Home Physical Sciences Synthesis and structural characterization of a novel copper(II)/lead(II) heterometallic organic–inorganic hybrid
Article Publicly Available

Synthesis and structural characterization of a novel copper(II)/lead(II) heterometallic organic–inorganic hybrid

  • Gao-Feng Wang EMAIL logo , Xiao Zhang EMAIL logo , Shu-Wen Sun , Chen-Zhong Yao , Zhao-Rong Liu , Yu-Chun Wang and Yuan-Zhong Liu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 21, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A new copper(II)/lead(II) complex [(terpy)3CuPb5Br12] (1) (terpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine) has been synthesized and characterized by IR, elemental analysis, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The copper(II) and lead(II) ions in the title complex are in distorted six- (Cu(II), Pb(II)) and eight-fold (Pb(II)) coordination environments, in which the donor atoms are provided by bromide anions and nitrogen atoms of the 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine ligands. Complex 1 contains [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– building blocks. These bromoplumbate(II) clusters are connected by (terpy)2Cu2Br4 units along the crystallographic b axis and by PbBr6 units along the a axis, thereby forming an extended sheet structure.

1 Introduction

Organic–inorganic hybrid compounds have attracted increasing interest due to their intriguing aesthetic structures [1–15], as well as their interesting electrical, optical, and magnetic properties [2, 16–21]. One of the most extensively studied groups of organic–inorganic hybrid compounds is based on lead(II) halides, which are typically constructed from MXn polyhedra connected in corner-, edge-, or face-sharing arrangements [1, 3, 6–14, 17, 19–21]. The connectivity of the structures greatly depends on the nature of the organic ligands, the stoichiometry of the reagents, and the reaction conditions. A great number of organic–inorganic hybrid compounds have been synthesized by modification of these conditions [1, 3, 13, 14, 22–24].

In the class of inorganic–organic hybrid materials, a novel family of materials has been described, in which metal complexes are employed as template cations for the preparation of heterometallic hybrids [1, 3, 6–12, 20, 21, 25–27]. In contrast to the organic cations, that have been studied extensively [28, 29], little work has been done with the metal complex cations. By using different sizes of cations, polyanions with unusual structures are often formed. For example, zur Loye and co-workers have prepared novel iodometallate compounds [Co(terpy)2]2[Bi2I9][I] (terpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine) [1] and [Co(terpy)2][Bi2I8] [6] using the cation [Co(terpy)2]2+. We became interested in the combination of PbBrn polyhedra with metal complex cations. Recently we have reported two novel heterometallic organic–inorganic hybrids with unprecedented structures, [Co(terpy)2]4[Pb8Br24·2(DMF)]·8(DMF) (2) and {[Co(terpy)2]4[Pb16Br40]H2O}n, prepared from [Co(terpy)2]2+, PbBr2, and KBr [3], which represent the highest nuclearity for Pb–Br clusters and the first example incorporating a PbBr7 unit in bromoplumbates.

As part of our research on the synthesis of terpy-based complexes, we report here the synthesis and characterization of a heterometallic complex, [(terpy)3CuPb5Br12] (1), constructed from (terpy)CuBr3, (terpy)PbBr5, and PbBr6 polyhedra connected in corner- and edge-sharing arrangements. The unprecedented cluster [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– is an integral part of the crystal structure. These bromoplumbate(II) clusters are connected by (terpy)2Cu2Br4 and by PbBr6 units. Such a structure, to our knowledge, has not been reported before for polymeric haloplumbate(II) hybrids.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Preparation and characterization of the copper(II)/lead(II) complex 1

The complex [(terpy)3CuPb5Br12] (1) was prepared as a green crystalline product under a hydrothermal condition via the combination of 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine, CuCl2, and PbBr2. The complex is air stable and insoluble in common organic solvents such as acetonitrile, acetone, alcohol, and dichloromethane.

Complex 1 was characterized by infrared (IR), elemental analysis, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Weak IR bands centered at 3057 cm–1 can be assigned to ν(C–H) of the terpy ligands. A large group of bands in the region 1630–1430 cm–1 are characteristic of ν(C=N) and ν(C=C) stretches of aromatic groups and reveal the presence of terpy ligands.

