Abstract
Background
Aboveground parts and bulbs of Ornithogalum species are consumed as food and used in traditional medicine in worldwide.
Objective
It is aimed to report the antioxidant capacity and phenolic compounds content of Ornithogalum sigmoideum, Ornithogalum orthophyllum and Ornithogalum oligophyllum for the first time.
Materials and methods
Antioxidant activity of the crude methanol extracts of the aerial parts and the bulbs of the species were determined with 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl, superoxide radical scavenging, ferrous ion-chelating effect, phosphomolybdenum-reducing antioxidant power and ferric-reducing antioxidant power assay. The ethylacetate, diethylether and water subextracts from leaf and flower were analyzed to quantify selected phenolic compounds by HPLC-UV.
Results
Among the six extracts, the methanol extract of the aerial parts of O. orthophyllum contained the highest amount of phenolic compounds (GAE, 11.0 mg/g extract). The aerial parts of O. orthophyllum showed higher DPPH and SOD activities than the other extracts with the SC50 values of 0.39±0.05 mg/mL and 0.44±0.08 mg/mL, respectively. Protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid and p-coumaric acid were the most abundant compounds at all the subextracts.
Conclusion
The antioxidant activity is found to be in accordance with the levels of phenolic content in the extracts.
Öz
Geçmiş
Ornithogalum türlerinin topraküstü kısımları ve soğanları, dünya çapında gıda olarak tüketilmekte ve halk ilacı olarak kullanılmaktadır. Ornithogalum sigmoideum, Ornithogalum orthophyllum ve O. oligophyllum türlerinin daha önce çalışılmamış olan antioksidan kapasite ve fenolik bileşiklerini sunmak amaçlanmıştır.
Yöntem ve Gereçler
Türlerin toprak üstü kısımları ve soğanlarının ham metanol ekstrelerinin antioksidan aktiviteleri 1,1-difenil-2-pikril-hidrazil, süperoksit radikal süpürücü, demir iyon-şelat etkisi, fosfomolibdenyum indirgeyici antioksidan güç, demir indirgeyici antioksidan güç yöntemleriyle araştırılmıştır. Yapraktan ve çiçeklerden elde edilen etil asetat, dietil eter ve su alt ekstreleri seçilen fenolik bileşikleri ölçmek için YBSK-UV ile analiz edildi.
Bulgular
Altı ekstre arasında O. orthophyllum’un toprak üstü kısımlarının metanol ekstresi en yüksek miktarda fenolik bileşik (GAE, 11.0 mg/g ekstre) taşımaktadır. O. orthophyllum’un toprak üstü kısımlarından elde edilen ekstre diğer ekstrelere göre sırasıyla 0.38±0.05 mg/mL ve 0.44±0.08 mg/mL SC50 değerleriyle yüksek 1,1-difenil-2-pikril-hidrazil ve süperoksit radikal süpürücü aktivitelerine sahiptir. Protokatekuik asit, p-hidroksibenzoik asit, vanilik asit ve p-kumarik asit tüm alt ekstrelerde en fazla bulunan bileşiklerdir.
Sonuç
Antioksidan aktivitenin, ekstrelerdeki fenolik madde düzeyleriyle uyumlu olduğu bulunmuştur.
Introduction
The Ornithogalum L. (Asparagaceae) genus comprises about 160 species worldwide and 54 species are recorded in the flora of Turkey [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The name of genus is reported to come from antiquity based on the Greek word ‘Ornithogalen’ which has a meaning of something wonderful [6]. It was reported that the bulbs of Ornithogalum species which are economically valuable, are used against abscess and also as emetic since Dioscorides [7]. Aboveground parts and bulbs of Ornithogalum narbonense L., Ornithogalum oligophyllum E.D. Clarke, Ornithogalum platyphyllum Boiss. and particularly Ornithogalum sigmoideum Freyn & Sint are used as food and sold at farmers markets at different parts of Turkey [8], [9]. Leaves, stems and bulbs of O. sigmoideum are cooked with rice and eaten in Izmit which is a city at Northwest part of Turkey [8]. Ornithogalum sigmoideum, O. oligophyllum, O. platyphyllum and Ornithogalum umbellatum L. are also eaten after roasting or boiling, at the Black Sea Region of Turkey [10], [11]. Ornithogalum cuspidatum Bertol. has been used as a spice in Iran [12]. Ornithogalum species are rich in saponins and cholestane, cardenolide and flavonoid glycosides [13], [14]. Although cardenolide or cholestane glycosides are highly toxic compounds, some plants from this genus have been used to treat various medical conditions, including diabetes, cardiac troubles, hepatitis and even some cancer types by traditional healers [13], [14], [15], [16]. The infusion of O. umbellatum is used for the treatment of digestive and prostate related diseases [17]. Also, the bulbs are used externally after boiling [18]. Many of the compounds especially flavonoids and phenolic compounds in these species, have diverse biological effects [19]. Ornithogalum species are reported to exhibit antimicrobial [20], antioxidant [21], cytostatic [22] and antitumor [23] activities. In recent studies, saponins which have hepatic protective effect [24] and protective effect against acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury [25], were isolated from Ornithogalum saundersiae. Wan et al. reported the antioxidative activity of O. saundersiae and mentioned the importance of antioxidative activity which might be involved in the pathological process of O. saundersiae against acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury [25].
Antioxidant activities of the bulb, stem and seed extracts of the O. narbonense were investigated by using DPPH+, ABTS+, FRAP, CUPRAC, metal chelating and phosphomolybdenum assays. It was found that the ethyl acetate extract of the bulb demonstrated the most antioxidant activity and had the highest phenolic content [26].
The volatile compounds of O. sigmoideum, O. orthophyllum and O. oligophyllum were analyzed using solid phase microextraction (SPME) and GC-MS previously [27].
Because of the antioxidant properties and extensive distribution in plant species, polyphenols are mentioned to be one of the common bioactive compounds of the human diet. A number of studies have shown that polyphenols play an important role in the prevention of degenerative diseases [19]. However, to our best knowledge, phenolic compositions and antioxidant properties of O. sigmoideum, O. orthophyllum Ten., and O. oligophyllum remained unexplored. Herewith our aim is to report the antioxidant capacity of bulbs and aerial parts of these three species using DPPH, SOD, ferrous ion-chelating, PRAP and FRAP assays and to analyse the correlation between biological activity and phenolic compounds by finding the phenolic compounds occur in the more active part with HPLC-UV analysis, in the light of traditional usages.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
Ornithogalum sigmoideum (OS), O. orthophyllum (OO), and O. oligophyllum (OL) were collected in flowering season from Geçit Village, Trabzon in March 2013; Ordu in March 2013; Karadağ, Trabzon in May 2013, respectively. The voucher specimens (ISTE 101047, ISTE 101045, ISTE 101048, respectively) were deposited in the Herbarium of İstanbul University Faculty of Pharmacy (ISTE).
Extraction and sample preparation
Twenty gram of pulverized bulbs and aerial parts were separately extracted with 80% methanol (300 mL×3) for 15 min under reflux at 40°C, filtered and evaporated to obtain crude extracts. Methanol extracts of the aerial parts were suspended in water and fractionated with EtOAc and diethyl ether to give subfractions. All of extracts were filtered and dried under vacuum with a rotary evaporator (Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany).
Determination of phenolic compounds by HPLC-UV
HPLC-UV analyses were performed on a reverse phase C18 column (150 mm×4.6 mm id, 5 μm particle; Fortis, France) using a Thermo Finnigan Surveyor HPLC (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA) and UV detector which is simultaneously operating dual-UV wavelength. Gradient elution which had been developed by Turumtay, was used for HPLC analyses [28], [29]. The mobile phase was (A) 2% acetic acid in water and (B) 70:30 acetonitrile:water. The following gradient was used; 0–3 min 5% B; 3–8 min 5–15% B; 8–10 min 15–20% B; 10–12 min 20–25% B; 12–20 min 25–40% B; 20–30 min 40–80% B. The injection volume was 25 μL, the column temperature was 30°C and the flow rate was 1.2 mL/min. Benzoic acid derivatives were analysed at 280 nm whereas cinnamic acid derivatives, flavone, flavonols and the flavonol glycoside were analysed at 315 nm. Calibration solutions were prepared at different concentrations (1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg/L). External calibration curves were used for all standards. Linearity (R2) was given in Table 1. Limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) values as the concentration unit of mg/L were calculated as an S/N level of 3 and S/N level of 10 respectively. The compounds in the standard mixture were used at following concentrations: 0.5 mg/L for gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid and syringic acid, 1 mg/L for chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, fisetin, ferulic acid, rutin, myricetin, quercetin, apigenin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin, and 2 mg/L for catechin and epicatechin. The mixture was injected 7 times to verify the LOD and LOQ of each compound. To validate the reproducibility of the method, the percent relative standard deviation (RSD%) of the peak area responses were calculated (Table 1). Analytical grade methanol, ethanol, all reagents and all standard compounds; gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, fisetin, ferulic acid, rutin, myricetin, quercetin, apigenin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin, catechin, epicatechin, gallic acid and butylated hydroxyanisolewere purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HPLC grade acetonitrile, methanol, were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent was from Fluka Chemie GmbH (Buchs, Switzerland).
Calibration and validation parameters of 18 phenolic standards.
| No | RTMean | Compound | %RSD (RT) | %RSD (area) | R2 | LODa | LOQa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.78 | Gallic acid | 0.30 | 2.05 | 0.998 | 0.03 | 0.11 |
| 2 | 5.18 | Protocatechuic acid | 0.24 | 2.78 | 0.999 | 0.04 | 0.14 |
| 3 | 8.61 | p-OH benzoic acid | 0.65 | 1.19 | 0.999 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| 4 | 9.66 | Catechin | 0.58 | 2.10 | 0.999 | 0.12 | 0.39 |
| 5 | 10.28 | Chlorogenic acid | 0.29 | 1.50 | 0.998 | 0.04 | 0.15 |
| 6 | 10.73 | Vanillic acid | 0.35 | 0.87 | 0.999 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| 7 | 11.15 | Caffeic acid | 0.24 | 0.83 | 0.999 | 0.03 | 0.09 |
| 8 | 11.87 | Syringic acid | 0.36 | 1.49 | 0.999 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| 9 | 12.46 | Epicatechin | 0.38 | 1.33 | 0.999 | 0.08 | 0.26 |
| 10 | 14.17 | p-Coumaric acid | 0.11 | 0.56 | 0.999 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| 11 | 15.41 | Ferulic acid | 0.23 | 0.63 | 0.999 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| 12 | 15.82 | Rutin | 0.53 | 1.15 | 0.999 | 0.03 | 0.11 |
| 13 | 18.88 | Myricetin | 0.26 | 4.09 | 0.999 | 0.08 | 0.27 |
| 14 | 19.28 | Fisetin | 0.25 | 2.56 | 0.999 | 0.05 | 0.18 |
| 15 | 22.55 | Quercetin | 0.21 | 1.78 | 0.999 | 0.04 | 0.13 |
| 16 | 25.54 | Apigenin | 0.15 | 1.49 | 0.999 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
| 17 | 26.08 | Kaempferol | 0.14 | 2.68 | 0.999 | 0.07 | 0.22 |
| 18 | 26.66 | Isorhamnetin | 0.14 | 6.34 | 0.998 | 0.13 | 0.45 |
amg standard⋅L−1.
Antioxidant methods
Determination of total phenolic contents in the extracts
Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was used to determine the total phenolic content according to the method of Kähkönen [30]. Fifty microliter of sample extract, 250 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and 750 μL of 20% (w/v) sodium carbonate were mixed. After incubating for 120 min in the dark, the absorbance was measured at 750 nm to calculate the phenolic content which was given as gram of gallic acid equivalent (GAE).
DPPH radical scavenging assay
Free radical scavenging effect was tested with a DPPH free radical scavenging assay method [31]. The methanolic DPPH solution (0.1 mM) and different concentrations of samples were mixed and incubated in dark at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbances of the samples (Asample) were measured at 517 nm. Mixture without sample was used as control (control absorbance, Acontrol). Gallic acid (GA) and butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) were used as positive controls and scavenging effect was calculated with Equation 1.
Superoxide radical scavenging assay
A non-enzymatic superoxide radical (O2−˙) generation assay with modified spectrophotometrical nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) photoreduction method was used to test the superoxide radical scavenging activities of the samples [32]. The absorbances of the mixtures which contained riboflavin (2 μM), methionine (13 mM), NBT (75 mM), EDTA (0.1 mM), with the test samples (50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.8) were measured at 560 nm, after illuminating at 30°C for 10 min by a fluorescent lamp. Assay mixture without the samples was used as a control (control absorbance, Acontrol). All experiments were in triplicates and results were expressed as the mean±standard deviation (S.D.). Free O2−˙ radical scavenging effect was calculated using the Equation 1.
Ferrous ion-chelating effect
Ferrous ion-chelating effect of the extracts and reference was estimated by the method of Chua [33]. The total 740 μL mixture of methanol and the samples (200 μL) were incubated with 2 mM FeCl2 solution. The reaction was started by adding 5 mM ferrozine to mixture. The absorbance of the mixture of reaction was measured at 562 nm after incubating for 10 min. The capacity was calculated using Equation 1 and the ferrous ion chelating results were expressed as the mean±standard deviation (SD).
Phosphomolybdenum-reducing antioxidant power (PRAP) assay
Each dilution of the extracts was mixed with 10% phosphomolybdic acid solution in ethanol (w/v). The absorbances of the mixtures were read (600 nm) expressed as quercetin equivalent (QE, mg/g extract), after incubating 30 min at 80°C [34].
Ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay
The ferric-reducing power was tested according to the method of Oyaizu [35]. Different concentrations of the extracts and butylated hydroxyanisol (BHA) which was used as reference, were mixed. 2.5 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of potassium ferricyanide were added to the mixture which was than incubated at 50°C. At the end of 20 min, 10% trichloroacetic acid was added. After vigorous shaking, the solution was mixed with distilled water and FeCl3 (0.15%). The absorbance was read at 700 nm and expressed as BHA equivalent (BHAE, mg/g extract).
Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as means±standard deviations (SD) of three independent and parallel measurements. SC50 values were determined by linear regression analysis (Microsoft Excel program for Windows and GraphPad Prism 5.0, Albuquerque, NM, USA). The differences among the compounds were investigated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey tests. p<0.0001 was considered to be significant.
Results
In vitro antioxidant activity of the crude methanol extracts of the aerial parts (OOA, OSA and OLA) and the bulbs (OOB, OSB and OLB) of three Ornithogalum species were determined and tabulated in Table 2. DPPH and SOD of OOA showed higher radical scavenging activities with the SC50 values of 0.39±0.05 mg/mL and 0.44±0.08 mg/mL, respectively, among other extracts. The radical scavenging activities of DPPH and SOD of the extracts were sorted as OOA>OLB>OSA>OSB>OOB>OLA. The weakest DPPH and SOD were obtained in OLA extract with SC50 values of 3.82±0.11 and 1.19±0.09 mg/mL, respectively. There are previous studies regarding antioxidant properties of different species of Ornithogalum. Ebrahimzadeh reported that methanol extracts obtained from bulbs and aerial parts of Ornithogalum sintenisii scavenged DPPH radical with SC50 values of 669±25 μg/mL and 368.00±15 μg/mL, respectively [21]. Methanol extract of bulbs of O. alpigenum is reported to show 90.38% inhibition with DPPH dependent antioxidant activity assay [20].
Antioxidant activities and total phenol contents of methanol extracts.
| Extract code | DPPH±S.D. (SC50, g/mL) | SOD±S.D. (SC50, mg/mL) | Ferrous ion-chelating capacity±S.D. (SC, mg/mL) | PRAP±S.D. (QE, mg/g extract) | FRAP±S.D. (BHAE, mg/g extract) | Total phenol content±S.D. (GAE, mg/g extract) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOA | 0.39±0.05 | 0.44±0.08a | 3.25±0.09c | 128.00±0.08 | 27.39±0.07 | 11.00±0.18 |
| OSA | 0.91±0.08c | 0.58±0.10b | 1.85±0.07c | 100.72±0.11 | 15.33±0.09 | 7.12±0.21 |
| OLA | 3.82±0.11c | 1.19±0.09c | 6.29±0.12c | 50.83±0.08 | 1.65±0.12 | 0.19±0.02 |
| OOB | 2.36±0.09c | 0.77±0.08c | 1.30±0.08c | 60.80±0.12 | 4.80±0.08 | 2.04±0.22 |
| OSB | 1.06±0.07c | 0.62±0.11b | 5.01±0.09c | 84.52±0.10 | 9.75±0.10 | 3.90±0.08 |
| OLB | 0.55±0.06b | 0.49±0.05a | 2.18±0.10c | 113.00±0.09 | 22.62±0.11 | 7.27±0.19 |
| Gallic acid | 0.065±0.004 | – | – | – | – | – |
| BHA | 0.027±0.005 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Catechin | – | 0.023±0.009 | – | – | – | – |
| EDTA | – | – | 0.014±0.005 | – | – | – |
ap<0.05; bp<0.001; cp<0.0001. OOA, O. orthophyllum aerial parts; OSA, O. sigmoideum aerial parts; OLA, O. oligophyllum aerial parts; OOB, O. orthophyllum bulbs; OSB, O. sigmoideum bulbs; OLB, O. oligophyllum bulbs.
OOB extract with SC50 value of 1.30±0.08 mg/mL chelated more iron than the other extracts (Table 2), but consequently all extracts were less efficient than commercial chelator EDTA. Similarly, Fe2+ chelating activity of the aerial parts of O. sintenisii has been reported to be greater than bulbs of the same species with the values of IC50 340.00±14 μg/mL for aerial parts and 684.00±27 μg/mL for bulbs [21]. The absorbances measured for the samples were converted to BHA equivalent antioxidant capacity (BHAE) values obtained from the absorbance – [BHA] calibration graph, and the mg/g extract BHAE values are given in Table 2.
The results showed that all extracts have a strong ferric reducing power. OOA extract showed the highest reducing capacity (BHAE, 27.39±0.07 mg/g extract). The weakest capacity to reduce iron(III) (BHAE, 1.65±0.12 mg/g extract) was obtained in the OLA extract. According to our results, especially OOA, OLB, OSA extracts showed high antioxidant activity in PRAP assay; 128.00±0.08, 113.00±0.09 and 100.72±0.11 (QE, mg/g extract), respectively (Table 2). The reducing capacity of aqueous ethanolic extract of O. umbellatum stems was determined according to the same method and reported to be smaller than 0.2 μg/mL [11].
Among the five extracts, OOA extract was found to contain the highest (GAE, 11.0±0.18 mg/g extract) amount of phenolic compounds followed by OLB (GAE, 7.27±0.19 mg/g extract), OSA (GAE, 7.12±0.21 mg/g extract), OSB (GAE, 3.90±0.08 mg/g extract), OOB (GAE, 2.04±0.22 mg/g extract) and OLA (GAE, 0.19±0.02 mg/g extract) (Table 2).
The method that used for HPLC-UV analyses of phenolic compounds was revalidated, and all values were within acceptable criteria (Table 1) [28]. LOD and LOQ values were lower than 0.12 and 0.39 mg standard·L−1 respectively. Over the selected range, peak areas linearly depended on concentrations for all phenolics with high correlation coefficients (>0.998). The injection repeatability of the system was evaluated by seven consecutive injections of the standard solution of phenolics. The RSD values of retention times of phenolics were less than 0.60% (Table 1).
Discussion
Antioxidant activities of several Ornithogalum species has been described in previous studies and correlated with the phenolic contents of the extracts [11], [19], [20], [26], [36]. In connection with our studies on Ornithogalum species [27], we tested three Ornithogalum species growing in five types of antioxidant activity assays and the OOA extract exerted the highest activity in three of the assays except ferrous ion-chelating capacity and PRAP assay. The bulb extracts showed comparatively week activity overall the studied extracts (Table 2). It is very important to point out that; there was a positive relationship between antioxidant activity potential and amount of phenolic compounds of the crude extracts. Phenolic compounds have been associated with the overall antioxidant activities [35], [36], [37], [38]. From this point of view, we decided to investigate the more active aerial parts with HPLC-UV because of their rich phenolic composition.
Phenolics in diethylether, ethyl acetate and water subextracts were analyzed through the revalidated HPLC method. According to the determinations; protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid and p-coumaric acid were found to be the most abundant compounds among the identified compounds in the extracts (Table 3). The distribution of phenolics varied by plant part; leaves were found to be rich in amount of phenolic compounds compared to the flowers. Diethyl ether subextract of the leaves of OO has the highest phenolic content according to HPLC-UV analysis whose total phenolic content and antioxidant potential were the highest in the extracts as well. According to our findings, radical scavenging activities of the aerial parts of OO and OS were higher than the bulbs of same species. These findings are in a line with our HPLC experiment results. OS and OO are richer in terms of polyphenol source than O. oligophyllum. While this is the first report on the phenolics of O. sigmoideum, O. orthophyllum and O. oligophyllum, the phenolics of O. narbonense were investigated before and major phenolic compounds were found as benzoic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, rutin and caffeic acid [26]. The comparison of our data with those reported in literature proved that the extracts of the Ornithogalum species which were rich in phenolic contents had high antioxidant property. Especially methanol extract of aerial parts of O. orthophyllum was found to show higher radical scavenging activities, FRAP and PRAP reducing capacities and highest amount of phenolic compounds among other extracts. Among the samples studied, the epicatechin was found only in the ethyl acetate extract of the OO flowers which was found to show highest activity. Also, gallic acid is found to be in high amount in OO leaf extract and absent in the extracts of OL (Table 3). Also the antioxidant activity of protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, vanillic acid and p-coumaric acid which were the most abundant compounds, were previously reported [39], [40], [41]. Considered in terms of structure activity relationships, antioxidant activities of the compounds are in correlation with the number of hydroxyl groups that are bonded to the aromatic ring. Besides, epicatechin was reported to scavenge hydroxyl, peroxyl, superoxide, and DPPH radicals while peroxyl radical and DPPH radical scavenging effects of gallic acid was showed. (+)-catechin and (–)-epicatechins’ peroxyl radical scavenging activity was reported to be 10 times higher than those of L-ascorbate and β-carotene [42]. It is specified in the studies that the antioxidant activities of flavonoids and phenolic acids are directly related to the number and position of aromatic hydroxyl groups [43], [44].
Phenolic constituents of three Ornithogalum species determined by HPLC-UV.
| Gallic acid | Caffeic acid | Protocatechuic acid | p-OH benzoic acid | Vanillic acid | Syringic acid | Epicatechin | Ferulic acid | p-Coumaric acid | TIP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OO flower | ||||||||||
| EtOAc | ND | ND | 347.6 | 1843.5 | 1366.2 | 28.2 | 232.4 | 102.9 | 478.5 | 4399.4 |
| DEE | ND | ND | 368.6 | 1060.0 | 619.3 | ND | ND | ND | 399.3 | 2447.1 |
| H2O | ND | ND | 90.3 | 120.9 | 45.7 | ND | ND | ND | 441.4 | 698.3 |
| OO leaf | ||||||||||
| EtOAc | 149.2 | ND | 568.1 | 260.6 | 201.7 | 68.9 | ND | ND | 1308.4 | 2557.1 |
| DEE | 6796.0 | ND | 14768.0 | 6157.6 | 4423.2 | ND | ND | 2200 | 2710.0 | 37054.8 |
| H2O | 277.0 | ND | 381.2 | 55.3 | 52.0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 765.6 |
| OL flower | ||||||||||
| EtOAc | ND | ND | 350.6 | 1788.8 | 1240.6 | ND | ND | 312.5 | 3280.0 | 6972.5 |
| DEE | ND | ND | 121.2 | 588.8 | 326.5 | ND | ND | ND | 2391.8 | 3428.2 |
| H2O | ND | ND | 21.3 | 157.0 | 71.3 | ND | ND | ND | 2056.5 | 2306.2 |
| OL leaf | ||||||||||
| EtOAc | ND | ND | 3.6 | 266.0 | 2377.6 | 65.9 | ND | ND | 162.7 | 2875.7 |
| DEE | ND | ND | 149.2 | 594.2 | 4065.8 | 173.8 | ND | ND | ND | 4983.1 |
| H2O | ND | ND | 28.9 | 42.5 | 191.0 | 3.4 | ND | ND | 99.0 | 364.8 |
| OS flower | ||||||||||
| EtOAc | 130.7 | ND | 765.7 | 4290.5 | 1069.8 | ND | ND | 993.3 | 5507.1 | 12757.1 |
| DEE | 168.7 | ND | 711 | 3589.6 | 814.8 | ND | ND | 975.0 | 11385.4 | 17644.6 |
| H2O | ND | ND | 160.9 | 131.5 | 7.4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 299.8 |
| OS leaf | ||||||||||
| EtOAc | 229.5 | 189.5 | 469.5 | 477.4 | 366.3 | ND | ND | 114.7 | 1019.5 | 2866.3 |
| DEE | ND | ND | 902 | 680.0 | 283.0 | ND | ND | ND | 1230.0 | 3095.0 |
| H2O | 19.2 | ND | 222.9 | 145.0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1945.0 | 2332.1 |
Results are expressed in μg phenolic compound per g dry samples. ND, Non-detected; EtOAc, ethyl acetate; DEE, diethyl ether; TIP, total identified phenolics; OO, O. Orthophyllum; OS, O. Sigmoideum; OL, O. Oligophyllum.
All these results verified the traditional usage of Ornithogalum species. Considering the connection between plant-derived antioxidants in food and human health, Ornithogalum species consumed as food, could be evaluated as rich sources of bioactive supplements in human nutrition due to their rich polyphenol content.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge their thanks to Professor Neriman Özhatay (İstanbul University, Faculty of Pharmacy) for her help in the identification of the species. The authors are also grateful to the funding received through the Scientific Research Foundation of the Karadeniz Technical University (Funder Id: 10.13039/501100004045, Project Number 8960).
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
References
1. Cullen J. Ornithogalum L. In: Davis PH, editor. Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 8, 1984:227–45.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Davis PH, Mill RR, Tan K, editors. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 10 (Supp. I), 1988:223.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Özhatay N, Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Başer KH, editors. Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 11, 2000:233–7.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Mutlu B, Karakuş Ş. A new species of Ornithogalum from East Anatolia, Turkey. Turk J Bot 2012;36:125–33.10.3906/bot-1102-18Suche in Google Scholar
5. Uysal T. Ornithogalum. In: Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT, editors. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi. İstanbul, Turkey: Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi Araştırmaları Derneği, 2012:100–5.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Obermeyer A. Ornithogalum: a revision of the southern African species. Bothalia 1978;12:323–76.10.4102/abc.v12i3.1793Suche in Google Scholar
7. Baytop T. Phytotherapy in Turkey – in the past and today. Istanbul: Nobel, 1999.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Doğan Y, Başlar S, Ay G, Mert HH. The use of wild edible plants in western and Central Anatolia (Turkey). Econ Bot 2004;58:684–90.10.1663/0013-0001(2004)058[0684:TUOWEP]2.0.CO;2Suche in Google Scholar
9. Kızılarslan Ç, Özhatay N. An ethnobotanical study of the useful and edible plants of İzmit. Marmara Pharm J 2012;16:194–200.10.12991/201216398Suche in Google Scholar
10. Özbucak T, Kutbay HG, Ergen Akcın Ö. The contribution of wild edible plants to human nutrition in the Black Sea Region of Turkey. Ethnobot Leaflets 2006;10:98–103.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Özen T. Antioxidant activity of wild edible plants in the Black Sea Region of Turkey. Grasas Y Aceites 2010;61:86–94.10.3989/gya.075509Suche in Google Scholar
12. Dastan D, Aliahmadi A. Antioxidant and antibacterial studies on different extracts of Ornithogalum cuspidatum. BFIJ 2015;7:1072–5.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Ferth R, Kopp B. Cardenolide aus O. umbellatum L. Pharmazie 1992;47:626–9.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Ghannamy U, Kopp B, Robien W, Kubelka W. Cardenolides from Ornithogalum boucheanum. Planta Med 1987;53:172–8.10.1055/s-2006-962666Suche in Google Scholar
15. Al-Qura’n A. Ethnopharmacological survey of wild medicinal plants in Jordan. J Ethnopharm 2009;123:45–50.10.1016/j.jep.2009.02.031Suche in Google Scholar
16. Sabudak T, Oyman Ü. Phytochemical studies at the bulbs of O. umbellatum L. Turk J Chem 2002;26:453–5.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Polat R, Çakılcıoğlu U, Kaltalıoğlu K. An ethnobotanical study on medicinal plants in Espiye and its surrounding (Giresun, Turkey). J Ethnopharm 2015;163:1–11.10.1016/j.jep.2015.01.008Suche in Google Scholar
18. Özdemir E, Alpınar K. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in western part of central Taurus Mountains: Aladaglar (Nigde, Turkey). J Ethnopharm 2015;166:53–65.10.1016/j.jep.2015.02.052Suche in Google Scholar
19. Scalbert A, Manach C, Morand C. Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2005;45:287–306.10.1080/1040869059096Suche in Google Scholar
20. Makasci AA, Mammadov R, Dusen O, Işık HI. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of medicinal plant species Ornithogalum alpigenum Stapf. from Turkey. J Med Plant Res 2010;4:1637–42.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Ebrahimzadeh MA, Nabavi SM, Nabavi SF, Eslami B. Antioxidant activity of the bulb and aerial parts of Ornithogalum sintenisii (Liliaceae) at flowering stage. Trop J Pharm Res 2010;9:141–8.10.4314/tjpr.v9i2.53701Suche in Google Scholar
22. Kuroda M, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y. Saundersiosides C-H, rearranged cholestane glycosides from the bulbs of Ornithogalum saundersiae and their cytostatic activity on HL-60 cells. Phytochem 1999;52:435–43.10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00239-3Suche in Google Scholar
23. Chen R, Meng F, Liu Z, Chen R, Zhang M. Antitumor activities of different fractions polysaccharde purified from Ornithogalum caudatum. Carbohydr Polym 2010;80:845–51.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.12.042Suche in Google Scholar
24. Wan Y, Wu Y, Feng XC, Lian LH, Jiang YZ. The protective effects of total saponins from Ornithogalum saundersiae on acute hepatic failure induced by D-galactosamine in mice. J Ethnopharm 2010;132:450–5.10.1016/j.jep.2010.08.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Wan Y, Wu Y, Lian L, Nan J. Protective effect of Ornithogalum saundersiae Ait (Liliaceae) against acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury via CYP2E1 and HIF-1α. Chin J Nat Med 2010;10:177–84.10.3724/SP.J.1009.2012.00177Suche in Google Scholar
26. Zengin G, Uysal Ş, Ceylan R, Aktumsek A. Phenolic constituent, antioxidative and tyrosinase inhibitory activity of Ornithogalum narbonense L. from Turkey: a phytochemical study. Ind Crop Prod 2015;70:1–6.10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.012Suche in Google Scholar
27. Renda G, Tosun G, Yaylı N. SPME GC/MS analysis of three Ornithogalum L. species from Turkey. Rec Nat Prod 2016;10:497–502.Suche in Google Scholar
28. ICH Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1). Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. London: European Medicines Agency, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Turumtay EA, Islamoglu F, Çavus D, Şahin H, Turumtay H, Vanholme B. Correlation between phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Anzer tea (Thymus praecox Opiz subsp. caucasicus var. caucasicus). Indian Crop Prod 2014;52:687–94.10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.11.042Suche in Google Scholar
30. Ertürk Ö, Şahin H, Kolaylı S, Çol Ayvaz M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of East Black Sea Region honeys. Turk J Biochem 2014;39:99–106.10.5505/tjb.2014.77487Suche in Google Scholar
31. Barut EN, Barut B, Engin S, Yıldırım S, Yasar A, Turkis S, et al. Antioxidant capacity, anti-acetylcholinesterase activity and inhibitory effect on lipid peroxidation in mice brain homogenate of Achillea millefolium. Turk J Biochem 2017;42:493–502.10.1515/tjb-2017-0084Suche in Google Scholar
32. Blois MS. Antioxidant determinations by a stable free radical. Nature 1958;181:1199–200.10.1038/1811199a0Suche in Google Scholar
33. Tumen İ, Sezer Senol F, Erdogan Orhan I. Evaluation of possible in vitro neurobiological effects of two varieties of Cupressus sempervirens (Mediterranean cypress) through their antioxidant and enzyme inhibition actions. Turk J Biochem 2012;37:5–13.10.5505/tjb.2012.92400Suche in Google Scholar
34. Falcioni G, Fedeli D, Tiano L, Calzuola I. Mancinelli L. Antioxidant activity of wheat extact in vitro: inhibition of DNA oxidative damage. J Food Sci 2002;67:2918–22.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08838.xSuche in Google Scholar
35. Oyaizu M. Studies on products of browning reactions-antioxidative activities os products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nutr 1986;44:307–15.10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307Suche in Google Scholar
36. Delazar A, Nazifi E, Movafeghi A, Nazemıyeh H, Hemmati S. Analyses of phytosterols and free radical scavengers in bulbs of Ornithogalum cuspidatum Bertol. Blacpma 2010;9:87–92.Suche in Google Scholar
37. Jaradat NA, Al-Masri M, Zaid AN, Hussein F, Al-Rimawi F, Mokh AA, et al. Phytochemical, antimicrobial and antioxidant preliminary screening of a traditional Palestinian medicinal plant, Ononis pubescens L. Eur J Integr Med 2017;14:46–51.10.1016/j.eujim.2017.08.012Suche in Google Scholar
38. Zhou K, Yu L. Total phenolic content and antioxidant properties of commonly consumed vegetables grown in Colorado. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2006;39:1155–62.10.1016/j.lwt.2005.07.015Suche in Google Scholar
39. Li X, Wang X, Chen D, Chen S. Antioxidant activity and mechanism of protocatechuic acid in vitro. Funct Food Health Dis 2011;1:232–44.10.31989/ffhd.v1i7.127Suche in Google Scholar
40. Velika B, Kron I. Antioxidant properties of benzoic acid derivatives against Superoxide radical. Free Rad Antiox 2012;2:62–7.10.5530/ax.2012.4.11Suche in Google Scholar
41. Masek A, Chrzescijanska E, Latos M. Determination of antioxidant activity of caffeic acid and pcoumaric acid by using electrochemical and spectrophotometric assays. Int J Electrochem Sci 2016;11:10644–58.10.20964/2016.12.73Suche in Google Scholar
42. Yılmaz Y, Toledo RT. Major flavonoids in grape seeds and skins: antioxidant capacity of catechin, epicatechin, and gallic acid. J Agric Food Chem 2004;52:255–60.10.1021/jf030117hSuche in Google Scholar
43. Chen ZY, Chan PT, Ho KY, Fung KP, Wang J. Antioxiidant activity of natural flavonoids is governed by number and location of their aromatic hydroxyl groups. Chem Phys Lip 1996;79:157–63.10.1016/0009-3084(96)02523-6Suche in Google Scholar
44. Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G. Structure-antıoxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Rad Biol Med 1996;20:933–56.10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9Suche in Google Scholar
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Short Communication
- Acetone-water mixture is a competent solvent to extract phenolics and antioxidants from four organs of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
- Research Articles
- Proteases from Calotropis gigantea stem, leaf and calli as milk coagulant source
- A new method to quantify atmospheric Poaceae pollen DNA based on the trnT-F cpDNA region
- Expression of a functional recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (VEGF165) in Arabidopsis thaliana
- Computational exploration of antiviral activity of phytochemicals against NS2B/NS3 proteases from dengue virus
- Investigation of antioxidant, cytotoxic, tyrosinase inhibitory activities, and phenolic profiles of green, white, and black teas
- DFR and PAL gene transcription and their correlation with anthocyanin accumulation in Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton.) Hassk.
- Comparison of phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of three Ornithogalum L. species
- Increasing the fermentation efficiency of Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei MIUG BL6 in a rye flour sourdough
- Determination of chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of products obtained from carob and honey locust
- Chitinolytic Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 as a biocontrol agent against mycotoxigenic and phytopathogenic fungi
- Recycling fish skin for utilization in food industry as an effective emulsifier and foam stabilizing agent
- A novel, thermotolerant, extracellular PHB depolymerase producer Paenibacillus alvei PHB28 for bioremediation of biodegradable plastics
- Post-transcriptional regulation of miRNA-15a and miRNA-15b on VEGFR gene and deer antler cell proliferation
- Comparison of pendimethalin binding properties of serum albumins from various mammalian species
- Crocin (active constituent of saffron) improves CCl4-induced liver damage by modulating oxidative stress in rats
- Time dependent change of ethanol consumption biomarkers, ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate, after single dose ethanol intake
- GC-MS analysis and biological activities of Thymus vulgaris and Mentha arvensis essential oil
- Immobilization and some application of α-amylase purified from Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 strain ZB-34
- Letter to the Editor
- Molecular crosstalk between Hog1 and calcium/CaM signaling
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Short Communication
- Acetone-water mixture is a competent solvent to extract phenolics and antioxidants from four organs of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
- Research Articles
- Proteases from Calotropis gigantea stem, leaf and calli as milk coagulant source
- A new method to quantify atmospheric Poaceae pollen DNA based on the trnT-F cpDNA region
- Expression of a functional recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (VEGF165) in Arabidopsis thaliana
- Computational exploration of antiviral activity of phytochemicals against NS2B/NS3 proteases from dengue virus
- Investigation of antioxidant, cytotoxic, tyrosinase inhibitory activities, and phenolic profiles of green, white, and black teas
- DFR and PAL gene transcription and their correlation with anthocyanin accumulation in Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton.) Hassk.
- Comparison of phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of three Ornithogalum L. species
- Increasing the fermentation efficiency of Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei MIUG BL6 in a rye flour sourdough
- Determination of chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of products obtained from carob and honey locust
- Chitinolytic Bacillus subtilis Ege-B-1.19 as a biocontrol agent against mycotoxigenic and phytopathogenic fungi
- Recycling fish skin for utilization in food industry as an effective emulsifier and foam stabilizing agent
- A novel, thermotolerant, extracellular PHB depolymerase producer Paenibacillus alvei PHB28 for bioremediation of biodegradable plastics
- Post-transcriptional regulation of miRNA-15a and miRNA-15b on VEGFR gene and deer antler cell proliferation
- Comparison of pendimethalin binding properties of serum albumins from various mammalian species
- Crocin (active constituent of saffron) improves CCl4-induced liver damage by modulating oxidative stress in rats
- Time dependent change of ethanol consumption biomarkers, ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate, after single dose ethanol intake
- GC-MS analysis and biological activities of Thymus vulgaris and Mentha arvensis essential oil
- Immobilization and some application of α-amylase purified from Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 strain ZB-34
- Letter to the Editor
- Molecular crosstalk between Hog1 and calcium/CaM signaling