Lifting the pen and the gaze: embodied recruitment in collaborative writing

References

Abe, Makoto. 2020. Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 49. 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100752.Suche in Google Scholar

Ayaß, Ruth. 2014. Using media as involvement shields. Journal of Pragmatics 72. 5–17.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.003Suche in Google Scholar

Balaman, Ufuk. 2021. The interactional organization of video-mediated collaborative writing: Focus on repair practices. TESOL Quarterly 55(3). 979–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3034.Suche in Google Scholar

Barritt, Loren. 1981. Writing/speaking: A descriptive phenomenological view. In Barry M. Kroll & Roberta J. Vann (eds.), Exploring speaking-writing relationships: Connections and contrasts, 124–133. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.Suche in Google Scholar

Beeke, Suzanne, Fiona Johnson, Firle Beckley, Claudia Heilemann, Susan Edwards, Jane Maxim & Wendy Best. 2014. Enabling better conversations between a man with aphasia and his conversation partner: Incorporating writing into turn taking. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(3). 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.925667.Suche in Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 2013. Writing and society: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139061063Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles & Claire Parnet. 2006. Dialogues II, Revised edn. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2014. Requesting: From speech act to recruitment. In Paul Drew & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, 1–34. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.26.01dreSuche in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & Kobin H. Kendrick. 2018. Searching for trouble: Recruiting assistance through embodied action. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v1i1.105496. https://tidsskrift.dk/socialinteraction/article/view/105496 (Accessed 2022-04-13).Suche in Google Scholar

Due, Brian & Thomas L. W. Toft. 2021. Phygital highlighting: Achieving joint visual attention when physically co-editing a digital text. Journal of Pragmatics 177. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.034.Suche in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1977 [1969]. What is an author? In Donald F. Bouchard (ed.), Michel Foucault, language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews, 113–138. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara A. & Trine Heinemann. 2021. Are they requests? An exploration of declaratives of trouble in service encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54(1). 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1864154.Suche in Google Scholar

Francese, Erica. 2019. Writing alone, writing together. Creation of a space of play through writing. Revue de Psychothérapie Psychanalytique de Groupe 72(1). 99–111. https://doi.org/10.3917/rppg.072.0099.Suche in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 1993. A catalog of investigations with which to respecify topics of logic, order, meaning, method, reason, structure, science, and the rest, in, about, and as the workings of immortal ordinary society just in any actual case. What did we do? What did we learn? (Unpublished manuscript.) Available at the Garfinkel Archive in Newburyport, Massachusetts, USA.Suche in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism (Edited by Anne Warfield Rawls). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar

Gill, Virginia Teas, Timothy Halkowski & Felicia Roberts. 2001. Accomplishing a request without making one: A single case analysis of a primary care visit. Text 21(1–2). 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.55.Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Jo Ann. 1975. A system for transfer of instructions in natural settings. Semiotica 14(3). 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1975.14.3.269.Suche in Google Scholar

González-Martínez, Esther & Paul Drew. 2021. Informings as recruitment in nurses’ intrahospital telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics 186. 48–59.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.013Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1987. Unilateral departure. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation, 206–216. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418226-009Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Charles Goodwin. 1986. Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62(1–2). 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51.Suche in Google Scholar

Heap, James L. 1989. Writing as social action. Theory into Practice 28(2). 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848909543394.Suche in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Herder, Anke, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & TomKoole. 2020. Sharing knowledge with peers: Epistemic displays in collaborative writing of primary school children. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 24. 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100378.Suche in Google Scholar

Herder, Anke, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & Tom Koole. 2018. Nature and function of proposals in collaborative writing of primary school students. Linguistics and Education 46. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Hindmarsh, Jon & Christian Heath. 2000. Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29(5). 517–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124100129023990.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoey, Elliott M. 2020. Waiting to inhale: On sniffing in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(1). 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712962.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakonen, Teppo. 2016. Gaining access to another participant’s writing in the classroom. Language and Dialogue 6(1). 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.06jak.Suche in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSuche in Google Scholar

Juvonen, Riita, Marie Tanner, Christina Olin-Scheller, Liisa Tainio & Anna Slotte. 2019. ‘Being stuck’: Analyzing text-planning activities in digitally rich upper secondary school classrooms. Learning, Culture & Social interaction 21. 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin H. 2021. The ‘other’ side of recruitment: Methods of assistance in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 178. 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin H. & Francisco Torreira. 2015. The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes 52(4). 255–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2014.955997.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew. 2016a. Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1). 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew. 2016b. The boundary of recruitment: A response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1). 32–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126442.Suche in Google Scholar

Komter, Martha L. 2006. From talk to text: The interactional construction of a police record. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(3). 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2.Suche in Google Scholar

Korbut, Andrei. 2019. A preliminary study of the orderliness of university student note-taking practices. In Tanya Tyagunova (ed.), Studentische Praxis und universitäre Interaktionskultur: Perspektiven einer praxeologischen Bildungsforschung, 119–142. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-21246-9_6Suche in Google Scholar

Krishnan, Jenell, Andrew Cusimano, Dakuo Wang & Soobin Yim. 2018. Writing together: Online synchronous collaboration in middle school. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 62(2). 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.871.Suche in Google Scholar

Kristiansen, Elisabeth Dalby. 2017. Doing formulating: “Writing aloud voice” sequences as an interactional method. Journal of Pragmatics 114. 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Lunsford, Andrea & Lisa Ede. 1990. Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lunsford, Andrea & Lisa Ede. 2011. Writing together: Collaboration in theory and practice. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.Suche in Google Scholar

Magnusson, Simon. 2021. Establishing jointness in proximal multiparty decision-making: The case of collaborative writing. Journal of Pragmatics 181. 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Manning, Susan M. 2018. Collaborative poetic processes: Methodological reflections on co-writing with participants. Qualitative Report 23(4). 742–757. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3185.Suche in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1973. The prose of the world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mlynář, Jakub. 2021. Rewatching a video clip in classroom work with digital oral history. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée Special issue, Summer 2021(1). 57–76.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. Requesting immediate action in the surgical operating room: Time, embodied resources and praxeological embeddedness. In Paul Drew & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, 269–302. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.26.11monSuche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. Going to write: Embodied trajectories of writing of collective proposals in grassroots democracy meetings. Language and Dialogue 6(1). 140–178. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.05mon.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1). 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza & Kimmo Svinhufvud. 2016. Writing-in-interaction: Studying writing as a multimodal phenomenon in social interaction. Language and Dialogue 6(1). 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.01mon.Suche in Google Scholar

Morita, Emi. 2018. The interactiveness of ‘unilateral’ activity in child’s play. In Donald Favareau (ed.), Co-operative engagements in intertwined semiosis: Essays in honour of Charles Goodwin, 326–334. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mortensen, Kristian. 2013. Writing aloud: Some interactional functions of the public display of emergent writing. In Helinä Melkas & Jacob Buur (eds.), Proceedings of the participatory innovation conference PIN-C 2013, 119–125. Lahti: Lappeenranta University of Technology.Suche in Google Scholar

Nissi, Rikka. 2015. From entry proposals to a joint statement: Practices of shared text production in multiparty meeting interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 79. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Pälli, Pekka & Esa Lehtinen. 2014. Making objectives common in performance appraisal interviews. Language and Communication 39. 92–108.10.1016/j.langcom.2014.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

Paré, Anthony. 2014. Writing together for many reasons: Theoretical and historical perspectives. In Claire Aitchison & Cally Guerin (eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in theory and practice, 18–29. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Ritchie, Stephen M. & Donna L. Rigano. 2007. Writing together metaphorically and bodily side‐by‐side: An inquiry into collaborative academic writing. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives 8(1). 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940601139087.Suche in Google Scholar

Rose, Edward. 1992. The Werald. Boulder: Waiting Room.Suche in Google Scholar

Rossi, Giovanni. 2014. When do people not use language to make requests? In Paul Drew & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, 303–334. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slsi.26.12rosSuche in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey & Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2002. Home position. Gesture 2(2). 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac.Suche in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1978 [1974]. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 7–55. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Suche in Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred. 1962. Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy. 2013. Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847699954Suche in Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen. 2009. Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/gs.2Suche in Google Scholar

Svensson, Hanna. 2017. Surveiller et corriger: l’accomplissement interactionnel de la révision d’une inscription publique. In Lorenza Mondada & Sara Keel (eds.), Participation et asymétries dans l’interaction institutionnelle, 203–233. Paris: L’Harmattan.Suche in Google Scholar

Tiilikainen, Sanna & Ilkka Arminen. 2017. Together individually. In Anja R. Lahikainen, Tiina Mälkiä & Katja Repo (eds.), Media, family interaction and the digitalization of childhood, 155–170. Northampton/Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781785366673.00019Suche in Google Scholar

Tuncer, Sylvaine, Christian Licoppe & Pentti Haddington. 2019. When objects become the focus of human action and activity: Object-centred sequences in social interaction. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 20. 384–398.Suche in Google Scholar

Van der Houwen, Fleur. 2013. Reported writing in court: Putting evidence “on record”. Text and Talk 33(6). 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0032.Suche in Google Scholar

Zinken, Jörg & Giovanni Rossi. 2016. Assistance and other forms of cooperative engagement. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1). 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126439.Suche in Google Scholar