Startseite Symmetry Reductions and Group-Invariant Radial Solutions to the n-Dimensional Wave Equation
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Symmetry Reductions and Group-Invariant Radial Solutions to the n-Dimensional Wave Equation

  • Wei Feng EMAIL logo und Songlin Zhao
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. Januar 2018

Abstract

In this paper, we derive explicit group-invariant radial solutions to a class of wave equation via symmetry group method. The optimal systems of one-dimensional subalgebras for the corresponding radial wave equation are presented in terms of the known point symmetries. The reductions of the radial wave equation into second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with respect to each symmetry in the optimal systems are shown. Then we solve the corresponding reduced ODEs explicitly in order to write out the group-invariant radial solutions for the wave equation. Finally, several analytical behaviours and smoothness of the resulting solutions are discussed.

1 Introduction

In the analysis of partial differential equations (PDEs), exact solution plays a crucial role, especially in the study of asymptotical behaviour, blow-up, extinction, dispersive, and also in testing numerical solution. This motivates many researchers to propose methods for finding exact solutions, such as Hirota’s bilinear method [1], Darboux transformation [2], Bäcklund transformation [3], inverse scattering transformation [4] and symmetry group method [5], [6], [7]. Among all these methods, the symmetry group method was shown to be effective in dealing with PDEs as evidenced by the number of research papers, books and symbolic manipulation software related to it.

It is well known that Sophus Lie first introduced the theory of continuous group, now referred as Lie point symmetry group or classical symmetry group, which unified and extended various methods for construction of explicit solutions to ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Since then, there were considerable developments related to the symmetry group. On one hand, the symmetry group was found to be of importance in the study of conservation laws [8], [9], Hamiltonian structures [6], fundamental solutions [10], [11], Fourier transformations [12], reconstruction and integrability [13]. On the other hand, the fact remains that some PDEs admit poor point symmetry or symmetry reductions, for many PDEs are unobtainable by applying the classical symmetry method that inspired the creation of several generalisations of Lie point symmetry group, including non-classical symmetry method [14], Lie-Bäcklund symmetry method, potential and nonlocal symmetry method [15] and conditional Lie-Bäcklund symmetry method [16], [17].

Consider wave equation

(1)utt=(c+bup)Δu+aup1|u|2

for u(t, x), where a, b and c are constants, p(≠0) is nonlinearity power and n(>1) is dimension. The analysis of solutions for the Cauchy problem to (1) was discussed in [18], [19]. It can be easily seen that the radial reduction of (1) is given by

(2)utt=(c+bup)(urr+(n1)r1ur)+aup1ur2,

where r=|x|, ur=∂u/∂r and urr=∂2u/∂r2. The radial wave equation (2) with special values of n arises as a mathematical model to describe various phenomena in physics. For example, when n=2, (2) corresponds to the radial compressible polytropic fluid flow in Lagrangian coordinates [20]. In a recent work [21], point symmetries and conservation laws were fully classified for (2) with restrictions n≠1 and (bp)2+a2(b+c)2≠0. To be one of the extended works of [21], in this paper, we are devoted to deriving explicit group-invariant radial solutions u(t, |x|=r) of (1) by applying the method which was used successfully in the previous works [22], [23] to find the group-invariant solutions to semilinear Schrödinger equations in multi-dimensions and inhomogeneous nonlinear diffusion equation. For this purpose, we, firstly reduce (2) under each point symmetry subgroup in the optimal systems, and then solve the reduced ODEs that have explicit solutions so that the group-invariant radial solutions for (1) can be written out.

The rest of this paper is organised as follows. In Section 2, we present the optimal systems of one-dimensional subalgebras for (2) in terms of the known point symmetries. Section 3 is devoted to solving the reduced ODEs explicitly, which are determined by the reductions under each symmetry in the optimal systems. In Section 4, explicit group-invariant radial solutions of (1) along with their basic analytical features are listed. Finally, Section 5 states the conclusions of this paper.

2 Symmetries and Optimal Systems

For (2), a point symmetry is a one-dimensional Lie group of transformations in (t, r, u)

(3)tt+ϵτ(t,r,u),   rr+ϵζ(t,r,u),   uu+ϵη(t,r,u)

with a group parameter ε, such that the prolongation prX of infinitesimal generator

(4)X=τ(t,r,u)/t+ζ(t,r,u)/r+η(t,r,u)/u

satisfies

(5)prX(utt(c+bup)(urr+(n1)r1ur)+aup1ur2)=0

on the solutions of (2), where prX is the second-order prolongation of generator X (see Ref. [6]). It is straightforward to eliminate utt and its derivatives by (2) in (5) and split the resulting equation with respect to utr, urr, ut and ur. Then the system of overdetermined linear PDEs for τ(t, r, u), ζ(t, r, u) and η(t, r, u) reduces to PDEs

(6)ζt=ζu=τr=τu=0,
(7)η=(α+τt/2)u+β,α=α(r),β=β(t,r),
(8)a(p1)β=0,
(9)a((2+p/2)τt2ζr+pα)=0,
(10)(brζrr2(a+b)rαrb(n1)(2+p/2)τt+b(n1)ζr+b(n1)(ζprα)/r)up(2arβr+bp(n1)β)up1+cr(ζrr2αr)(n1)(2cτtζrcζ/r)=0,
(11)b(αrr+(n1)αr/r)up+1+b(βrr+(n1)βr/r)up+(c(αrr+(n1)αr/r)τttt/2)u+c(βrr+(n1)βr/r)βtt=0,

which are easily solved to obtain the following result.

