Abstract
The thf-complexed silanimine tBu2Si=N–Sit- Bu3·thf (1(thf); monoclinic, space group C2/c) was prepared by the reaction of 1 equivalent of tBu2SiClN3 with 1 equivalent of Na[SitBu3] in Bu2O and subsequent addition of thf. By heating a benzene solution over a period of 11 d –140 °C, 1(thf) slowly released the thf donor to form the uncomplexed silanimine 1. However, under these conditions the silanimine 1 is unstable and is thermolized to give the ene reaction product of 1 with isobutene, H2C=C(CH2SitBu2–NH–SitBu3)2. By contrast, the thermolysis reaction of Me2Si=N–SitBu3·thf yielded the silanimine dimer (Me2SiNSitBu3)2 in 51 % and the vinyl ether Me2Si(OCH=CH2)NHSitBu3 in 49 % yield.
1 Introduction
In the past few decades, the reactivity of unsaturated silicon compounds has been extensively studied. In this period, several examples of stable compounds with Si=N double bonds (silanimines) have been synthesized and structurally characterized [1–18]. Ab-inito calculations have shown that the parent silanimine H2Si=N–SiH3 possesses an almost linear Si–N–Si skeleton with a short Si=N double bond and a short Si–N single bond [11]. Additionally, these calculations have revealed a negative charge of 1.71 on the N center of H2Si=N–SiH3. It is interesting to note that the molecular structure of the first characterized silanimine tBu2Si=N–SitBu3 (1) [1], which bears bulky tBu groups features nearly the same Si=N–Si skeleton as that calculated for H2Si=N–SiH3. Apparently, only electronic effects, namely the difference in electronegativity between Si and N, determine the molecular structure of this type of silanimines.
In 1986, Wiberg and co-workers reported the first synthesis of 1 by the reaction of 1 equivalent of the silyl azide tBu2SiClN3 with 1 equivalent of the silanides Na[SitBu3] [19, 20] in the weakly polar solvent Bu2O (Scheme 1) [1]. However, when this reaction was carried out in thf instead of Bu2O as solvent, the sodium amide tBu2SiCl–NNa–SitBu3 was formed rather than the silanimine 1 [21]. In this context, it should also be noted that the 2: 1 reaction of tBu2ClSiN3 with Na[SitBu3] [19, 20] yielded the [3+2] cycloadduct of tBu2ClSiN3 with 1 [22, 23].

Synthesis of the silanimine tBu2Si=N–SitBu3 (1). (i) –N2, –NaCl, in Bu2O, –78 °C. (ii) + thf.
Recently, we have reported that the tBu-substituted, donor-free silanimines 1 and tBu2Si=N–SiPhtBu2 [24] are thermolabile compounds that already decompose in benzene at r.t. [25]. In the course of their thermolysis, β-H elimination takes place to form isobutene. The purpose of the work described in this paper is to examine the thermal and chemical behavior of the thf-complexed silanimine 1(thf) and to make a comparison with the reactivity of its methyl-substituted congener Me2Si=N–SitBu3 · thf (2(thf)). Additionally, an X-ray crystal structure determination of the thf-complexed silanimine 1(thf) was performed to compare its structural parameters with those of the parent silanimine 1.
2 Results and Discussion
Following the approach of Wiberg et al. [1], we first prepared the donor-free silanimine 1 by the reaction of tBu2SiClN3 with Na[SitBu3] [19, 20] in the weakly polar solvent Bu2O. Subsequent treatment of a benzene solution of 1 with thf quantitatively gave the thf-complexed silanimine 1(thf) (Scheme 1). By storing a saturated benzene solution for 1 week at r.t. single crystals of a new polymorph of 1(thf) were obtained. This polymorph crystallized in the monoclinic space group C2/c.
To assess the stability of 1(thf), we conducted a series of thermolysis experiments. When a benzene solution of 1(thf) was heated in the absence of any silanimine trapping agent, no reaction was observed up to 140 °C. However, after heating the reaction mixture to 140 °C for 24 h, we found 16 % decomposition of 1(thf) (70 % after 6 days and 100 % after 11 d at 140 °C), and the ene reaction product of 1 with isobutene, H2C=C(CH2SitBu2–NH–SitBu3)2 (3) was formed along with other compounds (cf. Ref. [25]) (Scheme 2). Based on these findings, we concluded that in the thermolysis of 1(thf) the formation of 3 occurs via the donor-free silanimine 1. Interestingly, benzene solutions of 1(thf) can be stored for long periods at r. t. without noticeable decomposition of the silanimine. By contrast, degradation of donor-free 1 takes place in benzene already at r. t. to give 3 [25].

