The role of semiotics in the unification of langue and parole: an Agentive Cognitive Construction Grammar approach to English modals

References

Barthes, Roland. 1985. L’aventure sémiologique. Paris: Éditions du seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

Busso, Lucia, Florent Perek & Alessandro Lenci. 2021. Constructional associations trump lexical associations in processing valency coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 32(2). 287–318.10.1515/cog-2020-0050Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, Peter. 2009. Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789042029095Suche in Google Scholar

Cox, Ryan. 2018. Knowing why. Mind & Language 33(2). 177–197.10.1111/mila.12173Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990–present. Available online at: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Suche in Google Scholar

Eccleston, Christopher. 2015. Balance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2012. Elements of agency. In N. J. Enfield & Kockelman Paul (eds.), Distributed agency, 3–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190457204.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2017. Distribution of agency. In N. J. Enfield & Kockelman Paul (eds.), Distributed agency, 9–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190457204.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Facchinetti, Roberta, Frank Palmer & Manfred Krug (eds.). 2003. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110895339Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994 [1985]. Mental spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174220Suche in Google Scholar

Gentsch, Antje & Simone Schütz-Bosbach. 2015. Agency and outcome prediction. In Patrick Haggard & Baruch Eitam (eds.), The sense of agency, 218–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190267278.003.0009Suche in Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. 1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc772nnSuche in Google Scholar

Hyman, John. 2015. Action, knowledge and will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735779.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Almog Joseph, John Perry & Wettstein Howard (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In H.-J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.), Worlds, words, and contexts, 38–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2002. Deixis and subjectivity. In Brisard Frank (ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (Cognitive Linguistics Research 21), 1–28. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110899801.1Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in cognitive grammar (Cognitive Linguistics Research 42). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214369Suche in Google Scholar

Leclercq, Benoît & Ilse Depraetere. 2021. Making meaning with be able to: modality and actualisation. English Language and Linguistics, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674320000489.Suche in Google Scholar

Lorenzo, Guillermo & Emilio Rubiera. 2019. On Iconic-Discursive Representations: Do they bring us closer to a Humean Representational Mind?. Biosemiotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-019-09365-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Lupyan, G. & Bodo Winter. 2018. Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 373. 20170137.10.1098/rstb.2017.0137Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Morey, Richard D., Michael P. Kaschak, Antonio M. Díez-Álamo, Arthur M. Glenberg, Rolf A. Zwaan, Daniël Lakens, Agustín Ibáñez, Adolfo García, Claudia Gianelli, John L. Jones, Julie Madden, Florencia Alifano, Benjamin Bergen, G Nicholas, Bloxsom, Daniel N. Bub, Zhenguang G. Cai, Christopher R. Chartier, Anjan Chatterjee, Erin Conwell, SusanJoshua D. Wagner CookDavis, Ellen R. K. Evers, Sandrine Girard, Derek Harter, Franziska Hartung, Eduar Herrera, Huettig Falk, Stacey Humphries, Marie Juanchich, Katharina Kühne, Shulan Lu, Tom Lynes, E Michael, J. Masson, Markus Ostarek, Sebastiaan Pessers, Rebecca Reglin, Sara Steegen, Erik D. Thiessen, Laura E. Thomas, Sean Trott, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Wolf Vanpaemel, Maria Vlachou, Kristina Williams & Noam Ziv-Crispel. 2021. A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01927-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer, F. R. 1990. Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. London & New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Peña Cervel, Sandra & Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez. 2009. The metonymic and metaphoric grounding of two image-schema transformations. In Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg & Antonio Barcelona (eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar, 339–362. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.25.21penSuche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Suche in Google Scholar

Perek, F. & Adele E. Goldberg. 2017. Linguistic generalization on the basis of function and constraints on the basis of statistical preemption. Cognition 168. 276–293.10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.019Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Radvansky, Gabriel A. & Jeffrey M. Zacks. 2014. Event cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199898138.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Stawarska, Beata. 2015. Saussure’s philosophy of language as phenomenology: Undoing the doctrine of the Course in General Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190213022.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1982. Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8. 484–507.10.3765/bls.v8i0.2049Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12. 49–100.10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2015. A constructionist approach to the teaching of phrasal verbs. English Today 31(3). 46–58.10.1017/S0266078415000255Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2016. Working out multiword verbs within an applied cognitive construction grammar framework. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 5(1). 1–32.10.1515/eujal-2016-0003Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2018a. Constructions as triads of form, function and agency: An agentive cognitive construction grammar analysis of English modals. Cognitive Semantics 4(1). 1–38.10.1163/23526416-00401001Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2018b. Exploring attachment patterns between multi-word verbs and argument structure constructions. Lingua 209. 21–43.10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.001Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2019. Taming English modals: How a Construction Grammar approach helps to understand modal verbs. English Today 35(2). 50–57.10.1017/S0266078418000081Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2020. On English modals, embodiment and argument structure: Response to Fong. English Today (first view). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078420000437.Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2021a. Applied Cognitive Construction Grammar: A cognitive guide to the teaching of phrasal verbs. Medellín: Self-published monograph.Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2021b. Agentive Cognitive Construction Grammar: Exploring the Continuity between environment, body, mind, and language. Medellín: Self-published monograph.Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2021c. The cognition of caused-motion events in Spanish and German: An agentive cognitive construction grammar analysis. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41(1). 33–65.10.1080/07268602.2021.1888279Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2022a. A radical embodied characterization of German modals. Cognitive Semantics. Accepted for publication.Suche in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2022b. Metaphors are embodied otherwise they would not be metaphors. Linguistics Vanguard. Accepted for publication.10.1515/lingvan-2019-0083Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Johannes. 2018. Multilingual and multimodal interactions. Applied Linguistics 39(1). 99–107.10.1093/applin/amx058Suche in Google Scholar

Wärnsby, Anna. 2016. On the adequacy of a constructionist approach to modality. Constructions and Frames 8(1). 40–53.10.1075/cf.8.1.03warSuche in Google Scholar

Williams, Helen L., Martin A. Conway & Alan D. Baddeley. 2008. The boundaries of episodic memories. In Thomas F. Shipley & Jeffrey M. Zacks (eds.), Understanding events: From perception to action, 589–616. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0024Suche in Google Scholar

Zacks, Jeffrey M. 2004. Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science 28. 979–1008.10.1207/s15516709cog2806_5Suche in Google Scholar