Theoretical Linguistics and the philosophy of linguistics

Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1957. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, Emmon. 1986. Natural language metaphysics. In Ruth Barcan Marcus, Georg Dorn & Paul Weingartner (eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science VII, 573–595. North Holland: Elsevier.10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70714-1Search in Google Scholar

Baggio, Giosuè. 2022. Neurolinguistics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/12824.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bever, Thomas G. 2021. How cognition came into being. Cognition 213. 104761.10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104761Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2013. Biolinguistics: Forays into human cognitive biology. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 91. 63–89.Search in Google Scholar

Bromberger, Sylvain & Morris Halle. 2003. Why phonology is different. In Papers on Phonetics and Phonology 1954–2002, 150–175. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110871258.150Search in Google Scholar

Cappelen, Herman. 2017. Why philosophers shouldn’t do semantics. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8. 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0340-9.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811937Search in Google Scholar

Collins, John. 2008. Chomsky: A guide for the perplexed. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Devitt, Michael. 2006. Ignorance of language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199250960.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Elliott, Patrick D. 2020. A plea for equality: Remarks on Moltmann’s semantics for clausal embedding. Theoretical Linguistics 46(3-4). 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2020-0013.Search in Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1960 [1862]. On sense and reference. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language, 36–56. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1991. Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 39–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00628304.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2021. General linguistics must be based on universals (or non-conventional aspects of language). Theoretical Linguistics 47(1-2). 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2021-2002.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD thesis. UMass Amherst.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko. 1999. The emperor’s new intuitions. Journal of Philosophy 96. 127–147. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil199996331.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2018. Representations and rules in language. In The philosophy of Daniel Dennett, 95–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199367511.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kent. 2015. Notational variants and invariance in linguistics. Mind and Language 30. 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12076.Search in Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic contex. Theoretical Linguistics 1. 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1974.1.1-3.181.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold. 1972. Linguistic philosophy: The underlying reality of language and its philosophical import. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold. 1981. Language and other abstract objects. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold & Paul Postal. 1991. Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 515–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00632596.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Ronnie Cann, Eleni Gregoromichelaki & Stergios Chatzikyriakidis. 2016. Language as mechanisms for interaction. Theoretical Linguistics 42(3-4). 203–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0011.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Wolfgang. 2021. Another way to look at counterfactuals. Theoretical Linguistics 47(3-4). 189–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2021-2019.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1970. General semantics. Synthese 22. 18–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00413598.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1975. Languages and language. In Keith Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, 3–35. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lobina, David. 2017. Recursion: A computational investigation into the representation and processing of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198785156.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Marr, David. 1982. Vision. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, George. 2003. The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7. 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00029-9.Search in Google Scholar

Millikan, Ruth. 2005. Language: A biological model. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199284768.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Moltmann, Friederike. 2017. Natural language ontology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of linguistics.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.330Search in Google Scholar

Moltmann, Friederike. 2020. Truthmaker semantics for natural language: Attitude verbs, modals, and intensional transitive verbs. Theoretical Linguistics 46(3–4). 159–200.10.1515/tl-2020-0010Search in Google Scholar

Montague, Richard. 1970. Universal grammar. Theoria 36. 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.x.Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 2014. On the similarity between syntax and actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18. 109–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.006.Search in Google Scholar

Nefdt, Ryan. 2018. Languages and other abstract structures. In Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds.), Essays on linguistic realism, 139–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.196.06nefSearch in Google Scholar

Nefdt, Ryan. 2019a. Infinity and the foundations of linguistics. Synthese 196. 1671–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1574-x.Search in Google Scholar

Nefdt, Ryan. 2019b. The philosophy of linguistics: Scientific underpinnings and methodological disputes. Philosophy Compass 14(12). e12636. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12636.Search in Google Scholar

Nefdt, Ryan. 2021. Structural realism and generative linguistics. Synthese 199. 3711–3737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02952-1.Search in Google Scholar

Nefdt, Ryan. 2023a. Language, science, and structure: A journey into the philosophy of linguistics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197653098.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nefdt, Ryan 2023b. Biolinguistics and biological systems: A complex systems analysis of language. Biology and Philosophy 38. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-023-09903-3.Search in Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara Hall. 2004. Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers of Barbara H. Partee. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470751305Search in Google Scholar

Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. 1994. The principle of semantic compositionality. Topoi 13. 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00763644.Search in Google Scholar

Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. 2011. Descriptive metaphysics, natural language metaphysics, Sapir-. Whorf, and all that stuff: Evidence from the Mass-count distinction. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6. 7.10.4148/biyclc.v6i0.1570Search in Google Scholar

Peregrin, Jaroslav. 1998. Linguistics and philosophy. Theoretical Linguistics 24. 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1998.24.2-3.245.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, Stanley. 1979. A truth: Conditional formulation of Karttunen’s account of presupposition. Synthese 40. 301–316.10.1007/BF00485682Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey. 2011. On the mathematical foundations of syntactic structures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20. 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-011-9139-8.Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey. 2013. The central question in comparative syntactic metatheory. Mind and Language 28. 492–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12029.Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey & Barbara Scholz. 2010. Recursion and the infinitude claim. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Recursion and human language, 111–138. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110219258.111Search in Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2014. The syntax of action. Trends Cognitive Sciences 18. 219–220.10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1967. The ‘innateness hypothesis’ and explanatory models in linguistics. Synthese 17. 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00485014.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, Willard. 1970. Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory. Synthese 21. 386–398.10.1007/BF00484806Search in Google Scholar

Rey, Georges. 2020. Representation of language: Philosophical issues in a Chomskyan linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198855637.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Scholz, Barbara, Jeffry Pelletier, Geoffrey Pullum, & Ryan Nefdt. 2023. Philosophy of linguistics. In Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1974. Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. In Gilbert Harman (ed.), On Noam Chomsky: Critical essays, 2–33. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stainton, Robert. 2014. Philosophy of linguistics. In The Oxford handbook of topics in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.002Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2. 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00262951.Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1976. Possible worlds. Noûs 10. 65–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214477.Search in Google Scholar

Stanton, Kate. 2020. Linguistics and philosophy: Break up song. In Ryan Nefdt, Carita Klippi & Bart Karstens (eds.), The Philosophy and science of language: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 409–436. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-55438-5_15Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Graham. 2013. Philosophy, linguistics, and the philosophy of linguistics. In Hanne Andersen, et al.. (eds.), New challenges to philosophy of science, 435–444. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5845-2_35Search in Google Scholar

Stokhof, Martin. 2011. The role of artificial languages. In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of language, 544–553. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Stokhof, Martin & Michiel van Lambalgen. 2011. Abstractions and idealisations: The construction of modern linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 37(1-2). 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2011.001.Search in Google Scholar

Szabó, Zoltán. 2012. The case for compositionality. In The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0003Search in Google Scholar

Tomalin, Marcus. 2006. Linguistics and the formal sciences: The origins of generative grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486340Search in Google Scholar

Veltman, Frank. 1996. Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25. 221–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00248150.Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1971. Summary: Linguistics and the a priori. In Colin Lyas (ed.), Philosophy and linguistics, 245–265. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-15426-5_15Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The philosophy of philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Yalcin, Seth. 2018. Semantics as model-based science. In Derek Ball & Brian Rabern (eds.), The science of meaning: Essays on the metatheory of natural language semantics, 334–360. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198739548.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Yngve, Victor. 1986. Linguistics among the sciences. Theoretical Linguistics 13. 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1986.13.3.257.Search in Google Scholar