The structure of the title complex 1 is shown in Fig. 1 with the atom labeling scheme. The crystal structure data are summarized in Table 1. Selected bond lengths and angles are tabulated in Table 2. Crystals are orthorhombic with space group Pnnm with four formula units. The asymmetric unit contains five lead atoms, 1.5 terpy ligands, one copper atom, and nine independent bromine atoms.

Fig. 1: Coordination environments of complex 1 and atom numbering adopted. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. For symmetry operations see Table 2.
Fig. 1:

Coordination environments of complex 1 and atom numbering adopted. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. For symmetry operations see Table 2.

Table 1

Summary of crystallographic data for the complex [(terpy)6Cu2Pb10Br24] (1).

Empirical formulaC45H33Br12CuN9Pb5
Formula weight, g cm–32758.21
T, K293(2)
Crystal systemOrthorhombic
Space groupPnnm
a, Å15.0060(15)
b, Å20.570(2)
c, Å20.303(2)
V, Å–36267.0(11)
Z4
Dcalcd., g m–32.92
μ(MoKα), mm–121.4
F(000), e4900
θ range, deg1.41–25.01
hkl range–17 → 13, ±24, ±24
Refl. total/unique/Rint20696/5574/0.0538
Data/restraints/ref. param.5547/36/320
R1/wR2 [I > 2σ(I)]0.0707/0.1579
R1/wR2 (all data)0.0825/0.1652
Goodness-of-fit on F21.082
Largest peak/hole, e Å–32.19/–2.18
Table 2

Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for complex 1.a

Br(1)–Pb(3)3.0452(9)Br(6)–Cu(1)2.342(2)N(3)–Pb(1)2.588(6)
Br(1)–Pb(2)3.1192(10)Br(6)–Pb(5)3.1815(14)Pb(2)–Br(2)#32.9403(12)
Br(2)–Pb(2)2.9403(12)Br(7)–Cu(1)2.7842(19)Pb(2)–Br(1)#33.1193(10)
Br(2)–Pb(3)2.9850(14)Br(7)–Pb(5)2.9753(12)Pb(2)–Br(1)#43.1193(10)
Br(3)–Pb(4)3.0034(7)Br(8)–Pb(1)3.0007(9)Pb(2)–Br(1)#23.1193(10)
Br(3)–Pb(3)3.0870(8)Br(9)–Pb(1)3.1478(7)Pb(3)–Br(1)#23.0452(9)
Br(3)–Pb(1)3.3728(8)Br(9)–Pb(1)#13.1478(7)Pb(3)–Br(3)#23.0870(8)
Br(4)–Pb(3)3.0395(15)Cu(1)–N(5)2.014(10)Pb(4)–Br(3)#23.0034(7)
Br(4)–Pb(5)3.0867(13)Cu(1)–N(4)#22.030(8)Pb(4)–Br(3)#13.0034(7)
Br(5)–Pb(5)2.8805(13)Cu(1)–N(4)2.030(8)Pb(4)–Br(3)#53.0034(7)
Br(5)–Pb(4)3.0094(12)N(1)–Pb(1)2.505(6)Pb(4)–Br(5)#53.0094(12)
Br(5)–Pb(1)3.7995(5)N(2)–Pb(1)2.511(6)Pb(5)–Br(8)#23.0119(8)
Pb(3)–Br(1)–Pb(2)77.67(2)N(2)–Pb(1)–N(3)65.06(19)Br(4)–Pb(3)–Br(3)92.98(2)
Pb(2)–Br(2)–Pb(3)81.45(3)N(1)–Pb(1)–Br(8)74.94(16)Br(1)–Pb(3)–Br(3)168.20(3)
Pb(4)–Br(3)–Pb(3)88.48(2)N(2)–Pb(1)–Br(8)80.61(14)Br(1)#2–Pb(3)–Br(3)91.48(2)
Pb(3)–Br(4)–Pb(5)130.51(5)N(3)–Pb(1)–Br(8)88.55(14)Br(3)#2–Pb(3)–Br(3)89.55(3)
Pb(5)–Br(5)–Pb(4)131.55(5)N(1)–Pb(1)–Br(9)80.90(16)Br(3)#2–Pb(4)–Br(3)#1180
Cu(1)–Br(6)–Pb(5)93.84(5)N(2)–Pb(1)–Br(9)76.92(14)Br(3)#2–Pb(4)–Br(3)#587.24(3)
Cu(1)–Br(7)–Pb(5)90.01(5)N(3)–Pb(1)–Br(9)96.39(14)Br(3)#1–Pb(4)–Br(3)#592.76(3)
Pb(1)–Br(8)–Pb(5)103.69(3)Br(8)–Pb(1)–Br(9)152.30(2)Br(3)#2–Pb(4)–Br(3)92.76(3)
Pb(1)–Br(9)–Pb(1)#1103.09(3)Br(2)#3–Pb(2)–Br(1)96.38(3)Br(3)#1–Pb(4)–Br(3)87.24(3)
N(5)–Cu(1)–N(4)#277.6(2)Br(2)–Pb(2)–Br(1)83.62(3)Br(3)#2–Pb(4)–Br(5)95.48(2)
N(5)–Cu(1)–N(4)77.6(2)Br(2)#3–Pb(2)–Br(1)#383.62(3)Br(3)#1–Pb(4)–Br(5)84.52(2)
N(4)#2–Cu(1)–N(4)154.9(4)Br(2)–Pb(2)–Br(1)#396.38(3)Br(3)#5–Pb(4)–Br(5)84.52(2)
N(5)–Cu(1)–Br(6)170.7(3)Br(1)–Pb(2)–Br(1)#3180Br(3)–Pb(4)–Br(5)95.48(2)
N(4)#2–Cu(1)–Br(6)102.0(2)Br(2)#3–Pb(2)–Br(1)#483.62(3)Br(3)#2–Pb(4)–Br(5)#584.53(2)
N(4)–Cu(1)–Br(6)102.0(2)Br(1)#3–Pb(2)–Br(1)#297.32(4)Br(5)–Pb(5)–Br(4)95.03(4)
N(5)–Cu(1)–Br(7)91.2(3)Br(2)–Pb(3)–Br(4)176.07(4)Br(7)–Pb(5)–Br(4)174.72(4)
N(4)#2–Cu(1)–Br(7)91.9(2)Br(2)–Pb(3)–Br(1)84.17(3)Br(8)–Pb(5)–Br(4)92.482(18)
N(4)–Cu(1)–Br(7)91.9(2)Br(4)–Pb(3)–Br(1)98.70(3)Br(8)#2–Pb(5)–Br(4)92.483(18)
Br(6)–Cu(1)–Br(7)98.05(6)Br(2)–Pb(3)–Br(1)#284.17(3)Br(8)–Pb(5)–Br(6)90.978(18)
C(23)#2–N(5)–Cu(1)119.9(5)Br(4)–Pb(3)–Br(1)#298.70(3)Br(8)#2–Pb(5)–Br(6)90.978(18)
N(1)–Pb(1)–N(2)64.8(2)Br(2)–Pb(3)–Br(3)84.24(2)Br(4)–Pb(5)–Br(6)96.63(4)
N(1)–Pb(1)–N(3)129.0(2)

aSymmetry operations: #1x, –y+ 1, z; #2x, y, –z; #3x– 1, –y+ 1, –z; #4x– 1, –y+ 1, z; #5x, –y+ 1, –z; #6x, –y, z.

In the crystal clusters, [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– are observed (Fig. 2), which to our knowledge are unprecedented. These building blocks are connected by a hexabromo-coordinated octahedral atom Pb2 resulting in triply bridging PbBr3Pb units through edge sharing of octahedra. This leads to the formation of a zigzag chain running along the a axis (Fig. 3a). The clusters are further connected by the dinuclear copper units (terpy)Cu2Br4 through four-membered CuBr2Pb rings leading to a two-dimensional network (Figs. 3b and 4a). The layers are further linked by terpy ligands through weak ππ interactions of Cg(1) and Cg(2) (Fig. 4b) with the distance of 3.774(11) Å (symmetry operation: 1/2 + x, 1/2 – y, 12 – z; Cg(1) stands for ring C1-C2-C3-C4-C5-N1, Cg(2) for ring C11-C12-C13-C14-C15-N3) resulting in a weakly bound 3D network.

Fig. 2: The [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– bromoplumbate(II) cluster in complex 1.
Fig. 2:

The [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– bromoplumbate(II) cluster in complex 1.

Fig. 3: Illustrations of the crystal structure of 1: (a) chains running along the crystallographic a axis; atom Pb2 referred to in the text is the hexa-coordinated Pb atom connecting the [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– units; (b) chains running along the b axis; the unit connecting the [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– is the dinuclear building block (terpy)Cu2Br4.
Fig. 3:

Illustrations of the crystal structure of 1: (a) chains running along the crystallographic a axis; atom Pb2 referred to in the text is the hexa-coordinated Pb atom connecting the [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– units; (b) chains running along the b axis; the unit connecting the [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– is the dinuclear building block (terpy)Cu2Br4.

Fig. 4: Illustrations of the crystal structure of 1: (a) sheets as seen down the crystallographic c axis; (b) projection of the crystal structure as seen down the a axis.
Fig. 4:

Illustrations of the crystal structure of 1: (a) sheets as seen down the crystallographic c axis; (b) projection of the crystal structure as seen down the a axis.

In the following, some key features of the crystal and molecular structure shall be briefly discussed. The Pb–Br distances are in the range 2.8805(13) to 3.799(5) Å, which is consistent with the data reported in the literature [3, 7, 11–14, 30]. The Cu1–Br6 and Cu1–Br7 of 1 are 2.342(2) and 2.7842(19) Å, and the Cu1–N4 and Cu1–N5 bond lengths are 2.030(8) and 2.014(10) Å, respectively, which are in agreement with those reported in other copper complexes [15]. The ligand terpy is almost planar with N–C–C–N torsion angles of 1.74° (Cu) and 1.18° (Pb). The metal ions Pb2, Pb3, Pb4, and Pb5 are in a distorted octahedral coordination environment of six bromine atoms, while Pb1 are coordinated by five bromine atoms and three nitrogen atoms of a terpy ligand. The bromine atoms that are bound to Pb atoms have different connectivities. The Cu1 atom is coordinated to three terpyridyl N atoms, one μ2-bromine atom (Br7), and two μ3-bromine atoms (Br6 and Br6#6, symmetry operation: –x, –y, z), thus forming a Cu2Br4(terpy)2 unit. The Pb1 atom is coordinated to two μ2-Br atoms (Br8 and Br9) and three μ3-Br atoms (Br5, Br3, and Br3#1, symmetry operation: –x, –y+ 1, z). The Pb2, Pb3, and Pb4 atoms are bonded to six bridging bromine atoms. The coordination sphere of Pb5 includes the Br4 (μ2), Br5 (μ4), Br7 (μ2), Br8 (μ2), Br8 (μ2), and Br6 (μ3) atoms.

3 Conclusion

In summary, a novel heterometallic bromoplumbate(II)-based complex, [(terpy)3CuPb5Br12] (1), has been synthesized and structurally characterized. It contains the unprecedented anions [(terpy)4Pb9Br20]2– as well as four-membered CuBr2Pb and CuBr2Cu rings. The formation of 1 confirms that 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine is a very useful ligand for the self-assembly of organic–inorganic hybrid materials.

4 Experimental section

4.1 Materials and measurements

All solvents, CuCl2·2H2O, KBr, PbBr2, and 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine (terpy) were commercially available and purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Shanghai, China) and used as received. Elemental analyses were performed on an Elementar Vario ELIII elemental analyzer. The IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Vector 22 spectrophotometer with KBr pellets in the 4000–400 cm–1 region.

