one Cu(II) atom in a tridentate coordination mode. In this way, the ligands L further link the layers into a 3D framework structure (Fig. 3). Topological analysis shows that the coordination polymer 1 is a novel example of the 3D (3,3,4)-connected (4.7.9)(7.8.9)(4.7.8.93) net with each Cu2(μ2-O2CR)4 core as a 4-connected node, and each Cu(I) and each L as 3-connected nodes (Fig. 4).

Fig. 1: Coordination environments of the Cu(II) and Cu(I) atoms in 1. Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: (A) x, −y + 3/2, z − 1/2; (B) −x + 1, y + 1/2, −z + 1/2; (C) x, −y + 1/2, z + 1/2; (D) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1; (E) –x + 2, y + 1/2, –z + 1/2.
Fig. 1:

Coordination environments of the Cu(II) and Cu(I) atoms in 1. Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: (A) x, −y + 3/2, z − 1/2; (B) −x + 1, y + 1/2, −z + 1/2; (C) x, −y + 1/2, z + 1/2; (D) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1; (E) –x + 2, y + 1/2, –z + 1/2.

Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) for 1 with estimated standard deviations in parentheses.a

Compound 1
Distances
 Cu(1)–N(4)A1.925(3)Cu(1)–N(3)1.956(2)
 Cu(1)–O(3)B2.126(2)Cu(2)–O(1)1.939(3)
 Cu(2)–O(4)C1.963(2)Cu(2)–N(2)2.015(3)
 Cu(2)–N(1)2.019(2)Cu(2)–O(2)D2.351(3)
Angles
 N(4)A–Cu(1)–N(3)149.47(10)N(4)i–Cu(1)–O(3)B115.75(11)
 N(3)–Cu(1)–O(3)B94.28(9)O(1)–Cu(2)–O(4)C91.26(10)
 O(1)–Cu(2)–N(2)163.79(11)O(4)C–Cu(2)–N(2)94.53(10)
 O(1)–Cu(2)–N(1)92.33(10)O(4)C–Cu(2)–N(1)174.17(10)
 N(2)–Cu(2)–N(1)80.81(11)O(1)–Cu(2)–O(2)D111.7(1)
 O(4)C–Cu(2)–O(2)D102.02(9)N(2)–Cu(2)–O(2)D81.87(10)
 N(1)–Cu(2)–O(2)D80.89(10)

aFor symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms, see the caption to Fig. 1.

Fig. 2: View of the layer structure of 1 constructed by Cu(I), Cu(II) and 1,3-BDC.
Fig. 2:

View of the layer structure of 1 constructed by Cu(I), Cu(II) and 1,3-BDC.

Fig. 3: View of the 3D framework structure of 1.
Fig. 3:

View of the 3D framework structure of 1.

Fig. 4: View of the 3D (3,3,4)-connected (4.7.9)(7.8.9)(4.7.8.93) net in the crystal structure of 1.
Fig. 4:

View of the 3D (3,3,4)-connected (4.7.9)(7.8.9)(4.7.8.93) net in the crystal structure of 1.

2.2 Powder X-ray diffraction

To confirm whether the single crystal examined is truly representative of the bulk material, powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was carried out for 1. The experimental and simulated PXRD patterns are shown in Fig. 5. They show that the synthesized bulk material and the measured single crystals are identical within the error limits of the experiment.

Fig. 5: Simulated (red) and experimental (blue) PXRD patterns of 1.
Fig. 5:

Simulated (red) and experimental (blue) PXRD patterns of 1.

2.3 Magnetic properties

The temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility data of compound 1 were measured at an applied magnetic field of 1 kOe (1 kOe = 7.96 × 104 A m–1) in the temperature range of 2–300 K (Fig. 6). For 1, the χmT value at 300 K is 0.859 cm3 mol–1 K, which falls into the range of two isolated Cu(II) ions (S = 1/2) [26]. Upon cooling, the values of χmT decrease quickly, reaching a minimum value of 0.104 cm3 mol–1 K at 2 K. This feature indicates a strong antiferromagnetic interaction between Cu(II) ions in each binuclear unit [26]. The magnetic susceptibility in the temperature range of 300–90 K obeys the Curie–Weiss law with the Curie constant, C = 2.1 cm3 mol–1 K, and the Weiss constant, Θ = –457.1 K. The result of the analysis indicates that complex 1 shows a relatively strong exchange interaction between Cu(II) ions in diamagnetic Cu2(μ2-O2CR)4 units, where the Cu2···Cu2D separation is 4.30 Å (see also Fig. 1). Usually, bridging carboxylate anions induce a strong antiferromagnetic interaction between Cu(II) ions because of the small energy difference of the relevant orbitals of the Cu(II) ion and of the bridging species [27, 28].

