Home Crystal structure of the europium(II) aluminate Eu3Al2O6
Article Publicly Available

Crystal structure of the europium(II) aluminate Eu3Al2O6

  • Oliver Niehaus and Rainer Pöttgen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 6, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Well-shaped single crystals of the europium(II) aluminate Eu3Al2O6 were obtained as a side product during a synthesis attempt for EuCdAl. The structure was refined from single crystal X-ray diffractometer data of a twinned specimen: Ca3Al2O6 type, Pa3¯,a=1584.82(2) pm, wR=0.0570, 2034 F2 values, and 103 variables. All aluminium atoms in the Eu3Al2O6 structure show tetrahedral oxygen coordination, and the AlO4 tetrahedra (173–178 pm Al–O) are condensed via common corners to two-dimensional networks. The six crystallographically independent europium sites have coordination numbers 6, 7, 8, and 9, and their europium–oxygen polyhedra are linked with the AlO4 tetrahedra to a dense packing. Bond-valence calculations reveal two sets of differently bonded europium atoms.

1 Introduction

Europium can adopt two different valence states, Eu2+ with a [Xe]4f7 and Eu3+ with a [Xe]4f6 configuration, leading to different magnetic ground states. This is already realized for the binary oxides. EuO with the simple rock salt structure contains purely divalent europium and shows ferromagnetic ordering at 70 K [1–3]. On the other hand, Van Vleck type paramagnetism occurs for Eu2O3 [4, 5] with exclusively trivalent europium. Mixed-valent Eu3O4 (≡ EuIIEu2IIIO4) shows antiferromagnetic ordering only of the Eu2+ site at TN=5 K. This is evident through magnetic hyperfine field splitting of the Eu(II) signal in 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy [6, 7].

The comparatively high Curie temperature of EuO initiated many investigations for ternary Eu(II)-based oxidic materials. The titanates EuTiO3 (TN=5.3 K) [8, 9], Eu2TiO4 (TC=7.8 K), and Eu3Ti2O7 (TC=8 K) [9] were among the first examples, similar to the silicates EuSiO3, Eu2SiO4, and Eu3SiO5 [10]. Especially the perovskite EuTiO3 is broadly reinvestigated with respect to its structural instability and multiferroic behavior (e.g., [11–13]).

Phase analytical work in the EuO–Al2O3 system and thermochemical investigations of the reduction process of Eu2O3 with aluminium led to the aluminates EuAl2O4, Eu3Al2O6, and Eu5Al2O8 [10, 14]. These phases have intensively been studied with respect to their synthesis conditions, their crystal optical and magnetic properties, for their complex dielectric constants, or with respect to AlN/aluminate composite formation [10, 14–21].

Among these aluminates, Eu3Al2O6 [15] is a ferromagnet with TC=8.5 K. This phase has so far only been characterized with respect to its properties. Even lattice parameters are not available. Eu3Al2O6 is isotypic with the C3A clinker phase (an important component in Portland cement) Ca3Al2O6 [22] and Sr3Al2O6 [23]. During a synthesis attempt of an equiatomic compound ‘EuCdAl’ in a sealed niobium ampoule (strongly reducing atmosphere), we obtained small amounts of irregularly shaped single crystals of Eu3Al2O6 as a byproduct. Surface-contaminated europium and/or cadmium were the oxygen source. A single crystal X-ray diffractometer study of Eu3Al2O6 is reported herein.

