Home Physical Sciences A new dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrone from an endophytic fungus Aspergillus niger AKRN associated with the roots of Entandrophragma congoënse collected in Cameroon
Article Publicly Available

A new dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrone from an endophytic fungus Aspergillus niger AKRN associated with the roots of Entandrophragma congoënse collected in Cameroon

  • Gervais M. Happi , Simeon Fogue Kouam EMAIL logo , Ferdinand M. Talontsi , Céline N. Nkenfou , Frida Longo , Sebastian Zühlke , Clovis Douanla-Meli and Michael Spiteller EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 20, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A new dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrone, 2-hydroxydihydronigerone (1), along with five compounds, nigerone (2), pyrophen (3), kojic acid (4), 4-(hydroxymethyl)-5-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-one (5), and p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (6), was isolated from an endophytic fungus Aspergillus niger AKRN associated with the roots of Entandrophragma congoënse. The structure of the new compound has been elucidated using spectroscopic data including 1D and 2D NMR as well as the high-resolution mass spectrometry. Compounds 15 showed weak antimicrobial activity on five selected Gram-negative bacteria, namely Enterobacter aerogenes (CM64), Enterobacter cloacae (BM67), Klebsiella pneumonia (K2), and Escherichia coli (ATCC8739 and ATCC10536).

1 Introduction

Endophytic fungi are eukaryotic organisms living inside the tissues of the host plants without causing any visible manifestations of disease, and live in mutualistic association with plant for at least a part of their life cycle [1]. These microorganisms have recently been recognized as a rich source of structurally novel natural products with high level of biodiversity, interesting biological activities, and may directly or indirectly be used as therapeutic agents or prodrugs against several diseases [1–3]. The genus Aspergillus from the Trichocomaceae family consists of a set of filamentous saprophytic fungi that can be found in almost all aerobic environments and is among the most common endophytic fungal genera in plants. This genus with over 180 species has been found to produce a wide range of secondary metabolites including alkaloids, terpenoids, cytochalasins, butyrolactones, and lignans, which showed antibacterial, antifungal, antifeedant, cytotoxicity, and anticancer activities [4–12]. Aspergillus niger is commonly isolated from plant tissues, and it produces α-pyrones, γ-pyrones, and naphtho-γ-pyrones as the most widely encountered classes of bioactive metabolites. Examples include campyrones A–C [13], nigerapyrones A–H, asnipyrones A–B [14], asperpyrones A–C [15], aurasperones A–E, rubrofusarin, flavasperone, and nigerone [16]. In addition, harmful mycotoxins such as malformin C [17], ochratoxin A, 3-nitropropionic acid, and oxalic acid have also been isolated [18]. As part of our ongoing search for bioactive compounds from a natural source, we investigated the chemical constituents of the fungal strain A. niger, isolated from the inner tissues of Entandrophragmacongoënse collected in Nkomokui near Yaounde, Cameroon, and fermented in static culture on solid rice. We report herein the isolation and characterization of a new dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrone 2-hydroxydihydronigerone (1).

2 Results and discussion

The fungal strain AKRN, isolated from the roots of E. congoënse (De Wild) A. chev. (Meliaceae), was identified as A. niger. The strain was cultured on a solid rice medium for 30 days and then extracted with ethyl acetate. Column chromatography of the crude extract led to the isolation of a new dimer of naphtho-γ-pyrone named 2-hydroxydihydronigerone (1) together with five known compounds: nigerone (2) [19], pyrophen (3) [20], kojic acid (4) [21], 4-(hydroxymethyl)-5-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-one (5) [22], and p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (6) [23].