Fig. 6: Plots of the temperature dependence of χmT (open squares) and χm−1 (open triangles) of 1.
Fig. 6:

Plots of the temperature dependence of χmT (open squares) and χm−1 (open triangles) of 1.

3 Experimental section

3.1 General

All reagents and solvents used in the experiment were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. The C, H and N elemental analyses were conducted on a Perkin-Elmer 240C elemental analyzer. The PXRD patterns of the samples were recorded on a Rigaku Dmax 2000 X-ray diffractometer with graphite monochromatized CuKα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility data for polycrystalline compound 1 were obtained on a Quantum Design MPMSXL SQUID magnetometer under an applied field of 1 kOe over the temperature range of 2–300 K.

3.2 Synthesis of compound 1

A mixture of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (0.24 g, 1 mmol), HL (0.32 g, 1 mmol), 1,3-H2BDC (0.166 g, 1 mmol) and H2O (10 mL) was stirred for 1 h, and then sealed in an 18 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel container. The mixture was heated at 185 °C for 6 days and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 10 °C h–1. Navy blue crystals of 1 were collected in 33 % yield based on Cu. Analysis for C27H14Cu2FN4O4 (604.50): calcd. C 53.64, H 2.33, N 9.27; found C 53.25, H 2.02, N 9.36.

3.3 X-ray structure determination

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data for 1 were recorded at a temperature of 293(2) K on a Rigaku RAXIS-RAPID image plate diffractometer with MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) using ω scans. Absorption corrections were applied using ψ scans. The structure was solved with Direct Methods (shelxs-97 [29,30]) and refined with full-matrix least squares using shelxl-97 [31,32]. The non-hydrogen atoms of the complex were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. The hydrogen atoms attached to a carbon atom were generated geometrically. The phenyl ring C22–C27 bearing the fluorine substituent was found to be positionally disordered with respect to the F atom. The distances of C23–F1 and C27–F1′ were restrained to 1.35 ± 0.01 Å.

CCDC 1043326 for 1 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper (Table 2). These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Table 2

Crystal structure data for 1.

Compound1
FormulaC27H14Cu2FN4O4
Mr604.50
Crystal size, mm30.29 × 0.18 × 0.16
Crystal systemMonoclinic
Space groupP21/c
a, Å10.686(4)
b, Å17.376(8)
c, Å11.759(4)
β, deg92.072(14)
V, Å32182.1(15)
Z4
Dcalcd, g cm–31.84
μ(MoKα), mm–12.0
F(000), e1212
hkl range±13, ±22, ±15
θ range, deg3.02–27.48
Refl. collect./unique/Rint4961/3924/0.0509
Data/ref. parameters3924/347
R1/wR2 [I > 2σ(I)]0.0443/0.1126
R1/wR2 (all data)0.0588/0.1202
GoF (F2)1.052
Δρmaxρmin, e Å–31.43/−0.48

Corresponding author: Zhi-Guo Kong, College of Chemistry, Jilin Normal University, Siping 136000, P.R. China, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Key Laboratory of Preparation and Applications of Environmental Friendly Materials and the Science and Technology Research Projects of the Education Committee of Jilin Province (No. 2013206).

References

[1] O. M. Yaghi, H. Li, J.Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10401.10.1021/ja00146a033Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. H. K. Yip, J. Wu, K.-Y. Wong, K.-W. Yeung, J. J. Vittal, Organometallics2012, 21, 1612.Search in Google Scholar

[3] H.-Y. Liu, J. Yang, Y.-Y. Liu, J.-F. Ma, Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 9922.10.1039/c2dt12382gSearch in Google Scholar

[4] J. Tao, M.-L. Tong, X.-M. Chen, J Chem Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 20, 3369.Search in Google Scholar

[5] G.-G. Gao, L. Xu, X.-S. Qu, H. Liu, Y.-Y. Yang, Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 3402.10.1021/ic7025126Search in Google Scholar

[6] N. N. Murthy, M. M. Tahir, K. D. Karlin, Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 628.10.1021/ic000792ySearch in Google Scholar

