Home Toward a Peircean logic of meditation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Toward a Peircean logic of meditation

  • Michael L. Raposa EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 19, 2021

Abstract

Peirce’s philosophy, to a great extent, continues to be neglected as a potentially valuable resource for theologians and scholars of religion. This essay represents an attempt to rectify that state of affairs, albeit focused narrowly on how some of Peirce’s ideas might help to illuminate the role that attention plays in transforming consciousness and shaping certain meditative practices. Such practices display a logic consistent with the one that Peirce described in the process of developing his semiotic theory and his theory of inquiry. While his writings on logic are voluminous, Peirce produced only a very few scattered remarks about the “logic of meditation,” broadly conceived. One purpose of this essay is to collect and to examine carefully those remarks. Another is to evaluate their significance for contemporary philosophers of religion who are invested in the task of trying to understand the nature and purpose of meditation, not as a single type of exercise, but in its various forms and manifestations.


Corresponding author: Michael L. Raposa, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA, E-mail:

References

Caterina, Gianluca & Rocco Gangle. 2016. Iconicity and abduction. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-44245-7Search in Google Scholar

Champagne, Marc. 2018. Consciousness and the philosophy of signs: How Peircean semiotics combines phenomenal qualia and practical effects. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-73338-8Search in Google Scholar

Colapietro, Vincent. 1988. Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS or L.].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.), The Peirce/Welby Correspondence, 8 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles & Victoria Welby Lady. 1977. Semiotic and significs. In Charles S. Hardwick (ed.), The Peirce/Welby Correspondence. Bloomington: Indianapolis University Press. [Reference to this work will be designated SS followed by page number].Search in Google Scholar

Raposa, Michael L. 1989. Peirce’s philosophy of religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Raposa, Michael L. 2003. Meditation and the martial arts. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Raposa, Michael L. 2020. Theosemiotic: Religion, reading, and the gift of meaning. New York: Fordham University Press.10.5422/fordham/9780823289516.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Raposa, Michael L. 2021. Theology, metasemiosis, and the ethics of attention. In Jason Cronbach Van Boom and Thomas-Andreas Põder (eds.), Sign, method, and the sacred: New directions in semiotic methodologies for the study of religion, 87–104. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110694925-007Search in Google Scholar

Thoreau, Henry David. 1951 [1854]. Walden. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

West, Donna. 2017. Virtual habit as episode-builder in the inferencing process. Cognitive Semiotics 10(1). 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2017-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-30
Accepted: 2021-09-22
Published Online: 2021-10-19
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2021-0119/html
Scroll to top button