Decomposition of the thf-complexed silanimines R2Si=N–SitBu3 · thf (1(thf), R = tBu; 2(thf), R = Me). (i) -tBuHSiNSitBu3, in benzene, 11 d at 140 °C. (ii) -H2C=CH2, in benzene, 19 h at 110 °C.
As shown in Scheme 2, the thermolysis reaction of 2(thf) in benzene at 110 °C yielded the silanimine dimer 4 in 51 % and the vinyl ether 5 in 49 % yield. It is worth to mention that in the thermolysis of the corresponding silanimine amine adduct Me2Si=N–SitBu3 · NMe2Et the silyl amines EtNMeCH2SiMe2–NH–SitBu3 and EtNMeCH(Me2Si–NH–SitBu3)2 are formed by Stevens rearrangement [25].
The thf-complexed silanimine 1(thf) (Fig. 1) crystallizes together with a half molecule benzene in the asymmetric unit. The selected bond lengths and angles are listed in the caption of Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of 1(thf) in the solid state. Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg): Si(1)–N(1) 1.6025(16), Si(1)–O(1) 1.9151(15), Si(1)–C(21) 1.917(2), Si(1)–C(11) 1.922(2), Si(2)–N(1) 1.6714(16), Si(2)–C(41) 1.952(2), Si(2)–C(31) 1.954(2), Si(2)–C(51) 1.960(2); N(1)–Si(1)–O(1) 104.36(7), N(1)–Si(1)–C(21) 117.05(9), O(1)–Si(1)–C(21) 100.13(8), N(1)–Si(1)–C (11) 118.30(9), O(1)–Si(1)–C(11) 99.85(9), C(21)–Si(1)–C(11) 113.02(10), N(1)–Si(2)–C(41) 109.11(9), N(1)–Si(2)–C(31) 109.82(8), C(41)–Si(2)–C(31) 109.72(9), N(1)–Si(2)–C(51) 111.44(8), C(41)–Si(2)–C(51) 108.48(9), C(31)–Si(2)–C(51) 108.24(9), Si(1)–N(1)–Si(2) 172.47(11).
The present structure is that of a pseudo polymorph of the silanimine · thf adduct, which was reported by Wiberg et al. [1]. Whereas this adduct crystallizes in the primitive monoclinic space group P21/m with Z′ = 0.5, the structure which is presented in Fig. 1 has the monoclinic C-centered space group C2/c with Z′ = 1. Since no coordinates and therefore no structural parameters of the literature-known polymorph (monoclinic space group P21/m) are available, no comparison of structural parameters of the two polymorphs can be made.
As shown in Table 1, the thf-complexed silanimine 1(thf) displays a Si–N–Si angle somewhat smaller than 180°, and smaller than that in the donor-free silanimine 1, but significantly larger than those in the thf adduct 2(thf) [1: Si–N–Si = 177.8(2)°; 1(thf): Si–N–Si = 172.47(11)°; 2(thf): Si–N–Si = 161.0(6)°, 161.5(6)°]. The Si=N double bond [1.6025(16) Å] in 1(thf) is longer than the bond of the parent silanimine 1 and those of the thf adduct 2(thf) [1: Si=N = 1.568(3) Å; 1(thf): Si=N = 1.6025(16) Å; 2(thf): Si=N = 1.574(10), 1.588(9) Å]. As depicted in Table 1, the N–Si single bonds in the parent silanimine 1 and in the silanimine adducts 1(thf) and 2(thf), however, are remarkably shorter than those found in related supersilylated nitrogen compounds.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) of supersilylated silanimines R2Si=N–SitBu3 (1, R = tBu, 1 · thf = 1(thf); 2, R = Me; 2 · thf = 2(thf)).
Si=N | N–SitBu3 | Si–N–Si | |
---|---|---|---|
1 [1] | 1.568(3) | 1.695(3) | 177.8(2) |
1(thf) | 1.6025(16) | 1.6714(16) | 172.47(11) |
2(thf)a [1] | 1.574(10)/ 1.588(9) | 1.654(9)/ 1.667(10) | 161.0(6)/ 161.5(6) |
aTwo crystallographically independent molecules.
