Home Linguistic Contact in Perspective: Lateral Coda in Principense Portuguese
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Linguistic Contact in Perspective: Lateral Coda in Principense Portuguese

  • Amanda Macedo Balduino ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Nancy Mendes Torres Vieira ORCID logo and Ana Lívia Agostinho ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: April 28, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Author Information Explore this Subject
Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics
From the journal Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics Volume 16 Issue 1

Abstract

This paper discusses the lateral /l/ in coda in Principense Portuguese (PP). Based on an elicited corpus recorded in situ, composed of 852 occurrences of 78 lexical items, we found that the lateral /l/ in coda can be vocalized or deleted. For instance, bolso ‘pocket’ can be pronounced as [ˈbow.sʊ] or [ˈbo.sʊ], as reported in some Brazilian Portuguese varieties. In PP, vocalization and deletion are phenomena that arise from a confluence of factors. It gathers characteristic features of the formative grammatical structure of Portuguese. At the same time, it reflects the linguistic contact scenario in which PP is inserted, since the lenition of consonants in semivowels, as well as strategies to avoid codas, are also reported in Lung’Ie (LI), a language in synchronic contact and present in the constitution of the PP (Agostinho, Ana Lívia. 2015. Fonologia e método pedagógico do lung’Ie [Phonology and pedagogical method of Lung’Ie]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo dissertation). Both Portuguese and Lung’Ie support vocalization and deletion in their grammars, fostering a relevant overlap of features to the alternation [ɫ] ∼ [w] ∼ ∅ in PP. We conclude that, in addition to specific features of Portuguese grammatical structure, PP’s linguistic contact situation must be considered as a relevant factor for the deletion and vocalization of laterals in coda in PP.

Keywords: lateral coda; vocalization; Principense Portuguese; Lung’Ie; linguistic contact
Corresponding author: Amanda Macedo Balduino, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP – São Paulo Research Foundation) for the funding (process: 2017/26595-1) that allowed us to conduct this research and prepare this paper.

Appendix 1

List of Analyzed Lexical Items – Group 1.

1. Adulto ‘adult’
2. Álcool ‘alcohol’
3. Alface ‘lettuce’
4. Algema ‘handcuffs’
5. Algodão ‘cotton’
6. Alma ‘soul’
7. Almoço ‘lunch’
8. Almofadas ‘cushion’
9. Alto ‘tall’
10. Anel ‘ring’
11. Anzol ‘fishhook’
12. Azul ‘blue’
13. Bolsa ‘purse/bag’
14. Bolso ‘pocket’
15. Brasil ‘Brazil’
16. Cachecol ‘scarf’
17. Calça ‘pants’
18. Colchão ‘mattress’
19. Culpado ‘guilty’
20. Culto ‘cult’
21. Difícil ‘hard’
22. Fácil ‘easy’
23. Farol ‘lighthouse’
24. Filme ‘movie’
25. Folgado ‘loose’
26. Fralda ‘diaper’
27. Funil ‘funnel’
28. Futebol ‘soccer’
29. General ‘army general’
30. Girassol ‘sunflower’
31. Hospital ‘hospital’
32. Mel ‘honey’
33. Mil ‘thousand’
34. Natal ‘Christmas’
35. Olfato ‘smell’
36. Palmeira ‘palm tree’
37. Pincel ‘brush’
38. Polvo ‘octopus’
39. Pólvora ‘gunpowder’
40. Portugal ‘Portugal’
41. Potável ‘drinkable’
42. Pulmão ‘lung’
43. Pulseira ‘bracelet’
44. Pulso ‘wrist’
45. Rural ‘rural’
46. Sal ‘salt’
47. Salgada ‘salted’
48. Salsicha ‘sausage’
49. Salto ‘high heels’
50. Sol ‘sun’
51. Soldado ‘soldier
52. Telejornal ‘TV news’
53. Telemóvel ‘Cellphone’
54. Túnel ‘tunnel’
55. Vulcão ‘volcano’

List of Analyzed Lexical Items – Group 2.

1. Albino ‘albino’
2. Alça ‘shoulder strap’
3. Alface ‘lettuce’
4. Alma ‘soul’
5. Alto ‘tall’
6. Culpa ‘fault’
7. Mel ‘honey’
8. Melga ‘mosquito’
9. Melro ‘blackbird’
10. Molde ‘mold’
11. Polvo ‘octopus’
12. Vulnerável ‘vulnerable’

Appendix 2

List of Distracting Lexical Items – Group 1.

1. Açúcar ‘sugar’
2. Aberto ‘open’
3. Aeroporto ‘airport’
4. Almoçar ‘to have luch’
5. Apertar ‘to press’
6. Artista ‘artist’
7. Árvore ‘tree’
8. Assistir ‘to watch’
9. Barco ‘boat’
10. Borboleta ‘butterfly’
11. Caderno ‘notebook’
12. Cantor ‘singer’
13. Cartaz ‘poster’
14. Colher ‘spoon’
15. Comer ‘to eat’
16. Computador ‘computer’
17. Conversar ‘to talk’
18. Curta ‘short’
19. Dor ‘pain’
20. Dormir ‘to sleep’
21. Energia ‘power’
22. Flor ‘flower’
23. Garfo ‘fork’
24. Irmã ‘sister’
25. Irmão ‘brother’
26. Morcego ‘bat’
27. Morder ‘to bite’
28. Morto ‘dead’
29. Mulher ‘woman’
30. Nervosa ‘nervous’
31. Perder ‘to lose’
32. Perna ‘leg’
33. Perto ‘close’
34. Pescar ‘to fish’
35. Porco ‘pig’
36. Porta ‘door’
37. Tartaruga ‘turtle’

References

Agostinho, Ana Lívia. 2015. Fonologia e método pedagógico do lung’Ie [Phonology and pedagogical method of Lung’Ie]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Agostinho, Ana Lívia. 2016a. Fonologia do lung’Ie [Ph of Lung’Ie]. München: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Agostinho, Ana Lívia. 2016b. Róticos em contexto intervocálico no Português da Ilha do Príncipe: Fonologia e educação [Rotics in intervocalic contexts in Principense Portuguese: Phonology and education]. Paper presented at the IX Encontro da Associação Brasileira de Estudos Crioulos e Similares, University of Brasília, 28 November – 01 December.Search in Google Scholar

Agostinho, Ana Lívia & Gabriel Antunes de Araujo. 2021. Lung’Ie, Lunge No: Método para Aprender Lung’Ie. São Paulo: FFLCH/USP.10.11606/9786587621500Search in Google Scholar

Agostinho, Ana Lívia & Maiara Mendes. 2020. A grafia dos róticos intervocálicos no português da Ilha do Príncipe: Fusão fonológica e ensino [The spelling of intervocalic rhotics in Principense Portuguese: Phonological merging and teaching]. Veredas-Revista de Estudos Linguísticos 24(3). 154–176. https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-2243.2020.v24.31830.Search in Google Scholar

Agostinho, Ana Lívia, Eduardo Soares & Maiara Mendes. 2020. Merging of quasi-phonemes in contact situations: Evidence from rhotics in Principense Portuguese. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting on Phonology: 2020, University of California, 18–20 September.Search in Google Scholar

Araujo, Gabriel Antunes. 2020. Há uma política linguística para o português em São Tomé e Príncipe? [Is there a language politics for Portuguese in São Tomé and Príncipe?]. In Sweder Souza & Francisco Calvo del Olmo (eds.), Línguas em português – A Lusofonia numa visão crítica, 173–197. Porto: Universidade do Porto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Araujo, Gabriel Antunes & Amanda Macedo Balduino. 2019. Nasalização vocálica no Português urbano de São Tomé e Príncipe [Vocalic nasalization in São Tomé and Príncipe’s urban Portuguese]. Diacrítica 33(2). 41–68.10.21814/diacritica.256Search in Google Scholar

Araujo, Gabriel Antunes & Ana Lívia Agostinho. 2010. Padronização das línguas nacionais de São Tomé e Príncipe [Standardization of the national languages of São Tomé and Príncipe]. Língua e Instrumentos Linguísticos 26. 49–81.Search in Google Scholar