2 Experimental

The starting materials for the preparation of the intermetallic phase were sublimed ingots of europium (Alfa-Aesar), cadmium tear drops (Johnson Matthey), and aluminium turnings (Koch Chemicals). Although the air- and moisture-sensitive europium ingots were kept in Schlenk tubes under argon prior to the reaction, they were most likely the oxygen source through surface oxidation. The elements were weighed in the ideal 1:1:1 atomic ratio and arc-welded [24] in a niobium tube under 800 mbar of argon. Argon was purified with titanium sponge (900 K), silica gel, and molecular sieves. The niobium ampoule was subsequently placed in the water-cooled sample chamber of an induction furnace (Typ TIG 1.5/300; Hüttinger Elektronik, Freiburg, Germany) [25]. The sample was first heated to 1323 K, maintained at that temperature for 5 min, and then annealed at 873 K for 2 h, followed by quenching. The temperature was controlled by a Sensor Therm Methis MS09 pyrometer with an accuracy of ±30 K. Afterward, the niobium tube was sealed in a silica tube under vacuum, rapidly heated to 1273 K, and cooled down to 673 K within 12 days in order to achieve a better crystallinity. No reaction with the container material was observed; however, within the reaction product, we obtained a small quantity of Eu3Al2O6 single crystals.

Irregularly shaped crystal fragments with dark amber color were selected from the crushed ‘EuCdAl’ sample. The crystals were glued to thin quartz fibers using beeswax and their quality was checked by Laue photographs on a Buerger camera (white molybdenum radiation, image plate technique, BAS-1800, Fujifilm). The data set was collected using an IPDS II diffractometer (graphite monochromatized MoKα radiation; oscillation mode, room temperature). A numerical absorption correction was applied to the data set. All relevant crystallographic data and details of the data collection and evaluation are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Crystal data and structure refinement of Eu3Al2O6 with Ca3Al2O6 type structure.

Refined compositionEu3Al2O6
Formula weight, g mol–1605.85
Unit cell dimensions
a, pm1584.82(2)
Cell volume, nm33.9805
Space group; ZPa3¯; 24
Pearson codecP264
Calculated density, g cm–36.06
Crystal size, μm320×30×80
DiffractometerIPDS II
Radiation; wavelength, pmMoKα; 71.073
Transmission ratio (min; max)0.213; 0.672
Absorption correctionNumerical
Absorption coefficient, mm–128.2
Detector distance, mm90
Exposure time, min5
ω Range; increment, deg0–180; 1.0
Integr. param. A; B; EMS11.6; 1.7; 0.012
F(000), e6312
θ Range for data collection, deg2.3–30.6
Range in hkl+15, +15, +22
Total no. of reflections147 287
Independent reflections; Rint2034; 0.1319
Reflections with I>3 σ(I); Rσ566; 0.1891
Data; parameters2034; 103
Goodness-of-fit on F20.40
R1; wR for I>3σ(I)0.0121; 0.0239
R1; wR for all data0.0570; 0.0294
Twin matrix010, 100, 001¯
Twin ratio79.0(2):21.0(2)
Extinction coefficient0.00467(5)
Largest diff. peak; hole, e Å–30.35; –0.42

Several Eu3Al2O6 crystal fragments were analyzed by semiquantitative EDX analysis using a Zeiss EVO MA10 scanning electron microscope with EuF3 and Al2O3 as standards. No impurity elements (especially from the crucible material and cadmium) heavier than sodium (detection limit of the instrument) were observed. The experimentally determined composition (23 ± 3 at.-% Eu:18 ± 3 at.-% Al:59 ± 3 at.-% O) was close to that obtained from the structure refinement (27.3:18.2:54.5). The standard deviations account for the irregular shape of the crystals (typical conchoidal fracture; see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 A single crystal of Eu3Al2O6. The maximum edge length is 80 μm.
Fig. 1

A single crystal of Eu3Al2O6. The maximum edge length is 80 μm.

2.1 Structure refinement

The diffractometer data set showed a primitive cubic lattice with low Laue symmetry. The systematic extinctions were compatible with space group Pa3¯, in agreement with the earlier studies on Ca3Al2O6 [22] and Sr3Al2O6 [23]. The atomic parameters of Sr3Al2O6 [23] were taken as starting values, and the structure was refined with anisotropic displacement parameters for all atoms with the Jana2006 software [26]. However, the two crystallographically independent aluminium sites as well as the O1 site showed non-positive definite anisotropic displacements and the residual still was enhanced. The present crystal showed merohedric twinning. Subsequently, the twin matrix 010, 100, 001¯ was introduced and the refinement went smoothly to the residuals listed in Table 1. The refined twin ratio was 79.0(2):21.0(2). The positional parameters and interatomic distances (along with calculated bond-valence values [27, 28]) are listed in Tables 2 and 3. Further information on the structure refinement is available.