Compound 1 was obtained as a yellow and optically active powder ([α]D20=56°). Its molecular formula was established as C32H29O11 from the [M + H]+ peak at m/z = 589.1733 (calcd. 589.1709 for C32H29O11) in the positive high resolution electronspray ionization mass spectroscopy (HRESIMS), indicating 20° of unsaturation. The IR spectrum exhibited strong absorptions at 1765 and 1653 cm−1 due to two carbonyl groups which were confirmed in the 13C NMR spectrum with signals at δC = 185.0 and 197.1 ppm. The UV spectrum showed absorption bands at λmax = 230, 278, and 330 nm, suggesting the presence of an extended conjugated ring system, characteristic of a heminigerone derivative [19]. The 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) exhibited signals for two chelated hydroxyl groups at δH = 15.23 and 14.60 ppm, two meta-coupled aromatic protons at δH = 6.40 and 6.20 ppm (1H each, J = 2.0 Hz), one olefinic proton at δH = 5.98 ppm (1H, s), one olefinic methyl group at δH = 2.09 ppm (3H, s), and four methoxyl groups at δH = 3.48 (3H, s), 3.49 (3H, s), 3.54 (3H, s), and 4.06 ppm (3H, s). In the 13C NMR spectrum, signals at δC = 21.1, 55.5, 55.6, and 56.1 ppm confirmed the presence of the olefinic methyl group and methoxyl groups. The 13C NMR spectrum (Table 1) also displayed signals including those of five methine groups (δC = 96.2, 96.8, 97.4 [× 2], and 107.6 ppm), and 30 quaternary sp2 carbons. In the heteronuclear multiple-bond correlation (HMBC) spectrum (Fig. 1), the olefinic proton signal at δH = 5.98 ppm displayed cross peaks with carbon signals at δC = 185.0 ppm (C-4) and 104.7 ppm (C-4a), which in turn showed correlations to the deshielded proton signal at δH = 15.23 ppm. The latter also showed correlations with carbon signals at δC = 151.9 ppm (C-5) and 107.1 ppm (C-5a), which also revealed an intense cross peak with the aromatic proton signal at δH = 6.40 ppm (H-7). Furthermore, the HMBC spectrum revealed important cross peaks due to 2J and 3J correlations of the aromatic proton signal at δH = 6.20 ppm (H-9) with the carbon signals at δC = 141.2 ppm (C-9a) and 109.0 ppm (C-10). These findings established the heminigerone moiety in the structure of 1. In addition, signals were observed at δH = 11.88 ppm (hydroxyl group) and δH = 2.90, 2.97 ppm (methylene group) in the 1H NMR spectrum, as well as signals at δC = 100.3 ppm (acetal group) and 47.2 ppm (methylene group) in its 13C NMR spectrum (Table 1). In the HMBC experiment, correlations were observed between the proton signal at δH = 1.41 ppm (methyl group) and carbon signals at δC = 100.3 ppm (acetal group) and 47.2 ppm (methylene group), suggesting the oxidation of one heminigerone moiety across one of the double bond at C-2 or C-2′ in the structure of 2. Furthermore, cross peaks were observed between the proton signal at δH = 14.60 ppm (OH-5′) and carbon signals at δC = 103.8 ppm (C-4a′), 151.9 ppm (C-5′), and 104.6 ppm (C-5a′), confirming the presence of the suggested hydrated heminigerone feature. Compound 1 is then a derivative of nigerone (2), consisting of two sub-structures including a heminigerone and a 2-hydroxydihydroheminigerone. Chemical shifts of different atoms in 1 were assigned on the basis of heteronuclear single-quantum coherence and HMBC spectra and by comparison of the NMR data with those of nigerone already published in the literature. The comparison of the calculated CD spectra (Fig. 2) for compound 1 and nigerone (2), as well as the reported data of the natural (–)-nigerone and related compounds [19, 24, 25], revealed the same respective conformers in compounds 1 and 2, as established in (–)-nigerone [24]. Consequently, the absolute configurations of compound 1 and nigerone (2) were assigned to be M [24]. However, the configuration of the chiral center C-2′ remained unknown as reported for similar 2,3 (or 2′,3′)-hydrated naphtho-γ-pyrones [15, 16, 26]. On the basis of this evidence, the structure of 1 was determined to be that of an asymmetrical dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrone consisting of heminigerone and 2′-hydroxydihydroheminigerone linked at C-10/C-10′ as shown in Fig. 3.

Table 1

1H and 13C NMR data for compounds 1 and 2a.