4.2 Synthesis of the complex [(terpy)3CuPb5Br12] (1)

CuCl2·2H2O (51 mg, 0.3 mmol) and terpy (139.8 mg, 0.6 mmol) were dissolved in 5 mL H2O, and the mixture was stirred for 20 min. PbBr2 (110.0 mg 0.3 mmol) and KBr (35.7 mg, 0.3 mmol) in 5 mL H2O was added to the above solution. The mixture was stirred for another 20 min. Then it was placed in a Teflon reactor (40 mL) and heated at 150 °C for 24 h. Finally, the temperature was lowered at a rate of 10 °C h–1 to room temperature to give block-shaped crystals with dark green color. C45H33Br12CuN9Pb5 (1) (13 mg, yield based on Cu: 15.7 %). – Analysis for C45H33Br12CuN9Pb5: C 19.60, H, 1.21, N, 4.57; found: C 19.58, H 1.18, N 4.61 %. – IR (cm–1): 3057(w), 2959(w), 1621(m), 1591(s), 1575(s), 1563(m), 1475(s), 1446(s), 1430(w), 1304(w), 1238(w), 1156(m), 1051(w), 1007(m), 971(m), 899(w), 827(w), 775(s), 722(w), 648(m), 633(w), 509(w).

4.3 Crystal structure determination

All measurements were made on a Bruker SMART Apex II CCD diffractometer using graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) by using an φ–ω scan mode at T = 293(2) K. An absorption correction was applied using the program SADABS [31]. The structure was solved by Direct Methods [32] with the program SHELXTL (version 6.10) [31] and refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques on F2 with SHELXTL [32, 33]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, and the hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically. Disorder of atoms C5, C6, C7, C8, C9, and C10 was found which was modeled with displacement parameter restraints.

CCDC 1036238 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.


Corresponding authors: Gao-Feng Wang, Department of Applied Chemistry, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng 044000, P. R. China, e-mail: ; Xiao Zhang, Academy of Fundamental and Interdisciplinary Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang 150080, P. R. China, e-mail: ; and Yuan-Zhong Liu, Department of Medical Diagnostics, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215163, P. R. China, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for financial support from Young Teacher Starting-up Research of Yuncheng University (No. YQ-2013012) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51108122).

References

[1] A. M. Goforth, M. A. Tershansy, M. D. Smith, L. Peterson, J. G. Kelley, W. J. I. DeBenedetti, H.-C. zur Loye, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 133, 603.10.1021/ja108278jSearch in Google Scholar

[2] X. Zhang, M. Hejazi, S. J. Thiagarajan, W. R. Woerner, D. Banerjee, T. J. Emge, W. Xu, S. J. Teat, Q. Gong, A. Safari, R. Yang, J. B. Parise, J. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2013, 135, 17401.10.1021/ja4077556Search in Google Scholar

[3] G.-F. Wang, L. Chen, X.-J. Song, Y.-Z. Li, X.-T. Chen, Z.-L. Xue, Polyhedron2014, 81, 550.10.1016/j.poly.2014.06.060Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. J. Ewing, P. Vaqueiro, Inorg. Chem.2014, 53, 8845.10.1021/ic5011314Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. A. Tershansy, A. M. Goforth, J. M. Ellsworth, M. D. Smith, H.-C. zur Loye, CrystEngComm2008, 10, 833.Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. A. Tershansy, A. M. Goforth, L. Peterson Jr, M. C. Burns, M. D. Smith, H.-C. zur Loye, Solid State Sci. 2007, 9, 895.Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. D. Rogers, A. H. Bond, D. M. Roden, Inorg. Chem.1996, 35, 6964.10.1021/ic960587bSearch in Google Scholar

[8] J.-P. Li, L.-H. Li, L.-M. Wu, L. Chen, Inorg. Chem.2009, 48, 1260.Search in Google Scholar

[9] S. Mishra, E. Jeanneau, S. Daniele, G. Ledoux, P. N. Swamy, Inorg. Chem.2008, 47, 9333.10.1021/ic8010376Search in Google Scholar

[10] G.-E. Wang, M.-S. Wang, M.-J. Zhang, L.-Z. Cai, B.-W. Liu, C.-J. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, J.-S. Huang, Inorg. Chem. Commun.2012, 23, 137.10.1016/j.inoche.2012.07.009Search in Google Scholar

[11] W. Bi, N. Mercier, N. Louvain, M. Latroche, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2006, 2006, 4225.10.1002/ejic.200600634Search in Google Scholar

[12] S. Taheri, F. Marandi, H.-K. Fun, R. Kia, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2009, 635, 1352.10.1002/zaac.200900043Search in Google Scholar

[13] A. P. Wight, M. E. Davis, Chem. Rev.2002, 102, 3589.10.1021/cr010334mSearch in Google Scholar

[14] F. Marandi, L. Saghatforoush, I. Pantenburg, G. Meyer, J. Mol. Struct.2009, 938, 277.10.1016/j.molstruc.2009.09.042Search in Google Scholar

[15] L. M. Engelhardt, J. M. Harrowfield, H. Miyamae, J. M. Patrick, B. W. Skelton, A. A. Soudi, A. H. White, Aust. J. Chem.1996, 49, 1135.10.1071/CH9961135Search in Google Scholar

[16] D.-Q. Feng, X.-P. Zhou, J. Zheng, G.-H. Chen, X.-C. Huang, D. Li, Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 4255.10.1039/c2dt12081jSearch in Google Scholar

[17] A. Dolbecq, E. Dumas, C. R. Mayer, P. Mialane, Chem. Rev.2010, 110, 6009.10.1021/cr1000578Search in Google Scholar

[18] P. Natarajan, M. Schmittel, Inorg. Chem.2013, 52, 8579.10.1021/ic400676jSearch in Google Scholar

[19] M.-S. Wang, G. Xu, Z.-J. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 361.10.1039/B917890BSearch in Google Scholar

[20] H.-H. Li, L.-G. Sun, Z.-R. Chen, Y.-J. Wang, J.-Q. Li, Aust. J. Chem.2008, 61, 391.10.1071/CH08035Search in Google Scholar

[21] Z.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Xiang, Y.-F. Zhang, A.-Q. Wu, L.-Z. Cai, G.-C. Guo, J.-S. Huang, Inorg. Chem.2006, 45, 1972.10.1021/ic051350vSearch in Google Scholar

[22] N. Louvain, W. Bi, N. Mercier, J.-Y. Buzaré, C. Legein, G. Corbel, Dalton Trans.2007, 965.Search in Google Scholar

[23] D. G. Billing, A. Lemmerer, CrystEngComm2006, 8, 686.10.1039/B606987HSearch in Google Scholar

[24] D. G. Billing, A. Lemmerer, CrystEngComm2009, 11, 1549.10.1039/b819455fSearch in Google Scholar

[25] N. G. Armatas, D. G. Allis, A. Prosvirin, G. Carnutu, C. J. O’Connor, K. Dunbar, J. Zubieta, Inorg. Chem.2008, 47, 832.10.1021/ic701573rSearch in Google Scholar

[26] H.-Z. Kou, O. Sato, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 9513.10.1021/ic701043fSearch in Google Scholar

[27] X.-P. Zhou, W.-X. Ni, S.-Z. Zhan, J. Ni, D. Li, Y.-G. Yin, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 2345.10.1021/ic061927oSearch in Google Scholar

[28] D. B. Mitzi, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.2001, 1.Search in Google Scholar

[29] S.-P. Zhao, X.-M. Ren, Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 8261.10.1039/c0dt01806fSearch in Google Scholar

[30] A. Bondi, J. Phys. Chem.1964, 68, 441.10.1021/j100785a001Search in Google Scholar

[31] G. M. Sheldrick, SADABS, Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[32] G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXTL (version 6.1), Software Reference Manual, Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[33] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-3-9
Accepted: 2015-4-2
Published Online: 2015-8-21
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 20.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2015-0041/html
Scroll to top button