Abstract
After more than sixty years of research, it is now widely accepted that sign languages are real languages, sharing key properties with spoken languages. This means that spoken and signed languages together comprise one natural language system in some sense. But that is not the whole story. Here I probe more deeply into the two systems, and focus on the differences between them -- differences that are pervasive, systematic, and predictable. Taking the existence of two identical articulators in sign languages, the two hands, as a case in point, I show how the physical channel of transmission profoundly influences linguistic structure. Further support for the characterization of language proposed here, different systems in the same faculty, comes from the newly emerging sign language of the Al-Sayyid Bedouins. The Whole Human Language can only be fully understood by admitting and elaborating two types of language in one language faculty, and by acknowledging the fundamental role of the body in determining language form.
References
Arbib, Michael. 2012. How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199896684.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2008. The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies 9. 133–149.10.1075/is.9.1.10aroSearch in Google Scholar
Battison, R. 1978. Lexical borrowing in American sign language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Search in Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert & Noam Chomsky. 2016. Why only us? Language and evolution. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Search in Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5644.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine & Louis Goldstein. 1990. Gestural structures: Distinctiveness, phonological processes and historical change. In Ignatius G. Mattingly & Michael Studdert-Kennedy (eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception, 313–338. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. Of minds and language. Biolinguistics 1. 9–27. https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.8585.Search in Google Scholar
Corballis, Michael. 2002. From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691221731Search in Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler. 2009. Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech 52. 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909103175.Search in Google Scholar
De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Damian E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19. 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013.Search in Google Scholar
Donald, Mervin. 1991. Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen & Brenda Falgier. 1999. Talking about space with space: Describing environments in ASL. In Elizabeth A. Winston (ed.), Story telling and conversations: Discourse in deaf communities, 3–26. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2010. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Diane Brentari. 2017. Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40. e46–e82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001247.Search in Google Scholar
Graziano, Maria & Gullberg Marianne. 2018. When speech stops, gesture stops: Evidence from developmental and crosslinguistic comparisons. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 879. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00879.Search in Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88.Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1980. Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110813098.207Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2012. Reflections on “Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language” by Wendy Sandler. Gesture 12. 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.3.02ken.Search in Google Scholar
Kisch, Shifra. 2008. Deaf discourse: The social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community. Medical Anthropology 27. 283–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740802222807.Search in Google Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler. 2016. Taking meaning in hand. Sign Language and Linguistics 19. 37–81. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.1.02lep.Search in Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture and meaning in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615054Search in Google Scholar
MacNeilage, Peter. 2008. The origin of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Meir, Irit. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20. 413–450. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015041113514.10.1023/A:1015041113514Search in Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Assaf Israel, Wendy Sandler, Padden Carol & Mark Aronoff. 2013. The influence of community on language structure: Evidence from two young sign languages. Community Structure and Language Structure 12. 247–291. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.04mei.Search in Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2018. Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relation? Frontiers in Psychology 9. 1651.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651Search in Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosodic phonology in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42. 143–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420020201.Search in Google Scholar
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux. 2018. Visual iconicity across sign languages: Large-scale automated video analysis of iconic articulators and locations. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00725.Search in Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American sign language. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar
Padden, Carol & Tom Humphries. 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1097/00003446-198904000-00022Search in Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Robin H. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1. 227.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227.Search in Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll. eds. 2012. Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110261325Search in Google Scholar
Reilly, Judy, Marina McIntire & Ursula Bellugi. 1990. The acquisition of conditionals in American sign language: Grammaticized facial expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 11. 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400009632.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. in press. Sign Language and Spoken Language: The Dual System Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1989. Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American sign language. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110250473Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2006. Phonology, phonetics, and the nondominant hand. In Louis Goldstein, Doug H. Whalen & Catherine Best (eds.), Laboratory phonology 8. 185–212. Berlin: Moutonde Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197211.1.185Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2009. Symbiotic symbolization by hand and mouth in sign language. Semiotica 174(1/4). 241–275. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.035.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2012a. The phonological organization of sign languages. Language and Linguistics Compass. 6. 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.326. Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2012b. Dedicated gestures in the emergence of sign language. Gesture 12. 265–307. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.3.01san.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2018. The body as evidence for the nature of language. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1782.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir & Carol Padden. 2011a. The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 503–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9128-2.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff & Carol Padden (eds.). 2022. The emergence of sign languages. Basel: MDPI.10.3390/books978-3-0365-6246-9Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Marianne Gullberg & Carol Padden. 2018. Editorial: Visual language. Frontiers in Psychology 10. 1765. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01765.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139163910Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Svetlana Dachkovsky, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2011b. The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax. Lingua 121. 2014–2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.007.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2005. The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102. 2661–2665. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405448102.Search in Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2022. What it all means: Semantics for (Almost) everything. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/12128.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Stamp, Rose, David Cohn, Hagit Hel-Or & Wendy Sandler. 2024. Kinect-ing the dots: Using motion-capture technology to distinguish sign language linguistic from gestural expressions. Language and Speech 67. 255–267.10.1177/00238309231169502Search in Google Scholar
Stokoe, William. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American deaf. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.Search in Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah F. 2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511509629Search in Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, Harry. 1993. Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10. 209–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000004X.Search in Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2003. Representation of telicity in ASL. CLS 39. 354–368.Search in Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike & Connie, de Vos (eds.). 2012. Sign languages in village communities. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614511496Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The empirical turn and its consequences for theoretical syntax
- Linguistic typology in action: how to know more
- Large language models are better than theoretical linguists at theoretical linguistics
- On the goals of theoretical linguistics
- Social meaning
- Large Language Models and theoretical linguistics
- It’s time for a complete theory of partial predictability in language
- Theoretical Linguistics and the philosophy of linguistics
- Speech and sign: the whole human language
- Cross-linguistic insights in the theory of semantics and its interface with syntax
- Reflections on the grammatical view of scalar implicatures
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The empirical turn and its consequences for theoretical syntax
- Linguistic typology in action: how to know more
- Large language models are better than theoretical linguists at theoretical linguistics
- On the goals of theoretical linguistics
- Social meaning
- Large Language Models and theoretical linguistics
- It’s time for a complete theory of partial predictability in language
- Theoretical Linguistics and the philosophy of linguistics
- Speech and sign: the whole human language
- Cross-linguistic insights in the theory of semantics and its interface with syntax
- Reflections on the grammatical view of scalar implicatures