Position12
δHδCδHδC
2168.2167.6
35.98 (s)107.66.01 (s)107.2
4185.0184.5
4a104.7104.2
5151.9151.2
5a107.1105.4
6162.0161.1
76.40 (d, 2.0)97.46.43 (d, 2.2)97.1
8162.0161.8
96.20 (d, 2.0)96.26.06 (d, 2.2)96.3
9a141.2140.6
10109.0108.7
10a162.9163.0
CH3–22.09 (s)21.12.04 (s)20.5
OH–515.23 (s)15.33 (s)
OCH3–83.54 (s)55.63.49 (s)55.2
OCH3–64.06 (s)56.54.06 (s)56.1
2′100.3167.6
3′2.90 (s)2.97 (s)47.26.01 (s)107.2
4′197.1184.5
4a′103.8104.2
5′151.9151.2
5a′104.6105.4
6′162.9161.1
7′6.35 (d, 2.2)96.86.43 (d, 2.2)97.1
8′162.9161.8
9′5.96 (d, 2.2)97.46.06 (d, 2.2)96.3
9a′141.2140.6
10′108.0108.7
10a′165.4163.0
CH3–2′1.41 (s)29.02.04 (s)20.5
OH–211.88 (s)
OH–5′14.60 (s)15.33 (s)
OCH3–8′3.48 (s)55.53.49 (s)55.2
OCH3–6′3.49 (s)55.54.06 (s)56.1

aIn CDCl3 at 500/125 MHz; the coupling constants J (in Hz) and multiplicities are given in parentheses; chemical shifts δ are reported in ppm.

Fig. 1: Important HMBC correlations of 1.
Fig. 1:

Important HMBC correlations of 1.

Fig. 2: CD spectra of compound 1 and nigerone (2).
Fig. 2:

CD spectra of compound 1 and nigerone (2).

Fig. 3: Structures of isolated compounds 1–6.
Fig. 3:

Structures of isolated compounds 16.

The structures of the known compounds were established via spectroscopic data and/or by comparison with literature data.

The isolated compounds 15 which were obtained in sufficient quantity were evaluated against five bacterial strains, namely Enterobacter aerogenes (CM64), Enterobacter cloacae (BM67), Klebsiella pneumonia (K2), and Escherichia coli (ATCC8739 and ATCC10536). These tested secondary metabolites have shown a very weak inhibition on the bacterial growth, even at the highest concentration of 500 μg mL−1.

3 Chemotaxonomic significance

The genus Aspergillus has been reported as a rich source of several classes of secondary metabolites including pyrones, naphthopyrones, terpenoids, or steroids. The present study involved the investigation of the fungal endophyte Aspergillus niger AKRN strain fermented in static culture on solid rice, which yielded a mixture of four steroids as well as six pure compounds allocated into two naphtho-γ-pyrones (1, 2), one γ-pyrone (4), two α-pyrones (3, 5), and one acetic acid derivative (6). The occurrence of nigerone (2) and pyrophen (3) from A. niger has been reported [19, 20], whereas kojic acid (4) and 4-(hydroxymethyl)-5-hydroxy-2H-pyran-2-one (5) have been previously produced by A. oryzae and A. flavus, respectively [21, 22]. However, p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (6) has been noted previously from the fungal strain Stachylidium sp. [23], and the naphtho-γ-pyrone, namely 2-hydroxydihydronigerone (1), was found to be a new compound. The obtained results from our chemical investigation of A. niger AKRN have revealed constituents which are in agreement with the identification, the classification, and the chemotaxonomy of this fungal strain.

4 Experimental section

4.1 General experimental procedures

For general methods and instrumentation, see [27]. Melting points were determined with a Gallenkamp micro-melting point apparatus (Loughborough, UK) and are uncorrected. NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance-500 NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with trimethylsilyl (TMS) as internal standard. The CD spectrum was collected using a Jasco J-715 spectrometer (Jasco, Gross-Umstadt, Germany). HREIMS data were obtained with an LTQ Orbitrap Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an HESI-II source.