Avelar, Juanito & Charlotte Galves. 2014. O papel das línguas africanas na emergência da gramática do português brasileiro [The role of African languages in the emergence of the the Brazilian Portuguese grammar]. Linguística: Revista da ALFAL 30(2). 241–288.Search in Google Scholar

Bandeira, Manuele. 2017. Reconstrução fonológica e lexical do protocrioulo do Golfo da Guiné [Phonological and lexical reconstruction of the protocreole of the Gulf of Guinea]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bandeira, Manuele, Gabriel Antunes Araujo & Thomas Finbow. 2019. Liquids in the Proto-Creole of the Gulf of Guinea and in its daughter languages. University of São Paulo Unpublished conference paper.Search in Google Scholar

Balduino, Amanda Macedo. 2018. A nasalidade vocálica no português falado em São Tomé e Príncipe [Distribution of the lateral /l/ in coda in Santomean Portuguese]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Balduino, Amanda Macedo. 2020a. Nasality triggered by /ɲ/ in two Portuguese of São Tome and Principe. Diadorim 22(3). 23–45. https://doi.org/10.35520/diadorim.2020.v22n3a36244.Search in Google Scholar

Balduino, Amanda Macedo. 2020b. Templates silábicos no Português do Príncipe: Processos em coda e ‘prevalência’ de sílabas CV [Syllable templates in Portuguese of Principe: Processes in coda and ‘prevalence’ of CV syllables]. Filologia e Linguística Portuguesa 22(2). 247–270. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v22i2p247-270.Search in Google Scholar

Balduino, Amanda Macedo & Nancy Mendes Torres Vieira. 2020. Distribuição da lateral /l/ em coda no português santomense [Distribution of the lateral /l/ in coda in Santomean Portuguese]. Revista Estudos Linguísticos 49(2). 594–615. https://doi.org/10.21165/el.v49i2.2490.Search in Google Scholar

Balduino, Amanda Macedo, Nancy Mendes Torres Vieira & Shirley Freitas. 2020. A coda no português santomense (PST) e principense (PP): Aspectos gerais e processos de apagamento [The coda in Santomean Portuguese (PST) and Principense (PP): General aspects and deletion processes]. Revista da Associação Brasileira de Linguística-Abralin 19(1). 1–26.10.25189/rabralin.v19i1.1690Search in Google Scholar

Battisti, Elisa & Viviane Tebaldi Moras. 2016. A vocalização da consoante lateral em coda silábica em uma variedade de português brasileiro: Análise sociolinguística em tempo real [Lateral vocalization in syllabic codas in a Brazilian Portuguese variety: Real-time sociolinguistic analysis]. Gragoatá 21(40). 90–112.10.22409/gragoata.v21i40.33376Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.82) Computer Program. http://www.praat.org (accessed 10 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Marie-Eve. 2017. Linguistic variation and change in the Portuguese of São Tomé. New York: New York University doctoral dissertation.10.5334/jpl.192Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Marie-Eve. 2018. Subject pronoun expression in Santomean Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 17(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.191.Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Marie-Eve. 2019a. Language shift from Forro to Portuguese: Language ideologies and the symbolic power of Portuguese on São Tomé Island. Lingua 228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.013.Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Marie-Eve. 2019b. Becoming monolingual: The impact of language ideologies on the loss of multilingualism on São Tomé Island. Languages 4(3). 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4030050.Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Marie-Eve. 2019c. Ongoing change in post-independence São Tomé: The use of rhotics as a marker of national identity among young speakers of Santomean Portuguese. Language Variation and Change 31. 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394518000182.Search in Google Scholar

Bowern, Claire. 2008. Linguistic fieldwork: A practical guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590168Search in Google Scholar

Braga, Gabriela. 2018. A prosódia do português de São Tomé: A entoação do contorno neutro [Prosody of São Tomé Portuguese: The intonational contour of neutral declarative sentences]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Brandão, Silvia Figueiredo, David Bretas Pessanha, Stefany Pontes & Monique Corrêa. 2017. Róticos na variedade urbana do Português de São Tomé [Rhotics in the urban variety of Portuguese of São Tomé]. Papia-Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Contato Linguístico 27(2). 293–315.Search in Google Scholar

