The word revisited: Introducing the CogSens Model to integrate semiotic, linguistic, and psychological perspectives

References

Andersen, Henning. 1981. Markedness and the theory of linguistic change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219), 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Apresjan, Juri D. 1995. Izbrannye trudy. 1. Leksičeskaja semantika: Sinonimičeskie sredstva jazyka [Selected writings. I. Lexical semantics: The synonymy means of language]. Moskva: Škola Jazyki Russkoj Kul’tury.Suche in Google Scholar

Atkinson, Richard Chatham & Richard M. Shiffrin. 1968. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Kenneth W. Spence & Janet Taylor Spence (eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 2, 89–195. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3Suche in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4). 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99532147.Suche in Google Scholar

Baggio, Giosuè, Michiel van Lambalgen & Peter Hagoort. 2012. The processing consequences of compositionality. In Wolfram Hinzen, Edouard Machery & Markus Werning (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 657–674. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0032Suche in Google Scholar

Bally, Charles. 1944. Linguistique générale et linguistique francaise. Paris: PUF.Suche in Google Scholar

Baron, Irene & Michael Herslund. 2005. Langues endocentriques et langues exocentriques. Approche typologique du danois, du francais et l’anglais. In Michael Herslund & Irene Baron (eds.), Le genie de la langue francaise. Perspectives typologiques et contrastives (Langue Francaise 145), 35–53. Paris: Ediciones Larousse.10.3917/lf.145.0035Suche in Google Scholar

Barrett, Martyn. 1996. Early lexical development. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), The handbook of child language, 362–392. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631203124.1996.00015.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bentsen, Stine Evald. 2018. The comprehension of English texts by native speakers of English and Japanese, Chinese and Russian speakers of English as a lingua franca: An empirical study, PhD diss., Copenhagen Business School.Suche in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Suche in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1935. Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Suche in Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Suche in Google Scholar

Contini-Morava, Ellen, Robert S. Kirschner & Betsy Rodríguez-Bachiller (eds.). 2004. Cognitive and communicative approaches to linguistic analysis (Studies in functional and structural linguistics 51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sfsl.51Suche in Google Scholar

Cowan, Nelson. 2008. What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research 169. 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(07)00020-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon. 1989. The theory of functional grammar. Part one: The structure of the clause. Dordrect: Foris.Suche in Google Scholar

Dudai, Yadin. 2004. The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Annual Review of Psychology 55. 51–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142050.Suche in Google Scholar

Durst-Andersen, Per. 2008. Linguistics as semiotics: Saussure and Bühler revisited. Signs 2, 1–29.Suche in Google Scholar

Durst-Andersen, Per. 2009. The grammar of linguistic semiotics: Reading Peirce in a modern linguistic light. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 16(3/4). 38–79.Suche in Google Scholar

Durst-Andersen, Per. 2011. Linguistic supertypes: A cognitive-semiotic theory of human communication. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110253153Suche in Google Scholar

Durst-Andersen, Per. 2012. What languages tell us about the structure of the human mind. Journal of Cognitive Computation 4(1). 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-011-9109-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Durst-Andersen, Per & Daniel Barratt. 2019. Idea-based and image-based linguacultures. Evidence from American English and Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Language and Culture 6(2). 351–387. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253153, In this issue.Suche in Google Scholar

Durst-Andersen, Per & Paul Cobley. 2018. The communicative wheel: Symptom, signal and model in multimodal communication. Semiotica 225(1/4). 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0228.Suche in Google Scholar

Ebbesen, Denis K. & Jeppe Olsen. 2018. Ontogenetic development of symbolicity. Human Arenas 18. 1–30.Suche in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198700302.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gerlach, Christian. 2008. Visual object recognition and category specificity. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University Press, doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Gerlach, Christian. 2009. Category-specificity in visual object recognition. Cognition 111. 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff & Zhengdao Ye (eds.). 2016. “Happiness” and “pain” across languages and cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.84Suche in Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 2012. Nachmetaphysisches Denken II. Aufsätze und Repliken. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1975. Learning how to mean. London: Arnold.10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50025-1Suche in Google Scholar

Harnad, Stevan. 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 42. 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2009. Implicit and explicit language teaching. In Michael Toolan (ed.), Language teaching: Integrational linguistic approaches,24–46. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees. 2004. The architecture of a functional discourse grammar. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie & María de los Ángeles Gómez-González (eds.), A new architecture for functional grammar, 1–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197112.1Suche in Google Scholar

