Anti-homophony and rhizotony in the Spanish preterite
-
Richard E. Morris
Abstract
Speakers tend to avoid homophony that is problematic. While Spanish admits some homophony of 1SG and 3SG forms in three arrhizotonic tenses/moods (imperfect, past subjunctive, conditional), in two of the three rhizotonic tenses/moods (present indicative and preterite), the 1SG and 3SG contrast systematically. In the preterite, contrast (DĪXĪ ∼ DĪXIT) was lost in Old Spanish (dix[e] ∼ dix[e]) but subsequently restored (dije ∼ dijo). The development dix(e) > dijo has been attributed to analogical extension of arrhizotonic –o, (cf. amó), with destressing. This article proposes that said extension is the result of anti-homophony (AH). Like analogical extension, AH improves form-function isomorphism yet applies primarily to higher-frequency forms. It is argued that AH targeted 1SG ∼ 3SG homophony selectively, affecting only verb forms without an explicit tense/mood marker (e.g., dixe ∼ dixe vs tenga ∼ tenga). This morphological restriction on AH explains why homophony persisted in four of the seven basic tenses (e.g., tenga ∼ tenga, tenía ∼ tenía, tendría ∼ tendría, tuviera [–se] ∼ tuviera [–se]). The modern pairs fui ∼ fue and di ∼ dio, which are the outcome of heavy competition, are shown to be a straightforward result of AH. In a broader perspective, the drive to distinguish 1SG and 3SG forms has brought about a “1–3 pattern” with a range similar to that of the N-pattern, in which stress is retained in certain paradigmatic cells in the absence of conditioning phonological factors. Destressing –o in forms like dijo and vino served to maintain the integrity of the 1–3 pattern as an organizing principle.
References
Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2013. Person features and syncretism. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(4). 901–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9202-z.Suche in Google Scholar
Alvar, Manuel & Bernard Pottier. 1993. Morfología histórica del español, 2nd edn. Madrid: Gredos.Suche in Google Scholar
Andrés Díaz, Ramón De. 2013. Gramática comparada de las lenguas ibéricas. Madrid: Trea.Suche in Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Badal Bertolín, Manuel. 2022. Extensió de la marca /g/ i desaparició del sincretisme formal en els verbs de la segona conjugació del català. Anuari de Filologia 12. 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1344/afel2022.12.2.Suche in Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew. 2004. Typology and the formal modelling of syncretism. In Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004, 41–72. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-2900-4_3Suche in Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486234Suche in Google Scholar
Bar, Moshe. 2007. The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11. 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Suche in Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Violeta Demonte. 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Suche in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612886Suche in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186.Suche in Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1999. Historical linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Cano, Rafael. 2013. Historia de la lengua española. Barcelona: Planeta.Suche in Google Scholar
Castro, Enrico. 2019. Schemi disenziali e pattern definiti del condizionale veneto antico. In Lene Schøsler & Juhani Härmä (eds.), Actes du XXIXe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes, vol. 1, 311–323. Copenhagen: Eliphi.Suche in Google Scholar
Coutinho, Ismael de Lima. 1938. Pontos de gramática histórica portuguesa. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional.Suche in Google Scholar
Craddock, Jerry R. 2006. A small Old Spanish mystery: Why wasn’t did(e) the first singular preterite of “dar” ‘to give?’. Romance Philology 60. 215–220.10.1484/J.RPH.2.305745Suche in Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine. 1999. Intra-paradigmatic homophony avoidance in two dialects of Slavic. In Matthew Gordon (ed.), UCLA working papers in linguistics 1: Papers in phonology, 48–67. Los Angeles: UCLA Linguistics Department.Suche in Google Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine. 2001. Vowel reduction in optimality theory. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Cunha, Viviane. 1997. Os verbos fortes portugueses e a sua mudança vocálica. Caligrama 2. 89–95. https://doi.org/10.17851/2238-3824.2.0.89-95.Suche in Google Scholar
Dautriche, Isabelle, Laia Fiblad, Anne-Caroline Fievet & Anne Christophe. 2018. Learning homophones in context: Easy cases are favored in the lexicon of natural languages. Cognitive Psychology 104. 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Delius, Nikolaus. 1868. Review of Diez’ Grammatik, vol. 2. Jahrbuch für Romanische und Englische Literatur 9. 220–228.Suche in Google Scholar
Elvira, Javier. 1999. El cambio analógico. Madrid: Gredos.Suche in Google Scholar
Enríquez, Emilia V. 1984. El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.Suche in Google Scholar
Ettinger, Allyson, Tal Linzen & Alec Marantz. 2014. The role of morphology in phoneme prediction: Evidence from MEG. Brain & Language 129. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Ferreiro, Manuel. 1999. Gramática histórica galega, 1: Fonética e morfosintaxe, 4th edn. Santiago de Compostela: Laiovento.Suche in Google Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, María Beatriz. 1987. El español bonaerense: Cuatro siglos de evolución lingüística (1580–1980). Buenos Aires: Hachette.Suche in Google Scholar
Fouché, Pierre. 1929. Le parfait castillan. Bulletin Hispanique 77. 45–87.Suche in Google Scholar
Frías Conde, Xavier. 2011. Compendio de gramática asturiana. Madrid: Romania Minor.Suche in Google Scholar
García de Diego, Vicente. 1909. Elementos de gramática histórica gallega. Burgos: Hijos de Santiago Rodríguez.Suche in Google Scholar
García de Diego, Vicente. 1914. Elementos de gramática histórica castellana. Burgos: Monte Carmelo.Suche in Google Scholar
Gassner, Arnim. 1897. Das altspanische Verbum. Halle: Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar
Grandgent, Charles Hall. 1907. An introduction to Vulgar Latin. Boston: Heath.Suche in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language universals with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Hanssen, Federico. 1913. Gramática histórica de la lengua castellana. Halle: Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 25–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226705003683.Suche in Google Scholar
Herce, Borja. 2020. Alignment of forms in Spanish verbal inflection: The gang poner, tener, venir, salir, valer as a window into the nature of paradigmatic analogy and predictability. Morphology 30. 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09352-8.Suche in Google Scholar
Herce, Borja. 2022. Stress and stem allomorphy in the Romance perfectum: Emergence, typology, and motivations of a symbiotic relation. Linguistics 60(4). 1103–1147. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0042.Suche in Google Scholar
Herce, Borja. 2023. The typological diversity of morphomes: A cross-linguistic study of unnatural morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192864598.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier & Maria Goldbach. 2011. El sincretismo verbal en las lenguas ibero- y galorrománicas: aspectos teóricos y comparativos. In Elisabeth Stark & Natascha Pomino (eds.), El sincretismo en la gramática del español, 29–44. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert.10.31819/9783865278746-002Suche in Google Scholar
Hochberg, Judith G. 1986. Functional compensation for /s/ deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 62(3). 609–621. https://doi.org/10.2307/415480.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abby. 2010. The evidence for homophone resolution in language change. Diachronica 32(2). 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.04kap.Suche in Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Liljencrants, Johan & Björn Lindblom. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48(4). 839–862. https://doi.org/10.2307/411991.Suche in Google Scholar
Lloyd, Paul M. 1987. From Latin to Spanish. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.10.70249/9780871692993Suche in Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2011. Morphological innovation. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, 261–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521800723.007Suche in Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2018. The Romance verb: Morphomic structure and diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199660216.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1959. Toward a reconsideration of Old Spanish imperfect in –ía ∼ –ié. Hispanic Review 27(4). 435–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/470558.Suche in Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1960. Paradigmatic resistance to sound change: The Old Spanish preterite forms vide, vido against the background of the recession of primary –d–. Language 36(3). 281–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/410959.Suche in Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold. 1966. La nature du supplétivisme. Linguistics 4(28). 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1966.4.28.82.Suche in Google Scholar
Mazzocco, Michèle M. 1997. Children’s interpretations of homonyms: A developmental study. Journal of Child Language 24(2). 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000997003103.Suche in Google Scholar
Meier, Harri. 1948. A evolução dos pretéritos fortes em portugués. In Harri Meier (ed.), Ensaios de Filologia Românica, 31–54. Lisbon: Revista de Portugal.Suche in Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 1968. Manual de gramática histórica española, 13th edn. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Suche in Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 1986 [1926]. Orígenes del español: estado lingüístico de la Península Ibérica hasta el siglo XI, 10th edn. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Suche in Google Scholar
Mondon, Jean-François. 2009. The nature of homophony and its effects on diachrony and synchrony. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Mondon, Jean-François. 2010. A reassessment of anti-homophony in Bulgarian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(1). 137–146.Suche in Google Scholar
Montgomery, Thomas. 1983. (Tú) eres: A neologism. Hispanic Review 51(4). 449–454. https://doi.org/10.2307/472879.Suche in Google Scholar
Mota, Maria Antónia & Silvia Rodrigues Vieira. 2008. Contrastando variedades do português brasileiro e europeu: Padrões de concordância sujeito-verbo. In Carlos Alexandre Gonçalves & Maria Lúcia L. de Almeida (eds.), Língua portuguesa: Identidade, difusão e variabilidade, 111–137. Rio de Janeiro: AILP–UFRU.Suche in Google Scholar
Moyna, María Irene. 2009. Child acquisition and language change: Voseo evolution in Río de la Plata Spanish. In Joseph Collentine, Maryellen García, Barbara Lafford & Francisco Marcos Marín (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 11th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 131–142. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Suche in Google Scholar
Munteanu, Andrei. 2021. Homophone resolution in the grammar: Russian nominal allomorphy. Phonology 38(3). 401–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675721000257.Suche in Google Scholar
Nebrija, Antonio de. 1747 [1492]. Gramática de la lengua castellana. Madrid: Junta del Centenario.Suche in Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene. 1958. An analysis of meaning and dictionary making. IJAL 24. 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1086/464477.Suche in Google Scholar
Nunes, José Joaquim. 1932. Compêndio de gramática histórica portuguesa, 5th edn. Lisbon: Livraria Clássica.Suche in Google Scholar
Ogura, Mieko & William S.-Y. Wang. 2006. Ambiguity and language evolution: Evolution of homophones and syllable number of words. Studia Anglica Posniensia 42. 3–30.Suche in Google Scholar
Orquín, Francho Rodés. 2017. Gramática básica de l’aragonés: estudio de filología aragonesa. Zaragoza: Edicions Dichitals de L’Academia de l’Aragonés.Suche in Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 1970. El habla pasiega: Ensayo de dialectología montañesa. London: Tamesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 2002. A history of the Spanish language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tily & Edward Gibson. 2012. The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition 122(3). 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Piel, Joseph M. 1945. A flexão verbal do português: Estudo de morfologia histórica. Biblos 20. 359–404.Suche in Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1978. Case syncretism and coding syncretism. In Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth international conference of linguists; Vienna, August 28–September 7, 1977, 405–407. Innsbruck: Beiträge für Sprachwissenschaft.Suche in Google Scholar
Posio, Pekka. 2008. Uso del pronombre personal sujeto de la primera persona singular en español y portugués hablados: Factores semánticos y pragmáticos. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Ranson, Diana. 1991. Person marking in the wake of /s/ deletion in Andalusian Spanish. Language Variation and Change 3(2). 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394500000491.Suche in Google Scholar
Rini, Joel. 1999. Exploring the role of morphology in the evolution of Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.179Suche in Google Scholar
Salvioni, Carlo. 1907. Note varie sulle parlate lobardo-sicule. Memorie del Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, XXI–XII della serie III, fasc. VI, 255–302. Milan: Tipografia Bernardoni.Suche in Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 2001. Sociolingüística y pragmática del español. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, Helen. 2016. Analogical levelling and optimisation: The treatment of pointless lexical allomorphy in Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 114(3). 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.12078.Suche in Google Scholar
Socasau, Jusèp Loís Sans. 2018. Es vèrbs en aranés. Viella: Institut d’Estudis Aranesi.Suche in Google Scholar
Song, Hanbyul & James White. 2022. Interaction of phonological biases and frequency in learning a probabilistic language pattern. Cognition 226. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105170.Suche in Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2006. Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage. Language 82(2). 279–322. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0110.Suche in Google Scholar
Svobodová, Petra. 2018. A conjugação dos verbos irregulares na 1a pessoa do singular do pretérito perfeito simples do indicativo nos dialeitos do português europeu e tipologia das alterações ocorrentes. Études romanes de Brno 39. 95–114. https://doi.org/10.5817/erb2018-1-7.Suche in Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, José Leite de. 1901. Esquisse d’une dialectologie portugaise. Paris/Lisbon: Aillaud.Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin B. 1930. The Portuguese and Spanish preterit. Modern Philology 27(3). 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/387835.Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin B. 1962. From Latin to Portuguese: Historical phonology and morphology of the Portuguese language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9781512808957Suche in Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1989. Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Suche in Google Scholar
Yin, Sora Heng & James White. 2018. Neutralization and homophony avoidance in phonological learning. Cognition 179. 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.023.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Progressive aspect across temporalities: variation between synthetic and analytic forms in L1 and L2 Spanish
- Accounting for effects of monitored speech: vowel nasalization, nasal consonant weakening and /s/ production in Spanish
- Variation, contact, and change in Boston Spanish: how social meaning shapes stylistic practice and bilingual optimization
- First things third? The extension of canonically third-person singular inflections to first-person singular subjects in adult heritage Spanish
- Anti-homophony and rhizotony in the Spanish preterite
- Tenho cantado and venho cantando in Brazilian Portuguese
- Consequences of prosodic variation for spatiotemporal organization in Spanish stop-lateral clusters
- Gender agreement among Russian learners of Spanish in an instructed versus naturalistic learning environment
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Progressive aspect across temporalities: variation between synthetic and analytic forms in L1 and L2 Spanish
- Accounting for effects of monitored speech: vowel nasalization, nasal consonant weakening and /s/ production in Spanish
- Variation, contact, and change in Boston Spanish: how social meaning shapes stylistic practice and bilingual optimization
- First things third? The extension of canonically third-person singular inflections to first-person singular subjects in adult heritage Spanish
- Anti-homophony and rhizotony in the Spanish preterite
- Tenho cantado and venho cantando in Brazilian Portuguese
- Consequences of prosodic variation for spatiotemporal organization in Spanish stop-lateral clusters
- Gender agreement among Russian learners of Spanish in an instructed versus naturalistic learning environment