4.2 Fungal material and identification

Healthy roots of E. congoënse (Meliaceae) were collected in December 2013 at Nkomokui near Yaounde, Cameroon. The plant material was transported immediately to Higher Teachers’ Training College, University of Yaounde I, Cameroon, and processed within 48 h of collection. The plant samples were washed thoroughly in running tap water followed by distillated water to remove dust, debris, and any dirt sticking to them and stored at 4 °C until the isolation procedure. Surface sterilization of the plant material was done following the method described by Talontsi et al. [28]. Briefly, the small fragments of inner bark of the roots of approximately 20 mm (length) by 10 mm (breadth) were cut with the aid of a flame-sterilized razor blade. Then, the small stem fragments were surface-sterilized by sequential immersion in 70 % ethanol for 1 min, in 10 % sodium hypochlorite for 8 min, in 30 % ethanol for 1 min, and finally, rinsed two times in sterile distilled water for 1 min each, to remove excess surface sterilants, and then dried aseptically. The inner tissues were placed on isolation media (Nutrient Agar, NA) in Petri dishes supplemented with 100 mg/L ampicillin to eliminate any bacterial growth, and incubated at 27 °C until the outgrowth of endophytes was detected. Single fungal colonies were removed and transferred onto sterile NA. Each isolate was kept in a slant agar tube for future investigations. The endophytic fungus isolate AKRN was identified by one of the authors (C.D.-M.) on the basis of its 16S rRNA gene sequence and deposited in the microbial collection at the Institute of Environmental Research (INFU), Dortmund University of Technology, Dortmund, Germany.

4.3 Fermentation and isolation of compounds

The fungal endophyte strain AKRN was cultured on slants of NA at 27 °C for 7 days and then agar plugs were used to inoculate 50 Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing a sterilized medium of 60 g of rice and 80 mL of water, and incubated at room temperature under static conditions for 30 days. The culture was extracted three times with ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and the filtrate was concentrated to dryness in vacuo to obtain a yellow gum (15.8 g). A part of the extract (13.6 g) was subjected to flash silica gel column chromatography, using a gradient of ethyl acetate in hexane, then pure ethyl acetate followed by a gradient of methanol in ethyl acetate, to give 10 fractions named RN1 (pure hexane), RN2 (hexane-ethyl acetate, 9:1), RN3 (hexane-ethyl acetate, 4:1), RN4 (hexane-ethyl acetate, 7:3), RN5 (hexane-ethyl acetate, 3:2), RN6 (hexane-ethyl acetate, 5:5), RN7 (hexane-ethyl acetate, 25:75), RN8 (pure ethyl acetate), RN9 (ethyl acetate-methanol, 9:1), and RN10 (ethyl acetate-methanol, 7:3). The white amorphous powder obtained in fraction RN2 was analyzed by GC-MS and was found to contain a mixture of four steroids including ergosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, and γ-sitosterol. Fractions RN3 (103.2 mg), RN4 (306 mg), RN5 (600 mg), and RN6 (900 mg) were combined based on their TLC profiles, and the mixture was subjected to silica gel column chromatography at atmospheric pressure, using a gradient of methanol in dichloromethane to afford compounds 6 (09 mg), 2 (32 mg) and 5 (60 mg). According to their LC-MS profiles, sub-fractions F6–8 and F14–15 were purified separately by repeated semi-preparative reversed phase HPLC at wavelength 205 nm with the solvent system H2O + 0.1 % HCOOH (A)–MeOH (B) with a gradient program as described above to give compounds 3 (12 mg, tR = 6.47 min), 4 (14 mg, tR = 8.10 min), and 1 (21 mg, tR = 10.04 min).

2-Hydroxydihydronigerone (1). Yellow powder; m.p.: 168170 °C[α]D20=56° (c = 1.0, CHCl3). – HRMS [(+)-ESI]: m/z = 589.1733 (calcd. 589.1709 for C32H29O11, [M + H]+). – UV (MeOH): λmax = 230, 278, 330 nm. – IR (KBr): ν = 1765 (C=O), 1653, 1611, 1404, 1206, 1166, 1122, 1026, 764 cm−1. – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS) and 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): see Table 1.