While the chemical behavior of the thf-supported silanimines 1(thf) resembles that of the corresponding donor-free silanimine 1 (e.g., ene reaction with acetone or insertion reaction with water as trapping agent [26]), the use of the thermally stable thf-complex 1(thf) instead of the parent silanimine 1 appears to be particularly advantageous for preparative chemistry.
3 Experimental section
The solvents thf, pentane, benzene, and C6D6 were stirred over sodium/benzophenone and distilled prior to use. 1 [1] and 2(thf) [1] were prepared according to the published procedures. All other starting materials were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. The NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AM 250, DPX 250, Avance 400, and Avance 500 spectrometers. NMR chemical shifts are reported in ppm. Abbreviations d = doublet; dd = doublet of doublets. For quantitative separation, the dried filtrate was redissolved and separated by HPLC (Reprosil-Pur C18-AQ, 250 mm × 20 mm, 10 μm, Maisch GmbH, Germany; Sykam S3310 UV detector, λ = 254 nm; Sykam Refractive Index Monitor RI2000) with isocratic elution.
3.1 tBu2Si=N–SitBu3 · thf (1(thf))
The thf-complexed silanimine 1(thf) was prepared by a modified literature-known procedure [26]. To a benzene (5 mL) solution of 1 (0.37 g; 1.03 mmol) thf (0.5 mL) was added. X-ray-quality crystals of 1(thf) were grown from a concentrated benzene solution after one week at r. t. 1(thf): M. p. 143 °C. – 1H NMR (250.1 MHz; C6D6; Me4Si): δ= 1.11 (CH2), 1.17 (SitBu2), 1.46 (SitBu3), 3.94 ppm (OCH2). – 13C NMR (62.9 MHz; C6D6; Me4Si): δ = 24.3 (CH2), 24.9 (CMe3), 25.6 (CMe3), 30.5 (CMe3), 32.3 (CMe3), 73.5 ppm (OCH2). – 29Si NMR (49.7 MHz; C6D6; Me4Si): δ = 1.1 (SitBu2), –14.7 ppm (SitBu3).
3.2 Thermolysis of 1(thf)
1(thf) (0.05 g, 0.12 mmol) was dissolved in C6D6 (0.6 mL). The solution was heated in a sealed NMR tube to 140 °C for 11 d. The NMR spectra of the solution revealed that 3 [25], the ene reaction product of 1 with isobutene, was formed in 60 % yield.
3.3 Thermolysis of 2(thf)
2(thf) (0.02 g, 0.05 mmol) was dissolved in C6D6 (0.6 mL). The solution was heated in a sealed NMR tube to 110 °C for 19 h. The NMR spectra of the solution revealed that the silanimine dimer 4 [21] was formed in 51 % and the vinyl ether 5 in 49 % yield. The vinyl ether 5 was separated by HPLC (Reprosil-pur C18-AQ, flow rate: 3 mL min–1, two solvent system (MeOH-TBME 2: 1, τ = 19 min). 5: – 1H NMR (250.1 MHz; C6D6; Me4Si): δ = 0.22 (SiMe2), 1.13 (SitBu3), 4.18 (d, J = 5.86 Hz; H2C= (cis)), 4.63 (d, J = 13.7 Hz; H2C= (trans)), 6.48 ppm (dd, =CH–O). – 29Si NMR (49.7 MHz; C6D6; Me4Si): δ = –1.2 (SiMe2), 6.8 ppm (SitBu3);
3.4 Crystal structure determination
Data of 1(thf) were collected on a Stoe IPDS II two-circle diffractometer with a Genix Microfocus tube with mirror optics using MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and were scaled using the frame scaling procedure in the X-area program system [27]. The structure was solved by Direct Methods using the program Shelxs [28] and refined against F2 with full-matrix least-squares techniques using the program Shelxl-97 [29].
The C atoms of the thf ligand are disordered over two positions with a site occupation factor of 0.635(9) for the major occupied site. The benzene molecule is disordered over two positions with a site occupation factor of 0.68(1) for the major occupied site. The disordered atoms were refined isotropically. Details of the crystal structure analysis are summarized in Table 2.
Crystallographic data of 1(thf).
1(thf) | |
---|---|
Empirical formula | C27H56NOSi2 |
Mr | 466.91 |
Crystal size, mm3 | 0.38 × 0.35 × 0.2 |
Crystal system | Monoclinic |
Space group | C2/c |
a, Å | 32.441(2) |
b, Å | 11.4072(4) |
c, Å | 17.0477(11) |
β, deg | 111.247(5) |
V, Å3 | 5879.9(6) |
Z | 8 |
Dcalcd., g cm–3 | 1.06 |
μ(MoKα), mm–1 | 0.1 |
F(000), e | 2088 |
hkl range | –38/39, ±13, ±20 |
((sinθ)/λ)max, Å–1 | 0.609 |
Refl. measured | 46347 |
Refl. unique/Rint | 5531/0.064 |
Param. refined | 275 |
R(F)/wR(F2)a,b (all refls.) | 0.0620/0.1196 |
GoF (F2)c | 1.040 |
a/bb | 0.0498/9.2353 |
Δρfin (max/min), e Å–3 | 0.37/–0.28 |
aR(F) = ∑||Fo|−|Fc||/∑|Fo|; bwR(F2) = [∑w(Fo2−Fc2)2/∑w(Fo2)2]1/2, w = [σ2(Fo2)+(aP)2+bP]–1, where P = (Max(Fo2, 0)+2Fc2)/3; cGoF = [∑w(Fo2−Fc2)2/(nobs−nparam)]1/2.
CCDC 1009965 (1(thf)) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
References
[1] N. Wiberg, K. Schurz, G. Reber, G. Müller, Chem. Commun. 1986, 591–592.10.1039/C39860000591Suche in Google Scholar
[2] G. Reber, J. Riede, N. Wiberg, K. Schurz, G. Müller, Z. Naturforsch. 1989, 44b, 786–795.Suche in Google Scholar
[3] H. Cui, B. Ma, C. Cui, Organometallics 2012, 31, 7339–7342.10.1021/om3009958Suche in Google Scholar
[4] L. Kong, C. Cui, Organometallics 2010, 29, 5738–5742.10.1021/om1005676Suche in Google Scholar
[5] R. Azhakar, H. W. Roesky, J. J. Holstein, K. Pröpper, B. Dittrich, Organometallics 2013, 32, 358–361.10.1021/om301149qSuche in Google Scholar
[6] R. S. Ghadwal, H. W. Roesky, K. Pröpper, B. Dittrich, S. Klein, G. Frenking, Angew. Chem.Int. Ed. 2011,50,5374–5378.Suche in Google Scholar
[7] R. S. Ghadwal, H. W. Roesky, C. Schulzke, M. Granitzka, Organometallics 2010, 29, 6329–6333.10.1021/om100737vSuche in Google Scholar
[8] P. P. Samuel, R. Azhakar, R. S. Ghadwal, S. S. Sen, H. W. Roesky, M. Granitzka, J. Matussek, R. Herbst-Irmer, D. Stalke, Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 11049–11054.Suche in Google Scholar
[9] I. A. Cade, A. F. Hill, A. Kämpfe, J. Wagler, Organometallics 2010, 29, 4012–4017.10.1021/om100146mSuche in Google Scholar
[10] S.-H. Zhang, H.-W. Xi, K. H. Lim, C.-W. So, Angew. Chem.Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12364–12367.Suche in Google Scholar
[11] S.-H. Zhang, H.-W. Xi, K. H. Lim, Q. Meng, M.-B. Huang, C.-W. So, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 4258–4263.Suche in Google Scholar
[12] S. H. Zhang, H. X. Yeong, C. W. So, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3490–3499.Suche in Google Scholar
[13] O. Flögel, J. Dash, I. Brüdgam, H. Hartl, H.-U. Reissig, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4283–4290.Suche in Google Scholar
[14] J. Niesmann, U. Klingebiel, M. Schäfer, R. Boese, Organometallics 1998, 17, 947–953.10.1021/om9710430Suche in Google Scholar
[15] S. Walter, U. Klingebiel, D. Schmidt-Bäse, J. Organomet. Chem. 1991, 412, 319–326.Suche in Google Scholar
[16] T. Iwamoto, N. Ohnishi, Z. Gui, S. Ishida, H. Isobe, S. Maeda, K. Ohno, M. Kira, New J. Chem. 2010, 34, 1637–1645.Suche in Google Scholar
[17] M. Denk, R. K. Hayashi, R. West, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10813–10814.Suche in Google Scholar
[18] P. von Ragué Schleyer, P. D. Stout, Chem. Commun. 1986, 1373–1374.10.1039/C39860001373Suche in Google Scholar
[19] H.-W. Lerner, Coord, Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 781–798.Suche in Google Scholar
[20] N. Wiberg, K. Amelunxen, H.-W. Lerner, H. Schuster, H. Nöth, I. Krossing, M. Schmidt-Amelunxen, T. Seifert, J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 542, 1–18.Suche in Google Scholar
[21] H.-W. Lerner, M. Bolte, K. Schurz, N. Wiberg, G. Baum, D. Fenske, J. W. Bats, M. Wagner, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 4998–5005.10.1002/ejic.200600614Suche in Google Scholar
[22] H.-W. Lerner, N. Wiberg, J. W. Bats, J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 3898–3907.Suche in Google Scholar
[23] H.-W. Lerner, N. Wiberg, K. Polborn, Z. Naturforsch. 2002, 57b, 1199–1206.Suche in Google Scholar
[24] H.-W. Lerner, S. Scholz, M. Bolte, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2001, 627, 1638–1642.Suche in Google Scholar
[25] H.-W. Lerner, I. Sänger, M. Bolte, M. Wagner, Z. Naturforsch. 2010, 65b, 72–78.Suche in Google Scholar
[26] N. Wiberg, K. Schurz, G. Fischer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1053–1054.Suche in Google Scholar
[27] X-area, Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt (Germany) 2002.Suche in Google Scholar
[28] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 1990, A46, 467–473.Suche in Google Scholar
[29] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112–122.Suche in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- 2,3-Dihydro-4,5-diisopropyl-1,3-dimethylimidazol-2-yliden und seine Chalkogenone
- Syntheses and structural characterization of coordination polymers of Cu(II) and Zn(II) chlorobenzoates and bis(pyridin-4-yl)-substituted species
- New transition metal-rich rare-earth palladium/platinum aluminides with RET5Al2 composition: structure, magnetism and 27Al NMR spectroscopy
- Crystal structure and thermal decomposition of the Silanimine tBu2Si=N-SitBu3·thf
- Hydrometallation of amino-dialkynylgermanes – a gallium hydride oligomer and intramolecular Lewis acid-base interactions
- Porphyrin substituent regiochemistry, conformation and packing – the case of 5,10-diphenylporphyrin
- New crystal structures in the realm of 5,5′-azotetrazolates
- Ternary aurides RE4Mg3Au10 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) and their silver analogues
- Photochemisch induzierte C–C-Verknüpfungen zwischen einem Mangan-koordinierten Pentadienylliganden und Acetylen
- Syntheses, single-crystal structure determination, and Raman spectra of Rb[C(CN)3] and Cs[C(CN)3]
- Crystal structure of the europium(II) aluminate Eu3Al2O6
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- 2,3-Dihydro-4,5-diisopropyl-1,3-dimethylimidazol-2-yliden und seine Chalkogenone
- Syntheses and structural characterization of coordination polymers of Cu(II) and Zn(II) chlorobenzoates and bis(pyridin-4-yl)-substituted species
- New transition metal-rich rare-earth palladium/platinum aluminides with RET5Al2 composition: structure, magnetism and 27Al NMR spectroscopy
- Crystal structure and thermal decomposition of the Silanimine tBu2Si=N-SitBu3·thf
- Hydrometallation of amino-dialkynylgermanes – a gallium hydride oligomer and intramolecular Lewis acid-base interactions
- Porphyrin substituent regiochemistry, conformation and packing – the case of 5,10-diphenylporphyrin
- New crystal structures in the realm of 5,5′-azotetrazolates
- Ternary aurides RE4Mg3Au10 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy) and their silver analogues
- Photochemisch induzierte C–C-Verknüpfungen zwischen einem Mangan-koordinierten Pentadienylliganden und Acetylen
- Syntheses, single-crystal structure determination, and Raman spectra of Rb[C(CN)3] and Cs[C(CN)3]
- Crystal structure of the europium(II) aluminate Eu3Al2O6