Theorem 1:The point symmetries of (2) with n≠1 and (bp)2+a2(b+c)2≠0 are generated by [21]

(12)X1=t,
(13)X2=tt+rr,
(14)X3=bprr+2(bu+cp)u,cp(p1)=0,b0,
(15)X4=u,   p=1,b=0,
(16)X5=tu,   p=1,b=0,
(17)X6=t2t+tuu,p=4,c=0,
(18)X7=(a+b+c(1p))r3nr+(2n)((b+c(1p))u+cp)r2nu,cp(p1)=0,(a+b+c(1p))(n3)=bp(n/21),n2,
(19)X8=bprlnrr+21+lnr)(bu+cp)u,        cp(p1)=0,a+b+c(1p)=0,n=2,b0.

The corresponding transformation groups acting on solution u=f(t, r) are given by

(20)u=f(tϵ,r),
(21)u=f(λ1t,λ1r),
(22)u=λ2f(t,λpr)+cp(λ21)/b,   cp(p1)=0,b0,
(23)u=f(t,r)+ϵ,   p=1,b=0,
(24)u=f(t,r)+ϵt,   p=1,b=0,
(25)u=(1+ϵt)f(t/(1+ϵt),r),   p=4,c=0,
(26)u=exp(ϵr2n)f(t,r),   p=0,a+b+c=0,n2,
(27)u=(f(t,(rn2ϵ)1/(n2))+cp/b)(1ϵr2n)b+c(1p)a+b+c(1p)cp/b,       cp(p1)=0,(a+b+c(1p))(n3)=bp(n/21),       b(n2)(a+b+c(1p))0,
(28)u=rϵf(t,r),   p=0,a+b+c=0,n=2,b0,
(29)u=λ2/pr2(11/λ)/p(f(t,r1/λ)+c/b)c/b,  c(p1)=0,a+b=0,n=2,b0,

where group parameters satisfy −∞<ε<∞, 0<λ<∞.

To find all group-invariant solutions, it is sufficient to determine the optimal system of one-dimensional subalgebras. The classification problem is equivalent to the problem of classifying the algebra of system into conjugacy inequivalent subalgebra under the adjoint action of the algebra. It is easily carried out by simplifying a general Lie algebra operator as much as possible in terms of all kinds of adjoint actions [6]. After a systematic calculation, we arrive at the following result.

Theorem 2:The optimal systems of one-dimensional subalgebras admitted by (2) are generated by (i) X1, X2in the general case; (ii) X1, X3+a1X1, X2+a2X3when cp(p−1)=0, b≠0; (iii) X4, X5, X1+a1X5, X2+a2X4when p=1 and b=0; (iv) X3, X1+a1X3, X2+a2X3, X1+X6+a3X3when p=−4 and c=0; (v) X1, X2, X3+a1X1, X2+a2X3, X7+a3X1with a2≠0 when cp(p−1)=0, (a+b+c(1−p))(n−3)=bp(n/2−1) and n≠2; (vi) X1, X2+a1X8, X3+a2X1, X8+a3X1when cp(p−1)=0, a+b+c(1−p)=0, n=2 and b≠0; (vii) X2, X3, X7, X1+a1X3, X1+a2X7, X2+a3X3, X1+X6+a4X3, X1+X6+a5X7with a1a3a4≠0 when p=−4, c=0, (a+b)(n−3)=bp(n/2−1) and n≠2, (viii) X7, X1+a1X5, X2+a2X4, X4+a3X7, X5+a4X7, X1+X7+a5X5when p=1, n=3 and b=0; (ix) X3, X8, X1+a1X3, X1+a2X8, X2+a3X8, X1+X6+a4X3, X1+X6+a5X8with a2a5≠0 when p=−4, c=0, a+b=0 and n=2 where −∞<ai<∞, (i=1, …, 5) are parameters.

3 Reduced ODEs and Solutions

In this section, we focus on solving reduced ODEs formulated in terms of invariants [7] which are determined by point symmetry groups in optimal systems. For convenience, we replace the parameters a1, …, a5 in Theorem 2 by constant α. Firstly, it is readily seen that under symmetry (18), (2) is reduced to vʺ=0 possessing solution v=C1ξ+C2, where and hereafter Ci (i=1, 2, …) denote arbitrary constants. The reduced ODE obtained under symmetry X1+X6+αX3 is not easy to handle for finding the general solution, but we can obtain its invariant solution v=((2bn−a−5b)/a)1/4. Then let us turn to solve the other reduced ODEs in detail.

