Startseite Medizin Chitinolytic Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 as a biocontrol agent against mycotoxigenic and phytopathogenic fungi
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Chitinolytic Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 as a biocontrol agent against mycotoxigenic and phytopathogenic fungi

  • Ozlem Oztopuz ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Nermin Sarigul , Fakhra Liaqat , Ro-Dong Park und Rengin Eltem
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Oktober 2018

Abstract

Background

Biological control of pathogenic fungi is a possible alternate to the chemical control, which is harmful to humans and environment. Soil-borne Bacillus strains can be potential biocontrol agents and a source of lytic enzymes.

Aim

This study aimed to examine biocontrol potential and lytic enzyme activities of a soil isolate Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19.

Materials and methods

Strain was identified by biochemical and 16S rRNA gene analysis and its biocontrol activity was investigated against Aspergillus niger EGE-K-213, Aspergillus foetidus EGE-K-211, Aspergillus ochraceus EGE-K-217, Fusarium solani KCTC6328, Rhizoctonia solani KACC40111 and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides KACC40689. Chitinase, chitosanase, N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase and protease activities of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 were also determined. Chitosanase was purified using Sephadex G-150 column and its molecular weight was determined by SDS-PAGE. Chitooligosaccharides production using chitosanase was carried out and analysed by TLC and HPLC.

Results

Results depicted that B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 has shown inhibitory effects against all the test fungi. Chitinase, chitosanase, N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase and protease activities were determined as 2.7 U mL−1, 7.2 U mL−1, 6.2 U mL−1 and 12.2 U mL−1, respectively. Molecular weight of purified chitosanase was 44 kDa. Chitosanase hydrolysed chitosan to glucosamine (GlcN), dimers (GlcN)2 and trimers (GlcN)3.

Conclusion

Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 can be anticipated as useful biocontrol agent and its chitosanase can be utilized for enzymatic synthesis of chitooligosaccharides.

Öz

Giriş

Patojenik küflerin biyolojik kontrolü, insanlara ve çevreye zararlı kimyasal kontrole olası bir alternatiftir.

Amaç

Bu çalışmada toprak kaynaklı bir izolat olan Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19’un litik enzim ve potansiyel biyokontrol aktivitesinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Gereç ve Yöntem

Suş biyokimyasal ve 16S rRNA gen analizi ile tanımlandı ve Aspergillus niger EGE-K-213, Aspergillus foetidus EGE-K-211, Aspergillus ochraceus EGE-K-217 ve Fusarium solani KCTC6328 Rhizoctonia solani KACC40111 ve Colletotrichum gloeosporioides KACC40689 karşı antifungal aktivitesi araştırıldı. B. Subtilis Ege-B-1.19’un kitinaz, kitosanaz, n-asetil-β-hekzosaminidaz ve proteaz aktiviteleri de ayrıca belirlenmiştir. Kitosanaz Sephadex G-150 kolonu kullanılarak saflaştırıldı ve molekül ağırlığı SDS-PAGE ile belirlendi. Kitosanaz kullanılarak kitosan-glikozilazların üretimi TLC ve HPLC ile gerçekleştirildi ve analiz edildi.

Bulgular

Elde edilen sonuçlar B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19’un tüm test küflerine karşı inhibitör etki gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Kitinaz, kitosanaz, n-asetil-β-hekzosaminidaz ve proteaz aktiviteleri sırasıyla 2,7 U mL−1, 7,2 U mL−1, 6,2 U mL−1 ve 12,2 U mL−1 olarak belirlendi. Saflaştırılmış kitosanazın moleküler ağırlığı 44 kDa idi. Kitosanaz kitosanı glukozamin (GlcN), dimerlere (GlcN)2 and trimerlere (GlcN)3 kadar hidroliz etti.

Sonuç

Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 faydalı bir biyo-kontrol ajanı olarak öngörülebilir ve kitosanaz kitooligosakkaridlerin enzimatik sentezi için kullanılabilir.

Introduction

In the absence of effective chemical control methods and to reduce environmental pollution, the biological control of plant pathogens is currently considered a key practice in sustainable agriculture. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas and Trichoderma species all express good antagonistic activities under controlled laboratory or greenhouse conditions. Thus, antagonistic microorganisms play a very important role in biological control [1]. In the past 30 years, there have been extensive research activities to explore and develop strategies based on microbial antagonists to biologically control postharvest pathogens [2]. The bacterial biocontrol mechanisms for plant protection against fungal diseases include systemic resistance, parasitism and competition for nutrients. Bacteria present in soil are also known to produce a number of enzymes and antimicrobial compounds [3].

Bacillus species are the most studied antagonist among the soil born bacteria [4]. They have been employed in biocontrol [5], [6] and bioremediation [7]. Bacillus species were found to inhibit a number of fungi under in vitro conditions [8], [9]. Bacillus strains can secrete various secondary metabolites, which inhibit the pathogenic fungi. It is also known that Bacillus strains are able to produce various hydrolytic enzymes, including chitosanases, chitinases, N-acetyl-β-hexoaminidase, proteases and laminarinases in order to inhibit the growth of pathogenic fungi by degrading their cell wall [8], [10], [11]. Among these hydrolytic enzymes chitosanase (EC 3.2.1.132) are important enzymes not only for the biocontrol of pathogenic fungi, but also with reference to their ability to produce chitooligosaccharides (COS): a degradative product of chitosan. Chitosan and its derivatives have shown various antibacterial, antifungal, antitumor and antioxidant activities [12] which made them important to be used in several industries including agriculture, food, cosmetics, biocontrol, and wastewater treatment. However, the difficult dissolution of chitosan limits its use in several industries including food and biomedical applications [13]. Unlike chitosan, chitosan oligosaccharides and short chain D-glucosamine units are readily soluble in water. Chemical and enzymatic ways are generally used to synthesize chitosan oligosaccharide, however, chemical methods have some disadvantages such as difficult control of chemical reactions, formation of various secondary compounds and use of harmful chemicals [12], [13]. Enzymatic methods including microbial chitosanases showed excellent performances in COS production [14], [15], [16].

With the aim to discover potential biocontrol agents, this study was designed to isolate chitinolytic Bacillus strains from vineyard soil. Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 having the highest chitinolytic activity was identified and examined for its in vitro antagonistic activity against phytopathogenic and mycotoxigenic fungi. Furthermore, partial purification of chitosanase from B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 and enzymatic production and quantitative analysis of COS were also the objectives of this study.

Materials and methods

Chitin and chitosan with various DA were purchased from Taehoon Bio (Seoul, Korea). Chitooligosaccharides, (GlcN)n (n=2–7), were purchased from Wako Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, D-glucosamine, glycol chitosan, p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminide (p-NP-GlcNAc) and azocasein were purchased from Sigma. Plate count agar (PCA), LB-broth and nutrient agar (NA) were purchased from Merck, Germany. Aspergillus niger EGE-K-213, A. foetidus EGE-K-211, A. ochraceus EGE-K-217 were obtained from Mold Culture Collection, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. Fusarium solani KCTC 6328, Rhizoctonia solani KACC 40111 and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides KACC 40689 strains were kindly provided by Materials-National Research Laboratory, Chonnam National University, South Korea.

Soil sampling and analysis

Soil samples were obtained as composites from five different sampling points of a vineyard in Manisa province, Turkey (38° 40′N and 27° 03′E and 39° 08′N and 27° 37′E). At each sampling point, firstly, surface material was dug to a depth of 2–3 cm. Soil samples were taken using sterile equipments at a depth of 25–30 cm for chemical analysis and isolation of potential biocontrol agents. The sample soils were analyzed in TARIS R&D Center, Soil Laboratory, Bornova, Izmir for water content, pH, salt (%), carbonate (%), texture, clay (%), sand (%), nitrate-N (%), total phosphorus and potassium.

Isolation of endospore forming bacteria and screening of chitosanolytic activity

Soil samples were suspended in sterile distilled water, shaken vigorously and incubated on a water bath (100 rpm, 80°C) for 30 min to kill all vegetative microbial cells. After incubation, the soil samples were serially diluted (10-fold), plated on NA medium and incubated at 30°C for 2 days and spore forming bacteria were isolated. Colonies arising from the isolates survived after heat shock were transferred to a maintenance medium. The isolates were stored in glycerol at −80°C [17], [18]. Screening of chitosanase production was carried out using chitosanase detection agar (CDA) containing 1% soluble chitosan, 0.13% sodium phosphate, 0.3% potassium phosphate, 0.05% sodium chloride, 0.1% ammonium chloride, 0.024% magnesium sulfate, 0.001% calcium chloride and 2% agar (pH 6.5). Isolates were inoculated on the plates, incubated at 30°C for 5 days and colonies surrounded by clear zones were isolated [8]. The isolates selected through the screening procedure were then cultured in LB-broth containing 0.2% swollen chitin and 0.2% colloidal chitosan and incubated at 30°C and 200 rpm for 2 days for the measurement of lytic enzyme activities.

Identification of the bacterial isolate

Isolate Ege-B-1.19, showing highest chitosanolytic activity was selected and performed Phenotypic identification test by using BBL Chrystal Gram Positive ID System Test Kit in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were interpreted according to BBL™ Crystal™ Identification System. For molecular identification, DNA isolation were performed using the UNIQ-10 Spin Column Genomic DNA Minipreps Kit (SK201&202) by the manufacturer’s instructions. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the universal eubacteria primers 8F, 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ and 1492R, 5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACT-3′. Partial 16S rDNA raw sequence data were imported into the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor and a contiguous consensus sequence was generated. Using blast against GenBank database (EU099356), the nearest relatives of these consensus sequence were identified. Data obtained after sequencing were submitted in the NCBI GenBank database to attain accession numbers.

Measurement of lytic enzyme activities

Chitinase activity was detected by measuring the amount of reducing sugar released from swollen chitin by the Schale’s method using a standard curve for N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) [19]. The assay was performed by mixing 0.9 mL of 1% swollen chitin (pH 6.0) and 0.1 mL of fermentation broth. After incubation for 2 h, at 37°C, chitin hydrolysis reaction was terminated by adding 0.2 mL NaOH (1 N). One millilitre Schale’s reagent was then added and the reaction mixture was kept in boiling water for 15 min followed by chilling on ice. The amount of reducing sugars released in the supernatant was measured spectrophotometrically at 420 nm. One unit of chitinase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol GlcNAc per hour [19].

Chitosanase activity was measured by DNS method using a standard curve of D-glucosamine (GlcN) [20]. The assay was performed by mixing 0.9 mL of 1% soluble chitosan (pH 6.0) and 0.1 mL of fermentation broth. After incubation for 30 min, at 37°C, hydrolysis reaction was terminated by adding 0.2 mL NaOH (1 N) and 1.5 mL DNS reagent. The reaction mixture was kept in boiling water for 5 min followed by chilling on ice. The amount of reducing sugars released in the supernatant was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. One unit of the enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of reducing sugars per min at 37°C [20].

N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase activity was assayed by using p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminide (p-NP-GlcNAc) as substrates. The reaction mixture containing 50 μL of 5 mM p-nitrophenyl-N-acetylglucosaminide, 50 μL of crude enzyme, and 100 μL of 50 mM McIlvaine buffer (pH 5.0) was incubated at 45°C for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 1 mL of 0.2 M Na2CO3 and the amount of p-nitrophenol released was determined by measuring the absorbance at 405 nm. One unit of β-N-acetylglucosaminidase was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of p-nitrophenol per min [21].

Protease activity was measured using 450 μL of 1% azocasein in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 50 μL enzyme solution. Reaction mixture was incubated at 50°C for 30 min. Reaction was terminated by adding 250 μL of 25% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. Mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm and 600 μL of supernatant was mixed with 600 μL of 1 N NaOH. Enzyme activity was measured at 440 nm and 1 U was defined as the amount that increased absorbance to 0.01 at 440 nm per min [22].

In vitro antifungal activity assay

Isolate Ege-B-1.19 was tested for antifungal activity against A. niger EGE-K-213, A. foetidus EGE-K-211, A. ochraceus EGE-K-217, F. solani KCTC 6328, R. solani KACC 40111 and C. gloeosporioides KACC 40689. Plugs of 6 mm in diameter were cut from the outer edges of the colony from the test fungi and placed in the center of PCA plates. Fermentation broth of isolate Ege-B-1.19 was filtered through 0.22 μm pore size membrane filters and used to prepare filter paper discs. Fifty microliter of filtered fermentation broth was dispensed on sterilized filter paper discs (9 mm) and discs were placed on the PCA plates around the fungal plugs. Fifty microliter of steriled water was used as a control. The plates were incubated for 10 days at 28°C and the ability of the isolate Ege-B-1.19 to inhibit test fungi was observed daily.

Hydrolysis of chitosan by chitosanases to produce chitosan oligomers

For the hydrolysis of chitosan to chitosan oligosaccharides, the reaction mixture containing 1 mL of 1% soluble chitosan, 1 mL of 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5), and 20 μL of culture supernatant was incubated at 37°C for 30 min and the reaction was stopped by immersing the tubes in boiling water for few minutes.

Investigation of chitosan oligomers by analytical methods

Chitosan oligosaccharides were analyzed by TLC on Silica gel 60 (Kieselgel 60 F254; Merck). A solvent system of n-propanol:ethylacetate:ammonia solution:water (6:3:3:1) was used and sugar spots on the plates were visualized by spraying 0.2% ninhydrin into 99% ethyl-alcohol. For the quantitative analysis of chitosan oligosaccharides, HPLC analysis was carried out with a Carbohydrate Analysis column (300×3.9 mm) using a solvent system of acetonitrile and water (68:32) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 with a refractive index detector [20].

