Summary
This article is concerned with grammaticalization of prepositional elements in Slavic. It is argued that external prefixes are internal prefixes that underwent some grammaticalization process. After discussing the grammaticalization of the Slavic prefix po- it is shown that the Czech future po- differs from Russian and Polish non-future prefixes. Furthermore, it is proposed that the presence of future po- in grammatical systems of Czech, Slovak, Slovenian and Sorbian is a result of diachronic grammaticalization processes induced primarily by the German-Slavic language contact in the Holy Roman Empire.
References
Arsenijević, Boban. 2006. Inner aspect and telicity: The decompositional and the quantificational nature of eventualities at the syntax-semantics interface (= LOT Dissertation Series 142). Leiden: Leiden University dissertation. Suche in Google Scholar
Babko-Malaya, Olga. 1999. Zero morphology: A study of aspect, argument structure, and case. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Berger, Tilman. 2008. Studien zur historischen Grammatik des Tschechischen: Bohemistische Beiträge zur Kontaktlinguistik (=Travaux Linguistiques de Brno 2). München: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr. 2019. Prepositions, case and verbal prefixes: The case of Slavic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.255Suche in Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr & Gerhild Zybatow. 2015. Verbal prefixation in Slavonic: A minimalist approach. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe. Vol. 2. (HSK 40.2), 1492–1515. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110246278-042Suche in Google Scholar
Bogusławski, Andrzej. 1960. Prefiksalne pary aspektowe a semantyka prefiksalna czasownika rosyjskiego. In Slavia Orientalis IX, 139–175.Suche in Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel & Markéta Ziková. 2016. Vowel length as evidence for a distinction between free and bound prefixes in Czech. In Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63 (3). 331–377. 10.1556/064.2016.63.3.3Suche in Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi, Ignazio Putzu & Paolo Ramat. 2006. The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. In Indogermanische Forschungen 111, 1–38.10.1515/9783110186505.1Suche in Google Scholar
Čertkova, Marina. 1996. Grammatičeskaja kategorija vida v sovremennom russkom jazyke. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Suche in Google Scholar
DeLazero, Octav Eugen. 2012. Aspect in syntax. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Diakorp. Kučera, Karel, Anna Řehořková & Martin Stluka. 2015. DIAKORP: Diachronní korpus, verze 6 z 18. 12. 2015. Praha: Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK. http://www.korpus.cz.Suche in Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M. 2011. The varying role of po- in the grammaticalization of Slavic aspectual systems: Sequences of events, delimitatives, and German language contact. In Journal of Slavic linguistics 19 (2), 175–230.10.1353/jsl.2011.0009Suche in Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M. 2000. Parameters of Slavic aspect: A cognitive approach. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Roumyana Slabakova. 2005. Quantification and aspect. In Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 61–80. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_4Suche in Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit. 2008. Ps in motion: On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events. Utrecht: Utrecht University dissertation. LOT Dissertation Series 184.Suche in Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 2012. Perfective and imperfective aspect. In Robert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 781–802. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0027Suche in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? In Linguistics 37 (6), 1043–1068.10.1515/ling.37.6.1043Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 575–601. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405127479.2004.00020.xSuche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614132Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613463Suche in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Suche in Google Scholar
Isačenko, Aleksandr V. 1962. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Formenlehre. Halle: Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2012. Grammaticalization as optimization. In Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, 15–51. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kopečný, František. 1973. Etymologický slovník slovanských jazyků. Slova gramatická a zájmena. Praha: Academia.Suche in Google Scholar
Kopečný, František. 1958. Základy české skladby. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1965. The evolution of grammatical categories. In Diogenes 13 (51), 55–71. 10.1177/039219216501305105Suche in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch. Vol. 1. Universität zu Köln, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. (Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts, 48.) [Pub. as Thoughts on Grammaticalization, Munich: Lincom Europa, 1995.]Suche in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar. 1999. Sprachliche Entwicklung als Expansion und Reduktion. In Volkmar Lehmann & Tanja Anstatt (eds.), Entwicklungen in slavischen Sprachen 1, 169–254. München: Otto Sagner.10.3726/b12520Suche in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar. 1993. Die russischen Aspekte als gestufte Kategorien. In Die Welt der Slawen 38, 265–297. Suche in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1993. Theoretical bases of Indo-European linguistics. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Markova, Angelina. 2011. On the nature of Bulgarian prefixes: Ordering and modification in multiple prefixation. In Word Structure 4 (2), 244–271.10.3366/word.2011.0013Suche in Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12, No. 26, 6. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 130–148. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion. Suche in Google Scholar
Mende, Julija, Eva Born-Rauchenecker, Natal’ja Brüggemann, Horst Dippong, Julija Kukla & Volkmar Lehmann. 2012. Vid i akcional’nost’ russkogo glagola. Opyt slovarja. München: Otto Sagner.10.3726/b11920Suche in Google Scholar
Němec, Igor. 1958. Vznik a vývoj vidu v souvislosti s vývojem tvoření slovesných kmenů. In Československé přednášky pro IV. mezinárodní sjezd slavistů v Moskvě, 137–150. Praha.Suche in Google Scholar
Němec, Igor. 1954. O slovanské předponě po- slovesné. In Slavia 23 (1), 1–22.Suche in Google Scholar
Oertle, Simon. 2016. Die slavischen Verbalpräfixe und Präpositionen: Polysemie und Grammatikalisierung. Herne: Gabriele Schäfer Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Petr, Jan (ed.). 1986. Mluvnice češtiny 1. Fonetika – Fonologie – Morfonologie a morfemika – Tvoření slov. Praha: Academia.Suche in Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C. 2004. Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes. In Nordlyd 32.2: Special issue on Slavic prefixes, 323–361.10.7557/12.72Suche in Google Scholar
Richardson, Kylie. 2007. Case and aspect in Slavic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291960.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
RNK. Russkij nacional'nyj korpus. http://www.ruscorpora.ru/new/index.html.Suche in Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486326Suche in Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 1999. A formal approach to grammaticalization. In Linguistics 37, 1011–1041.10.1515/ling.37.6.1011Suche in Google Scholar
Romanova, Eugenia. 2006. Constructing perfectivity in Russian. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1995. Participial passive and aspect in Russian. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht dissertation, OTS dissertation series.Suche in Google Scholar
Sigalov, Pavel S. 1975. Nekotorye voprosy izučenija prefiksal’nogo obrazovanija glagolov. In Trudy po russkoj i slavjanskoj filologii XXIII, 117–134.Suche in Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W. 1974 [1920]. Greek grammar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Sommer, Petr, Dušan Třeštík, Josef Žemlička & Zoë Opačić. 2009. Bohemia and Moravia. In Nora Berend (ed.), Christianization and the rise of Christian monarchy: Scandinavia, Central Europe and Rus', c.900–1200, 214–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511496400.007Suche in Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. Slavic prefixes inside and outside the VP. In Nordlyd 32.2: Special issue on Slavic prefixes, 205–253.10.7557/12.68Suche in Google Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata. 2011. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Suche in Google Scholar
Szucsich, Luka. 2014. Restriktionen bei mehrfacher Prä- und Suffigierung. In Hagen Pitsch (ed.), Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XXI. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Göttingen, 13.–15. September 2012, 199–217. München: Otto Sagner.Suche in Google Scholar
Šlosar, Dušan. 1981. Slovotvorný vývoj českého slovesa. Brno: Univerzita Jana Purkyně.Suche in Google Scholar
Śmiech, Witold. 1986. Derywacja prefiksalna czasowników polskich. Wrocław, Warszawa & Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Suche in Google Scholar
Švedova, Natal’ja Ju. (ed.). 1980. Russkaja grammatika. Moskva: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2008. Intermediate prefixes in Russian. In Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn & Christina Y. Bethin (eds.), Proceedings of the annual workshop on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 16. The Stony Brook meeting, 423–445. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs. 1980. Meaning-change in the development of grammatical markers. In Language Sciences 2 (1), 44–61.10.1016/S0388-0001(80)80004-0Suche in Google Scholar
Trávníček, František. 1923. Studie o českém vidu slovesném. Praha: Česká akademie věd a umění.Suche in Google Scholar
Trunte, Nikolaos H. 2005. Slověnьskъi językъ. Ein praktisches Lehrbuch des Kirchenslavischen in 30 Lektionen. Band I: Altkirchenslavisch. München: Otto Sagner.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.71Suche in Google Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor V. 1947. Russkij jazyk (grammatičeskoe učenie o slove). Moskva, Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo Ministerstva prosveščenija RSFSR.Suche in Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Ilja A. Seržant. 2017. Diachrony and typology of Slavic aspect: What does morphology tell us? In Walter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios (= Studies in diversity linguistics 16), 239–307. Berlin: Language Science Press. Suche in Google Scholar
Wiland, Bartosz. 2012. Prefix stacking, syncretism, and the syntactic hierarchy. In Markéta Ziková & Mojmír Dočekal (eds.), Slavic languages in formal grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, 307–324. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Aleksej D. Šmelёv. 1997. Lekcii po russkoj aspektologii. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.10.3726/b12573Suche in Google Scholar
Žaucer, Rok. 2009. A VP-internal/resultative analysis of 4 “VP-external” uses of Slavic verbal prefixes. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Zeman, Dalibor. 2008. Deutsch-tschechische Sprachkontakterscheinungen. In Germanoslavica XIX (1), 59–77.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- The Presence of the Past in Contemporary Russian Prose Fiction: A Comparative Reading of Guzel’ Iakhina and Sergei Lebedev
- Vollgas voraus. Testläufe für die Faktografie (Tret’jakov, Gromov, Karmen)
- Peregrynacja Maćkowa (Matzes Reise) (1612) und Finkenritter (um 1560). Traditionen der Erzählform und das Spiel mit den Konventionen: Einiges zu Julian Krzyżanowskis Überlegungen
- Simplifying grammatical gender in inflectional languages: Odessa Russian and beyond
- Das russische Demonstrativpronomen eto (‘dasʼ) in der Kopula-Stellung: Probleme des syntaktischen Status im Licht der funktionalen Grammatik
- Grammaticalization of Slavic Prefixes and Language Contact
- Tagungsbericht
- Tagungsbericht zur 29. Tagung der Jungslavist:innen
- Buchbesprechung
- Collective Memory and Oral Text
- Srpski (o)kvir. Prilozi za čitanje srpske književnosti u svetlu kvir teorije
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- The Presence of the Past in Contemporary Russian Prose Fiction: A Comparative Reading of Guzel’ Iakhina and Sergei Lebedev
- Vollgas voraus. Testläufe für die Faktografie (Tret’jakov, Gromov, Karmen)
- Peregrynacja Maćkowa (Matzes Reise) (1612) und Finkenritter (um 1560). Traditionen der Erzählform und das Spiel mit den Konventionen: Einiges zu Julian Krzyżanowskis Überlegungen
- Simplifying grammatical gender in inflectional languages: Odessa Russian and beyond
- Das russische Demonstrativpronomen eto (‘dasʼ) in der Kopula-Stellung: Probleme des syntaktischen Status im Licht der funktionalen Grammatik
- Grammaticalization of Slavic Prefixes and Language Contact
- Tagungsbericht
- Tagungsbericht zur 29. Tagung der Jungslavist:innen
- Buchbesprechung
- Collective Memory and Oral Text
- Srpski (o)kvir. Prilozi za čitanje srpske književnosti u svetlu kvir teorije