Example 1: Consider equation

(30)(c+bvp)v+avp1v2+(n1)(c+bvp)v/ξ=0,

which arises from the reduction of (2) under time-translation symmetry (12). The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=v(ξ), where ξ=r. To get explicit solutions, we consider the following two cases.

Case 1:p=0, b+c≠0 and a+b+c≠0

In this case, (30) has an integrating factor 1/v′, which yields a first-order ODE

(31)(b+c)lnv+alnv+(b+c)(n1)lnξ=C1,

possessing explicit solutions

(32)v=(C1ξ2n+C2)(b+c)/(a+b+c),   n2,
(33)v=(C1lnξ+C2)(b+c)/(a+b+c),   n=2.

Thus solutions (32) and (33) provide two solutions for (30) with p=0 and (b+c)(a+b+c)≠0.

Case 2:p=0, b+c≠0 and a+b+c=0

In this case, the integrating factor 1/v′ reduces (30) to a first-order ODE

(34)lnvlnv+(n1)lnξ=C1,

which can be solved explicitly

(35)v=C1exp(C2ξ2n),   n2,
(36)v=C1ξC2,   n=2.

Here we obtain two solutions of (30) with p=0 and a=−(b+c)≠0, given by (35) and (36).

Example 2: Consider equation

(37)v(2/p2)(2a+2b2bp+bpn)v1+p=0,

which arises from the reduction of (2) with c(p−1)=0 and bp≠0 under scaling symmetry (14). The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=r2/pv(ξ)−cp/b, where ξ=t. It is easily seen that (37) is a non-linear oscillator equation. By utilising integrating factor v′, (37) can be integrated to quadratures

(38)1/lnv+C1dv=2a+6b2bn(ξ+C2),   for p=2,
(39)1/vp+2+C1dv=4(2a+2b+bpn2bp)/(p2(p+2))(ξ+C2),for p2,

where bp≠0. Note that quadrature (38) presents an implicit solution of (37) for p=−2 and b≠0, whereas quadrature (39) can be evaluated to get explicit solutions for v in terms of elementary functions for special values of parameters. To proceed, we shall make use of a change of variable

(40)1/vp+2+C1dv=(1/s)1/G(y)dy,   y=vs

so that the respective expression is

(41)G(y)=y2+p/s+C1y22/s.

Taking into account the value of C1, we arrive at the following two cases.

Case 1:C1=0

In this case, integral (39) together with (40) and (41) becomes

(42)(1/s)1/y1+p/(2s)dy=4(2a+2b+bpn2bp)/(p2(p+2))(ξ+C2),y=vs,

which yields one explicit solution of (37) for p≠0, −2 and b≠0, given by

(43)v=((2a+2b+bpn2bp)(ξ+C2)2/(p+2))1/p.

Case 2:C1≠0

In this case, the required conditions arising from (41) are

(44)2+p/2=0,1,2;
(45)22/s=0,1,2.

By solving conditions (44) and (45) for p and s, we have

(46)p=1,   s=1;
(47)p=4,   s=2.

Subcase 2.1: Quadrature for p=−1

For case (46), the integral (39) together with (40) and (41) becomes

(48)1/y+C1dy=4(2a+4bbn)(ξ+C2),   y=v,

which yields one explicit solution of (37) for p=−1 and b≠0

(49)v=(2a+4bbn)(ξ+C2)2+C1.

Subcase 2.2: Quadrature for p=−4

For case (47), the integral (39) together with (40) and (41) becomes

(50)1/1+C1ydy=14(2bna5b)(ξ+C2),   y=v2,

which yields one explicit solution of (37) for p=−4 and b≠0

(51)v=12(2bna5b)C1(ξ+C2)24/C1.

Example 3: Consider equation

(52)v(2a/p)v1+p=0,

which arises from the reduction of (2) with c(p−1)=0, a+b=0, n=2 and ap≠0 under symmetry (19). The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=(r ln r)2/pv(ξ)−cp/b, where ξ=t. Equation (52) is also a non-linear oscillator equation. Thus, analogous to the analysis in Example 2, we arrive at two quadratures

(53)1/C1lnvdv=2a(ξ+C2),   for p=2,
(54)1/vp+2+C1dv=4a/(p(p+2))(ξ+C2),   for p2,

with ap≠0, where quadrature (53) determines an implicit solution of (52) for p=−2 and a>0. In terms of the change of variable (40) with (41), two cases are needed to be considered.

Case 1:C1=0

In this case, quadrature (54) can be evaluated to get one explicit solution of (52) for p≠0, −2 and a≠0

(55)v=(ap/(p+2))1/p(ξ+C2)2/p.

Case 2:C1≠0

To construct explicit solutions in terms of elementary functions, conditions (44) and (45) are required, which lead to case (46) and case (47).

Subcase 2.1: Quadrature for p=−1

When p=−1 and s=1, the integral (54) is transformed to

(56)1/y+C1dy=4a(ξ+C2),   y=v,

which leads to one explicit solution of (52) for p=−1

(57)v=a(ξ+C2)2+C1,   a<0.

Subcase 2.2: Quadrature for p=−4

When p=−4 and s=2, the integral (54) is transformed to

(58)1/1+C1ydy=a/2(ξ+C2),   y=v2,

which leads to one explicit solution of (52) for p=−4

(59)v=(aC1/2)(ξ+C2)21/C1,a>0,C10.

Example 4: Consider equation

(60)(b+c)v+av2/v+(n1)(b+c)v/ξ(4b2/α2)v=0,

which is derived from the reduction of (2) with p=0 and ≠0 under optimal symmetry X3+αX1. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=exp(2bt/α)v(ξ), where ξ=r. To solve (60) completely, we consider the following three cases.

Case 1:b+c=0

In this case, (60) becomes a first-order ODE

(61)av2/v(4b2/α2)v=0,

where ≠0, whose solution is given by

(62)v=C1exp(±2b2/(aα2)ξ),   a>0.

Case 2:a+b+c=0, a≠0

In terms of integrating factor ξn−1v−1, (60) can be reduced to a first-order ODE

(63)ξn1v/v=(4b2/(aα2))ξn1dξ+C1,

where ≠0. By solving (63), we get three explicit solutions for (60) with a+b+c=0 and abα≠0

(64)v=C2exp(2b2ξ2/(anα2)+C1ξ2n),   n0,2,
(65)v=C2exp(2b2ξ2lnξ/(cα2)+C1ξ2),   n=0,
(66)v=C2ξC1exp(b2ξ2/(aα2)),   n=2.

Case 3:a+b+c≠0, b+c≠0

In this case, we use a change of variables s=(2b(a+b+c)/(α(b+c)))ξ and w=s−1+n/2v(a+b+c)/(b+c) to transform (60) into Bessel’s equation

(67)s2w+sw((1+n/2)2s2)w=0.

whose general solution is

(68)w=C1J|1+n/2|(s)+C2Y|1+n/2|(s),

where Jμ(s) and Yμ(s) are Bessel functions. Thus the explicit solution of (60) with αb(b+c)(a+b+c)≠0 is given by

(69)v=(2b(a+b+c)ξ/(α(b+c)))(2n)(b+c)2(a+b+c)(C1J|1+n/2|(2b(a+b+c)/(α(b+c))ξ)+C2Y|1+n/2|(2b(a+b+c)/(α(b+c))ξ))b+ca+b+c,a+b+c<0.

Example 5: Consider equation

(70)cv+av2+c(n1)v/ξα=0,

which is obtained from the reduction of (2) with p=1 and b=0 under optimal symmetry X1+αX5. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=v(ξ)+αt2/2, where ξ=r. The case of α=0 is the reduction discussed in Example 1, so here we assume α≠0. To solve (70) completely, we distinguish the following two cases.

Case 1:c=0

In this case, (70) becomes to av2α=0, with general solution

(71)v=α/aξ+C1,   aα>0.

Case 2:c≠0

In this case, with transformations s=aαξ/c and w=s−1+n/2exp((a/c)v), (70) gets transformed to (67) with general solution (68). Thus, the general solution of (70) for c≠0 is given by

(72)v=(c/a)ln((aαξ/c)n/21C1J|1+n/2|(aαξ/c)+C2Y|1+n/2|(aαξ/c)),aα<0.

Example 6: Consider equation

(73)((a+b+c(1p))2(b+c(1p))α2vp)vaα2vp1v2=0,

which arises from the reduction of (2) with (a+b+c(1−p))(n−3)=bp(n/2−1), cp(p−1)=0, n≠2, b+c(1−p)≠0 and a+b+c(1−p)≠0 under optimal symmetry X7+αX1. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=rmv(ξ)cpb+c(1p), where ξ=tα(n2)(a+b+c(1p))rn2 and m=(n2)(b+c(1p))a+b+c(1p). Here constant α is also assumed to be non-zero. The condition cp(p−1)=0 leads to the following three cases.

Case 1:c=0

When c=0, (73) has an integrating factor ((a+b)22vp)−1+a/(bp), which yields a quadrature, viewed as an implicit solution of (73) with c=0, (a+b)(n−3)=bp(n/2−1) and αb(a+b)(n−2)≠0,

(74)((a+b)2bα2vp)a/(bp)dv=C1ξ+C2.

Case 2:p=0

In this case, (73) becomes

(75)((a+b+c)2(b+c)α2)vaα2v2/v=0,

where α(b+c)(a+b+c)≠0, which has three solutions

(76)v=C1,   (a+b+c)2=(b+c)α2,
(77)v=C1exp(C2ξ),   a+b+c=α2,(a+b+c)2(b+c)α2,
(78)v=(C1ξ+C2)(a+b+c)2(b+c)α2(a+b+c)2(a+b+c)α2,   a+b+cα2,(a+b+c)2(b+c)α2.