4.4 Microdilution assay

The antimicrobial activity of each of the five tested compounds was determined by the microdilution method on selected bacterial strains: one strain of Gram-negative E. aerogenes, the chloramphenicol-resistant derivative over-producing the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump (CM-64); one strain of E. cloacae AcrAB-TolC efflux pump (BM 67); one strain of K. pneumonia AcrAB-TolC (K2); and finally two strains of E. coli reference strains (ATCC 8739 and ATCC 10536) [29]. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the methylene blue colorimetric assay [30]. Briefly, compounds to be tested were first dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The solution obtained was then added to Mueller Hinton broth (MHB), and serially diluted twofold (in a 96-well microplate). One hundred microliters (100 μL) of inoculum (1.5 × 106 mL−1) prepared in MHB was then added. The prepared extract (100 μL) was added in the first well of each column of a microtiter plate containing 100 μL of medium in each well and serially diluted twofold. Then, 100 μL of inoculum prepared in MHB (Sigma-Aldrich) was added for a final concentration of 106 mL−1. The plate was covered with a sterile cover plate and then incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. The final concentration of DMSO was 2.5 % and did not affect the microbial growth. Wells containing MHB, 100 μL of inoculum, and DMSO at a final concentration of 2.5 % served as negative control. The MICs of samples were read after 18 h of incubation at 37 °C, following the addition of 20 μL of a 0.2 mg mL−1 methylene blue solution and incubation at 37 °C for 30 min. Viable bacteria reduce the blue and the medium become colorless. MIC was defined as the lowest sample concentration that exhibited complete inhibition of microbial growth. Ciprofloxacin was used as reference antibiotic.


Corresponding authors: Simeon Fogue Kouam, Department of Chemistry, Higher Teachers’ Training College, University of Yaounde I, PO Box 47, Yaounde, Cameroon, Tel.: +237-94-46-45-35, E-mail: ; and Michael Spiteller, Institute of Environmental Research (INFU) of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Chair of Environmental Chemistry and Analytical Chemistry, TU Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Str. 6, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany, Tel.: +49-231-755-4080, Fax: +49-231-755-4085, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Financial and material support for this work was provided by Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) through the program “Welcome to Africa”. We also appreciate the support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) for funding a high-resolution mass spectrometer. The Third World Academy of Science (Grant No. 10-004 RG/CHE/AF/AC-I) is also acknowledged. G.M.H. thanks the Dortmund University of Technology for 6 months’ fellowship that enabled him to work at the Institute of Environmental Research (INFU). We are grateful to Mr. Victor Nana for assisting in plant collection and identification and Mr. Emmanuel Rodrigue Guiffo for technical assistance.

References

[1] S. Kusari, S. P. Pandey, M. Spiteller, Phytochemistry2013, 91, 81.10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.07.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] A. A. L. Gunatilaka, J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 509.10.1021/np058128nSearch in Google Scholar

[3] B. J. E. Schulz, C. J. C. Boyle, Mycol. Res. 2005, 109, 661.10.1017/S095375620500273XSearch in Google Scholar

[4] S. Kusari, M. Lamshöft, M. Spiteller, J. Appl. Microbiol.2009, 107, 1019.10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04285.xSearch in Google Scholar

[5] S.-L. Luo, G.-H. Li, F.-F. Liu, L.-P. Lei, Z.-Y. Xia, K.-Q. Zhang, Nat. Prod. Res.2012, 26, 1334.10.1080/14786419.2011.583242Search in Google Scholar

[6] N. Ingavat, C. Mahidol, S. Ruchirawat, P. Kittakoop, J. Nat. Prod.2011, 74, 1650.10.1021/np200221wSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Y. Wang, J. Zheng, P. Liu, W. Wang, W. Zhu, Mar. Drugs2011, 9, 1368.10.3390/md9081368Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Z. K. Guo, T. Yan, Y. Guo, Y. C. Song, R. H. Jiao, R. X. Tan, H. M. Ge, J. Nat. Prod.2012, 75, 15.10.1021/np200321sSearch in Google Scholar

[9] M. M. S. Nagia, M. M. El-Metwally, M. Shaaban, S. M. El-Zalabani, A. G. Hanna, Org. Med. Chem. Lett.2012, 2, 9.10.1186/2191-2858-2-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] X.-J. Li, Q. Zhang, A.-L. Zhang, J.-M. Gao, J. Agric. Food Chem.2012, 60, 3424.10.1021/jf300146nSearch in Google Scholar

