A polysemy account of alternating verbs of creation in Brazilian Portuguese

References

Amaral, Luana. 2013. Os predicados primitivos ACT e DO na representação lexical dos verbos [The primitive predicates ACT and DO in the lexical representation of verbs]. Belo Horizonte, MG: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Faculdade de Letras) master’s thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Amaral, Luana & Márcia Cançado. 2014. Verbos de criação do português brasileiro: classificação e representação lexical [Verbs of creation in Brazilian Portuguese: classification and lexical representation]. Linguística 10(1). 51–73.Suche in Google Scholar

Amaral, Luana & Márcia Cançado. 2015. Argument structure of activity verbs in Brazilian Portuguese. Semantics-Syntax Interface 2(2). 115–140.Suche in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark & Kirsten Fudeman. 2005. What is Morphology? Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Apresjan, Jurij D. 1974. Regular polysemy. Linguistics 142. 5–32.10.1515/ling.1974.12.142.5Suche in Google Scholar

Beavers, John. 2014. Linking arguments to verbal meaning. Lecture notes from the X Workshop on Formal Linguistics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Aug 25–27, 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

Borba, Francisco da Silva. 1990. Dicionário gramatical de verbos do português contemporâneo do Brasil [Grammatical verbal dictionary of contemporary Brazilian Portuguese]. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.Suche in Google Scholar

Cançado, Márcia, Luisa Godoy & Luana Amaral. 2013. Catálogo de verbos do português brasileiro: classificação verbal segundo a decomposição de predicados. Volume 1: verbos de mudança [Catalogue of Brazilian Portuguese verbs: verb classification in predicate decomposition. Volume 1: Verbs of change]. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Suche in Google Scholar

Cann, Ronnie. 1993. Formal Semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166317Suche in Google Scholar

Copestake, Ann & Ted Briscoe. 1996. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. In James Pustejovsky & Branimir Boguraev (eds.), Lexical Semantics: The problem of polysemy, 15–67. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/jos/12.1.15Suche in Google Scholar

Damasceno, Maria. 2006. Verbos polissêmicos: propriedades semânticas e processos metafóricos [polysemous verbs: semantic properties and metaphorical processes]. Belo Horizonte, MG: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Faculdade de Letras) master’s thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Suche in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Suche in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 2005. Words and structure. Chicago: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken & Samuel Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In Naomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rappoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements.” In Tanya Mathews & Devon Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IX, 127–144. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University.10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833Suche in Google Scholar

Iwata, Seizi. 2002. Does MANNER count or not? Manner-of-motion verbs revisited. Linguistics 40(1). 61–110.10.1515/ling.2002.008Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1999. Objecthood: An event structure perspective. In Sabrina Billings, John Boyle & Aaron Griffith (eds.), Proceedings of CLS 35. Volume 1: The main session, 223–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity at the syntax lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1998. Morphology and lexical semantics. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), Handbook of morphology, 248–271. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781405166348.ch12Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610479Suche in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds.), Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates, 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5983-1_3Suche in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Meirelles, Letícia & Márcia Cançado. 2014. Análise semântica do prefixo re- em verbos do português brasileiro [Semantic analysis of the prefix re- in Brazilian Portuguese verbs]. Revista da Abralin 13(1). 155–180.10.5380/rabl.v13i1.38262Suche in Google Scholar

Moens, Marc & Mark Steedman. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14. 15–28.Suche in Google Scholar

Murphy, M. Lynne. 2010. Lexical meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511780684Suche in Google Scholar

Panman, Otto. 1982. Homonymy and polysemy. Lingua 58. 105–136.10.1016/0024-3841(82)90059-6Suche in Google Scholar

Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina, Rodolfo Llinás & Gregory L. Murphy. 2006. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(1). 97–109.10.1162/089892906775250003Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 2008. The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. London: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher. 2001. A finer look at the causative-inchoative alternation. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 11, 346–364. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University.10.3765/salt.v11i0.2858Suche in Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher. 2008. Verbs of creation. In Johannes Dölling, Tanja Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 493–521. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110925449.493Suche in Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher. 2010. Draw. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 270–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0013Suche in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3225.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 2014. Lexical Semantics. Manuscript, Brandeis University. http://www.cs135.org/?page_id=20 (accessed 27 December 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James & Branimir Boguraev (eds.). 1996. Lexical semantics: The problem of polysemy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198236627.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meaning. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2012. Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds.), The theta system: Argument structure at the interface, 150–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tania. 2002. The theta system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 229–290.10.1515/thli.28.3.229Suche in Google Scholar

Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470759127Suche in Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio & Emiliano Guevara. 2005. The lexicalist approach to word-formation and the notion of the Lexicon. In Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of word-formation, 147–187. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_7Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota. 1997. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6Suche in Google Scholar

Stechow, Armin Von. 2001. Temporally opaque arguments in verbs of creation. In Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia & Maria Teresa Guasti (eds.), Semantic interfaces: Reference, anaphora and aspect, 278–319. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2003. Polysemy’s paradoxes. Language Sciences 25. 637–655.10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00031-7Suche in Google Scholar

Tenny, Carol. 1987. Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610578Suche in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.10.7591/9781501743726Suche in Google Scholar

Verkuyl, H. J. 1989. Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 39–94.10.1017/CBO9780511597848.004Suche in Google Scholar