Solutions (76)–(78) thereby provide three solutions of (73) with p=0 and α(b+c)(a+b+c )≠0.

Case 3:p=1

In this case, (73) becomes

(79)((a+b)2bα2v)vaα2v2=0,

where (a+b)(n−3)=b(n/2−1), αb(a+b)(n−2)≠0. In terms of transformation w=(a+b)22v, (79) is converted to

(80)bww+aw2=0,

whose general solution is

(81)w=(C1ξ+C2)b/(a+b).

We then can find the general solution of (79)

(82)v=((a+b)2(C1ξ+C2)b/(a+b))/(bα2).

Hence, solution (82) provides a solution of (73) with p=1, (a+b)(n−3)=b(n/2−1) and αb(a+b)(n−2)≠0.

Example 7: Consider equation

(83)(a2cpα2)vaα2vp1v2=0,

which arises from the reduction of (2) with b=c(p−1), bp=0, n=3 and a≠0 under optimal symmetry X7+αX1. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=v(ξ)−(cp/α)ln r, where ξ=t−(α/a)r. Assuming α≠0. For further analysis, we distinguish three cases.

Case 1:c=0

When c=0, (83) reads as

(84)avα2vp1v2=0,

where ≠0, whose general solution can be expressed by quadrature

(85)exp(α2vp/(ap))dv=C1ξ+C2,   p0.

Thus (85) provides an implicit solution for (83) with c=0 and apα≠0.

Case 2:p=0

When p=0, (83) reads as

(86)avα2v2/v=0,

where ≠0 and c=−b, which has two solutions

(87)v=(C1ξ+C2)a/(aα2),   aα2,
(88)v=C2exp(C1ξ),   a=α2.

Solutions (87) and (88) thus are solutions of (83) with p=0, c=−b and ≠0.

Case 3:p=1

In this case, (83) reads as

(89)(a2cα2)vaα2v2=0,

where ≠0. Solving (89), we obtain solutions

(90)v=C1,   cα2=a2,
(91)v=((cα2a2)/(aα2))ln(C1ξ+C2),   cα2a2,

which are two solutions of (83) with p=1 and ≠0.

Example 8: Consider equation

(92)aα2ξvaα2ξv2/v+aα2v+4b2ξ(1+lnξ)2v=0,

which arises from the reduction of (2) with a+b+c=0, p=0, n=2, ≠0 under optimal symmetry X8+αX1. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=r2bt/α exp(2bt/α) v(ξ), where ξ=r. Note that when a=0, (92) only has trivial solution v=0. Alternatively, when a≠0, two integrating factors v−1 and 1 of (92) produce its general solution

(93)v=C1ξC2exp(b2ξ(1+2(lnξ)2)/(2aα2)),   a+b+c=0,abα0.

Example 9: Consider equation

(94)aα2v1=0,

which is obtained from the reduction of (2) with p=1, n=3, b=0 and ≠0 under optimal symmetry X4+αX7. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=v(ξ)+ r/()−(c/a) ln r, where ξ=t. It is easy to know that the general solution of (94) is given by

(95)v=C1+C2t+t2/(2aα2),  aα0.

Example 10: Consider equation

(96)aα2vt2=0,

which is obtained from the reduction of (2) with p=1, n=3, b=0 and ≠0 under optimal symmetry X5+αX7. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=v(ξ)+ tr/()−(c/a)ln r, where ξ=t. Solving (96), we get

(97)v=C1+C2t+t2/(12aα2),   aα0.

Example 11: Consider equation

(98)(a2c)vav2+2aαξvα(aαξ2c)=0,

which is derived from the reduction of (2) with p=1, n=3, b=0, a≠0 under optimal symmetry X1+X7+αX5. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=v(ξ)− αr2/(2a2)+αtr/a−(c/a) ln r, where ξ=tr/a. To solve (98) completely, we need to discuss two possibilities: a2=c and a2c.

Case 1:a2=c

In this case, (98) thereby becomes to a first-order ODE

(99)v22αξv+α(αξ2a)=0,

with a≠0, which has general solution

(100)v=αξ/2±aαξ+C1,   aα>0.

Then we find one solution of (98) with a2=c, given by (100).

Case 2:a2c

In this case, (98) gets converted to a second-order linear ODE

(101)(a2c)w2αa3/2w=0

by use of transformation v=(2aaαξ+aαξ2+(ca2)ln(w2(ξ)/(16a3α)))/(2a), (a≠0). The general solution of (101)

(102)w=C1+C2exp(2αa3/2ξ/(a2c))

determines the general solution of (98) with a≠0, which is of form

(103)v=aαξ+(aα/2)ξ2+ca22ln(116a3α(C1+C2exp(2αa3/2ξ/(a2c)))2),a2c,aα>0.

