Startseite Kubrick’s audible bodies: unseen subjectivities in 2001 and The Shining
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Kubrick’s audible bodies: unseen subjectivities in 2001 and The Shining

  • James Batcho EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. November 2021

Abstract

Stanley Kubrick is regarded as a filmmaker of complex imagery. Yet the vitality of his more metaphysical works lies in what is unseen. There is an embodiment to Kubrick’s films that maintains a sense of subjectivity, but one which is unapparent and non-visual. This opens another way into Kubrick’s works, that of conditions of audibility (hearing/listening), affectivity, and signs. To think of embodiment from such an audible perspective requires one to subvert film spectatorship (the frame) and instead enter the reality of the film’s immanent, borderless unfolding as itself. This essay applies Gilles Deleuze’s semiotic concepts of cinema, metaphysics, and subjectivity to conditions of audibility and unseeing, a connection Deleuze largely ignored in his writings. These dual concepts of audibility and unseeing break prevailing analytical norms in cinema discourse that affirm limitations via material, visual, textual, and spatial reification: subjective-objective delineations, the body and the gaze, sound as necessarily spatial/material, and the dominance of images in regard to aesthetics, surveillance, and evidence. Instead, this essay moves through Kubrick’s constructions of milieu that are unseen in the midst of an otherwise visual unfolding, and audible in the midst of an otherwise sonic unfolding. To consider Kubrick’s films through their audible embodiment, one must detach (1) the microphone from its adherence to space, (2) the body from its visual gaze. Here, sounds, images, and objects become secondary to hearing and signs in a temporal unfolding, resulting in a cinema that is experiential rather than representational. This opens to an actuality of spirit within the world of the film, offering new opportunities for creativity in the cinematic form.


Corresponding author: James Batcho, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, E-mail:

References

Bachelard, Gaston. 1960. The poetics of reverie: Childhood, language, and the cosmos. Boston: Beacon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1967. Elements of semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.Suche in Google Scholar

Bogue, Ronald. 2003. Deleuze on cinema. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203826065Suche in Google Scholar

Boljkovac, Nadine. 2013. Untimely affects: Gilles Deleuze and an ethics of cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748646449.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Chion, Michel. 1994. Audio-vision: Sound on screen. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chion, Michel. 2009. Film: A sound art. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Clarke, Arthur C. 1991. 2001: A space odyssey. New York: Ace.Suche in Google Scholar

Colman, Felicity. 2011. Deleuze and cinema: The film concepts. Oxford: Berg.10.5040/9781501351099Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzsche and philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1993. The fold: Leibniz and the baroque. London: Athlone.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari. 1991. What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Elsaesser, Thomas & Malta Hagener. 2015. Film theory: An introduction through the senses, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315740768Suche in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1988. The essence of truth: On Plato’s cave allegory and Theaetetus. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Hitchcock, Alfred. 1963. The birds [film]. Universal City, CA: Alfred J. Hitchcock Productions, Universal.Suche in Google Scholar

King, Stephen. 1977. The shining. New York: Anchor.Suche in Google Scholar

Kubrick, Stanley. 1968. 2001: A space odyssey [film]. Beverly Hills, CA: MGM.Suche in Google Scholar

Kubrick, Stanley. 1980. The shining [film]. Hollywood, CA: Peregrine Productions, Producers Circle, Warner Bros.Suche in Google Scholar

Metz, Christian. 1974. Film language. New York: Oxford University.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955. Logic as a semiotic: The theory of signs. In Justus Buchler (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce, 98–119. New York: Dover.Suche in Google Scholar

Powell, Anna. 2005. Deleuze and horror film. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748617470.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Suche in Google Scholar

Silverman, Kaja. 1988. The acoustic mirror: The female voice in psychoanalysis and cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tarkovsky, Andrei. 1989. Sculpting in time. Austin: University of Texas Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Kristin & David Bordwell. 2008. Categorical coherence: A closer look at character subjectivity. http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2008/10/24/categorical-coherence-a-closer-look-at-character-subjectivity/ (accessed 29 May 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, James. 2016. A process philosophy of signs. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748695027Suche in Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj. 1996. “I hear you with my eyes”; or, the invisible master. In Renata Salecl & Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Gaze and voice as love objects (Sic 1), 90–126. Durham & London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822379447-005Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-10-22
Accepted: 2021-04-14
Published Online: 2021-11-02
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 1.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2020-0105/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen