Home On the bottomless lake of firstness: conjectures on the synthetic power of consciousness
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On the bottomless lake of firstness: conjectures on the synthetic power of consciousness

  • Ivo A. Ibri ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 18, 2021

Abstract

This essay focuses on the concept of consciousness in C. S. Peirce’s work, revealing how its ways of being are associated with the three Peircean phenomenological categories. In this article, I intend to reflect on the heuristic power of the mind, namely, its ability to bring about new ideas, which, within Peirce’s logic of inquiry, is called by the well-known term of abduction. The abductive logical step promotes a synthesis of signs that constitutes a logical structure capable of proposing a new mediation or representation of a new phenomenon. I make use of a metaphorical passage from Peirce (CP 7.547, undated) not only to give the title to this essay, but also to highlight the importance of the first category as a sort of synechistic envelopment of an unprecedented logical structure of signs that composes a new synthesis. Two continua intertwine themselves, namely, those of the first and third categories, to account for what appears as a fact of the world in the theater of secondness. The essay also seeks to bring to light the core realism of Peirce’s philosophy, the genetic aspect of this bottomless lake, through its cosmology, where the generalization of forms and the acquisition of habits of reality are the proper ground of his Objective Idealism. One of the heuristic aspect of the lake metaphor is a sort of invitation to extend the concept of synthesis from the realm of logical structures to that one of arts, which in this essay will remain as a suggestion for a further reflection.


Corresponding author: Ivo A. Ibri, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, E-mail:

References

Champagne, Marc. 2018. Consciousness and the philosophy of signs: How Peircean semiotics combines phenomenal qualia and practical effects. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-73338-8Search in Google Scholar

Colapietro, Vincent. 1989. Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dilworth, David. 2016. Peirce’s transmutation of Schelling’s Philosophie der Natur. Cognitio 17(2). 253–290.Search in Google Scholar

Dilworth, David. 2019. Emotional, energetic, and entelic interpretants: Epistemic and ethical pragmaticism in Ibri, Peirce, and Aristotle. Cognitio 20(2). 304–342.10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p304-342Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Christopher S. 2009. Consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804274Search in Google Scholar

Houser, Nathan. 1983. Peirce’s general taxonomy of consciousness. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 19(4). 331–359.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmond. 2001 [1900]. Logical investigations, vol. 1, J. N. Findlay (trans.). Oxon & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmond. 1967. The Paris lectures, Peter Koestenbaum (trans.). Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-6058-4Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2006. The heuristic exclusivity of abduction in Peirce’s philosophy. In Rossella Fabbrichesi-Leo & Susana Marietti (eds.), Semiotics and philosophy in C. S. Peirce, 89–111. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.10.1007/978-3-031-09625-9_6Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2009. Reflections on a poetic ground in Peirce’s philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45(3). 273–307. https://doi.org/10.2979/tra.2009.45.3.273.Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2010. Peircean seeds for a philosophy of art. In Karen Haworth, Jason Hogue & Leonard G. Sbrocchi (eds.), The semiotics of space. New York: Legas Publishers.10.5840/cpsem201015Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2014. The continuity of life: On Peirce’s objective idealism. In Vinicius Romanini & Eliseo Fernándes (eds.), Peirce and biosemiotics: A guess at the riddle of life, 33–50. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7732-3_3Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2016. Linking the aesthetic and the normative in Peirce’s pragmaticism: A heuristic sketch: Charles S. Peirce Society 2016 Presidential Address. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 52(4). 598–610. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.52.4.04.Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2017a. Kósmos Noetós: The metaphysical architecture of Charles S. Peirce (Philosophical Studies Series 131), Henry Mallet (trans.). Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-66314-2Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2017b. The double face of habits: Time and timeless in pragmatic experience. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 3. 455–474. https://doi.org/10.3280/sf2017-003006.Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2018. Reflections on the presence of Peirce’s category of firstness in Schelling and Schopenhauer’s philosophy. In Vít Gvoždiak & Martin Švantner (eds.), How to make our signs clear: C. S. Peirce and Semiotics, 59–71. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004347786_006Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2019. The semiotic resilient mind: Conflictual and agapic relationship between logical and emotional interpretants. Cognitio 20(2). 378–391.10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i2p378-391Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2020. A face estética da epistemologia pragmaticista de Peirce [The esthetic face of Peirce’s pragmaticistic epistemology]. Veritas 65(3). e38456. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2020.3.38456.Search in Google Scholar

Innis, Robert. 2019. Peirce and Dewey think about art: Quality and the theory of signs. Semiotica 228(1/4). 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0079.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Yi. 2019. Peirce and Husserl on intentionality. In Mohammad Shafiei & Ahti-Veiko Pietarinen (eds.), Peirce and Husserl: Mutual insights on logic, mathematics, and cognitions, 177–184. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-25800-9_9Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. In Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.), The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., Cambridge: Harvard University Press [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1982. In M. Fisch, E. Moore & C. Kloesel (eds.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., Bloomington: Indiana University Press [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated W followed by volume and page number].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1992. In Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds.), Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), Bloomington: Indiana University Press [Reference to vol. 1 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 1].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1998. In Peirce Edition Project (eds.), Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Bloomington: Indiana University Press [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2].Search in Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich W. J. 1988 [1797]. Ideas for a philosophy of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich W. J. 1978 [1800]. System of transcendental idealism, P. Heath (trans.). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Search in Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1969 [1818]. The world as will and representation, E. F. J. Payne (trans.). New York: Dover.Search in Google Scholar

Sørensen, Bent. 2008. Comments regarding Charles Sanders Peirce’s notion of consciousness, abduction, and the hypo-icon metaphor. Semiotica 172(1/4). 11–23.10.1515/SEMI.2008.086Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Quentin & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.). 2004. Consciousness: New philosophical perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199241286.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-31
Accepted: 2021-09-22
Published Online: 2021-10-18
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2021-0120/html
Scroll to top button