[7] J. Tao, M.-L. Tong, J.-X. Shi, X.-M. Chen, S. W. Ng, Chem. Commun. 2000, 20, 2043.10.1039/b005753nSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Z.-M. Hao, J. Wang, X.-M. Zhang, Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2010, 12, 1103.10.1039/B915615ASearch in Google Scholar

[9] M.-G. Liu, P.-P. Zhang, J. Peng, H.-X. Meng, X. Wang, M. Zhu, D.-D. Wang, C.-L. Meng, K. Alimaje, Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 1273.10.1021/cg2012809Search in Google Scholar

[10] E. Pidcock, H. V. Obias, M. Abe, H. C. Liang, K. D. Karlin, E.-I. Solomon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1299.10.1021/ja983310eSearch in Google Scholar

[11] J.-Y. Lu, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 246, 327.10.1136/bmj.327.7409.246Search in Google Scholar

[12] W.-X. Ni, M. Li, S.-Z. Zhan, J.-Z. Hou, D. Li, Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 1433.10.1021/ic8015244Search in Google Scholar

[13] J.-P. Zhang, S.-L. Zheng, X.-C. Huang, X.-M. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 206.10.1002/anie.200352627Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. S. El Fallah, F. Badyine, R. Vicente, A. Escuer, X. Solans, M. Font-Bardia, Chem. Commun. 2006, 29, 3113.10.1039/B605078FSearch in Google Scholar

[15] J. Tao, Y. Zhang, M.-L. Tong, X.-M. Chen, T. Yuen, L. Lin, X.-Y. Huang, J. Li, Chem Commun. 2002, 13, 1342.10.1039/b203301aSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Y.-Z. Zheng, M.-L. Tong, X.-M. Chen, New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 1412.10.1039/b409696gSearch in Google Scholar

[17] T. Kumar Maji, D. Ghoshal, E. Zangrando, J. Ribas, N. Ray Chaudhuri, Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2004, 101, 623.10.1039/b414642eSearch in Google Scholar

[18] T. Okubo, N. Tanaka, K. H. Kim, H. Yone, M. Maekawa, T. Kuroda-Sowa, Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 3700.10.1021/ic1003098Search in Google Scholar

[19] M.-M. Liu, J.-J. Hou, Z.-K. Qi, L.-N. Duan, W.-J. Ji, C.-Y. Han, X.-M. Zhang, Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 4130.10.1021/ic5001232Search in Google Scholar

[20] X.-M. Zhang, M.-L. Tong, X.-M. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1029.10.1002/1521-3773(20020315)41:6<1029::AID-ANIE1029>3.0.CO;2-BSearch in Google Scholar

[21] J.-M. Zheng, S. R. Batten, M. Du, Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3371.10.1021/ic0483491Search in Google Scholar

[22] J.-K. Cheng, Y.-B. Chen, L. Wu, J. Zhang, Y.-H. Wen, Z.-J. Li, Y.-G. Yao, Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3386.10.1021/ic050301fSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Z.-G. Kong, X.-R. Sun, L. Li, H.-X. Wang, X.-Y. Wang, S.-W. Ng, Trans. Met. Chem. 2013, 38, 449.10.1007/s11243-013-9710-zSearch in Google Scholar

[24] L. Yan, C. Li, Y. Wang, J. Mol. Struct. 2013, 1035, 455.10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.11.066Search in Google Scholar

[25] Z.-G. Kong, Y. He, N. Xu, J. Guo, D. Li, Z. Naturforsch. 2012, 67b, 23.10.5560/ZNB.2012.67b0023Search in Google Scholar

[26] Q.-F. Yang, Z.-G. Gu, C.-H. Li, J.-Q. Tao, J.-L. Zuo, X.-Z. You, Inorg. Chim. Acta2007, 360, 2875.10.1016/j.ica.2007.01.017Search in Google Scholar

[27] P. Smoleński, J. Kłak, D. S. Nesterov, A. M. Kirillov, Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 5852.10.1021/cg301107kSearch in Google Scholar

[28] H.-J. Chen, Z.-W. Mao, S. Gao, X.-M. Chen, Chem. Commun. 2001, 22, 2320.10.1039/b106314fSearch in Google Scholar

[29] G. M. Sheldrick, shelxs-97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[30] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 1990, A46, 467.10.1107/S0108767390000277Search in Google Scholar

[31] G. M. Sheldrick, shelxl-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[32] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-4
Accepted: 2015-6-17
Published Online: 2015-10-13
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 20.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2015-0095/html
Scroll to top button