Example 12: Consider equation

(104)(4α2v4b)vv+bv2bvv+v6bv2/2=0,

which is derived from the reduction of (2) with a+b=0, c=0, p=−4, n=2 under optimal symmetry X1+X6+αX8. The corresponding group-invariant solution is u=v(ξ)/rlnr/(1+t2), where ξ=2α arctan(t)−ln ln r. Equation (104) is not tractable to solve in general by standard integrating method. Nevertheless, it is still available to construct explicit solution of (104) with α=0. For the case of α=0, a change of variables θ=exp(−ξ)/2 and V=v exp(ξ/2) converts (104) into

(105)bVVbV24V6=0,

which has solutions

(106)V=((bC12/8)sec2(C1θ+C2))1/4,   C1>0,
(107)V=((bC12/8)csch2(C1θ+C2))1/4,  C1>0,
(108)V=(4θ/2b+C2)1/2,   b>0.

Hence, (104) with b=−a and α=0 has three explicit solutions

(109)v=exp(ξ/2)((bC12/2)sec2(C1exp(ξ)+C2))1/4,C1>0,
(110)v=exp(ξ/2)((bC12/2)csch2(C1exp(ξ)/2+C2))1/4,C1>0,
(111)v=exp(ξ/2)(2/bexp(ξ)+C2)1/2,   b>0.

Additionally, an invariant solution of (104) can be derived, given by

(112)v=(b/2)1/4.

4 Exact Solutions of Radial Wave Equation

From the explicit solutions of reduced ODEs shown in Section 3, group-invariant solutions u=f(t, r) to (2) will now be written out in this section.

Theorem 3:The radial wave equation(2) withn≠1 and (bp)2+a2(b+c)2≠0 has the following group-invariant solutions

(113)u=(c2t+c1)r(2n)(b+c(1p))a+b+c(1p)cp/(b+c(1p)),         cp(p1)=0,(a+b+c(1p))(n3)=bp(n/21),          n2,b+c(1p)0,a+b+c(1p)0;
(114)u=(c/a)lnr+c2t+c1,   p=1,b=0,n=3,a0;
(115)u=((a+5b2bn)/4)1/4(1+t2)/r,   p=4,c=0;
(116)u=(c2r2n+c1)(b+c)/(a+b+c),   p=0,n2,(b+c)(a+b+c)0;
(117)u=(c2lnr+c1)(b+c)/(a+b+c),   p=0,n=2,(b+c)(a+b+c)0;
(118)u=c1exp(c2r2n),   p=0,a+b+c=0,n2,b+c0;
(119)u=c1rc2,   p=0,a+b+c=0,n=2,b+c0;
(120)u=((2a+2b+bp(n2))/(p+2))1/p(r/(t+c1))2/pc/b,          c(p1)=0,b0,p0,2;
(121)u=(2a+4bbn)r2(t2+c2t+c1),   p=1,c=0,b0;
(122)u=r1/2((c2/4)(2bna5b)(t+c1)21/c2)1/2,p=4,c=0,c20;
(123)u=(ap/(p+2))1/p((rlnr)/(t+c1))2/pc/b,          c(p1)=0,a+b=0,n=2,bp0;
(124)u=b(rlnr)2(t2+c2t+c1),   p=1,c=0,a+b=0,n=2,b>0;
(125)u=(rlnr)1/2((ac2/2)(t+c1)21/c2)1/2,p=4,c=0,a+b=0,n=2,a>0,c20;
(126)u=c1exp((2b/c2)t(2b2/(anc22))r2+c3r2n),         p=0,a+b+c=0,abc20,n0,2;
(127)u=c1exp((2b/c2)t(2b2/(ac22))r2lnr+c3r2),         p=0,a+b+c=0,n=0,abc20;
(128)u=c1rc2exp((2b/c3)t(b2/(ac32))r2),p=0,a+b+c=0,n=2,abc30;
(129)u=(4b2(a+b+c)c32(b+c)2)(2n)(b+c)4(a+b+c)r(2n)(b+c)2(a+b+c)exp(2bt/c3)×(c1J|n/21|(2b(a+b+c)c3(b+c)r)+c2Y|n/21|(2b(a+b+c)c3(b+c)r))b+ca+b+c,p=0,a+b+c<0,c3b(b+c)0;
(130)u=(c3/2)t2(c/a)ln((ac3r/c)1+n/2c1J|n/21|(ac3r/c)+c2Y|n/21|(ac3r/c)),p=1,b=0,c0,ac3<0;
(131)u=c1r(b+c)/(a+b+c),   p=0,n=3,(b+c)(a+b+c)0;
(132)u=rb+ca+b+c(c3tc2c3r/(a+b+c)+c1)(a+b+c)2(b+c)c22(a+b+c)(a+b+cc22),p=0,n=3,(b+c)(a+b+c)0,a+b+cc22;
(133)u=c3r1+a/c22exp(c1(tr/c2)),   p=0,n=3,b+cc22,a+b+c=c220;
(134)u=(bc32)1rb(2n)a+b((a+b)2(c2t+(c2c3/((n2)(a+b)))rn2+c1)ba+b)c/b,  p=1,(a+b)(n3)=b(n/21),b(a+b)(n2)0;
(135)u=c1(c/a)lnr,   p=1,b=0,n=3,a0;
(136)u=(c/a)lnr+(c/aa/c32)ln(c2tc2c3r/a+c1),p=1,b=0,n=3,a0,a2cc32;
(137)u=c1rc2+(2b/c3)texp((2b/c3)t(b2/(2ac32))r2(1+2(lnr)2)),p=0,a+b+c=0,n=2,abc30;
(138)u=r/(ac3)(c/a)lnr+t2/(2ac32)+c2t+c1,p=1,b=0,n=3,ac30;
(139)u=tr/(ac3)+t4/(12ac32)(c/a)lnr+c2t+c1,p=1,b=0,n=3,ac30;
(140)u=alnr+(c2/2)t2±ac2(tr/a)+c1,p=1,b=0,n=3,c=a2,ac2>0;
(141)u=ca22aln(116a3c3(c1+c2exp(2c3a3/2a2c(tr/a)))2)+ac3(tr/a)+(c3/2)t2(c/a)lnr,p=1,b=0,n=3,ca2,ac3>0;
(142)u=(b/2)1/4(1+t2)/(rlnr),p=4,a+b=0,c=0,n=2;
(143)u=(bc22/2)1/4((1+t2)r1sec(c2lnr+c1))1/2,p=4,c=0,n=2,a+b=0,bc2>0;
(144)u=(bc22/2)1/4((1+t2)r1csch(c2lnr+c1))1/2,p=4,c=0,n=2,a+b=0,bc2>0;
(145)u=(r(1+t2)1(c12/blnr))1/2,p=4,c=0,n=2,a=b<0.