Purification of chitosanase from the isolate Ege-B-1.19

The isolate Ege-B-1.19 was grown in LB-CC broth at 30°C, 200 rpm for 48 h. The cells were removed by centrifugation at 6000 g for 20 min. The supernatant was fractionated by addition of 85% saturation of (NH4)2SO4 and precipitates were collected by centrifugation. The precipitates were dissolved in appropriate volume (2 mL) of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.5 followed by overnight dialysis against the same buffer. After dialysis, the enzyme was concentrated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and eluted on Sephadex G-150 gel column (2.6×40 cm) previously equilibrated with the same buffer. The fractions were collected and chitosanase enzyme activity and protein amount were measured [23].

SDS-PAGE for the detection of molecular weight and chitosanase activity

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamine gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed with 12.5% polyacrylamide gel containing 0.01% soluble chitosan as a substrate for chitosanase activity. After SDS-PAGE, the gel was incubated at 37°C for 2 h with gentle shaking for renaturation in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 1% purified Triton X-100 and 1% skim milk. The gel was washed with distilled water and incubated for another 1 h at 37°C in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) with 1% purified Triton X-100. After renaturation, the gel was transferred to Tris-HCl buffer (0.5 M, pH 9.0) containing 0.01% (w/v) Calcofluor white M2R stain, and incubated for 7 min followed by several washes. Chitosanase activity on the gel was visualized under UV light [23].

Results

Characterization of the soil sample

The vineyard soil sample was collected from center of Manisa in the summer season (2004–2005). Table 1 summarizes the properties of soil samples.

Table 1:

Characteristics of vineyard soil samples.

AnalysisResults
Moisture (%)7.5
pH7.88
Salt (%)0.03
Carbonate (%)2.845
TextureSilty-loamy
Clay (%)20
Sand (%)20
Nitrogen (%)0.091
Phosphorus (ppm)0.9
Potassium (ppm)280

Isolation of endospore forming bacteria and screening of chitosanolytic activity

A total of 28 endospore forming isolates were obtained from the vineyard soil samples and 13 isolates have shown chitosanolytic activity on CDA plates. Isolate Ege-B-1.19 represented the best result by showing the largest clear zone, and therefore, it was selected for further studies.

Identification of Ege-B-1.19 isolate

Ege-B-1.19 isolate was a Gram-positive, rod-shaped and endospore forming bacterium. The cells were 0.8–1.0 μm wide and 2.0–3.0 μm long. Oval shaped, 0.7–0.8 μm wide and 1.0–1.5 μm long spores were produced by this isolate as observed by OLYMPUS (CX-31) model digital camera with microscope (10X40). Ege-B-1.19 isolate was identified as B. subtilis by the BBL™ Crystal™ Identification System which was further confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequence. Sequence was submitted to GenBank and accession number (EU099356) was obtained. Phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 5.0 by using the Neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replications (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA sequences showing the positions of strain Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19, and representatives of Bacillus species. The scale bar represents 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 1:

Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA sequences showing the positions of strain Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19, and representatives of Bacillus species. The scale bar represents 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Lytic enzymatic activities

Activities of four different lytic enzymes including chitinase, chitosanase, N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase and protease activities were measured from the culture supernatant of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19. Chitinase, chitosanase, N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase and protease activities were found as 2.7 U mL−1, 7.2 U mL−1, 6.2 U mL−1 and 12.2 U mL−1, respectively.

Detection of antifungal activity

Culture supernatant of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 showed a very high inhibitory effect (++++) against F. solani KCTC 6328, C. gloeosporioides KACC 40689 and A. ochraceus EGE-K-217, high inhibitory effect (+++) against A. niger EGE-K-213 and A. foetidus EGE-K-211, while a moderate inhibitory effect (++) was observed against R. solani KACC 40111 by in vitro antifungal activity assay (Table 2, Figure 2).

Table 2:

Antifungal activity of Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 against different fungi.

Test fungiAntifungal spectrum of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19
Fusarium solani KCTC 6328a++++
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesa KACC 40689++++
Rhizoctonia solani KACC 40111a++
Aspergillus niger EGE-K-213b+++
Aspergillus foetidus EGE-K-211b+++
Aspergillus ochraceus EGE-K-217b++++
  1. Inhibition strength: ++++, +++, ++; very high, high, moderate. aPhytopathogenic fungi. bMycotoxigenic fungi.

Figure 2: Antifungal activity of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 against to Fusarium solani KCTC 6328. (A) Sterilized water (control) (50 μL). (B) Filtered fermentation broth of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 (50 μL).
Figure 2:

Antifungal activity of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 against to Fusarium solani KCTC 6328. (A) Sterilized water (control) (50 μL). (B) Filtered fermentation broth of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 (50 μL).

Chitosan hydrolysis and analysis of chitosan oligomers

Crude chitosanase was used to hydrolyse soluble chitosan for the synthesis of COS. TLC results showed that the chitosanase had released chitosan oligosaccharides from chitosan, the hydrolysate was primarily containing GlcN, small amount of dimers (GlcN)2 and trimers (GlcN)3. The results suggested that chitosanase from B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 showed exo- and endo-type cleavage. These results were also confirmed by the HPLC analysis results, and quantitative analysis was done using a standard curve (Figure 3). Quantitative analysis showed that chitosan hydrolysate was containing 50.6 mg of GlcN, 5.2 mg of (GlcN)2 and 8.2 mg of (GlcN)3.

Figure 3: HPLC chromatograms of the chitooligosaccharide standards (A) and chitooligosaccharides produced by enzymatic hydrolysis of chitosan (B).
Figure 3:

HPLC chromatograms of the chitooligosaccharide standards (A) and chitooligosaccharides produced by enzymatic hydrolysis of chitosan (B).

Partial purification of chitosanase from B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19

An extracellular chitosanase was partial purified from the culture supernatant (1500 mL) of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 by Sephadex G-150. As shown in Figure 4, two chitosanase peaks of F1 (major fraction) and F2 (minor fraction) were separated. Specific chitosanase activity of F1 fraction was 4.7 U mg−1 and of F2 fraction was 33.7 U mg−1. The purification steps were summarized in Table 3. There was 0.3 fold increase in specific activity of the F1 fraction of chitosanase as compared to the fermented broth, while purification fold of F2 fractions was 2.2. The protein obtained from F1 and F2 fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and chitosanase enzyme activity was detected by Calcofluor white M2R staining. More than 10 bands of different molecular weights were observed in F1 fraction, while no chitosanase enzyme activity was detected. On the other hand, only one sharp band of chitosanase was observed in F2 fraction (44 kDa) and chitosanase activity was also detected (Figure 5).

Figure 4: Sephadex G-150 column chromatography.
Figure 4:

Sephadex G-150 column chromatography.

Table 3:

Purification of chitosanase from B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19.

Purification stepTotal volume (mL)Total activity (U)Total protein (mg)Specific activity (U mg−1)Yield (%)Purification folds
Crude enzyme1500360723315.51001
AS14010851248.75300.57
PEG109121187.7250.5
Sephadex G-150
 F135260554.770.3
 F240143433.732.2
  1. An extracellular chitosanase was purified from the culture supernatant (1500 mL) of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 by Sephadex G-150. The total enzyme activity is calculated per purification step. Specific enzyme activity is calculated per mg of protein, determined with Bradford. AS, ammonium sulphate precipitation; PEG, polyethylene glycol (PEG) concentration; F1, major fraction in purification step; F2, minor fraction in purification step.

Figure 5: SDS-PAGE and activity staining of chitosanase. S, molecular weights marker (kDa); 1, crude enzyme; F1, the first highest fraction in purification step; F2, the second highest fraction in purification step; F2, activity staining of purified chitosanase enzyme (44 kDa). Fifty microgram sample of protein was loaded in each lane.
Figure 5:

SDS-PAGE and activity staining of chitosanase. S, molecular weights marker (kDa); 1, crude enzyme; F1, the first highest fraction in purification step; F2, the second highest fraction in purification step; F2, activity staining of purified chitosanase enzyme (44 kDa). Fifty microgram sample of protein was loaded in each lane.

Discussion

Vineyard soil sample from Manisa province (38° 30′N 27° 42′E). Manisa province has mainly 20% clay, 20% sand, 20% sandy-clay, 14% loamy-clay, 9% clay type of soil with a very high organic matter content. Soil texture, mineralogy, nutrient contents, pH, and organic matter is proposed as the major driver affecting the bacterial community composition [24]. Bacillus species are the most studied antagonist among the soil borne bacteria [4]. Since Bacillus species have the ability to produce spores, therefore, it is advantageous to use them for biocontrol as compared to Gram-negative and non-spore forming bacteria. Endospores are particularly suitable to be used as biocontrol agents, because spores can stay alive for a longer period of time in highly variable environmental conditions (nutrient levels, temperature and water activity). Also many Bacillus spp. are known to produce antifungal antibiotics and extracellular hydrolytic enzymes.

In the present study, B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 which was able to secrete several hydrolytic enzymes, including chitinase, chitosanase, N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase and protease, suppressed the growth of A. niger EGE-K-213, A. foetidus EGE-K-211, A. ochraceus EGE-K-217, F. solani KCTC 6328, R. solani KACC 40111 and C. gloeosporioides KACC 40689. Previously, inhibitory effects of B. subtilis against pathogenic fungi have been demonstrated for A. niger [25], Fusarium verticillioides [26], Aspergillus flavus [27], Penicilium digitatum [28] and Penicilium digitatum Sacc [29]. These findings suggest the effectiveness of B. subtilis as biocontrol agent against pathogenic fungi and our present study has also demonstrated the inhibitory effect of B. subtilis against various phytopathogenic and mycotoxigenic fungi.

Chitosanases are hydrolase class enzymes produced by many microorganisms including bacteria [20], [30], [31] and fungi [32], [33]. Chitosanase enzyme of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 partially purified in this study has a molecular weight of 44 kDa, which is similar to Bacillus sp. 739 (46 kDa) [34], Bacillus sp. P16 (45 kDa) [20], B. cereus S1 (45 kDa) [35] and Bacillus sp. strain KFB-C108 (48 kDa) [36].

COS, being recognized as low molecular weight and water soluble chitosans, have much greater demand in many fields than that of precursor molecule. COS possess a wide range of biological activities and have numerous promising applications in multiple fields such as medicine, cosmetics, food and agriculture [12]. Chitosanase have the ability to split chitosan into oligosaccharides ranging from dimer to octamers. Many chitosanases from Bacillus strains have shown endo-type cleavage [37], [38], [39], whereas some chitosanases from fungi such as Aspergillus fumigatus KH-94, Aspergillus oryzae IAM2660 and some bacteria such as Nocardia orientalis IFO 12806, Enterobacter sp. strain G-1 have exo-splitting activity that hydrolyse chitosan to glucosamine [37], [40]. In the present study, the catalytic pattern of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 chitosanase was examined by using soluble chitosan. TLC analysis showed that the chitosanase had released chitosan oligosaccharides, mainly GlcN, GlcN2, and GlcN3 from soluble chitosan (Figure 3). Although primary products from chitosan by plenty of chitosanases were di-, tri- and tetra-chitooligosaccharides, B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 chitosanase hydrolysed chitosan to di- and tri-chitooligosaccharides along with the production of high amount of glucosamine. These results suggested that the mode of action of chitosanase produced by B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 is both exo- and endo type.

Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 could be a potential biocontrol agent biocontrol agent for vineyard uses. More investigations are necessary to increase the effectiveness of the bacterium before applying the bacterium to the vineyards. The chitosanase of B. subtilis Ege-B-1.19 hydrolysed chitosan into GlcN as well as oligomer, therefore, this chitosanase has shown both exo- and endo type hydrolysis and could be a preferable candidate for many biotechnological application.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Research Project fund of TUBITAK (104O339).

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Lin Y, Du D, Si C, Zhao Q, Li Z, Li P. Potential biocontrol Bacillus sp. strains isolated by an improved method from vinegar waste compost exhibit antibiosis against fungal pathogens and promote growth of cucumbers. Biol Control 2014;71:7–15.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.12.010Suche in Google Scholar

2. Spadaro D, Droby S. Development of biocontrol products for postharvest diseases of fruit: the importance of elucidating the mechanisms of action of yeast antagonists. Trends Food Sci Technol 2016;47:39–49.10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.003Suche in Google Scholar

3. Ciancio A, Pieterse CM, Mercado-Blanco J. Harnessing useful rhizosphere microorganisms for pathogen and pest biocontrol. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1620.10.3389/978-2-88945-059-6Suche in Google Scholar

4. Zhang X, Zhou Y, Li Y, Fu X, Wang Q. Screening and characterization of endophytic Bacillus for biocontrol of grapevine downy mildew. Crop Protect 2017;96:173–9.10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.018Suche in Google Scholar

5. Joshi S, Bharucha C, Desai AJ. Production of biosurfactant and antifungal compound by fermented food isolate Bacillus subtilis 20B. Bioresour Technol 2008;99:4603–8.10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.030Suche in Google Scholar

6. Yokota K, Yatsuda M, Miwa E, Higuchi K. Comparative study on sample preparation methods for the HPLC quantification of iturin from culture supernatant of an antagonistic Bacillus strain. J. ISSAAS 2012;18:70–5.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Kathiravan MN, Karthick R, Muthukumar K. Ex situ bioremediation of Cr (VI) contaminated soil by Bacillus sp.: batch and continuous studies. Chem Eng J 2011;169:107–5.10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.060Suche in Google Scholar

8. Chang W-T, Chen Y-C, Jao C-L. Antifungal activity and enhancement of plant growth by Bacillus cereus grown on shellfish chitin wastes. Bioresour Technol 2007;98:1224–30.10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.005Suche in Google Scholar

9. Velho R, Medina L, Segalin J, Brandelli A. Production of lipopeptides among Bacillus strains showing growth inhibition of phytopathogenic fungi. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2011;56:297.10.1007/s12223-011-0056-7Suche in Google Scholar

10. Helistö P, Aktuganov G, Galimzianova N, Melentjev A, Korpela T. Lytic enzyme complex of an antagonistic Bacillus sp. Xb: isolation and purification of components. J Chromatogr B: Biomed Sci Appl 2001;758:197–205.10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00181-5Suche in Google Scholar

11. Gao X-A, Ju W-T, Jung W-J, Park R-D. Purification and characterization of chitosanase from Bacillus cereus D-11. Carbohydr Polym 2008;72:513–20.10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.025Suche in Google Scholar

12. Liaqat F, Eltem R. Chitooligosaccharides and their biological activities: a comprehensive review. Carbohydr Polym 2017;184:243–59.10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.067Suche in Google Scholar

13. Kim S, Je J. Continuous production of chitooligosaccharides by enzymatic hydrolysis. Chitin, chitosan, oligosaccharides and their derivatives: biological activities and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010:47–51.10.1201/EBK1439816035Suche in Google Scholar

14. Kim S-K, Rajapakse N. Enzymatic production and biological activities of chitosan oligosaccharides (COS): a review. Carbohydr Polym 2005;62:357–68.10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.012Suche in Google Scholar

15. Lin Y-W, Hsiao Y-C, Chiang B-H. Production of high degree polymerized chitooligosaccharides in a membrane reactor using purified chitosanase from Bacillus cereus. Food Res Int 2009;42:1355–61.10.1016/j.foodres.2009.06.008Suche in Google Scholar

16. Waghmare SR, Ghosh JS. Chitobiose production by using a novel thermostable chitinase from Bacillus licheniformis strain JS isolated from a mushroom bed. Carbohydr Res 2010;345:2630–5.10.1016/j.carres.2010.09.023Suche in Google Scholar

17. Travers RS, Martin PA, Reichelderfer CF. Selective process for efficient isolation of soil Bacillus spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987;53:1263–6.10.1128/aem.53.6.1263-1266.1987Suche in Google Scholar

18. Nicholson W, Setlow P. Molecular biological methods for Bacillus. West Sussex: John Willey & Sons, LTD, 1990:391–451.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Imoto T, Yagishita K. A simple activity measurement of lysozyme. Agric Biol Chem 1971;35:1154–6.10.1080/00021369.1971.10860050Suche in Google Scholar

20. Jo Y-Y, Jo K-J, Jin Y-L, Jung W-J, Kuk J-H, Kim K-Y, et al. Characterization of endochitosanases-producing Bacillus cereus P16. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2003;13:960–8.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Shibata H, Yagi T. Rate assay of N-acetyl-β-D-hexosaminidase with 4-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide as an artificial substrate. Clin Chim Acta 1996;251:53–64.10.1016/0009-8981(96)06292-4Suche in Google Scholar

22. Chun D-S, Kang D-K, Kim H-K. Isolation and enzyme production of a neutral protease-producing strain, Bacillus sp. DS-1. Korean J Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;30:346–51.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Jung W-J, Kuk J-H, Kim K-Y, Jung K-C, Park R-D. Purification and characterization of exo-β-D-glucosaminidase from Aspergillus fumigatus S-26. Protein Expr Purif 2006;45:125–31.10.1016/j.pep.2005.06.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Sun D, Meng J, Liang H, Yang E, Huang Y, Chen W, et al. Effect of volatile organic compounds absorbed to fresh biochar on survival of Bacillus mucilaginosus and structure of soil microbial communities. J Soils Sed 2015;15:271–81.10.1007/s11368-014-0996-zSuche in Google Scholar

25. Podile A, Prakash A. Lysis and biological control of Aspergillus niger by Bacillus subtilis AF 1. Can J Microbiol 1996;42:533–8.10.1139/m96-072Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Cavaglieri L, Orlando J, Rodriguez M, Chulze S, Etcheverry M. Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against Fusarium verticillioides in vitro and at the maize root level. Res Microbiol 2005;156:748–54.10.1016/j.resmic.2005.03.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Zhang T, Shi Z-Q, Hu L-B, Cheng L-G, Wang F. Antifungal compounds from Bacillus subtilis B-FS06 inhibiting the growth of Aspergillus flavus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;24:783.10.1007/s11274-007-9533-1Suche in Google Scholar

28. Leelasuphakul W, Hemmanee P, Chuenchitt S. Growth inhibitory properties of Bacillus subtilis strains and their metabolites against the green mold pathogen (Penicillium digitatum Sacc.) of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 2008;48:113–21.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.09.024Suche in Google Scholar

29. Waewthongrak W, Pisuchpen S, Leelasuphakul W. Effect of Bacillus subtilis and chitosan applications on green mold (Penicilium digitatum Sacc.) decay in citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 2015;99:44–9.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.07.016Suche in Google Scholar

30. Kang L-X, Chen X-M, Fu L, Ma L-X. Recombinant expression of chitosanase from Bacillus subtilis HD145 in Pichia pastoris. Carbohydr Res 2012;352:37–43.10.1016/j.carres.2012.01.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Wang S-L, Liang T-W, Yen Y-H. Bioconversion of chitin-containing wastes for the production of enzymes and bioactive materials. Carbohydr Polym 2011;84:732–42.10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.022Suche in Google Scholar

32. Cheng CY, Li YK. An Aspergillus chitosanase with potential for large-scale preparation of chitosan oligosaccharides. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2000;32:197–203.10.1042/BA20000063Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Zhang X-Y, Dai A-L, Zhang X-K, Kuroiwa K, Kodaira R, Shimosaka M, et al. Purification and characterization of chitosanase and exo-β-D-glucosaminidase from a koji mold, Aspergillus oryzae IAM2660. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2000;64:1896–902.10.1271/bbb.64.1896Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Aktuganov G, Shirokov A, Melent’ev A. Isolation and characterization of chitosanase from the strain Bacillus sp. 739. Appl Biochem Microbiol 2003;39:469–74.10.1023/A:1025492518159Suche in Google Scholar

35. Kurakake M, Yo-u S, Nakagawa K, Sugihara M, Komaki T. Properties of chitosanase from Bacillus cereus S1. Curr Microbiol 2000;40:6–9.10.1007/s002849910002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Yoon HG, Ha SC, Lim YH, Cho HY. New thermostable Chitosanase from Bacillus sp. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1998;8:449–54.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Choi YJ, Kim EJ, Piao Z, Yun YC, Shin YC. Purification and characterization of chitosanase from Bacillus sp. strain KCTC 0377BP and its application for the production of chitosan oligosaccharides. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:4522–31.10.1128/AEM.70.8.4522-4531.2004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

38. Omumasaba CA, Yoshida N, Sekiguchi Y, Kariya K, Ogawa K. Purification and some properties of a novel chitosanase from Bacillus subtilis KH1. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2000; 46:19–27.10.2323/jgam.46.19Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Lee Y-S, Yoo J-S, Chung S-Y, Lee Y-C, Cho Y-S, Choi Y-L. Cloning, purification, and characterization of chitosanase from Bacillus sp. DAU101. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006;73:113.10.1007/s00253-006-0444-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Kim S-Y, Shon D-H, Lee K-H. Purification and characteristics of two types of chitosanases from Aspergillus fumigatus KH-94. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1998;8:568–74.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-04-14
Accepted: 2018-07-17
Published Online: 2018-10-18
Published in Print: 2019-05-01

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Short Communication
  3. Acetone-water mixture is a competent solvent to extract phenolics and antioxidants from four organs of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
  4. Research Articles
  5. Proteases from Calotropis gigantea stem, leaf and calli as milk coagulant source
  6. A new method to quantify atmospheric Poaceae pollen DNA based on the trnT-F cpDNA region
  7. Expression of a functional recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (VEGF165) in Arabidopsis thaliana
  8. Computational exploration of antiviral activity of phytochemicals against NS2B/NS3 proteases from dengue virus
  9. Investigation of antioxidant, cytotoxic, tyrosinase inhibitory activities, and phenolic profiles of green, white, and black teas
  10. DFR and PAL gene transcription and their correlation with anthocyanin accumulation in Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton.) Hassk.
  11. Comparison of phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of three Ornithogalum L. species
  12. Increasing the fermentation efficiency of Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei MIUG BL6 in a rye flour sourdough
  13. Determination of chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of products obtained from carob and honey locust
  14. Chitinolytic Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 as a biocontrol agent against mycotoxigenic and phytopathogenic fungi
  15. Recycling fish skin for utilization in food industry as an effective emulsifier and foam stabilizing agent
  16. A novel, thermotolerant, extracellular PHB depolymerase producer Paenibacillus alvei PHB28 for bioremediation of biodegradable plastics
  17. Post-transcriptional regulation of miRNA-15a and miRNA-15b on VEGFR gene and deer antler cell proliferation
  18. Comparison of pendimethalin binding properties of serum albumins from various mammalian species
  19. Crocin (active constituent of saffron) improves CCl4-induced liver damage by modulating oxidative stress in rats
  20. Time dependent change of ethanol consumption biomarkers, ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate, after single dose ethanol intake
  21. GC-MS analysis and biological activities of Thymus vulgaris and Mentha arvensis essential oil
  22. Immobilization and some application of α-amylase purified from Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 strain ZB-34
  23. Letter to the Editor
  24. Molecular crosstalk between Hog1 and calcium/CaM signaling
Heruntergeladen am 17.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjb-2018-0144/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen