Abstract
In a pioneer paper, Featherston (Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 269–318) advocated the use of better controlled data in theoretical linguistics. Despite diverging on many aspects, most syntactic theories are now testing their hypotheses with more data than a few linguists’ intuitions. I will examine the consequences of this empirical turn on two syntactic phenomena: long-distance dependencies (LDD) and ellipsis. In a series of recent experiments (Liu, Yingtong, Elodie Winckel, Anne Abeillé, Barbara Hemforth & Edward Gibson. 2022. Structural, functional and processing perspectives on linguistic islands effects. Annual Review of Linguistics 8. 495–525), most of the syntactic constraints (‘island constraints’) on LDD have shown less crosslinguistic variation and more cross-construction variation than previously thought. Corpus and experimental data have also shown elliptical clauses to be more flexible than expected under deletion-under-identity theories (Poppels, Till. 2022. Explaining ellipsis without identity. The Linguistic Review 39. 341–400). These are challenges for most syntactic theories, which call for taking discourse factors more seriously into account.
References
Abeillé, Anne (ed.). 2003. Treebanks: Building and using parsed corpora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0201-1Suche in Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne & Jong-Bok Kim. 2022. Me too fragments in English and French: A direct interpretation approach. The Linguistic Review 39. 495–524. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2095.Suche in Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne & François Mouret. 2010. Quelques contraintes sur les coordinations elliptiques en français. Revue de Sémantique et de Pragmatique 24. 177–207.Suche in Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne & Elodie Winckel. 2020. dont and de qui relative clauses: an empirical study. Journal of French Language Studies 30. 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269520000137.Suche in Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne, Gabriela Bîlbîie & François Mouret. 2014. A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Hans Boas & Francisco Gonzalvez Garcia (eds.), Romance in construction grammar, 227–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.15.07abeSuche in Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne, Barbara Hemforth, Elodie Winckel & Edward Gibson. 2020. Extraction from subject: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293.Suche in Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne, Barbara Hemforth & Aoi Shiraishi. 2023. Voice mismatch and contrast in French peripheral ellipsis. Journal of Linguistics 59. 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222672200055x.Suche in Google Scholar
Anand, Pranav, Daniel Hardt & James McCloskey. 2021. The Santa Cruz sluicing data set. Language 97. e68–e88. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0009.Suche in Google Scholar
Arregui, Ana, Clifton Charles, Lyn Frazier & Keir Moulton. 2006. Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 55. 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Bîlbîie, Gabriela. 2017. Une grammaire des constructions elliptiques. Berlin: Language Science Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bîlbîie, Gabriela & Israël de la Fuente. 2019. Can gapping be embedded? Experimental evidence from Spanish. Glossa 4(1). 110. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.782.Suche in Google Scholar
Bîlbîie, Gabriela, Israël de la Fuente & Anne Abeillé. 2021. L’ellipse verbale enchâssée dans les langues romanes. Langages 223. 61–80.10.3917/lang.223.0061Suche in Google Scholar
Bîlbîie, Gabriela, Israël de la Fuente & Anne Abeillé. 2023. Factivity and complementizer omission in English embedding gapping. Journal of Linguistics 59. 389–426 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000445.Suche in Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen & Stephen Wechsler. 2015. Lexical functional syntax. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781119105664Suche in Google Scholar
Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson, Lutz Marten & Masayuki Otsuka. 2005. Right node Raising, coordination and the dynamics of language processing. Lingua 115. 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.013.Suche in Google Scholar
Chaves, Rui P. 2012. On the grammar of extraction and coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30. 465–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9164-y.Suche in Google Scholar
Chaves, Rui P. 2013. An expectation-based account of subject islands and parasitism. Journal of Linguistics 49. 285–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226712000357.Suche in Google Scholar
Chaves, Rui P. 2014. On the disunity of right-node raising phenomena: Extraposition, ellipsis, and deletion. Language 90. 834–886. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0081.Suche in Google Scholar
Chaves, Rui P. & Jerry E. Dery. 2019. Frequency effects in subject islands. Journal of Linguistics 55. 475–521. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226718000294.Suche in Google Scholar
Chaves, Rui P. & Michael Putnam. 2021. Unbounded dependency constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198784999.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Steve Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–165. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1996. ‘Long’ Wh-movements and referentiality. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar, 226–248. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-0135-3_11Suche in Google Scholar