Brod, Lílian Elisa Minikel. 2014. A lateral nos falares florianopolitano (PB) e portuense (PE): Casos de gradiência fônica [The lateral in Florianopolitano (BP) and Porto (EP) speeches: Phonic gradiente cases]. Florianópolis: Federal University of Santa Catarina thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Christofoletti, Alfredo. 2013. Ditongos no português de São Tomé e Príncipe [Diphthongs in the Portuguese of São Tomé e Príncipe]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, Cristine Ferreira. 2003. Fonologia Lexical e controvérsia neogramática: Análise das regras de monotongação de /ow/ e vocalização de /l/ no PB [Lexical phonology and neogrammatical controversy: Analysis of monotongue rules of /ow/ and vocalization of /l/ in BP]. Porto Alegre: Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, Evellyne Patrícia. 2011. Mudança de estrutura moraica do latim ao português [Moraic structure change from Latin to Portuguese]. Alfa 55(2). 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1981-57942011000200010.Search in Google Scholar

Couto, Hildo Honório. 2009. Linguística, ecologia e ecolinguística: Contato de línguas [Linguistics, ecology and ecolinguistics: Language contact]. São Paulo: Contexto.Search in Google Scholar

Faraco, Carlos. 2012. Lusofonia: Utopia ou quimera? Língua, história e política [Lusophony: Utopia or chimera? Language, history and politics]. In Tânia Lobo, Zenaide Carneiro, Juliana Soledade, Ariadne Almeida & Silvana Ribeiro (eds.), Rosae: Linguística histórica, história das línguas e outras histórias, 31–50. Salvador: EDUFBA.Search in Google Scholar

Goldsmith, John. 1990. Syllable structure. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.), Autosegmental and metrical phonology, 103–140. Nova Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gonçalves, Rita. 2010. Propriedade de subcategorização verbal no português de São Tomé [Verbal subcategorization property in Portuguese of São Tomé]. Lisboa: University of Lisboa dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gonçalves, Rita & Tjerk Hagemeijer. 2015. O português num contexto multilingue: o caso de São Tomé e Príncipe [Portuguese in a multilingual environment: The case of São Tomé and Príncipe]. Revista Científica da Universidade Eduardo Mondlane 1(1). 84–103.Search in Google Scholar

Hagemeijer, Tjerk. 2018. From creoles to Portuguese: Language shift in São Tomé and Príncipe. In Laura Álvarez López, Perpétua Gonçalves & Juanito Ornelas de Avelar (eds.), The Portuguese language continuum in Africa and Brazil, 169–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.20.08hagSearch in Google Scholar

Hahn-Nonnenmacher, Laura Helena. 2019. Vocalização e velarização de /l/ em CODA: O papel da diacronia na estruturação da gramática a partir da análise do português brasileiro [Vocalization and velarization of /l/ in coda: The role of diachrony in grammar structuring from the analysis of Brazilian Portuguese]. Porto Alegre: Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Hora, Demerval. 2006. Vocalização da lateral /l/: Correlação entre restrições sociais e estruturais [Vocalization of the lateral /l/: Correlation between social and structural constraints]. Scripta 9(18). 29–44.Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, José Ignácio. 2005. The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE). 2001. São Tomé e Príncipe em Números. São Tomé. http://www.ine.st/2012.html (accessed 10 August 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Wyn & John Britain. 2007. L-vocalisation as a natural phenomenon: Explorations in sociophonolog. Language Sciences 29(2). 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.022.Search in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter & Keith Johnson. 2011. A course in phonetics. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Seung-Hwa. 2004. Síncope, brevis brevians e acento no Português Brasileiro [Syncope, brevis brevians and stress in Brazilian Portuguese]. Letras de Hoje 38(4). 163–176.Search in Google Scholar

Lucchesi, Dante. 2009. História do contato entre línguas no Brasil [History of contact between languages in Brazil]. In Dante Lucchesi, Alan Baxter & Ilza Ribeiro (eds.), O português afro-brasileiro, 41–74. Salvador: EDUFBA.10.7476/9788523208752.0003Search in Google Scholar

Lucchesi, Dante & Alan Baxter. 2009. A transmissão linguística irregular [Irregular linguistic transmission]. In Dante Lucchesi, Alan Baxter & Ilza Ribeiro (eds.), O português afro-brasileiro, 427–445. Salvador: EDUFBA.10.7476/9788523208752Search in Google Scholar

Mateus, Maria & Ernesto D’Andrade. 2000. The phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford linguistics.10.1093/oso/9780198235811.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Maurer, Philippe. 2009. Principense (Lung’Ie). London: Battlebridge Publications.Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Jonh. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17(1). 207–263.Search in Google Scholar

Mufwene, Saliloko. 2004. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Naro, Anthony Julius. 2008. O dinamismo das línguas [The dynamism of languages]. In Maria Cecília Mollica & Maria Luiza Braga (eds.), Introdução à sociolingüística: o tratamento da variação, 43–50. São Paulo: Contexto.Search in Google Scholar

Naro, Anthony Julius & Maria Marta Pereira Scherre. 2007. Origens do português brasileiro [Origins of Brazilian Portuguese]. São Paulo: Parábola.Search in Google Scholar

Nascimento, Augusto. 2010. História da Ilha do Príncipe [History of the Island of Príncipe]. Lisboa: Oeiras.Search in Google Scholar

Nascimento, Fabiane de Mello. 2018. O sistema vocálico do português de São Tomé e o comportamento das vogais médias em contexto pretônico [Vowel system of São Tomé Portuguese and behaviour of medial vowels in the pretonic contexto]. Rio de Janeiro: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Nedel, Eduardo Luíz. 2009. A lateral posvocálica em Lages/SC: Análise variacionista [The postvocalic lateral in Lages/SC: Variationist analysis]. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Negrão, Esmeralda Vailati & Evani Viotti. 2012. Em busca de uma história linguística [In search of a linguistic history]. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos 20(2). 309–342.10.17851/2237-2083.20.2.309-342Search in Google Scholar

Pinho, Antônio José & Felício Wessling Margotti. 2010. A variação da lateral pós-vocálica /l/ no português do Brasil [The variation of postvocalic liquid /l/ in Brazilian Portuguese]. Working Papers em Lingüística 2. 67–88.Search in Google Scholar

Quednau, Lilian. 1993. A lateral pós-vocálica no português gaúcho: Análise variacionista e representação não linear [The postvocalic lateral in Gaucho Portuguese: Variacionist analysis and nonlinear representation]. Porto Alegre: Pontifícia Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rodrigues, Maria Celeste. 2012. Todas as codas são frágeis em português europeu? [Are all codas fragile in European Portuguese?]. Revista LinguíStica-Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 8(1). 138–149.Search in Google Scholar

Sá, Edmilson José. 2007. Variação do /L/ em coda silábica na fala de Arcoverde (PE) [/L/ variation in syllabic coda in Arcoverde (PE) speech]. Recife, Brazil: Federal University of Pernambuco dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Santiago, Ana Maria. 2019. As vogais do português do Príncipe [The vowels of Principense Portuguese]. Florianópolis, Brazil: Federal University of Santa Catarina undergraduate thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Santiago, Ana Maria & Ana Lívia Agostinho. 2020. Situação linguística do português em São Tomé e Príncipe [Linguistic situation of Portuguese in São Tomé and Príncipe]. A cor das Letras 21(1). 39–61.10.13102/cl.v21i1.4970Search in Google Scholar

Santiago, Ana Maria, Amanda Macedo Balduino, Ana Lívia Agostinho & Eduardo Soares. 2022. As vogais no Português Principense. [Vowels in Principense Portuguese]. In Tjerk Hagemeijer, Márcia Oliveira & Francisco C. Santos (eds.), O português na África atlântica, vol. 2, 1–30. Lisbon: Lisbon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Santos, Shélida da Silva & Julio Manoel da Silva Neto. 2019. A lateral posvocálica /l/ no Rio Grande do Sul [The posvocalic liquid /l/ in Rio Grande do Sul]. Clarabóia 12. 7–27.Search in Google Scholar

