Faith in fakes: Secrets, lies, and conspiracies in Umberto Eco’s writings

References

Barthes, R. 1977 [1964]. Rhetoric of the image. In Stephen Heath (trans.) (eds.), Image-music-text, 32–51. London: Fontana Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, C. 2011. Semiotics approaches to advertising text and strategies: Narrative, passion, marketing. Semiotica 183(1/4). 243–271.10.1515/semi.2011.012Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, C. 2015. Thresholds, boundaries, limits: Ideological analysis in the semiotics of Umberto Eco. Semiotica 206(1/4). 109–127.10.1515/sem-2015-0015Search in Google Scholar

Bondanella, P. 1997. Umberto Eco and the open text: Semiotics, fiction, popular culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581755Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, N. 2009. Eco and popular culture. In P. Bondanella (ed.), New essays on Umberto Eco, 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627033.002Search in Google Scholar

Boym, S. 1999. Conspiracy theories and literary ethics: Umberto Eco, Danilo Kiš, and The Protocols of Zion. Comparative Literature 51(2). 97–122.10.2307/1771244Search in Google Scholar

Caesar, M. 1999. Umberto Eco: Philosophy, semiotics, and the work of fiction. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, J. 2011. Fiction imitating history or history imitating fiction? Umberto Eco’s. Il Cimitero Di Praga. Otherness 2(1). 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Capozzi, R. 2014. History, a “theatre of illusions”: Texts and contexts of Eco’s. The Book of Legendary Lands. University of Toronto Quarterly 83(4). 847–860.10.3138/utq.83.4.847Search in Google Scholar

Coletti, T. 1988. Naming the rose: Eco, medieval signs, and modern theory. lthaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Coletti, T. 2009. Eco’s Middle Ages and historical novel. In P. Bondanella (ed.), New essays on Umberto Eco, 71–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627033.006Search in Google Scholar

De Benedictis, R. 2011. Il cimitero di Praga: The epistemic implications between lies and reality. Forum Italicum 45(2). 428–450.10.1177/001458581104500208Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1968. Alcune verifiche: Il messaggio pubblicitario. In U. Eco (ed.), La struttura assente [The absent structure], 165–188. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1978. Il superuomo di massa: Retorica e idologia del romanzo popolare [The superman of the masses: Rhetoric and ideology in the popular novel]. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1986a. Faith in fakes: Travels in hyperreality. London: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1986b. Il messaggio persuasivo. In G. Fenocchio (ed.), Le ragioni della retorica, 11–27. Modena: Mucchi.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1988. Foucault’s pendulum. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1989. The structure of bad taste. In U. Eco (ed.), The open work, 180–216. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1992. Interpretation and overinterpretation with. Richard Rorty, Jonathan Culler, Christine Brooke-Rose & Stefan Collini (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627408Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1993 [1963]. Misreadings. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1994a [1964]. Apocalyptic and integrated intellectuals: Mass communications and theories of mass culture. In U. Eco (ed.), Apocalypse postponed, 17–35. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1994b. How to travel with a salmon and other essays. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1994c [1990]. The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1994d. Six walks in the fictional woods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1994e. The name of the rose, including the author’s postscript. New York: Harvest.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1998. Serendipities: Language and lunacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.7312/ecou11134Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1999. Signo [Sign]. Barcelona: Labor.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 2004. On literature. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 2007. Turning back the clock: Hot wars and media populism. New York: Harcourt. [2006].Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 2010a. The Prague cemetery. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 2010b. Not such wicked leaks. VoxEurop, 2 Dec. http://www.voxeurop.eu/en/content/article/414871-not-such-wicked-leaks (accessed 11 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 2012 [2008]. Inventing the enemy. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 2013. Interview with Umberto Eco. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 10(1). 50–58.10.1080/14791420.2013.769311Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 2015. Numero zero. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 2017. Chronicles of a liquid society. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Eisner, W. 2005. The plot: The secret story of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Escudero Chauvel, L. 1997. Umberto Eco: The sixties and cultural studies. Sites 1(1). 233–243.10.1080/10260219708455877Search in Google Scholar

Frank, T. 1997. The conquest of cool: Business, culture, counterculture and the rise of hip consumerism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226924632.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Genette, G. 1991. Fiction et diction. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Hutcheon, L. 1988. A poetics of postmodernism. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hutcheon, L. 1989. Historiographic metafiction: Parody and the intertextuality of history. In Patrick O’Donnell & Robert Con Davis (eds.), Intertextuality and contemporary American fiction, 3–32. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pisanty, V. 2015. From the model reader to the limits of interpretation. Semiotica 206(1/4). 37–61.10.1515/sem-2015-0014Search in Google Scholar

Pisanty, V. & R. Pellerey. 2004. Semiotica e interpretazione [Semiotics and interpretation]. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Ferrándiz, R. 2001. Apocalypse show: Intelectuales, televisión y fin de milenio [Apocalypse show: Intellectuals, television, and end of the millenium]. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Ferrándiz, R. 2010. La musa venal: Producción y consumo de la cultura industrial [The venal muse: Production and consumption of industrial culture]. Murcia: Tres Fronteras.Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Ferrándiz, R. 2018. Máscaras de la mentira: E nuevo desorden de la posverdad [Masks of lying: The new post-truth disorder]. Valencia: Pre-Textos.Search in Google Scholar

Sanjinés, J. 2014. On inventing the enemy: Lies and irony in Eco’s fiction. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotics Analysis 19(1). 81–110.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. 1975. Action description and narrative. New Literary History 6(2). 273–294.10.2307/468420Search in Google Scholar

Violi, P. 1998. Individual and communal encyclopedias. In N. Bouchard & V. Pravadelli (eds.), Umberto Eco’s alternative: The politics of culture and the ambiguities of interpretation, 25–38. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Violi, P. 2015. Global and local: Encyclopedic meaning revisited. Semiotica 206(1/4). 89–108.10.1515/sem-2015-0023Search in Google Scholar