Now we shall discuss the analytical behaviours of solutions related to static, blow-up, dispersive and vanishing, as well as the smoothness of these solutions involving regular, conical and singular. The results are summarised in Tables 13 , where A1=(2n)(b+c(1p))a+b+c(1p),A2=b+ca+b+c,A3=2a(n2)(a+b+c),A4=ba+b, and A5=(a+b+c)2(b+c)c22(a+b+c)(a+b+cc22).

Table 1:

Behaviours of solutions of (2).

Solutionn>1Dynamical behaviourRegularity
(113)≠2VanishA1>1, regular at r=0

0<A1≤1, conical at r=0

A1<0, singular at r=0
(115)AnyIncrease in t without boundSingular at r=0
(116)≠2StaticA2<1/(2−n), regular at r=0

1/(2−n)≤A2<0, conical at r=0

A2>0, singular at r=0
(118)≠2StaticSingular at r=0
(120)Anyp>0, c1>0, dispersive

p>0, c1<0, blow-up
0<p<2, regular at r=0

p≥2, conical at r=0

p<0, singular at r=0
(121), (122)AnyVanishSingular at r=0
(126)≠2b/c2<0, dispersiveConical at r=0
(129)Anyb/c3<0, dispersiveA2<min{0, A3}, regular at r=0

A3A2<0, Conical at r=0

A2>0, Singular at r=0
(130)AnyVanishSingular at r=0
(134)≠2A4<0, c2≠0, blow-up

A4>0, c2≠0, vanish
A4<(2−n)−1, regular at r=0

(2−n)−1A4<0, conical at r=0

A4>0, singular at r=0
Table 2:

Behaviours of solutions of (2) with n=2.

SolutionDynamical behaviourRegularity
(117)StaticA2<0, conical at r=0

A2>0, singular at r=0
(119)Staticc2>1, regular at r=0

0<c2≤1, conical at r=0

c2<0, singular at r=0
(123)p>0, c1>0, dispersive

p>0, c1<0, blow-up
p>0, p≠2, regular at r=0

p=2, conical at r=0

p<0, singular at r=0
(124), (125)VanishSingular at r=0
(128)b/c2<0, dispersivec2>1, regular at r=0

0<c2≤1, conical at r=0

c2<0, singular at r=0
(137)(b/c3)(re−1)<0, dispersive2bt/c3>1−c2, regular at r=0

0<c2+2bt/c3≤1, conical at r=0

c2+2bt/c3<0, singular at r=0
(142)Increase in t without boundSingular at r=0
(143)Increase in t without boundSingular at r=exp((2+π/2−c1)/c2)
(144)Increase in t without boundc2>3, regular at r=0

0<c2≤3, conical at r=0

c2<0, singular at r=0
(145)Increase in t without boundSingular at r=0,r=exp(c1b/2)
Table 3:

Behaviours of solutions of radial wave equation (2) with n=3.

SolutionDynamical behaviourRegularity
(114)VanishSingular at r=0
(131)StaticA2<−1, regular at r=0

−1≤A2<0, conical at r=0

A2>0, singular at r=0
(132)A5>0, vanish

A5<0, blow-up
A2<−1, regular at r=0

−1≤A2<0, conical at r=0

A2>0, singular at r=0
(133)c1<0, dispersivea/c22>2, regular at r=0

1<a/c22≤2, conical at r=0

a/c22<1, singular at r=0
(135)StaticSingular at r=0
(136)c2=0, static

c2≠0, blow-up
Singular at r=0
(138)–(140)Vanishc≠0, singular at r=0
(141)c1/c2<0, blow-upSingular at r=0

Out of the 33 solutions listed above, solution (127) exists for n=0, in this case, a two-dimensional form of (2) involving a parameter ν=2 is investigated [21]. For solution (127), u is regular at r=0. And when b/c2<0, this solution displays dispersion for long time t→∞.

5 Conclusions

In this paper, we thus achieve the derivation of the explicit group-invariant radial solutions to (1) by using symmetry group method. Firstly, the optimal systems of one-dimensional subalgebras for (1) are presented. Secondly, we apply the standard reduction method to derive explicit solutions of reduced ODEs arising from the optimal subgroups of point symmetries for (2). Finally, the explicit group-invariant radial solutions given by elementary functions are written out, also some analytical features of these solutions are discussed.

For future work, we plan to study the constructions of more kinds of exact radial solutions for (1) by using symmetry-related method, such as group foliation and conditional Lie-Bäcklund symmetry.

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Funder id: 10.13039/501100001809, nos. 11301483, 11401529), and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (nos. LY17A010024, LY18A010033).

References

[1] R. Hirota, The Direct Method in Soliton Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511543043Suche in Google Scholar

[2] V. B. Matveev and M. A. Salle, Darboux Transformation and Solitons, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1991.10.1007/978-3-662-00922-2Suche in Google Scholar

[3] C. Rogers and W. K. Schief, Bäcklund and Darboux Transformations, Geometry and Modern Applications in Soliton Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511606359Suche in Google Scholar

[4] M. J. Ablowitz and P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991.10.1017/CBO9780511623998Suche in Google Scholar

[5] S. Lie, Arch. Math. 6, 328 (1881).Suche in Google Scholar

[6] P. J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Springer, New York 1993.10.1007/978-1-4612-4350-2Suche in Google Scholar

[7] G. W. Bluman and S. C. Anco, Symmetry and Integration Methods for Differential Equations, Springer, New York 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] S. C. Anco, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 30, 1640004 (2016).10.1142/S021797921640004XSuche in Google Scholar

[9] S. C. Anco, in: Recent Progress and Modern Challenges in Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Computational Science, Fields Institute Communications, vol. 79, Springer, New York, USA, 2017, p. 119.10.1007/978-1-4939-6969-2_5Suche in Google Scholar

[10] M. Craddock and E. Platen, J. Differ. Equations 207, 285 (2004).10.1016/j.jde.2004.07.026Suche in Google Scholar

[11] M. Craddock and M. Grasselli, Lie Symmetry Methods for Local Volatility Models, Research Paper Series 377, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney 2016.10.2139/ssrn.2836817Suche in Google Scholar

[12] M. Craddock, J. Math. Phys. 56, 091501 (2015).10.1063/1.4929653Suche in Google Scholar

[13] F. C. De Vecchi, P. Morando, and S. Ugolini, J. Math. Phys. 57, 123508 (2016).10.1063/1.4973197Suche in Google Scholar

[14] G. W. Bluman and J. D. Cole, J. Math. Mech. 18, 1025 (1969).10.1512/iumj.1969.18.18074Suche in Google Scholar

[15] G. W. Bluman, S. Kumei, and G. J. Reid, J. Math. Phys. 29, 806 (1988).10.1063/1.527974Suche in Google Scholar

[16] R. Z. Zhdanov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28, 3841 (1995).10.1088/0305-4470/28/13/027Suche in Google Scholar

[17] A. S. Fokas and Q. M. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3293 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3293Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] S. Alinhac, Blowup for Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Progress in Nonlinear Diff. Equa. and Appl. 17, Birkhauser, Boston 1995.10.1007/978-1-4612-2578-2Suche in Google Scholar

[19] C. D. Sogge, Lectures on Nonlinear Wave Equations, International Press, Cambridge 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] A. M. Meirmanov, V. V. Pukhnachov, and S. I. Shmarev, Evolution Equations and Lagrangian Coordinates, de Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics 24, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin 1997.10.1515/9783110874440Suche in Google Scholar

[21] S. C. Anco and S. A. MacNaughton, J. Math. Phys. 53, 053703 (2012).10.1063/1.4711814Suche in Google Scholar

[22] S. C. Anco and W. Feng, J. Math. Phys. 54, 121504 (2013).10.1063/1.4830316Suche in Google Scholar

[23] W. Feng and L. N. Ji, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 28, 50 (2015).10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.03.017Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-09-14
Accepted: 2017-12-11
Published Online: 2018-01-10
Published in Print: 2018-01-26

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 26.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2017-0323/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen