The potential effect of walking on quantitative sensory testing, pain catastrophizing, and perceived stress: an exploratory study
-
Anna Houmøller Rasmussen
Abstract
Objectives
Studies suggest that a range of pain mechanisms, such as poor quality of sleep, perceived stress, pain catastrophizing or pain sensitivity, are likely to enhance clinical pain. Animal studies suggest that these pain mechanisms can be modulated by increasing physical activity, but human data are needed to support this hypothesis. This exploratory study aimed to investigate the changes in pain mechanisms after a simple self-directed walking program of 8-weeks. Additionally, this exploratory study investigated the interaction between changes over time in assessments of poor quality of sleep, perceived stress, pain catastrophizing or pain sensitivity and how these changes interacted with each other.
Methods
This prospective cohort study included 30 healthy subjects who were assessed at baseline and 4- and 8-weeks after initiating the walking program (30 min walking/day for 8 weeks). Self-report outcomes included: Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were assessed using cuff algometry.
Results
Twenty-four subjects completed all the visits (age: 42.2, SD: 14.9, 16 females). PCS and PSS significantly decreased at the 8-week’s visit compared to baseline (p<0.05). No significant differences were seen for an improvement in quality of sleep (p=0.071) and pain sensitivity (p>0.075) when comparing the 8-week’s visit to the baseline visit. Changes in pain mechanisms comparing baseline and 8-weeks data were calculated and regression analyses found that an improvement in PCS was associated with an improvement in CPM (R2=0.197, p=0.017) and that a higher adherence to the walking program was associated with a larger improvement in PCS (R2=0.216, p=0.013).
Conclusions
The current exploratory study indicates that a simple self-directed walking program of 8-weeks can improve pain catastrophizing thoughts, perceived stress. Higher adherence to the walking program were associated with an improvement in pain catastrophizing and an improvement in pain catastrophizing was associated with an increase in conditioned pain modulation.
Introduction
Chronic pain affects approx. 20 % of the world’s population and musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is the largest contributor to the high prevalence [1]. Inactivity have been suggested to maintain or worsen MSK pain [2, 3] but inactivity can also be associated with obesity [4, 5] or poor quality of sleep [6] and these factors are suggested to worsen MSK pain [7, 8]. Various forms of physical activity (often in combination with patient education) is recommended as a first-line treatment for many MSK pain disorders [9], [10], [11]. Walking is an easily implementable activity and walking programs with a duration of weeks has been demonstrated to improve pain and disability in patients with MSK pain [12] but the underlying mechanisms associated with pain relief are still to be explored.
Poor sleep quality is a major clinical issue for patients with chronic pain as up to 50 % of patients report poor sleep quality [13]. Poor sleep quality is also an issue in healthy pain-free individuals and epidemiological studies indicate that poor quality of sleep is associated to the development of widespread pain in the future [14, 15]. Recent evidence indicate that poor quality of sleep can negatively affect measures of pain sensitivity parameters in healthy individuals [16]. Additionally, poor quality of sleep is associated with worsening in psychological factors such as pain catastrophizing [7, 17] and higher levels of pain catastrophizing is associated with more impaired conditioned pain modulation (CPM) [18]. Finally, increased stress is associated with poor quality of sleep and vice versa [19] and this can potentially be associated with low-grade inflammation [20], which in preclinical studies are linked with increased sensitivity of both peripheral and central pain mechanisms [21, 22]. Conclusively, healthy pain-free individuals might experience increased pain sensitivity, and this could be due to impaired sleep quality or increased stress levels.
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is utilized to assess nerve function and is used to quantify pain sensitivity in humans. Severe MSK pain is often associated with lower pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), facilitated temporal summation of pain (TSP) and impaired CPM [23], [24], [25]. PPTs assessed in a painful area can assess localized hyperalgesia whereas outside of a painful area can assess widespread hyperalgesia [26]. TSP is believed to assess the wind-up process of dorsal horn neurons [26] and facilitated TSP is therefore believed to reflect sensitization of spinal cord mechanisms. CPM is assumed to assess the balance of descending pain inhibitory and facilitatory mechanisms [27] and impairment of CPM therefore suggests an imbalance in these mechanisms [28]. Recent evidence suggests that a subpopulation of healthy pain-free individuals might be more pain sensitive than others and that these subjects experience more pain when exposed to an acute trauma [29, 30].
Studies indicate that exercise is associated with improvement in sleep quality [31, 32] and increases in PPTs and CPM [31, 33, 34]. Some exercise programs can be difficult to implement in patients with chronic MSK pain, due to pain and discomfort for weight-bearing exercise modalities. Walking is a simple exercise which can improve physical activity and is implementable for e.g. patients with osteoarthritis [12]. Studying the interaction between exercise and different dimensions of pain, including pain sensitivity and sleep quality, in individuals without chronic pain will contribute to our comprehension of these intricate systems. These findings can provide a basis for future investigations in the field of chronic pain research.
This exploratory study aimed to assess if a battery of QST assessment, pain catastrophizing, stress and sleep quality assessed in healthy pain-free individuals could be modulated by a simple self-directed walking program of 8-weeks.
Methods
Participants
The current exploratory study aimed to include 30 pain-free subjects who were in good health. Recruitment of participants was conducted through Aalborg University, Denmark. Inclusion criteria consisted of healthy, pain-free individuals, both women and men, who had access to a smartphone and were capable of using the Strava app. Exclusion criteria encompassed drug and/or alcohol addiction, previous medical history of neurological, musculoskeletal, or mental illnesses, chronic pulmonary conditions, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, chronic pain conditions, and current use of analgesic medication. A pre-inclusion interview was conducted to screen all subjects for these inclusion and exclusion criteria.
All subjects received detailed verbal and written information and signed prior to enrollment in the study. The study was approved by The North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (N-20180089). The experiment was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
No studies have assessed the effect of an 8-week walking program on QST data and therefore the data to support a precise power calculation are not available. Based on previous studies using other exercise modalities [33, 35], the sample size calculation for the current study was based on an effect size of 0.6, with a power of 80 % and an alpha of 0.05, which yielded a sample size of 24 subjects. Longitudinal studies are known to suffer from drop-outs and therefore the current study aimed to recruit 30 subjects to account for drop-outs.
Experimental design and outcomes
The experiment consisted of three identical sessions (1) baseline, (2) 4-week follow-up and (3) 8-week follow-up. The 8-week exercise intervention consisted of 30-min walk 5 days a week, as studies has shown that exercises intervention lasting several weeks are capable of improving QST-parameters in chronic pain patients [31, 33, 34]. The daily walks were reported to the research team through the Strava app (Strava Inc, San Francisco, CA, United States). The participants were not restricted to a specific length or speed during their walks and were allowed to walk at their own pace. While the research team did not monitor the exact length of the walks, the Strava app served as a means of confirming that the subjects completed a walk of 30 min duration on a daily basis.
At each session Computer-controlled Cuff Algometry measurements were carried out and the four self-administered questionnaires: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) were completed. The measurement took place in a quiet isolated room at the Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg, Aalborg University, Denmark and FIXNORDIC A/S, Horsens, Denmark.
Questionnaires
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) consists of 13 items focusing on thoughts and feelings in connection with pain [36]. The questions are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much).
PQSI is a validated tool used to assess sleep quality in both clinical and non-clinical settings, as well as in young and old individuals [37], [38], [39]. The questionnaire is based on a four-point likert-scale, ranging from 0 meaning “not at all” to 3 meaning “all the time”. PQSI consists of 19 items, which are used to create seven component scores evaluating sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication and daytime dysfunction. The sum of each component score makes up a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with a higher global score indicating a lower sleep quality [40].
PSS is developed to assess the degree of situations in which one’s life are appraised as stressful within the last month [41]. As the questionnaire is completed continuously during this study, an overall estimation of self-estimated stress levels of 3 months was collected. In this study a 10-item version was used, as it has demonstrated to be superior to the original 14-item version [42, 43]. Participants are asked to evaluate their response upon life events and situations during the past month using a 5-point likert-scale ranging from 0 meaning “never” to 4 meaning “very often” with a total score ranging from 0 to 40 [42].
IPAQ is widely used for observing physical activity levels among 18–65 year-old adults [44]. This study used the long-lasting self-administered 27-item version which is designed to report thorough information within all domains of physical activity such as, leisure-time activity, household and yard-work activity, physical activity at work, self-powered transport and sedentary activity [44]. Total scores were calculated by summation of weighted MET-minutes per week across all activity domains [44].
Quantitative sensory testing
Deep tissue pain sensitivity was evaluated by cuff pressure stimuli using a computer-controlled cuff algometer (Cortex Technology and Aalborg University, Denmark), including a 13-cm wide tourniquet cuff (VBM, Sulz, Germany) and an electronic VAS (Aalborg University, Denmark) for the recording of the pain intensity. The cuff was placed at the head of the gastrocnemius muscle of the dominant lower leg. The electronic continuous VAS (sliding resistor) was 10 cm long and sampled at 10 Hz; 0 cm: no pain and 10 cm: worst pain imaginable. Cuff algometry is a reliable assessment for PPTs, TSP, and CPM [45, 46] and has often been utilized in studies with patients with chronic pain and healthy pain-free individuals [16, 29, 47, 48].
The pressure of the cuff was increased by 1 kPa/s and the participants were instructed to rate the pain intensity continuously on the electronic VAS until the tolerance level was reached. At this point, the participants were instructed to press a stop button. The pressure pain detection threshold (cPDT) was defined as the pressure at which the VAS score exceeded 1 cm as in previous studies [29, 48, 49]. The pain tolerance threshold (cPTT) was defined as the point at which participants indicated that their pressure tolerance level had been reached, which was signaled by pressing a stop button. The measurements were conducted once on both the dominant and non-dominant lower leg to the most affected knee.
Ten short-lasting stimuli (1 s each) at the level of the cPTT were given at the lower leg with a 1 s break between stimuli. The participants were instructed to continuously rate the pain intensity of the sequential stimuli using the electronic VAS and not return to zero during the breaks. For each cuff stimulus, a VAS score was extracted. TSP was calculated as the absolute difference between the last three stimuli and the first three stimuli as in previous studies [16, 50].
The CPM magnitude was assessed as the absolute changes in cPDT with and without a cuff conditioning stimulus. The conditioning stimulus was applied to the non-dominant lower leg, and the cPDT was assessed on the dominant lower leg as described above. The conditioning stimulus was applied as a constant stimulus with an intensity of 70 % of the pain tolerance level on the non-dominant leg [45, 48, 51]. The CPM effect was calculated as the absolute difference in conditioned and unconditioned cPDT (i.e., cPDTconditioned minus cPDTunconditioned).
Statistical analysis
Repeated measures analysis of variances (RM-ANOVAs) with a time factor (baseline, 4-week visit, and 8-week visit) were conducted for all questionnaires and QST data. The Bonferroni post hoc test was utilized to adjust for multiple comparisons. Cohen’s d was used to report effect sizes. No imputations were made and only data from subjects with complete data at the three time points was used in the analysis.
Three multiple linear regression models with dependent parameters being change in (1) cPPT, (2) TSP and (3) CPM and independent parameters being change in PCS, PSS, PSQI and IPAQ were established in an attempt to understand the modulation of different study parameters and their interactions changes in pain sensitivity. Changes in study parameters were based on changes from baseline assessment to 8-week follow-up. Backwards elimination was applied to the linear regressions to identify independent predictors using cut-offs for statistical independence and inclusion of 0.05 and exclusion of 0.157, respectively, according to Akaike’s Information Criterion for prognostic models [52]. The adjusted R2 value was reported for each model. Scatterplot of standardized predicted values verses standardized residuals for all the regression analysis were plotted to test the assumptions of homogeneity of variance and linearity. For the analysis, all collinearity tolerance and variance inflation factor (VIF) levels were above 0.1 and below 10 [53], respectively, indicating no collinearity or multicollinearity among the independent variables.
Statistical tests were conducted using the IBM SPSS Statistics software version 26 (IBM, New York, USA). p<0.05 was considered a significant finding. All data are presented as means±standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise specified.
Results
Twenty-four participants completed all three visits, see Table 1 for demographics. The average adherence to the walking program was found to be 84 % (SD: 19 %).
Demographic information on the 24 subjects who completed the study.
Demographics | |
Age, years | 42.17 (SD: 14.87) |
BMI, kg/m2 | 27.20 (SD: 4.18) |
Sex (female/male) | 16/8 |
Baseline IPAQ score (met minutes/week) | 4376 (SD: 4492) |
-
kg, kilograms; MET, metabolic equivalent of task
The 8-weeks walking program did not significantly increase physical activity (IPAQ scores) over time (F(2,46)=2.67, p=0.080).
Changes over time for pain catastrophizing, sleep and stress
A significant decrease in PCS scores were observed over time (F(2,44)=4.42, p=0.018) with post hoc analysis revealing significantly lower PCS scores at the 8-week visit when compared to the baseline visit (Bonferroni: p=0.013, Cohen’s d: 0.57), Figure 1A. PSS scores significantly decreased over time (F(2,46)=4.28, p=0.020) with post hoc analysis revealing that scores at the 8-week visit were significantly lower when compared to the baseline visit (Bonferroni: p=0.017, Cohen’s d: 0.53), Figure 1B. No significant changes over time were found for the PSQI (F(2,46)=2.06, p=0.069), Figure 1C.

(A) Pain Catastrophizing Scale, (B) Perceived Stress Scale and (C) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index scores from before (baseline) and after 4-weeks and 8-weeks of initiating the walking program. * indicated significant changes (p<0.05) when compared to the baseline visit.
Quantitative sensory testing
No significant changes were observed in cPPT (F(2,46)=2.74, p=0.075), TSP (F(2,46)=))=1.527, p=0.228) and CPM (F(2,46)=0.214, p=0.808) over time, Figure 2.

(A) Pressure pain thresholds, (B) temporal summation of pain and (C) conditioned pain modulation from before (baseline) and after 4-weeks and 8-weeks of initiating the walking program. * indicated significant changes (p<0.05) when compared to the baseline visit.
The interaction between modulation of study parameters
The scatterplot of standardized predicted values verses standardized residuals for all the regression analysis, showed that the data met the assumptions of homogeneity of variance and linearity, and the residuals were approximately normally distributed.
A regression model containing changes in study parameters were associated to a change in TSP (adjusted R2=0.065, tolerance>0.7, VIF<1.5) and applying backwards elimination to this model identified changes in PSS as an important parameter, but not a significant independent parameter (p=0.147) for change in TSP (adjusted R2=0.052, tolerance=1.0, VIF=1.0). Additionally, a regression model found that changes in questionnaire parameters were associated to a change in CPM (adjusted R2=0.161, tolerance>0.7, VIF<1.5) and applying backwards elimination to this model identified changes in PCS as an independent factor (p=0.017) for change in CPM (adjusted R2=0.197, tolerance=1.0, VIF=1.0). No associations were found to change in cPPT.
A regression analysis containing changes in questionnaire parameters were associated to a change in PCS (adjusted R2=0.104, tolerance>0.7, VIF<1.4) and applying backward elimination to the model identified that higher adherence were independently (p=0.013) associated with larger improvement in PCS (adjusted R2=0.216, tolerance=1.0, VIF=1.0). A regression analysis containing changes in questionnaire parameters were associated to a change in PSS (adjusted R2=0.009, tolerance>0.7, VIF<1.5) and applying backward elimination to the model identified that larger improvement in PSQI were associated (p=0.134) with larger improvement in PSS (adjusted R2=0.058, tolerance=1.0, VIF=1.0). A regression analysis containing changes in questionnaire parameters were associated to a change in IPAQ (adjusted R2=0.007, tolerance>0.7, VIF<1.5) and applying backward elimination to the model identified that larger improvement in PSQI were associated (p=0.125) with larger improvement in IPAQ (adjusted R2=0.063, tolerance=1.0, VIF=1.0). A regression analysis containing changes in questionnaire parameters were associated to a change in PSQI (adjusted R2=0.109, tolerance>0.7, VIF<1.4) and applying backward elimination to the model identified that larger improvement in PSS (p=0.074) and IPAQ (p=0.070) were associated with larger improvement in PSQI (adjusted R2=0.159, tolerance>0.9, VIF<1.1). See Figure 3 for associations between changed study parameters.

Multiple linear regressions were completed to understand the interaction between changes in study parameters assessed before and 8-weeks after a walking program in healthy pain-free subjects. Model A focused on understanding the changes in pain sensitivity parameters whereas model B focuses on understanding the modulation of sleep, stress, physical activity and pain catastrophizing. Both models contained adherence to the walking program. Color-coding’s are linked to the specific regression analysis aiming to explain the variability. PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PSS, Perceived Stress Scale; IPAQ, The International Physical Activity Questionnaire; PCS, Pain Catastrophizing Scale; cPPT, cuff pressure pain threshold; TSP, temporal summation of pain; CPM, conditioned pain modulation.
Discussion
This exploratory study found that a simple self-directed walking program of 8-weeks significantly reduced perceived stress and pain catastrophizing. This study suggests that a decrease in perceived stress was associated with a decrease in temporal summation of pain and a decrease in pain catastrophizing was associated with an increase in conditioned pain modulation. Finally, improvement in perceived stress and physical activity were associated with an improvement in sleep quality and vice versa and a higher adherence to the exercise program was associated with a decrease in pain catastrophizing.
Changes in cognitive factors after exercise
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that high intensity interval training could increase mental well-being, and reduce depressive symptoms and perceived stress compared to non-active control groups in non-chronic pain subjects [54]. Youngstedt and Kline [32] reported that increased physical activity was associated with better sleep quality in the general population [32] and Lyng et al., 2022 demonstrated improvements in PSQI after an 8-week exercise program for patients with shoulder pain [31]. Two randomized controlled trials demonstrated no effect of 12-weeks of high intensity interval training on sleep quality when compared to a non-active control group [55, 56]. Patients with chronic low back pain who report low levels of physical activity are more likely to report higher levels of kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs when compared to patients with higher levels of physical activity [57], indicating an association between physical activity and mental health. Less intensive exercise-modes might also improve cognitive factors, as e.g. 8-weeks of yoga exercise have been shown to improve pain catastrophizing in patients with fibromyalgia [58]. Additionally, a randomized controlled trial found that 8-weeks of low-intensity physical activity program combining talking and weightlifting (light weight) improved pain catastrophizing, perceived stress and PPTs in patients with fibromyalgia when compared to patients receiving no intervention [59]. This study distinguishes itself from previous attempts by focusing on a straightforward self-directed walking program that necessitates no specific equipment or instructions. Moreover, our study exclusively involves pain-free individuals. Despite the exploratory nature of this study, the results indicate potential improvements in certain pain-related cognitive factors after an 8-week walking program in pain-free individuals. The dose-response relationship between adherence and larger improvement in pain catastrophizing thoughts is of interest and should be further investigated in future studies.
Changes in pain sensitivity after exercise
Pre-clinical literature suggests that inactivity is associated with a higher level of pro-inflammatory cytokines and that exercise potentially leads to a more anti-inflammatory profile [60]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines are known to sensitize peripheral [21] and central nervous system [61] and therefore, the potential anti-inflammatory profile caused by exercise could partly explain the hypoalgesia effect of exercise.
In humans, a recent systematic review of randomized controlled trails concluded that exercise could improve local and widespread pressure hyperalgesia in patients with chronic pain [62]. Additionally, Lyng et al. [31] demonstrated improvements in CPM following an 8-weeks exercise program for patients with shoulder pain and Heredia-Rizo et al. [33] demonstrated an improvement in PPTs and CPM following a 5-week exercise program for patients with neck and shoulder pain. Hansen et al. [35] demonstrated improvements in exercise-induced hypoalgesia following 7-weeks of military training in healthy individuals and specifically found that subjects with higher levels of pain sensitivity at baseline were more likely to improve in pain sensitivity following the intervention.
The current study utilized a light exercise program, which cannot be compared to the previous studies, and finds that a simple self-directed walking program of 8-weeks could not reduce pain sensitivity. Additionally, this study found that a decrease in perceived stress was associated with a decrease in temporal summation of pain and that a decrease in pain catastrophizing was associated with an increase in CPM. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.
Limitations
The current exploratory study is limited by the absence of a control or placebo group, necessitating cautious interpretation of the results. Furthermore, the sample size used in this study was determined based on an estimated effect size of 0.6 for the walking intervention on quantitative sensory testing (QST). However, the effect sizes reported for the significant findings in this study are below 0.6, indicating that the study may be underpowered. Therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution. Additionally, it is important to note that the effect size of 0.6 was derived from studies involving patients with chronic pain [33] and interventions that differ from a walking program [35]. Consequently, the findings of the current study should be approached with caution.
The current study examined potential associations between the study parameters using multiple linear regression. However, it is important to note that the study sample size does not provide sufficient statistical power for such an analysis, and there is a high risk of overfitting the model. These multiple linear regression models should be confirmed in larger studies with sufficient power. Therefore, it is crucial to interpret the results from the model with caution.
Conclusions
The findings of this exploratory study suggest that an 8-week self-directed walking program can lead to improvements in pain catastrophizing thoughts and perceived stress among healthy individuals. Additionally, a higher adherence to the walking program was associated with an improvement in pain catastrophizing thoughts and an improvement in pain catastrophizing might be associated with an improvement in CPM. This study is exploratory in nature and non-controlled and therefore the results should be interpreted with care.
Funding source: Danish National Research Foundation
Award Identifier / Grant number: DNRF121
Funding source: Novo Nordisk Foundation
Award Identifier / Grant number: NNF21OC0065373
-
Research ethics: The study was approved by The North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (N-20180089). The experiment was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
-
Informed consent: All subjects received detailed verbal and written information and signed prior to enrollment in the study.
-
Author contribution: Anna Houmøller Rasmussen, Lærke Kjeldgaard Petersen, Mette Andbæk Kaasgaard, Maria Møller Bertelsen, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, and Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen designed the study. Anna Houmøller Rasmussen, Lærke Kjeldgaard Petersen, Mette Andbæk Kaasgaard, and Maria Møller Bertelsen collected the data under supervision of Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen. Anna Houmøller Rasmussen, Lærke Kjeldgaard Petersen, Mette Andbæk Kaasgaard, and Maria Møller Bertelsen wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Michael Skovdal Rathleff, and Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen critically revised the manuscript. The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: The author states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) is supported by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF121). The Center for Mathematical Modeling of Knee Osteoarthritis (MathKOA) is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF21OC0065373).
-
Data availability: The data can be obtained on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Vos, T, Abajobir, AA, Abate, KH, Abbafati, C, Abbas, KM, Abd-Allah, F, et al.. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017;390:1211–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32154-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2. Korshøj, M, Jørgensen, MB, Hallman, DM, Lagersted-Olsen, J, Holtermann, A, Gupta, N. Prolonged sitting at work is associated with a favorable time course of low-back pain among blue-collar workers: a prospective study in the DPhacto cohort. Scand J Work Environ Health 2018;44:530–8. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3726.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Lunde, L-K, Koch, M, Knardahl, S, Veiersted, KB. Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2017;43:269–78. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3628.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Hamann, V, Deruelle, P, Enaux, C, Deguen, S, Kihal-Talantikite, W. Physical activity and gestational weight gain: a systematic review of observational studies. BMC Publ Health 2022;22:1951. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14324-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Wang, R, Zhang, X, Ren, H, Zhou, H, Yuan, Y, Chai, Y, et al.. Effects of different exercise types on visceral fat in young individuals with obesity aged 6–24 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol 2022;13:987804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.987804.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Cheval, B, Maltagliati, S, Sieber, S, Cullati, S, Sander, D, Boisgontier, MP. Physical inactivity amplifies the negative association between sleep quality and depressive symptoms. Prev Med 2022;164:107233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107233.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Boye Larsen, D, Laursen, M, Simonsen, O, Arendt-Nielsen, L, Petersen, KK. The association between sleep quality, preoperative risk factors for chronic postoperative pain and postoperative pain intensity 12 months after knee and hip arthroplasty. Br J Pain 2021;15:486–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637211005803.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
8. Peiris, WL, Cicuttini, FM, Hussain, SM, Estee, MM, Romero, L, Ranger, TA, et al.. Is adiposity associated with back and lower limb pain? A systematic review. PLoS One 2021;16:e0256720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256720.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Bannuru, RR, Osani, MC, Vaysbrot, EE, Arden, N, Bennell, K, Bierma-Zeinstra, S, et al.. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2019;27:1578–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Pedersen, BK, Saltin, B. Exercise as medicine – evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015;25:1–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12581.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Stochkendahl, MJ, Kjaer, P, Hartvigsen, J, Kongsted, A, Aaboe, J, Andersen, M, et al.. National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Spine J 2018;27:60–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5099-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Callahan, LF, Shreffler, JH, Altpeter, M, Schoster, B, Hootman, J, Houenou, LO, et al.. Evaluation of group and self-directed formats of the arthritis foundation’s walk with Ease program. Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:1098–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20490.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Smith, MT, Haythornthwaite, JA. How do sleep disturbance and chronic pain inter-relate? Insights from the longitudinal and cognitive-behavioral clinical trials literature. Sleep Med Rev 2004;8:119–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1087-0792(03)00044-3.Search in Google Scholar
14. McBeth, J, Wilkie, R, Bedson, J, Chew-Graham, C, Lacey, RJ. Sleep disturbance and chronic widespread pain. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2015;17:469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-014-0469-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Mork, PJ, Nilsen, TIL. Sleep problems and risk of fibromyalgia: longitudinal data on an adult female population in Norway. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:281–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.33346.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Staffe, AT, Bech, MW, Clemmensen, SLK, Nielsen, HT, Larsen, DB, Petersen, KK. Total sleep deprivation increases pain sensitivity, impairs conditioned pain modulation and facilitates temporal summation of pain in healthy participants. PLoS One 2019;14:e0225849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225849.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Edwards, RR, Haythornthwaite, J, Smith, MT, Klick, B, Katz, JN. Catastrophizing and depressive symptoms as prospective predictors of outcomes following total knee replacement. Pain Res Manag 2009;14:307–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/273783.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18. Christensen, KS, O’Sullivan, K, Palsson, TS. Conditioned pain modulation efficiency is associated with pain catastrophizing in patients with chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain 2020;36:825–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000000878.Search in Google Scholar
19. Almojali, AI, Almalki, SA, Alothman, AS, Masuadi, EM, Alaqeel, MK. The prevalence and association of stress with sleep quality among medical students. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2017;7:169–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.04.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Irwin, MR, Olmstead, R, Carroll, JE. Sleep disturbance, sleep duration, and inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and experimental sleep deprivation. Biol Psychiatr 2016;80:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Schaible, H-GG. Nociceptive neurons detect cytokines in arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:470–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-014-0470-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22. Schaible, HG, Grubb, BD. Afferent and spinal mechanisms of joint pain. Pain 1993;55:5–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(93)90183-p.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Arendt-Nielsen, L, Morlion, B, Perrot, S, Dahan, A, Dickenson, A, Kress, H, et al.. Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions. Eur J Pain 2018;22:216–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1140.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Arendt-Nielsen, L, Skou, ST, Nielsen, TA, Petersen, KK. Altered central sensitization and pain modulation in the CNS in chronic joint pain. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2015;13:225–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-015-0276-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Petersen, KK-S. Predicting pain after standard pain therapy for knee osteoarthritis – the first steps towards personalized mechanistic-based pain medicine in osteoarthritis. Scand J pain 2022;23:40–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2022-0082.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Arendt-Nielsen, L, Graven-Nielsen, T. Translational musculoskeletal pain research. Best Pract Res Rheumatol 2011;25:209–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2010.01.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Cummins, TM, Kucharczyk, M, Graven-Nielsen, T, Bannister, K. Activation of the descending pain modulatory system using cuff pressure algometry: back translation from man to rat. Eur J Pain 2020;24:1330–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1580.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Petersen, KK, McPhee, ME, Hoegh, MS, Graven-Nielsen, T. Assessment of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants and patients with chronic pain: manifestations and implications for pain progression. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2019;13:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/spc.0000000000000419.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
29. Kristensen, NS, Hertel, E, Skadhauge, CH, Kronborg, SH, Petersen, KK, McPhee, ME. Psychophysical predictors of experimental muscle pain intensity following fatiguing calf exercise. PLoS One 2021;16:e0253945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253945.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
30. McPhee, ME, Vaegter, HB, Graven-Nielsen, T. Alterations in pronociceptive and antinociceptive mechanisms in patients with low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain 2020;161:464–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001737.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
31. Lyng, KD, Andersen, JD, Jensen, SL, et al.. The influence of exercise on clinical pain and pain mechanisms in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Eur J Pain 2022:1–14.10.1002/ejp.2010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
32. Youngstedt, SD, Kline, CE. Epidemiology of exercise and sleep. Sleep Biol Rhythm 2006;4:215–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8425.2006.00235.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
33. Heredia-Rizo, AM, Petersen, KK, Madeleine, P, Arendt-Nielsen, L. Clinical outcomes and central pain mechanisms are improved after upper Trapezius eccentric training in female computer users with chronic neck/shoulder pain. Clin J Pain 2019;35:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0000000000000656.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
34. Holm, PM, Petersen, KK, Wernbom, M, Schrøder, HM, Arendt‐Nielsen, L, Skou, ST. Strength training in addition to neuromuscular exercise and education in individuals with knee osteoarthritis-the effects on pain and sensitization. Eur J Pain 2021;25:1898–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1796.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
35. Hansen, S, Dalgaard, RC, Mikkelsen, PS, Sørensen, MB, Petersen, KK. Modulation of exercise-induced hypoalgesia following an exercise intervention in healthy subjects. Pain Med 2020;21:3556–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa212.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
36. Sullivan, MJL, Bishop, SR, Pivik, J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524.Search in Google Scholar
37. Beaudreau, SA, Spira, AP, Stewart, A, Kezirian, EJ, Lui, LY, Ensrud, K, et al.. Validation of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index and the Epworth sleepiness scale in older black and white women. Sleep Med 2012;13:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2011.04.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
38. de la Vega, R, Tomé-Pires, C, Solé, E, Racine, M, Castarlenas, E, Jensen, MP, et al.. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: validity and factor structure in young people. Psychol Assess 2015;27:e22–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000128.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
39. Mollayeva, T, Thurairajah, P, Burton, K, Mollayeva, S, Shapiro, CM, Colantonio, A. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 2016;25:52–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2015.01.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
40. Buysse, DJ, Reynolds, CF, Monk, TH, Berman, SR, Kupfer, DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatr Res 1989;28:193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
41. Cohen, S, Kamarck, T, Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24:385–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404.Search in Google Scholar
42. Baik, SH, Fox, RS, Mills, SD, Roesch, SC, Sadler, GR, Klonoff, EA, et al.. Reliability and validity of the perceived stress scale-10 in Hispanic Americans with English or Spanish language preference. J Health Psychol 2019;24:628–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316684938.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
43. Lee, EH. Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nurs Res 2012;6:121–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
44. Craig, CL, Marshall, AL, Sjöström, M, Bauman, AE, Booth, ML, Ainsworth, BE, et al.. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1381–95. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000078924.61453.fb.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
45. Graven-Nielsen, T, Izumi, M, Petersen, KK, Arendt-Nielsen, L. User-independent assessment of conditioning pain modulation by cuff pressure algometry. Eur J Pain 2017;21:552–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.958.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
46. Imai, Y, Petersen, KK, Mørch, CD, Arendt Nielsen, L. Comparing test–retest reliability and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation using different combinations of test and conditioning stimuli. Somatosens Mot Res 2016;33:169–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2016.1229178.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
47. Petersen, KK, Graven-Nielsen, T, Simonsen, O, Laursen, MB, Arendt-Nielsen, L. Preoperative pain mechanisms assessed by cuff algometry are associated with chronic postoperative pain relief after total knee replacement. Pain 2016;157:1400–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000531.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
48. Petersen, KK, Simonsen, O, Olesen, AE, Mørch, CD, Arendt‐Nielsen, L. Pain inhibitory mechanisms and response to weak analgesics in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain 2019;23:1904–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1465.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
49. Larsen, DB, Laursen, M, Edwards, RR, Simonsen, O, Arendt-Nielsen, L, Petersen, KK. The combination of preoperative pain, conditioned pain modulation, and pain catastrophizing predicts postoperative pain 12 Months after total knee arthroplasty. Pain Med 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa402.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
50. Petersen, KK, Olesen, AE, Simonsen, O, et al.. Mechanistic pain profiling as a tool to predict the efficacy of 3-week nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus paracetamol in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis. Pain 2019: 160.10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001427Search in Google Scholar PubMed
51. Petersen, KK, Andersen, HH, Tsukamoto, M, Tracy, L, Koenig, J, Arendt-Nielsen, L. The effects of propranolol on heart rate variability and quantitative, mechanistic, pain profiling: a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study. Scand J pain 2018;18:479–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2018-0054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
52. Heinze, G, Dunkler, D. Five myths about variable selection. Transpl Int 2017;1:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12895.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
53. Hair, J, Black, W, Babin, B, et al.. Multivariate data analysis: International version; 2010.Search in Google Scholar
54. Martland, R, Korman, N, Firth, J, Vancampfort, D, Thompson, T, Stubbs, B. Can high-intensity interval training improve mental health outcomes in the general population and those with physical illnesses? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2022;56:279–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-103984.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
55. Adams, SC, DeLorey, DS, Davenport, MH, Fairey, AS, North, S, Courneya, KS. Effects of high-intensity interval training on fatigue and quality of life in testicular cancer survivors. Br J Cancer 2018;118:1313–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0044-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
56. Jurado‐Fasoli, L, De‐la‐O, A, Molina‐Hidalgo, C, Migueles, JH, Castillo, MJ, Amaro‐Gahete, FJ. Exercise training improves sleep quality: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Invest 2020:50. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13202.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
57. Elfving, B, Andersson, T, Grooten, WJA. Low levels of physical activity in back pain patients are associated with high levels of fear-avoidance beliefs and pain catastrophizing. Physiother Res Int 2007;12:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.355.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
58. Curtis, K, Osadchuk, KJ. An eight-week yoga intervention is associated with improvements in pain, psychological functioning and mindfulness, and changes in cortisol levels in women with fibromyalgia. J Pain Res 2011;189. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s22761.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
59. Izquierdo-Alventosa, R, Inglés, M, Cortés-Amador, S, Gimeno-Mallench, L, Chirivella-Garrido, J, Kropotov, J, et al.. Low-intensity physical exercise improves pain catastrophizing and other psychological and physical aspects in women with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103634.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
60. Sluka, KA, Frey-Law, L, Hoeger Bement, M. Exercise-induced pain and analgesia? Underlying mechanisms and clinical translation. Pain 2018;159:S91–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001235.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
61. Schaible, H-G. Spinal mechanisms contributing to joint pain. Novartis Found Symp 2004;260:4–22;discussion 22–7, 100–4, 277–9.10.1002/0470867639.ch2Search in Google Scholar
62. Belavy, DL, Van Oosterwijck, J, Clarkson, M, Dhondt, E, Mundell, NL, Miller, CT, et al.. Pain sensitivity is reduced by exercise training: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021;120:100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial Comment
- What do we mean by “biopsychosocial” in pain medicine?
- Systematic Review
- The efficacy of manual therapy on HRV in those with long-standing neck pain: a systematic review
- Clinical Pain Research
- Development of a binary classifier model from extended facial codes toward video-based pain recognition in cancer patients
- Experience and usability of a website containing research-based knowledge and tools for pain self-management: a mixed-method study in people with high-impact chronic pain
- Effect on orofacial pain in patients with chronic pain participating in a multimodal rehabilitation programme – a pilot study
- Analysis of Japanese nationwide health datasets: association between lifestyle habits and prevalence of neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia with reference to dementia-related diseases and Parkinson’s disease
- Impact of antidepressant medication on the analgetic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of neuropathic pain. Preliminary findings from a registry study
- Does lumbar spinal decompression or fusion surgery influence outcome parameters in patients with intrathecal morphine treatment for persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2)
- Original Experimentals
- Low back-pain among school-teachers in Southern Tunisia: prevalence and predictors
- Economic burden of osteoarthritis – multi-country estimates of direct and indirect costs from the BISCUITS study
- Demographic and clinical factors associated with psychological wellbeing in people with chronic, non-specific musculoskeletal pain engaged in multimodal rehabilitation: –a cross-sectional study with a correlational design
- Interventional pathway in the management of refractory post cholecystectomy pain (PCP) syndrome: a 6-year prospective audit in 60 patients
- Original Articles
- Preoperatively assessed offset analgesia predicts acute postoperative pain following orthognathic surgery
- Oxaliplatin causes increased offset analgesia during chemotherapy – a feasibility study
- Effects of conditioned pain modulation on Capsaicin-induced spreading muscle hyperalgesia in humans
- Effects of oral morphine on experimentally evoked itch and pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- The potential effect of walking on quantitative sensory testing, pain catastrophizing, and perceived stress: an exploratory study
- What matters to people with chronic musculoskeletal pain consulting general practice? Comparing research priorities across different sectors
- Is there a geographic and gender divide in Europe regarding the biopsychosocial approach to pain research? An evaluation of the 12th EFIC congress
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial Comment
- What do we mean by “biopsychosocial” in pain medicine?
- Systematic Review
- The efficacy of manual therapy on HRV in those with long-standing neck pain: a systematic review
- Clinical Pain Research
- Development of a binary classifier model from extended facial codes toward video-based pain recognition in cancer patients
- Experience and usability of a website containing research-based knowledge and tools for pain self-management: a mixed-method study in people with high-impact chronic pain
- Effect on orofacial pain in patients with chronic pain participating in a multimodal rehabilitation programme – a pilot study
- Analysis of Japanese nationwide health datasets: association between lifestyle habits and prevalence of neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia with reference to dementia-related diseases and Parkinson’s disease
- Impact of antidepressant medication on the analgetic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of neuropathic pain. Preliminary findings from a registry study
- Does lumbar spinal decompression or fusion surgery influence outcome parameters in patients with intrathecal morphine treatment for persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2)
- Original Experimentals
- Low back-pain among school-teachers in Southern Tunisia: prevalence and predictors
- Economic burden of osteoarthritis – multi-country estimates of direct and indirect costs from the BISCUITS study
- Demographic and clinical factors associated with psychological wellbeing in people with chronic, non-specific musculoskeletal pain engaged in multimodal rehabilitation: –a cross-sectional study with a correlational design
- Interventional pathway in the management of refractory post cholecystectomy pain (PCP) syndrome: a 6-year prospective audit in 60 patients
- Original Articles
- Preoperatively assessed offset analgesia predicts acute postoperative pain following orthognathic surgery
- Oxaliplatin causes increased offset analgesia during chemotherapy – a feasibility study
- Effects of conditioned pain modulation on Capsaicin-induced spreading muscle hyperalgesia in humans
- Effects of oral morphine on experimentally evoked itch and pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- The potential effect of walking on quantitative sensory testing, pain catastrophizing, and perceived stress: an exploratory study
- What matters to people with chronic musculoskeletal pain consulting general practice? Comparing research priorities across different sectors
- Is there a geographic and gender divide in Europe regarding the biopsychosocial approach to pain research? An evaluation of the 12th EFIC congress