Table 2

Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (pm2) of Eu3Al2O6.

AtomWyckoff positionxyzUeq
Eu14a00075(2)
Eu24b1/21/21/259(2)
Eu38c0.25093(4)xx102(2)
Eu48c0.37536(4)xx97(1)
Eu524d0.13319(4)0.13495(4)0.37517(4)106(1)
Eu624d0.12539(4)0.38016(4)0.38444(4)81(1)
Al124d0.0166(2)0.0200(2)0.2518(2)47(7)
Al224d0.0041(2)0.2385(2)0.2331(2)56(7)
O124d0.0015(3)0.2621(4)0.1247(5)112(16)
O224d0.1296(4)0.2448(5)0.4938(5)119(17)
O324d0.0987(4)0.2720(4)0.2761(4)106(16)
O424d0.2338(4)0.4054(4)0.2787(4)106(16)
O524d0.0272(5)0.4809(5)0.1535(4)150(20)
O624d0.0181(4)0.4823(4)0.3452(4)115(19)

Ueq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor.

Table 3

Interatomic distances (in Å), and BVSs (with coordination numbers in brackets) for Eu3Al2O6.

DistanceBVaDistanceBV
Eu16O62.4860.400Eu61O62.4290.467
BVS [6]=2.4001O42.4330.462
Eu26O52.4890.3971O32.4630.426
BVS [6]=2.3821O62.7210.212
Eu33O32.4680.4201O22.7590.191
3O42.5020.3831O62.7990.172
BVS [6]=2.4091O12.8530.148
Eu43O12.6870.232BVS [7]=2.078
3O42.7580.192Al11O61.7380.790
3O52.9660.1091O11.7470.771
BVS [9]=1.5991O51.7660.733
Eu51O52.4140.4861O21.7750.715
1O22.5630.325BVS [4]=3.009
1O32.7350.204Al21O31.7300.808
1O12.7750.1831O11.7590.747
1O42.8290.1581O41.7680.729
1O32.8520.1491O21.7690.727
1O52.8820.137BVS [4]=3.011
1O22.9160.125
BVS [8]=1.767

Standard deviations are all equal or smaller than 0.2 pm.

aBV=e(r0–r)/b with the following parameters: b=0.37, r0 (EuII–O)=2.147, and r0 (Al–O)=1.651 Å [27, 28].

Further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: +49-7247-808-666; e-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de, http://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/request_for_deposited_data.html) on quoting the deposition number CSD-428778.

2.2 Crystal chemistry

The aluminate Eu3Al2O6 crystallizes with the cubic Ca3Al2O6-type structure [22]. The calcium compound is one of the important so-called clinker phases in Portland cement [29]. Other isotypic phases are Sr3Al2O6 [23] and Sr3Ga2O6 [30]. In the case of the strontium phases, a homogeneous solid solution Sr3Al2–xGaxO6 occurs [31]. Crystallization of these aluminate phases is not simple. Only the prototype structure has been refined from X-ray film data [22], whereas the structures of Sr3Al2O6 [23] and Sr3Ga2O6 [30] were deduced from Rietveld refinements based on X-ray and neutron powder diffraction data.

Herein we report on the first crystallographic study of Eu3Al2O6. This aluminate crystallizes with a comparatively large unit cell (a=1584.82 pm). The best approach for description of the structure relies on the metal–oxygen polyhedra. The Eu3Al2O6 structure has two crystallographically independent aluminium sites, both in tetrahedral oxygen coordination with Al–O distances ranging from 173 to 178 pm. For both sites, the bond-valence sums (BVSs) (Table 3) are close to the ideal value. Three Al1@O4 and three Al2@O4 tetrahedra share common corners in –up–down–up–down–up–down– sequence, leading to hexagonal rings (Fig. 2) perpendicular to the threefold axis. These networks are condensed in the third direction via the europium atoms.

Fig. 2 Condensation of the aluminium–oxygen tetrahedra in the structure of Eu3Al2O6 (view along the threefold axis).
Fig. 2

Condensation of the aluminium–oxygen tetrahedra in the structure of Eu3Al2O6 (view along the threefold axis).

The Eu3Al2O6 structure contains six crystallographically independent europium sites, which can be assigned to two groups. The Eu1, Eu2, and Eu3 atoms have distorted octahedral oxygen coordination with a small range of Eu–O distances (247–250 pm). These EuO6 octahedra are linked to the network of AlO4 tetrahedra via common corners (Fig. 3). This network still leaves large voids that are filled with the Eu4, Eu5, and Eu6 atoms. These three europium sites have higher coordination numbers of 9, 8, and 7, respectively, with a much broader range of Eu–O distances (241–297 pm). The irregularly shaped Eu4@O9, Eu5@O8, and Eu6@O7 polyhedra are condensed to the octahedra via common triangular faces (Fig. 4), leading to a dense packing.

Fig. 3 The crystal structure of Eu3Al2O6. The octahedral (in magenta) and tetrahedral (in light gray) oxygen coordination around the Eu1, Eu2, Eu3, Al1, and Al2 atoms is emphasized. Voids left by this complex network are filled by the Eu4, Eu5, and Eu6 atoms.
Fig. 3

The crystal structure of Eu3Al2O6. The octahedral (in magenta) and tetrahedral (in light gray) oxygen coordination around the Eu1, Eu2, Eu3, Al1, and Al2 atoms is emphasized. Voids left by this complex network are filled by the Eu4, Eu5, and Eu6 atoms.

Fig. 4 Cutout of the Eu3Al2O6 structure, emphasizing the condensation of the europium–oxygen polyhedra.
Fig. 4

Cutout of the Eu3Al2O6 structure, emphasizing the condensation of the europium–oxygen polyhedra.

Although a simple ionic formula splitting 3Eu2+2Al3+6O2– leads to an electron-precise description of this transparent salt-like material, the course of the calculated BVSs (Table 3) reveals some differences for the six europium sites. The BVSs of Eu1, Eu2, and Eu3 are slightly higher than 2, and we observe average Eu–O distances that are shorter than those for Eu4, Eu5, and Eu6. This is consistent with stronger covalent Eu–O bonding for the octahedrally coordinated europium atoms, whereas Eu4, Eu5, and Eu6 show higher ionicity for the Eu–O bonds (with an almost optimal value for Eu6). A similar range of BVSs has been reported for the isotypic strontium compound [23].


Corresponding author: Rainer Pöttgen, Institut für Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 30, D-48149 Münster, Germany, e-mail:

Acknowledgments

We thank Dipl.-Ing. U. Ch. Rodewald for collection of the single crystal diffraction data. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. O. N. is indebted to the NRW Forschungsschule Molecules and Materials – A Common Design Principle for a PhD fellowship.

References

[1] B. T. Matthias, R. M. Bozorth, J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. Lett.1961, 5, 160.Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. B. McWhan, P. C. Souers, G. Jura, Phys. Rev.1966, 143, 385.Search in Google Scholar

[3] B. Stroka, J. Wosnitza, E. Scheer, H. v. Löhneysen, W. Park, K. Fischer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter1992, 89, 39.10.1007/BF01320827Search in Google Scholar

[4] S. Arajs, R. V. Colvin, J. Appl. Phys.1964, 35, 1181.Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. Kern, R. Kostelecky, J. Appl. Phys.1971, 42, 1773.Search in Google Scholar

[6] L. Holmes, M. Schieber, Phys. Rev.1968, 167, 449.Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. H. Wickman, E. Catalano, J. Appl. Phys.1968, 39, 1248.Search in Google Scholar

[8] T. R. McGuire, M. W. Shafer, R. J. Joenk, H. A. Alperin, S. J. Pickart, J. Appl. Phys.1966, 37, 981.Search in Google Scholar

[9] C.-L. Chien, S. DeBenedetti, F. De S. Barros, Phys. Rev. B1974, 10, 3913.10.1103/PhysRevB.10.3913Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. W. Shafer, J. Appl. Phys.1965, 36, 1145.Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Bussmann-Holder, J. Köhler, R. K. Kremer, J. M. Law, Phys. Rev. B2011, 83, 212102.10.1103/PhysRevB.83.212102Search in Google Scholar

[12] D. S. Ellis, H. Uchiyama, S. Tsutsui, K. Sugimoto, K. Kato, A. Q. R. Baron, Physica B2014, 442, 34.10.1016/j.physb.2014.02.041Search in Google Scholar

[13] K. Caslin, R. K. Kremer, Z. Guguchia, H. Keller, J. Köhler, A. Bussmann-Holder, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter2014, 26, 022202.10.1088/0953-8984/26/2/022202Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] J. M. De Godoy, K. Grjotheim, O. Herstad, C. Krohn, Rev. Chim. Minér.1974, 11, 533.Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. A. Samokhvalov, V. G. Bamburov, N. V. Volkenshtein, T. D. Zotov, A. A. Ivakin, Yu. N. Motozov, M. I. Simonova, Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR1966, 30, 984.Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. A. Samokhvalov, V. G. Bamburov, N. V. Volkenshtein, T. D. Zotov, Yu. N. Motozov, M. I. Simonova, Fizika Tverdogo Tela1967, 9, 559.Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. W. Shafer, US Patent No. 3,399,957, 1968.Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. A. Samokhvalov, S. A. Ismailov, A. Ya. Afanas’ev, Fizika Tverdogo Tela1968, 10, 425.Search in Google Scholar

[19] I. A. Bondar, K. A. Dobrovolskii, Sci. Ceram.1973, 6, 1.Search in Google Scholar

[20] I. A. Bondar, K. A. Dobrovol’skii, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem.1975, 20, 846.Search in Google Scholar

[21] N. Teratani, Y. Katsuda, US Patent No. 2008/0242531 A1, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. Mondal, J. W. Jeffery, Acta Crystallogr. B1975, 31, 689.10.1107/S0567740875003639Search in Google Scholar

[23] J. A. Alonso, I. Rasines, J. L. Soubeyroux, Inorg. Chem.1990, 29, 4768.Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. Pöttgen, Th. Gulden, A. Simon, GIT Labor-Fachzeitschrift1999, 43, 133.Search in Google Scholar

[25] D. Kußmann, R.-D. Hoffmann, R. Pöttgen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1998, 624, 1727.Search in Google Scholar

[26] V. Petříček, M. Dušek, L. Palatinus, Z. Kristallogr.2014, 229, 345.Search in Google Scholar

[27] I. D. Brown, D. Altermatt, Acta Crystallogr. B1985, 41, 244.10.1107/S0108768185002051Search in Google Scholar

[28] N. E. Brese, M. O’Keeffe, Acta Crystallogr.B1991, 47, 192.10.1107/S0108768190011041Search in Google Scholar

[29] H. Knoblauch, U. Schneider, Bauchemie, 4. Auflage, Werner-Verlag, Düsseldorf (Germany) 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[30] V. Kahlenberg, J. Solid State Chem.2001, 160, 421.Search in Google Scholar

[31] V. Kahlenberg, Cryst. Res. Technol.2000, 35, 1279.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-11-24
Accepted: 2014-11-29
Published Online: 2015-2-6
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2014-0240/html
Scroll to top button