Herslund, Michael & Irene Baron. 2003. Language as a world view: Endocentric and exocentric representations of reality. In Irene Baron (ed.), Language and culture (Copenhagen Studies in Language 29), 29–42. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Suche in Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. 1943. Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse [Prolegomena to a theory of language]. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Suche in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: MacMillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1963. The problem of universals in language. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals in language,1–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoff, Erika. 2009. Language development, 4th edn. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Suche in Google Scholar

Holdcroft, David. 1991. Saussure: Signs, systems, and arbitrariness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624599Suche in Google Scholar

Innis, Robert. 2013 [1982]. Karl Bühler: Semiotic foundations of language theory. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1992. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language,350–377. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1962. Zeichen und System der Sprache. In Selected writings II,272–279. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1963]. Efforts toward a means-end model of language in interwar Continental linguistics. In Selected writings II, 522–526. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.522Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1965]. Quest for the essence of language. In Selected writings II, 345–359. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.345Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1968]. Language in relation to other communication systems. In Selected writings II, 697–708. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.697Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Retrospect. In Selected writings II, 709–722. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.709Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1977. A few remarks on Peirce: Pathfinder in the science of language. Modern Language Notes 92(5). 1026–1032. https://doi.org/10.2307/2906890.Suche in Google Scholar

Jensen, Malene Rise. 1999. Strukturen i russiske gestus. En semiotisk, semantisk og pragmatisk analyse [The structure of Russian gestures. A semiotic, semantic and pragmatic analysis]. Copenhagen: Handelshøjskolen i København.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, reasoning. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Jocelyn, Sheena A. 2010. Continuing the search for the engram: Examining the mechanism of fear memories. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 35(4). 221–228.10.1503/jpn.100015Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, Phillip N. 1983. Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kany, Werner & Hermann Schöler. 2014. Theorien zum Spracherwerb. In Lieselotte Ahnert (ed.), Theorien in der entwicklungspsychologie,468–485. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-34805-1_18Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1995. Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23(3). 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-f.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2014. Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369(1651). 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293.Suche in Google Scholar

Koerner, Ernst F. K. 1996. Notes on the history of the concept of language as a system ‘où tout se tient’. Linguistica Atlantica 18–19. 1–20.Suche in Google Scholar

Kowalewski, Hubert. 2015. Against arbitrariness: An alternative approach towards motivation of the sign. Public Journal of Semiotics 6(2). 14–31. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2015.6.15179.Suche in Google Scholar

Kowalewski, Hubert. 2017. Motivating the symbolic: Towards a cognitive theory of the linguistic sign. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Krampen, Martin. 1986. Ontogenesis of iconicity and the accessibilty of the mental image by children’s drawings. In Jonathan D. Ewans & André Helbo (eds.), Semiotics and international scholarship: Towards a language of theory, 85–99. Dordrect: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-009-4464-0_5Suche in Google Scholar

Krampen, Martin. 1990. Children’s drawings: An iconic coding of the environment. New York: Plenum Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categoires reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800524Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lashley, Karl. 1950. In search of the engram. Symposia of Society for Experimental Biology 4. 454–82.Suche in Google Scholar

Levisen, Carsten. 2012. Cultural semantics and social cognition: A case study on the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110294651Suche in Google Scholar

Liefschitz, Avi. 2012. The arbitrariness of the linguistic sign: Variations on an enlightenment theme. Journal of the History of Ideas 73(4). 537–557.10.1353/jhi.2012.0042Suche in Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lucid, Daniel P. (ed.). 1977. Soviet semiotics: An anthology. Baltimore-London.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1963. Structural semantics: An analysis of part of the vocabulary of Plato. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1981. Language and linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Martinet, André. 1949. La double articulation linguistique. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 5. 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01050206.1949.10416289.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mel’chuk, Igor. 1999 [1974]. Opyt teorii lingvisticheskikh modelej “Smysl ⇔ Tekst” [explorations into the meaning ⇔ Text models of language]. Moskva: Yazyki russkoy kul’tury.Suche in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. La phénoménologíe de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Suche in Google Scholar

Morris, Charles W. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mosekjær, Stine. 2016. The understanding of English emotion words by Chinese and Japanese speakers of English as a lingua franca. An empirical study. PhD diss., Copenhagen Business School.Suche in Google Scholar

Nida, Eugene A. 1975. Componential analysis of meaning: An introduction to semantic structure. The Hague: Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840715Suche in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried. 2002. Charles Sanders Peirce, pathfinder in linguistics. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 7. 1–14.Suche in Google Scholar

Ogden, Charles Kay & Ivor Armstrong Richards. 1989 [1923]. The meaning of meaning. Orlando, Florida: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich.Suche in Google Scholar

Panther, Klaus-Uwe. 2013. Motivation in language. In Shulamith Kreitler (ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective, 407–432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139021463.023Suche in Google Scholar

Parker, Kelly A. 1997. The continuity of Peirce’s thoughts. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number].Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1953. Charles S. Peirce’s letters to Lady Welby, Irwin Lieb (ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain. 2006. Motion verbs in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 121–135. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.66.08peySuche in Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean & Bärbel Inhelder. 1966. L’image mentale chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Suche in Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean. 1954. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Poo, Mu-ming, Michele Pignatelli, Tomás J. Ryan, Susumu Tonegawa, Bonhoeffer Tobias, Kelsey C. Martin, Andrii Rudenko, Li-Huei Tsai, Richard W. Tsien, Gord Fishell, Caitlin Mullins, J. Tiago Gonçalves, Matthew Shtrahman, Stephen T. Johnston, Fred H. Gage, Yang Dan, John Long, György Buzsáki & Charles Stevens. 2016. What is memory? The present state of the engram. BMC Biology 14(1). 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-016-0261-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.10.1063/1.3060577Suche in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3225.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Ransdell, Joseph. 1977. Some leading ideas in Peirce’s semiotic. Semiotica 19. 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1977.19.3-4.157.Suche in Google Scholar

Ritchey, Gary H. 1980. Picture superiority in free recall: The effects of organization and elaboration. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29(3). 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(80)90107-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experiemental Psychology 104(3). 192–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192.Suche in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Suche in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Martin. 2018. The semantic transparency of English compound nouns. Berlin: Langscience Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schweppe, Judith & Ralf Rummer. 2014. Attention, working memory, and long-term memory in multimedia learning: An integrated perspective based on process models of working memory. Educational Psychology Review 26(2). 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9242-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Semon, Richard. 1921. The mneme. London: George Allen & Unwin.Suche in Google Scholar

Serebrennikov, Boris A. (ed.). 1973. Metody lingvističeskix issledovanij [The methods of linguistic research], vols. 1–3. Moskva: Akademija nauk.Suche in Google Scholar

Shapiro, Michael. 1983. The sense of grammar: Language as semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Shapiro, Michael. 2003. Aspects of a neo-Peircean linguistics: Language history as linguistic theory. In Michael Shapiro (ed.), The Peirce seminar papers, vol. 5, 108–125. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Sheriff, John K. 1994. Charles Peirce’s guess at the riddle: Grounds for human significance. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Short, Thomas L. 2004. The development of Peirce’s sign theory. In Cheryl Misak (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Peirce, 214–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521570069.009Suche in Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert C. 2004. Emotions, thoughts, and feelings: Emotions as engagements with the world. In Robert C. Solomon (ed.), Thinking about feeling: Contemporary philosophers on emotions, 76–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195153170.003.0006Suche in Google Scholar

Sun, Ron. 2005. Symbol grounding: A new look at an old idea. Philosophical Psychology 13(2). 149–172.10.1080/09515080050075663Suche in Google Scholar

Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Luciano Floridi. 2005. Solving the symbol grounding problem: A critical review of fifteen years of research. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 17(4). 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528130500284053.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2001. Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring, vol. II. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Tobin, Yishai. 1990. Semiotics and linguistics. London & New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Violi, Patrizia. 2008. Beyond the body: Towards a full embodied semiosis. In Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke & Enrique Bernárdez (eds.), Body, language and mind: Sociocultural situatedness, vol. 2, 53–76. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199116.1.53Suche in Google Scholar

Vogt, Paul. 2002. The physical grounding problem. Cognitive Systems Research 3(3). 429–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-0417(02)00051-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1962. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1037/11193-000Suche in Google Scholar

Werner, Heinz & Bernard Kaplan. 2014 [1984]. Symbol formation: An organismic developmental approach to the psychology of language. New York & London: Psychology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198700029.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding cultures through their keywords: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195088359.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Wimmer, Heinz & Josef Perner. 1983. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 13(1). 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5.Suche in Google Scholar