Culicover, Paul & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2007. Phase extension contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Naomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Naomi & Shalom Lappin. 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6. 41–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1979.6.1-3.41.Suche in Google Scholar
Featherston, Sam. 2007. Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33. 269–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.020.Suche in Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn, Lori Taft, Tom Roeper, Charles CliftonJr. & Kate Ehrlich. 1984. Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Memory and Cognition 12. 421–430. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198303.Suche in Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68. 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1.Suche in Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward & Eve Fedorenko. 2010. Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14. 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Raquel Fernández. 2002. A corpus study of non-sentential utterances in dialogue. Traitement Automatique des Langues 43. 12–43.Suche in Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Jong-Bok Kim. 2023. Exclaiming non-sententially: Exclamative sluices and the (non-elliptical) nature of ellipsis constructions. Glossa 8(1).10.16995/glossa.9639Suche in Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Godard, Danièle. 1988. La syntaxe des relatives en français. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Suche in Google Scholar
Godard, Danièle & Ivan A. Sag. 1996. Quels compléments de nom peut-on extraire en français? Langages 122. 60–79.10.3406/lfr.1996.5334Suche in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2013. Backgrounded constituents cannot be extracted from. In Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Experimental syntax and island effects, 221–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035309.012Suche in Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge & Ivan A. Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 391–428.Suche in Google Scholar
Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. University of Pennsylvania PhD. thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A. Sag. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86. 366–415. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0223.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, C-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. MIT PhD. thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 2009. Gapping is not (VP)-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.289.Suche in Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew. 1993. The effect of establishing coherence in ellipsis and anaphora resolution. ACL 31. 62–69.10.3115/981574.981583Suche in Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew. 2000. Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 23. 533–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005677819813.10.1023/A:1005677819813Suche in Google Scholar
Keller, Franck. 2000. Gradience in grammar. University of Edinburgh PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth, Ronnie Cann, Eleni Gregoromichelaki & Stergios Chatzikyriakidis. 2016. Language as mechanisms for interaction. Theoretical Linguistics 42. 203–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0011.Suche in Google Scholar
Kertz, Laura. 2013. Verb phrase ellipsis: The view from information structure. Language 89. 390–428. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0051.Suche in Google Scholar
Kim, Jungsoo & Jon-Bok Kim. 2023. Aggressively non-D-linked construction and ellipsis: A direct interpretation approach. Journal of Linguistics 59. 257–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000226.Suche in Google Scholar
Kluender, Robert. 1991. Cognitive constraints on variables in syntax. University of California, San Diego PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Kobele, Gregory M. & Jason Merchant. 2016. The dynamics of ellipsis. Theoretical Linguistics 42. 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2016-0013.Suche in Google Scholar
Kobzeva, Anastasia, Charlotte Sant, Parker Robbins, Myrte Vos, Terje Lohndal & Dave Kush. 2022. Comparing island effects for different dependency types in Norwegian. Languages 7. 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030197.Suche in Google Scholar
Kush, Dave, Terje Lohndal & John Sprouse. 2017. Investigating variation in island effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z.Suche in Google Scholar
Levin, Nancy S. 1986. Main-verb ellipsis in spoken English. New York: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, Yingtong, Elodie Winckel, Anne Abeillé, Barbara Hemforth & Edward Gibson. 2022. Structural, functional and processing perspectives on linguistic islands effects. Annual Review of Linguistics 8. 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030319.Suche in Google Scholar
López Sancio, Sergio & Itziar Laka. 2019. Dependency type modulates island effects: Evidence from Spanish. Presentation at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. New York.Suche in Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1981. The syntax and semantics of English relative clauses. Lingua 53. 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(81)90014-0.Suche in Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1988. The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2013. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00120.Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Philip. 2014. A corpus study of pseudogapping and its theoretical consequences. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 10. 73–90.Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Philip & Barbara Hemforth. 2024. Verb phrase ellipsis with nominal antecedents: The case of polar nouns. Glossa 9.Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Philip & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2013. Exophoric VP ellipsis. In Philip Hofmeister & Elisabeth Northcliffe (eds.), The core and the periphery, data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by I. Sag, 5–32. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Müller, Christine & Clara U. Eggers. 2022. Island extractions in the wild: A corpus study of adjunct and relative clause islands in Danish and English. Languages 7. 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020125.Suche in Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan, Anne Abeillé, Robert D. Borsley & Jean-Pierre Koenig (eds.). 2021. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Nivre, Joachim, Marie-Catherine De Marneffe, Filip Ginter, Yoad Goldberg, Jan Hajic, Christopher D. Manning, Ryan McDonald, Slav Petrov, Sampo Pyysalo, Natalia Silveira, Reut Tsarfaty & Daniel Zeman. 2016. Universal dependencies v1: A multilingual treebank collection. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), 1659–1666.Suche in Google Scholar
Park, Sang-Hee. 2016. Towards a QUD-based analysis of Gapping constructions. PACLIC 30. 297–305.Suche in Google Scholar
Pañeda, Claudia & Dave Kush. 2021. Spanish embedded question island effects revisited: An experimental study. Linguistics 60. 463–504. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0110.Suche in Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl J. & Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Poppels, Till. 2022. Explaining ellipsis without identity. The Linguistic Review 39. 341–400. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2091.Suche in Google Scholar
Poppels, Till & Andrew Kehler. 2019. Reconsidering asymmetries in voice-mismatched VP-ellipsis. Glossa 4(1). 60. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.738.Suche in Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1986. Phonological resolution of syntactic feature conflict. Language 64. 751–773. https://doi.org/10.2307/415171.Suche in Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie. 2009. Negation in gapping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543601.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110883718Suche in Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1969. Guess who? CLS 5. 252–286.Suche in Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A., Gerald Gazdar, Tom Wasow & Steven Weisler. 1985. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 117–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133839.Suche in Google Scholar
Shiraïshi, Aoi. 2018. Discordances dans l’ellipse périphérique en français. Université de Paris PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Shiraïshi, Aoi, Barbara Hemforth, Philip Miller & Anne Abeillé. 2019. Verbal mismatch in right-node raising. Glossa 4(1). 114. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.843.Suche in Google Scholar
Sprouse, John, Ivan Caponigro, Ciro Greco & Carlo Cechetto. 2016. Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34. 307–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8.Suche in Google Scholar
Tellier, Christine. 1990. Subjacency and subject condition violations in French. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 306–311.Suche in Google Scholar
Truswell, Robert. 2011. Events, phrases and questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577774.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth & Peter W. Culicover. 1980. Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Winckel, Elodie. 2024. French subject islands: Empirical and formal approaches. Berlin: Language Science Press (to appear).Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The empirical turn and its consequences for theoretical syntax
- Linguistic typology in action: how to know more
- Large language models are better than theoretical linguists at theoretical linguistics
- On the goals of theoretical linguistics
- Social meaning
- Large Language Models and theoretical linguistics
- It’s time for a complete theory of partial predictability in language
- Theoretical Linguistics and the philosophy of linguistics
- Speech and sign: the whole human language
- Cross-linguistic insights in the theory of semantics and its interface with syntax
- Reflections on the grammatical view of scalar implicatures
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The empirical turn and its consequences for theoretical syntax
- Linguistic typology in action: how to know more
- Large language models are better than theoretical linguists at theoretical linguistics
- On the goals of theoretical linguistics
- Social meaning
- Large Language Models and theoretical linguistics
- It’s time for a complete theory of partial predictability in language
- Theoretical Linguistics and the philosophy of linguistics
- Speech and sign: the whole human language
- Cross-linguistic insights in the theory of semantics and its interface with syntax
- Reflections on the grammatical view of scalar implicatures