Home Research on high-bandwidth linear active disturbance rejection control method for variable speed turboshaft engine
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Research on high-bandwidth linear active disturbance rejection control method for variable speed turboshaft engine

  • Bo Huang , Wenbo Li EMAIL logo , Yerong Peng and Jie Song
Published/Copyright: December 19, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The wide flight range and high torsional vibration frequency of high-speed helicopters impose stricter criteria for the high-bandwidth control of turboshaft engines. Consequently, research is underway to implement a high-bandwidth control method for turboshaft engines using the linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) theory. Initially, the LADRC is designed based on the mathematical model of the integrated helicopter/engine system. To address the challenge of maintaining control quality with varying speed reference commands for the power turbine, an improved LADRC method with tracking differentiators (TD) is developed. Numerical simulations comparing the control effectiveness of LADRC with TD to cascade PID and conventional LADRC methods are conducted. The results demonstrate that the improved LADRC gains have a wider tuning range than the LADRC controller, and the power turbine speed tracking effect of LADRC with TD is optimal. It is more conducive to accomplish high-bandwidth control of turboshaft engine with variable rotational speed.


Corresponding author: Wenbo Li, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, JiangSu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, No. 29 Yudao Street, Nanjing 210016, China, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The work has been co-supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant/Award Number: J2019-I-0020-0019).

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Ni, X. Helicopter manual[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

2. Ximing, Wu. Current Status, Development Trend and Countermeasure for High-Speed Rotorcraft[J]. J Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 2015; 47:173–9. https://doi.org/10.16356/j.1005-2615.2015.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

3. Gao, W, Cai, J. Research on the development of army aviation high-speed helicopter[J]. Sci Technol Innov 2020;6:39–40.Search in Google Scholar

4. Hao, Li, Hui, Chen. Development Need and Status of Variable Speed Transmission for Helicopter [J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology 2016:46–50. https://doi.org/10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2016.08.046.Search in Google Scholar

5. Robuck, M, Wilkerson, J, Snyder, C. Study and sub-system optimization of propulsion and drive systems for the Large Civil TiltRotor (LCTR2) Rotorcraft[C]. Phoenix: 69th Annual Forum Proceedings of American Helicopter Society; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

6. DiOttavio, J, Friedmann, D. Operational benefits of an optimal, widely variable speed rotor[C]. Phoenix: 66th Annual Forum Proceedings of American Helicopter Society, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

7. Steiner, JH. An investigation of performance benefits and trim requirements of a variable speed helicopter rotor[D]. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

8. Snyder, CA, Acree, CW. Preliminary assessment of variable speed power turbine technology on civil Tiltrotor size and performance[C]. Fort Worth: 68th Annual Forum Proceedings of American Helicopter Society; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

9. Han, J. Automatic disturbance rejection controller and its application[J]. Control Decis 1998;1:19–23.Search in Google Scholar

10. Gao, Z. Scaling and parameterization based controller tuning[C]. Denver: American Control Conference; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

11. Zheng, Q, Gao, Z. Motion control design optimization: problem and solutions[J]. Int J Intell Control Syst 2005;10:269–76.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gao, Z. Active disturbance rejection control: a paradigm shift in feedback control system design[C]. Minneapolis: American Control Conference; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

13. Tian, G, Gao, Z. Frequency response analysis of active disturbance rejection based control system[C]. Singapore: 16th IEEE International Conference; 2007.10.1109/CCA.2007.4389465Search in Google Scholar

14. Chen, Z, Liu, J, Sun, M. Overview of a novel control method: active disturbance rejection control technology and its practical applications[J]. CAAI Trans Intell Syst 2018;13:865–77.Search in Google Scholar

15. Liu, C, Luo, G, Duan, X, Chen, Z, Zhang, Z, Qiu, C. Adaptive LADRC-based disturbance rejection method for electromechanical servo system[J]. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2019;56:876–89, https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2019.2955664.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lin, P, Wu, Z, Fei, Z, Sun, XM. A generalized PID interpretation for high-order LADRC and cascade LADRC for servo systems[J]. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2021;69:5207–14, https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2021.3082058.Search in Google Scholar

17. Cai, Z, Wang, Z, Zhao, J, Wang, Y. Equivalence of LADRC and INDI controllers for improvement of LADRC in practical applications[J]. ISA Trans 2022;126:562–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.07.039.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Liang, H, Xu, Y, Yu, X. ADRC vs LADRC for quadrotor UAV with wind disturbances[C]. In: 2019 Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Guangzhou. IEEE; 2019:8037–43 pp.10.23919/ChiCC.2019.8865272Search in Google Scholar

19. Liu, Y, Yang, H, Pan, H. Attitude control of quadrotor UAV based on improved linear active disturbance rejection control. Electron Opt Control 2023;30:8–14+20.10.54254/2755-2721/20/20231076Search in Google Scholar

20. Wang, Z, Tong, Z. Linear active disturbance rejection control for attitude of quadrotor with external disturbances based sliding mode[J]. J Qingdao Univ Sci Technol (Nat Sci Ed) 2022;43:90–7+108.10.1007/s11071-022-07349-ySearch in Google Scholar

21. Qian, Q, Dan, Z, Zhang, S. Linear active disturbance rejection control method for intake pressure control in aero-engine transient test[J]. J Aero Power 2019;34:2271–9.Search in Google Scholar

22. Zhang, H, Sun, L, Sun, J. Robust disturbance rejection control design for integrated helicopter system/turbo-shaft engine[J]. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 2010;31:883–92.Search in Google Scholar

23. Sun, L, Wang, R, Sun, J. Subsystem disturbance rejection control of turbo-shaft engine/helicopter based on cascade ADRC[J]. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 2011;37:1312–16.Search in Google Scholar

24. Ning, J. Study on simulation and control of integrated helicopter/transmission/engine system with variable rotor speed[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2016.Search in Google Scholar

25. Chen, X. Active disturbance rejection controller tuning and its applications to thermal processes[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-10-10
Accepted: 2023-12-03
Published Online: 2023-12-19
Published in Print: 2024-08-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition analysis of mode switching in supersonic jets impinging on flat and corrugated plates
  3. Impact of cavity and ramp configuration on the combustion performance of a strut-based scramjet combustor
  4. In-service load calculation surrogate models for high-pressure turbine blade life digital twin
  5. Numerical analysis on the effect of passive control geometry in supersonic jet mixing enhancement
  6. Study on one-dimensional performance prediction of multi-stage axial turbine based on the blade height
  7. Dynamic characteristics of open-ends squeeze film dampers with air ingestion
  8. Fluid flow in a microdiffuser at small Reynolds numbers
  9. A study on optimal rotor speed control method for helicopter power system considering the influence of infrared suppressors
  10. Effects of turbulence and flamelet combustion modelling on the CFD simulation of a dual inlet ramjet combustor
  11. Design and combustion characteristics analysis of a static shaft turbofan engine
  12. Aerothermal effects of squealer openings on a cavity tip in a turbine cascade
  13. Endwall heat transfer in wedge channel with teardrop pin fins, circular fins and oblong pin fins
  14. Virtual deflection with synthetic jet actuators at high angles of attack
  15. Design of mode transition control system for tandem TBCC engine based on direct performance parameters closed-loop control
  16. Effect of tab shape, length, and placement on the over-expanded free jet at Mach 2.0
  17. Influence of the ending position of controllable speed casing on a transonic compressor rotor tip leakage flow
  18. Integrated modeling and coupling characteristics analysis of helicopter/engine/infrared suppressor
  19. Effect of velocity ratio and Mach number on thin lip coaxial jet
  20. C conjugate heat transfer simulation of swirl internal cooling on blade leading edge
  21. Influence of inlet structure on combustion flow structure in magnesium powder fueled water ramjet engine
  22. Research on high-bandwidth linear active disturbance rejection control method for variable speed turboshaft engine
  23. Numerical investigation of force over the horizontal jet tab of various sector angle fixed to the convergent-divergent nozzle exit
Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2023-0090/html
Scroll to top button