Studies on Stepped Air Ejector Diffusers incorporating Heat Transfer Effects

References

1. Chen Qi, Birk AM. Experimental study of an exhaust ejector with entraining diffuser. In Proceedings of GT 2005, ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea and Air, USA, Paper GT 2005–68654, 2005.10.1115/GT2005-68654Suche in Google Scholar

2. Zhang JZ, Li LG, Gao C. Model experiments of infrared suppressor for helicopter exhaust system. J Infrared Millimeter Waves 2005;24(2):125–9.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Kral LD, Ladd JA, Mani M. Application of turbulence models for aerodynamic and propulsion flow fields. AIAA J 1996;34(11):2291–8.10.2514/3.13393Suche in Google Scholar

4. Hah C. Calculation of various diffuser flows with inlet swirl and inlet distortion effects. AIAA J 1983;21(8):1127–33.10.2514/3.8215Suche in Google Scholar

5. Cordova M, Stoffel B. Comparison of various turbulence models in respect to their suitability for CFD calculations of diffuser flows. Paper no. GT2006-90524 pp. 1343–1353, ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, May 8–11, 2006, Barcelona, Spain, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Adane KK, Tachie MF, Ormiston SJ. Numerical analysis of turbulent flow in a conical diffuser. Trans Canadian Soc Mech Eng 2006;30(3):359–74.10.1139/tcsme-2006-0023Suche in Google Scholar

7. Zhou B, Fleck BA, Bouak F, Gauthier JE. Comparison of swirling effects on ejector performance using four turbulence models. Canadian Aeronaut Space J 2000;46(4):178–82.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Singh P, Singh SN, Seshadri V, Kumar A, Tribhuvan N. Pressure Recovery Coefficient in Conical Diffusers with Injection Flux using CFD, 33rd National & 3rd International Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, IIT, Bombay, India, Paper No. NCFMFP2006–1311, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Mateer JC, Birk AM, Poirier D. Computational comparison of an air-air ejector system utilizing a primary S-bend transition duct employing the realizable k-ε turbulence model, Proc. of GT2005, ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea and Air, USA. Paper No. GT2005–68657, 2005.10.1115/GT2005-68657Suche in Google Scholar

10. Maqsood A, Birk AM. Experimental and CFD study of exhaust ejectors with bent mixing tubes. In Proceedings of GT 2005, ASME turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea and Air, USA, Paper GT 2005–68597, 2005.10.1115/GT2005-68597Suche in Google Scholar

11. Vyas BD, Kar S. Study of entrainment and mixing process for an air to air ejector, second symposium on jet pumps and ejectors and gas lift techniques. Cranfield Bedford: BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1975.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Bonnington ST, King AI. Jet pumps and ejectors, a state of the art review and bibliography. Cranfield Bedford: BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1976.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Silvester R, Mueller NH. Design data for the liquid-liquid jet pumps. J Hydraul Res 1968;6(2):129–62.10.1080/00221686809500226Suche in Google Scholar

14. Skebe SA, McCormick DC, Presez Jr WM. Parameter Effects on Mixer-Ejector Pumping Performance, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting AIAA Paper AIAA-88-0188 (2nd ed.), 1988.10.2514/6.1988-188Suche in Google Scholar

15. Hu H, Kobayashi T, Saga T, Taniguchi N, Liu H, Wu S. Research on the rectangular lobed exhaust ejector/mixer systems. Trans Japan Soc Aerosp Sci 1998;41(34):187–94.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Gutmark EJ, Grinstein FF. Flow control with noncircular jets. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 1993;31:239–72.10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.239Suche in Google Scholar

17. Belvins RD. Applied fluid dynamics handbook. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1984.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Tirumalesa D. Effect of ejector spacing on ejector-jet noise characteristics. J Acoust Soc America 1974;56(3):911–16.10.1121/1.1903346Suche in Google Scholar

19. Nicoll WB, Ramaprian BR. Performance of conical diffusers with annular injection at Inlet. J Basic Eng 1970;92(4):827–35.10.1115/1.3425153Suche in Google Scholar

20. Ferri A, Mahrer A, Hefner JN. Investigation of slot cooling at high subsonic speeds. AIAA J 1976;14(7):880–5.10.2514/3.7163Suche in Google Scholar

21. Juhasz AJ, Marek CJ. Combustor liner film cooling in the presence of high free-stream turbulence. NASA TN D-6360, Lewis Research Centre, Ohio, USA, 1971.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Williams JJ, Giedt WH. Experimental and predicted recovery temperature distribution in a rocket nozzle with gaseous film cooling. J Heat Transfer Trans ASME 1977;99:386–91.10.1115/1.3450707Suche in Google Scholar

23. Bergeles G, Gosman AD, Launder BE. The turbulent jet in a cross-stream at low injection rates: a three-dimensional numerical treatment. Numer Heat Transfer 1978;1:217–42.10.1080/10407787808913373Suche in Google Scholar

24. Alvarez J, Jone WP, Scound R. Predictions of Momentum and Scalar Fields in a Jet in Cross-flow using First and Second Order Turbulence Closures, Proceedings of AGARD, Meeting on Computational & Experimental Assessment of Jets in Cross Flow (AGARD CP-534, Paper 24), 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Fluent-6 user’s guide. USA: Fluent Inc., 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Singh P, Singh SN, Seshadri V. Experimental Investigations on Non-Circular Ejector Air Diffusers, Paper No. AIAA-2009-4213, 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Antonio, Texas, June 22–25, 2009.10.2514/6.2009-4213Suche in Google Scholar

27. Singh P, Singh SN, Seshadri V. CFD analysis of the Effect of Wall Thickness (Interface Height) on the Flow Characteristics of Non-circular Ejector Air Diffuser, 6th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2008, Pretoria, South Africa, Paper No. SP3.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Singh P, Singh SN, Seshadri V. Effect of number of slots and overlap on the performance of Non-circular Ejector Air Diffuser, 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, June 16–20, 2014. AIAA–2014–2837.10.2514/6.2014-2837Suche in Google Scholar

29. Patankar SV. Numerical heat transfer & fluid flow. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis Publication, 1980.Suche in Google Scholar