Startseite Technik An improved aerodynamic performance optimization method of 3-D low Reynolds number rotor blade
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

An improved aerodynamic performance optimization method of 3-D low Reynolds number rotor blade

  • Shuyi Zhang und Bo Yang EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Mai 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, an improved aerodynamic performance optimization method for 3-D low Reynolds number (Re) rotor blade is proposed. A conventional optimization procedure of blade is usually divided into three parts, such as the parameterization method, the fitness value evaluation and the optimization algorithm. This work is mainly focused on the first two parts. The parametrization method, Camber-FFD, is presented based on the camber parametrization method and the free-form deformation algorithm (FFD). The shape of 3-D blade is parameterized by the incidence angles and the coordinates of the maximum camber points. The fitness value evaluation has been realized with the help of an adaptive topological back propagation multi-layer forward artificial neural network (BP-MLFANN). During the training of BP-MLFANN, the hybrid particle swarm optimization method combined with the modified very fast simulate annealing algorithm (HPSO-MVFSA) is adopted to determine the neural network topology adaptively. To verify the effectiveness of this aerodynamic optimization method, the aerodynamic performance of a 3-D low-Re blade, such as Blade D900, is optimized, and the results are compared and analyzed based on the experiments and simulations. It is proved that this aerodynamic optimization method is feasible.


Corresponding author: Bo Yang, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, P. R. China, E-mail:

Funding source: National Science and Technology Major Project of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2017-V-0012-0064

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This research was supported by National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2017-V-0012-0064).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Li, Z, Zheng, X. Review of design optimization methods for turbomachinery aerodynamics. Prog Aero Sci 2017;93:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.05.003.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Dutta, AK, Flassig, PM, Bestle, D. Multi-objective blade design using a quasi-3d non-dimensional parameterization approach. In: Proceedings of 1st European air and space conference (CEAS), Berlin, 10–13.09.2007; 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Gratton, T, Ghisu, T, Parks, G, Cambuli, F, Puddu, P. Optimization of blade profiles for the wells turbine. Ocean Eng 2018;169:202–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.08.066.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Jakobsson, S, Amoignon, O. Mesh deformation using radial basis functions for gradient-based aerodynamic shape optimization. Comput Fluids 2007;36:1119–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.11.002.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Li, L, Jiao, J, Sun, S, Zhao, Z, Kang, J. Aerodynamic shape optimization of a single turbine stage based on parameterized free-form deformation with mapping design parameters. Energy 2019;169:444–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.11.002.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Masters, DA, Taylor, NJ, Rendall, T, Allen, CB, Daniel, J. Poole review of airfoil parameterization methods for aerodynamic shape optimization, AIAA paper 2015-0761. Kissemee, Florida: Proceedings AIAA Science and Technology Forum; 2003.10.2514/6.2015-0761Suche in Google Scholar

7. Sommer, L, Bestle, D. Curvature driven two-dimensional multi-objective optimization of compressor blade sections. Aero Sci Technol 2011;15:334–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2010.08.008.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Chen, N, Zhang, H, Ning, F, Xu, Y, Huang, W. An effective turbine blade parameterization and aerodynamic optimization procedure using an improved response surface method. In: Proc. ASME turbo expo (ASME Paper GT 2006-90104). New York, USA: ASME; 2006.10.1115/GT2006-90104Suche in Google Scholar

9. Hicks, RM, Henne, PA. Wing design by numerical optimization. J Aircraft 1978;15:407–12.10.2514/3.58379Suche in Google Scholar

10. Buhmann, MD. Radial basis functions. Acta Numer 2000;9:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492900000015.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Kulfan, BM, Bussoletti, JE. Fundamental parametric geometry representations for aircraft component shapes. In: 11th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Portsmouth, Virginia, September 06–08; 2006.10.2514/6.2006-6948Suche in Google Scholar

12. Pierret, S, Van Den Braembussche, RA. Turbomachinery blade design using a Navier-Stokes solver and artificial neural network. In: Proc. ASME turbo expo (ASME Paper 98-GT-004). New York, USA: ASME; 1998.10.1115/98-GT-004Suche in Google Scholar

13. Chao, SM, Whang, JW, Chou, CH, Su, WS, Hsieh, TH. Optimization of a total internal reflection lens by using a hybrid Taguchi-simulated annealing algorithm. Opt Rev 2014;2:153–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-014-0024-y.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Ghaly, WS, Temesgent, T. Mengistu optimal geometric representation of turbomachinery cascades using NURBS. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 2003;11:359–73.10.1080/1068276031000086778Suche in Google Scholar

15. Sederberg, TW, Parry, SR. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 1986;20:151–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/15922.15903.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Jackson, M, Newill, B, Carter, PR. Aerodynamic optimization for an E-1 class streamliner using arbitrary shape deformation, SAE technical paper 200701-3858. USA: SAE; 2007.10.4271/2007-01-3858Suche in Google Scholar

17. John, A, Shahpar, S, Qin, N. Novel compressor blade shaping through a freeform method. ASME J Turbomach 2017;139:081002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035833.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Duan, W, An, LQ, Wang, Z. Strength reliability analysis of turbine blade using surrogate models. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 2017;7:3699–708. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.724.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Hecht-Nielsen, R. Kolmogorov’s mapping neural network existence theorem. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Joint Conference of Neural Networks. IEEE Press, New York; 1987.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Meireles, MRG, Almeida, PEM, Simoes, MG. A comprehensive review for industrial applicability of artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2003;50:585–601. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2003.812470.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Rai, MM, Nateri, KM. Aerodynamic design using neural networks. AIAA J 2000;38:173–82. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.14393.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Irie, B, Miyake, S. Capabilities of three-layered perceptrons. In: Proc. IEEE int. conf. neural networks. IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA, 1988.10.1109/ICNN.1988.23901Suche in Google Scholar

23. Lecun, Y, Bottou, L, Orr, GB. Efficient back prop. Neural networks: tricks of the trade, this book is an outgrowth of a nips workshop. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1998.10.1007/3-540-49430-8_2Suche in Google Scholar

24. Nazghelichi, T, Aghbashlo, M, Kianmehr, MH. Optimization of an artificial neural network topology using coupled response surface methodology and genetic algorithm for fluidized bed drying. Comput Electron Agric 2011;75:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.09.014.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Yang, Z, Cao, Y, Xiu, J. Power generation forecasting model for photovoltaic array based on generic algorithm and BP neural network. In: 2014 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems. IEEE, Shenzhen, China; 2014:380–383 pp.10.1109/CCIS.2014.7175764Suche in Google Scholar

26. Zhang, JR, Zhang, J, Lok, TM. A hybrid particle swarm optimization–back-propagation algorithm for feedforward neural network training. Appl Math Comput 2007;185:1026–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.025.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Zhang, S, Yang, B, Xie, H, Song, M. Applications of an improved aerodynamic optimization method on a low Reynolds number cascade. Processes 2020;8:1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091150.Suche in Google Scholar

28. D’Ippolito, G, Dossena, V, Mora, A. The influence of blade lean on straight and annular turbine cascade flow field. J Turbomach 2008;133:011013. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000536.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Shirazian, S, Alibabaei, M. Using neural networks coupled with particle swarm optimization technique for mathematical modeling of air gap membrane distillation (AGMD) systems for desalination process. Neural Comput Appl 2016;28:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2184-0.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Yang, B. Axial flow fan design (3), technical report. Key lab. For power machinery & engineering of ministry of education. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Jiao Tong University; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-04-27
Accepted: 2021-05-04
Published Online: 2021-05-20
Published in Print: 2023-08-28

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 19.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2021-0008/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen