Home Effect of tab shape, length, and placement on the over-expanded free jet at Mach 2.0
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of tab shape, length, and placement on the over-expanded free jet at Mach 2.0

  • Srinivasa Rao Lavala , Partha Mondal and Sudip Das EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 18, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Experiments have been carried out to investigate the over expanded free jet at Mach number 2.0 without and with tabs of different cross-sectional shapes, tab length penetration into the jet core defined as blockage ratio, and symmetrical and asymmetrical placement of tabs at the jet exit. The cross-sectional shapes such as triangular, square, and circular have been studied with the penetration depth of 3 %, 7 %, and 11 % blockage. The Pitot tube and Schlieren flow visualization were carried out in experiments. The basic features of the jet with Mach disk, shock cell, and its distortion with the adoption of tabs at various nozzle pressure ratios indicate a definite influence that helps in the reduction of the core jet length. This characteristic is also influenced by changes in tab cross-section and length of penetration. Since the basic jet has three-dimensional structures, the asymmetric placement of tabs is beneficial compared to the symmetric orientation of tabs. The jet width increases with adoption of these tabs and different shapes. Whereas, a maximum core jet length reduction of the order of 60 % could be achieved using the present techniques.


Corresponding author: Sudip Das, Department of Space Engineering and Rocketry, BIT Mesra, Ranchi, 835215, India, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors states no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Paramanantham, V, Janakiram, S, Gopalapillai, R. Prediction of Mach stem height in compressible open jets. Part 1. Overexpanded jets. J Fluid Mech 2022;942:A48. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.374.Search in Google Scholar

2. Kumar, RA, Gopalapillai, R. Shock transformation and hysteresis in underexpanded confined jets. J Fluid Mech 2017;823:538–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.231.Search in Google Scholar

3. Horning, HG, Robinson, ML. Transition from regular to Mach reflection of shock waves Part 2. The steady-flow criterion. J Fluid Mech 1982;123:155–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112082003000.Search in Google Scholar

4. Hadjadj, A, Kudryavtsev, AN, Ivanov, MS. Numerical investigation of shock-reflection phenomena in overexpanded supersonic jets. AIAA J 2004;42:570–7. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.989.Search in Google Scholar

5. Shimshi, E, Ben-Dor, G, Levy, A. Viscous simulation of shock-reflection hysteresis in overexpanded planar nozzles. J Fluid Mech 2006;635:189–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211200900771X.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bai, CY, Wu, ZN. Size and shape of shock waves and slipline for Mach reflection in steady flow. J Fluid Mech 2017;818:116–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.139.Search in Google Scholar

7. Rathakrishnan, E. Applied gas dynamics, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 2019.10.1002/9781119500377Search in Google Scholar

8. Tam, CKW. Supersonic jet noise. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1995;27:17–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.27.010195.000313.Search in Google Scholar

9. Powell, A. On the mechanism of choked jet noise. Proc Phys Soc B 1953;66:1039–56. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/66/12/306.Search in Google Scholar

10. Powell, A, Umeda, Y, Ishii, R. Observations of the oscillation modes of choked circular jets. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;92:2823–36. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.404398.Search in Google Scholar

11. Umeda, Y, Ishii, R. On the sound sources of screech tones radiated from choked circular jets. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:1845–58. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1402620.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Edgington-Mitchell, D, Wang, T, Nogueira, P, Schmidt, O, Jaunet, V, Duke, D, et al.. Waves in screeching jets. J Fluid Mech 2021;913:A7. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.1175.Search in Google Scholar

13. Edgington-Mitchell, D, Oberleithner, K, Honnery, DR, Soria, J. Coherent structure and sound production in the helical mode of a screeching axisymmetric jet. J Fluid Mech 2014;748:822–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.173.Search in Google Scholar

14. Rao, AN, Kushari, A, Chandra Mandal, A. Screech characteristics of under-expanded high aspect ratio elliptic jet. Phys Fluid 2020;32:076106. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010186.Search in Google Scholar

15. Bradbury, LJS, Khadem, AH. The distortion of a jet by tabs. J Fluid Mech 1975;70:801–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075002352.Search in Google Scholar

16. Zaman, KBMQ, Reeder, MF, Samimy, M. Control of an axisymmetric jet using vortex generators. Phys Fluid 1994;6:778–93. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868316.Search in Google Scholar

17. Zaman, KBMQ. Axis switching and spreading of an asymmetric jet: the role of coherent structure dynamics. J Fluid Mech 1996;316:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096000420.Search in Google Scholar

18. Lovaraju, P, Clement, S, Rathakrishnan, E. Effect of cross-wire and tabs on sonic jet structure. Shock Waves 2007;17:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-007-0092-z.Search in Google Scholar

19. Rathakrishnan, E. Experimental studies on the limiting tab. AIAA J 2009;47:2475–85. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.43790.Search in Google Scholar

20. Maruthupandiyan, K, Rathakrishnan, E. Tab location effect on supersonic jet mixing. Aeronaut J 2018;122:1229–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2018.61.Search in Google Scholar

21. Ahuja, KK, BrownShear, WH. Flow control by mechanical tabs. In: AIAA 2nd shear flow conference, 1989; 1989.10.2514/6.1989-994Search in Google Scholar

22. Samimy, M, Zaman, KBMQ, Reeder, MF. Effect of tabs on the flow and noise field of an axisymmetric jet. AIAA J 1993;31:609–19. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11594.Search in Google Scholar

23. Hortensius, R, Dutton, JC, Elliott, GS. Near field of an axisymmetric underexpanded jet and an adjacent parallel surface. AIAA J 2017;55:2489–502. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055515.Search in Google Scholar

24. Karthick, SK, Jagadeesh, G, Reddy, KPJ. Visualization of supersonic free and confined jet using planar laser Mie scattering technique. J Indian Inst Sci 2016;96:29–46. http://journal.library.iisc.ernet.in/index.php/iisc/article/view/4596/0.Search in Google Scholar

25. André, B, Castelain, T, Bailly, C. Experimental exploration of underexpanded supersonic jets. Shock Waves 2014;24:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-013-0457-4.Search in Google Scholar

26. Mehta, RC, Prasad, JK. Estimation of shock-cell structure of axisymmetric supersonic free jets. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 1996;3:141–7. https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/29795.Search in Google Scholar

27. Nagel, RT, Denham, JW, Papathanasiou, AG. Supersonic jet screech tone cancellation. AIAA J 1983;21:1541–5. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60153.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-24
Accepted: 2023-08-30
Published Online: 2023-10-18
Published in Print: 2024-08-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition analysis of mode switching in supersonic jets impinging on flat and corrugated plates
  3. Impact of cavity and ramp configuration on the combustion performance of a strut-based scramjet combustor
  4. In-service load calculation surrogate models for high-pressure turbine blade life digital twin
  5. Numerical analysis on the effect of passive control geometry in supersonic jet mixing enhancement
  6. Study on one-dimensional performance prediction of multi-stage axial turbine based on the blade height
  7. Dynamic characteristics of open-ends squeeze film dampers with air ingestion
  8. Fluid flow in a microdiffuser at small Reynolds numbers
  9. A study on optimal rotor speed control method for helicopter power system considering the influence of infrared suppressors
  10. Effects of turbulence and flamelet combustion modelling on the CFD simulation of a dual inlet ramjet combustor
  11. Design and combustion characteristics analysis of a static shaft turbofan engine
  12. Aerothermal effects of squealer openings on a cavity tip in a turbine cascade
  13. Endwall heat transfer in wedge channel with teardrop pin fins, circular fins and oblong pin fins
  14. Virtual deflection with synthetic jet actuators at high angles of attack
  15. Design of mode transition control system for tandem TBCC engine based on direct performance parameters closed-loop control
  16. Effect of tab shape, length, and placement on the over-expanded free jet at Mach 2.0
  17. Influence of the ending position of controllable speed casing on a transonic compressor rotor tip leakage flow
  18. Integrated modeling and coupling characteristics analysis of helicopter/engine/infrared suppressor
  19. Effect of velocity ratio and Mach number on thin lip coaxial jet
  20. C conjugate heat transfer simulation of swirl internal cooling on blade leading edge
  21. Influence of inlet structure on combustion flow structure in magnesium powder fueled water ramjet engine
  22. Research on high-bandwidth linear active disturbance rejection control method for variable speed turboshaft engine
  23. Numerical investigation of force over the horizontal jet tab of various sector angle fixed to the convergent-divergent nozzle exit
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2023-0079/html
Scroll to top button