[11] C.-J. Zheng, C.-L. Shao, L.-Y. Wu, M. Chen, K.-L. Wang, D.-L. Zhao, X.-P. Sun, G.-Y. Chen, C.-Y. Wang, Mar. Drugs2013, 11, 2054.10.3390/md11062054Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] F. He, J. Bao, X.-Y. Zhang, Z.-C. Tu, Y.-M. Shi, S.-H. Qi, J. Nat. Prod.2013, 76, 1182.10.1021/np300897vSearch in Google Scholar

[13] F. M. Talontsi, K. D. M. Tatong, B. Dittrich, C. Douanla-Meli, H. Laatsch, Tetrahedron2013, 69, 7147.10.1016/j.tet.2013.05.098Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. Liu, X.-M. Li, L. Meng, C.-S. Li, S.-S. Gao, Z. Shang, P. Proksch, C.-G. Huang, B.-G. Wang, J. Nat. Prod.2011, 74, 1787.10.1021/np200381uSearch in Google Scholar

[15] K. Akiyama, S. Teraguchi, Y. Hamasaki, M. Mori, K. Tatsumi, K. Ohnishi, H. Hayashi, J. Nat. Prod.2003, 66, 136.10.1021/np020174pSearch in Google Scholar

[16] K. C. Ehrlich, A. J. Delucca II, A. Ciegler, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.1984, 48, 1.10.1128/aem.48.1.1-4.1984Search in Google Scholar

[17] B. Kobbe, M. Cushman, G. N. Wogan, A. L. Demain, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.1977, 33, 996.10.1128/aem.33.4.996-997.1977Search in Google Scholar

[18] Z. C. Blumenthal, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.2004, 39, 214.Search in Google Scholar

[19] C. P. Gorst-Allman, P. S. Steyn, J. Christiaan, C. J. Rabie, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin I1980, 2474.10.1039/p19800002474Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Varoglu, P. Crews, J. Nat. Prod.2009, 63, 41.10.1021/np9902892Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. Yabuta, J. Chem. Soc.1924, 125, 575.10.1039/CT9242500575Search in Google Scholar

[22] A. Lin, X. Lu, Y. Fang, T. Zhu, Q. Gu, W. Zhu, J. Antibiot.2008, 61, 245.10.1038/ja.2008.36Search in Google Scholar

[23] C. Almeida, N. Part, S. Bouhired, S. Kehraus, G. M. König, J. Nat. Prod.2011, 74, 21.10.1021/np1005345Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. C. Kozlowski, E. C. Dugan, E. S. DiVirgilio, K. Maksimenka, G. Bringmann, Adv. Synth. Catal.2007, 349, 583.10.1002/adsc.200600570Search in Google Scholar

[25] K. Koyama, S. Natori, Y. Iitaka, Chem. Pharm. Bull.1987, 35, 4049.10.1248/cpb.35.4049Search in Google Scholar

[26] S. Ghosal, K. Biswas, D. K. Chakrabarti, J. Agric. Food Chem. 1979, 27, 1347.10.1021/jf60226a018Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. F. Kouam, S. Kusari, M. Lamshöft, O. K. Tatuedom, M. Spiteller, Phytochemistry2012, 83, 79.10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] F. M. Talontsi, P. Facey, M. D. K. Tatong, M. T. Islam, H. Frauendorf, S. Draeger, A. von Tiedemann, H. Laatsch, Phytochemistry2012, 83, 87.10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.06.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] J. A. Seukep, A. G. Fankam, D. E. Djeussi, I. K. Voukeng, S. B. Tankeo, J. A. K. Noumdem, A. H. L. N. Kuete, V. Kuete, Springer Plus2013, 2, 363.10.1186/2193-1801-2-363Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] M. H. Oliver, N. K. Harrison, J. E. Bishop, P. J. Cole, G. J. Laurent, J. Cell Sci.1989, 92, 513.10.1242/jcs.92.3.513Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-2-19
Accepted: 2015-4-30
Published Online: 2015-6-20
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 20.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2015-0036/html
Scroll to top button