Seibert, Gerhard. 2015. Colonialismo em São Tomé e Príncipe: Hierarquização, classificação e segregação da vida social [Colonialism in São Tome and Príncipe: Hierarchization, classification and segregation of social life]. Anuário Antropológico 40(2). 99–120.10.4000/aa.1411Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The syllable. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, 337–383. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Sem, Ranian. 2016. Examining the life cycle of phonological processes: Considerations for historical research. Papers in Historical Phonology 1. 5–36. https://doi.org/10.2218/pihph.1.2016.1691.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, Thais Cristofaro. 2017. Fonologia do português [Portuguese phonology]. São Paulo: Contexto.Search in Google Scholar

Souza, Janderson Lemos. 2020. O debate deriva/contato na história do Português Brasileiro [The drift/contact debate in the history of Brazilian Portuguese]. Alfa 64. 1–24.10.1590/1981-5794-e11584Search in Google Scholar

Tasca, Maria. 1999. A lateral em coda silábica no sul do Brasil [The lateral in syllabic coda in Southern Brazil]. Porto Alegre: Pontifícia Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Tasca, Maria. 2000. A preservação da lateral alveolar em coda: uma explicação possível [The preservation of the alveolar lateral in coda: A possible explanation]. Letras de Hoje 35(1). 331–354.Search in Google Scholar

Vaux, Bert & Justin Cooper. 1999. Introduction to linguistics field methods. Munich: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Viaro, Mario. 2011. Etimologia [Etymology]. São Paulo: Contexto.Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, Nancy Mendes Torres. 2021. Monotongação de ditongos orais no português brasileiro: uma revisão sistemática da literatura [Brazilian Portuguese oral diphthongs monothongization: A systematic literature review]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, Nancy Mendes Torres & Amanda Macedo Balduino. 2020. Apagamento de /R, S, l/ na coda no português de São Tomé: Convergência linguística? [Deletion of the codas /R, S, l/ in Santomean Portuguese (PST)]. Papia-Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Contato Linguístico 30(1). 7–33.Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, Nancy Mendes Torres & Amanda Macedo Balduino. 2021. Apagamento do rótico em coda no português santomense (PST): uma análise sociolinguística [Rhotic deletion in coda in Santomean Portuguese (PST): A sociolinguistic analysis]. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 29(3). 2011–2040. https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.3.2011-2040.Search in Google Scholar
Published Online: 2023-04-28
Published in Print: 2023-05-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Remembering SHLL Associate Editor Kimberly Geeslin
  4. A Thank You and a Welcome
  5. Research Articles
  6. Cognitive Status and Subject Reference in Spanish Written Discourse
  7. El efecto del refuerzo de /b d ɡ/ en la percepción de acento extranjero en español
  8. The Temporal Relationships between the Pluscuamperfecto and mientras + Imperfecto
  9. Spanish Emphatic Possessives and Reflexivity
  10. Linguistic Contact in Perspective: Lateral Coda in Principense Portuguese
  11. Las vocales glotalizadas en el español guatemalteco: Un análisis sociofonético entre los hablantes bilingües (español-kaqchikel) y monolingües
  12. How Do You Say Madrid? Final /d/ Variation and the Indexicality of Madrilenian Localness
  13. Phonetic Context, Task Formality, Learner Level, and Orthographic Effects in L2 Spanish Palatal Obstruents
https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2023-2006
Keywords for this article
lateral coda; vocalization; Principense Portuguese; Lung’Ie; linguistic contact

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Remembering SHLL Associate Editor Kimberly Geeslin
  4. A Thank You and a Welcome
  5. Research Articles
  6. Cognitive Status and Subject Reference in Spanish Written Discourse
  7. El efecto del refuerzo de /b d ɡ/ en la percepción de acento extranjero en español
  8. The Temporal Relationships between the Pluscuamperfecto and mientras + Imperfecto
  9. Spanish Emphatic Possessives and Reflexivity
  10. Linguistic Contact in Perspective: Lateral Coda in Principense Portuguese
  11. Las vocales glotalizadas en el español guatemalteco: Un análisis sociofonético entre los hablantes bilingües (español-kaqchikel) y monolingües
  12. How Do You Say Madrid? Final /d/ Variation and the Indexicality of Madrilenian Localness
  13. Phonetic Context, Task Formality, Learner Level, and Orthographic Effects in L2 Spanish Palatal Obstruents
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/shll-2023-2006/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button