The empirical turn and its consequences for theoretical syntax

References

Abeillé, Anne (ed.). 2003. Treebanks: Building and using parsed corpora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0201-1Search in Google Scholar

Abeillé, Anne & Jong-Bok Kim. 2022. Me too fragments in English and French: A direct interpretation approach. The Linguistic Review 39. 495–524. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2095.Search in Google Scholar

Abeillé, Anne & François Mouret. 2010. Quelques contraintes sur les coordinations elliptiques en français. Revue de Sémantique et de Pragmatique 24. 177–207.Search in Google Scholar

Abeillé, Anne & Elodie Winckel. 2020. dont and de qui relative clauses: an empirical study. Journal of French Language Studies 30. 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269520000137.Search in Google Scholar

Abeillé, Anne, Gabriela Bîlbîie & François Mouret. 2014. A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Hans Boas & Francisco Gonzalvez Garcia (eds.), Romance in construction grammar, 227–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.15.07abeSearch in Google Scholar

Abeillé, Anne, Barbara Hemforth, Elodie Winckel & Edward Gibson. 2020. Extraction from subject: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293.Search in Google Scholar

Abeillé, Anne, Barbara Hemforth & Aoi Shiraishi. 2023. Voice mismatch and contrast in French peripheral ellipsis. Journal of Linguistics 59. 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222672200055x.Search in Google Scholar

Anand, Pranav, Daniel Hardt & James McCloskey. 2021. The Santa Cruz sluicing data set. Language 97. e68–e88. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0009.Search in Google Scholar

Arregui, Ana, Clifton Charles, Lyn Frazier & Keir Moulton. 2006. Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 55. 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.005.Search in Google Scholar

Bîlbîie, Gabriela. 2017. Une grammaire des constructions elliptiques. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bîlbîie, Gabriela & Israël de la Fuente. 2019. Can gapping be embedded? Experimental evidence from Spanish. Glossa 4(1). 110. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.782.Search in Google Scholar

Bîlbîie, Gabriela, Israël de la Fuente & Anne Abeillé. 2021. L’ellipse verbale enchâssée dans les langues romanes. Langages 223. 61–80.10.3917/lang.223.0061Search in Google Scholar

Bîlbîie, Gabriela, Israël de la Fuente & Anne Abeillé. 2023. Factivity and complementizer omission in English embedding gapping. Journal of Linguistics 59. 389–426 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000445.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen & Stephen Wechsler. 2015. Lexical functional syntax. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781119105664Search in Google Scholar

Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson, Lutz Marten & Masayuki Otsuka. 2005. Right node Raising, coordination and the dynamics of language processing. Lingua 115. 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.013.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. 2012. On the grammar of extraction and coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30. 465–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9164-y.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. 2013. An expectation-based account of subject islands and parasitism. Journal of Linguistics 49. 285–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226712000357.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. 2014. On the disunity of right-node raising phenomena: Extraposition, ellipsis, and deletion. Language 90. 834–886. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0081.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. & Jerry E. Dery. 2019. Frequency effects in subject islands. Journal of Linguistics 55. 475–521. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226718000294.Search in Google Scholar

Chaves, Rui P. & Michael Putnam. 2021. Unbounded dependency constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198784999.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Steve Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–165. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1996. ‘Long’ Wh-movements and referentiality. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar, 226–248. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-0135-3_11Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Paul & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 2007. Phase extension contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.001.Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Naomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Naomi & Shalom Lappin. 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6. 41–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1979.6.1-3.41.Search in Google Scholar

Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 269–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.020.Search in Google Scholar

Frazier, Lyn, Lori Taft, Tom Roeper, Charles CliftonJr. & Kate Ehrlich. 1984. Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Memory and Cognition 12. 421–430. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198303.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68. 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward & Eve Fedorenko. 2010. Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14. 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Raquel Fernández. 2002. A corpus study of non-sentential utterances in dialogue. Traitement Automatique des Langues 43. 12–43.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Jong-Bok Kim. 2023. Exclaiming non-sententially: Exclamative sluices and the (non-elliptical) nature of ellipsis constructions. Glossa 8(1).10.16995/glossa.9639Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Godard, Danièle. 1988. La syntaxe des relatives en français. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Search in Google Scholar

Godard, Danièle & Ivan A. Sag. 1996. Quels compléments de nom peut-on extraire en français? Langages 122. 60–79.10.3406/lfr.1996.5334Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2013. Backgrounded constituents cannot be extracted from. In Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Experimental syntax and island effects, 221–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035309.012Search in Google Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge & Ivan A. Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 391–428.Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. University of Pennsylvania PhD. thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A. Sag. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86. 366–415. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0223.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. MIT PhD. thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 2009. Gapping is not (VP)-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.289.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 1993. The effect of establishing coherence in ellipsis and anaphora resolution. ACL 31. 62–69.10.3115/981574.981583Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 2000. Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 23. 533–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005677819813.10.1023/A:1005677819813Search in Google Scholar

Keller, Franck. 2000. Gradience in grammar. University of Edinburgh PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth, Ronnie Cann, Eleni Gregoromichelaki & Stergios Chatzikyriakidis. 2016. Language as mechanisms for interaction. Theoretical Linguistics 42. 203–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0011.Search in Google Scholar

Kertz, Laura. 2013. Verb phrase ellipsis: The view from information structure. Language 89. 390–428. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0051.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jungsoo & Jon-Bok Kim. 2023. Aggressively non-D-linked construction and ellipsis: A direct interpretation approach. Journal of Linguistics 59. 257–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000226.Search in Google Scholar

Kluender, Robert. 1991. Cognitive constraints on variables in syntax. University of California, San Diego PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Kobele, Gregory M. & Jason Merchant. 2016. The dynamics of ellipsis. Theoretical Linguistics 42. 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0013.Search in Google Scholar

Kobzeva, Anastasia, Charlotte Sant, Parker Robbins, Myrte Vos, Terje Lohndal & Dave Kush. 2022. Comparing island effects for different dependency types in Norwegian. Languages 7. 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030197.Search in Google Scholar

Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & John Sprouse. 2017. Investigating variation in island effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Nancy S. 1986. Main-verb ellipsis in spoken English. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Yingtong, Elodie Winckel, Anne Abeillé, Barbara Hemforth & Edward Gibson. 2022. Structural, functional and processing perspectives on linguistic islands effects. Annual Review of Linguistics 8. 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030319.Search in Google Scholar

López Sancio, Sergio & Itziar Laka. 2019. Dependency type modulates island effects: Evidence from Spanish. Presentation at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. New York.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1981. The syntax and semantics of English relative clauses. Lingua 53. 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(81)90014-0.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1988. The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2013. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00120.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip. 2014. A corpus study of pseudogapping and its theoretical consequences. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 10. 73–90.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip & Barbara Hemforth. 2024. Verb phrase ellipsis with nominal antecedents: The case of polar nouns. Glossa 9.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2013. Exophoric VP ellipsis. In Philip Hofmeister & Elisabeth Northcliffe (eds.), The core and the periphery, data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by I. Sag, 5–32. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Christine & Clara U. Eggers. 2022. Island extractions in the wild: A corpus study of adjunct and relative clause islands in Danish and English. Languages 7. 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020125.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley & Jean-Pierre Koenig (eds.). 2021. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nivre, Joachim, Marie-Catherine De Marneffe, Filip Ginter, Yoad Goldberg, Jan Hajic, Christopher D. Manning, Ryan McDonald, Slav Petrov, Sampo Pyysalo, Natalia Silveira, Reut Tsarfaty & Daniel Zeman. 2016. Universal dependencies v1: A multilingual treebank collection. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), 1659–1666.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Sang-Hee. 2016. Towards a QUD-based analysis of Gapping constructions. PACLIC 30. 297–305.Search in Google Scholar

Pañeda, Claudia & Dave Kush. 2021. Spanish embedded question island effects revisited: An experimental study. Linguistics 60. 463–504. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0110.Search in Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl J. & Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Poppels, Till. 2022. Explaining ellipsis without identity. The Linguistic Review 39. 341–400. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2091.Search in Google Scholar

Poppels, Till & Andrew Kehler. 2019. Reconsidering asymmetries in voice-mismatched VP-ellipsis. Glossa 4(1). 60. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.738.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. 1974. On raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1986. Phonological resolution of syntactic feature conflict. Language 64. 751–773. https://doi.org/10.2307/415171.Search in Google Scholar

Repp, Sophie. 2009. Negation in gapping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110883718Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1969. Guess who? CLS 5. 252–286.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Gerald Gazdar, Tom Wasow & Steven Weisler. 1985. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 117–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133839.Search in Google Scholar

Shiraïshi, Aoi. 2018. Discordances dans l’ellipse périphérique en français. Université de Paris PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Shiraïshi, Aoi, Barbara Hemforth, Philip Miller & Anne Abeillé. 2019. Verbal mismatch in right-node raising. Glossa 4(1). 114. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.843.Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, John, Ivan Caponigro, Ciro Greco & Carlo Cechetto. 2016. Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34. 307–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8.Search in Google Scholar

Tellier, Christine. 1990. Subjacency and subject condition violations in French. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 306–311.Search in Google Scholar

Truswell, Robert. 2011. Events, phrases and questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wexler, Kenneth & Peter W. Culicover. 1980. Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Winckel, Elodie. 2024. French subject islands: Empirical and formal approaches. Berlin: Language Science Press (to appear).Search in Google Scholar