Home A review of the comparative study of Mo Yan and Faulkner in China
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A review of the comparative study of Mo Yan and Faulkner in China

  • Xiuguo Huang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 19, 2017

Abstract

Mo Yan’s multi-layered and allegorical tales were highly inspired by William Faulkner. Mo Yan’s semi-fictional Gaomi Northeast Township was often linked to William Faulkner’s fictional Yoknapatawpha, and he himself was extolled by the Chinese scholars to be “China’s Faulkner.” Inside China, there have emerged a great number of comparative studies on Faulkner and Mo Yan, which are usually conducted from the perspectives of literary forms, native-soil complex, attitudes towards tradition, the influence of local culture, and so on. However, despite the strong record of research on these two writers in China, there is still room for improvement in the study, for after the initial stage of the superficial and sporadic comparison between individual works, the comparative study of Faulkner and Mo Yanis in pressing need of comprehensive and systematic research of these criticisms.

Funding statement: Supported by Research Project Fund of Shandong University at Weihai and Shandong University Postdoctoral Sustentation Fund.

References

Cai, Rong. 2003. Problematizing the foreign other: Mother, father, and the bastard in Mo Yan’s Large Breasts & Wide Hips. Modern China 1. 108–137.10.1177/0097700402238598Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Chunsheng. 1998. Forging in a high burning furnace: On Mo Yan’s absorption of Faulkner’s and Marquez’s works. Foreign Literature Study 3. 13–16.Search in Google Scholar

Deng, Fang. 2004. From the sense of life to Dionysian spirit: The unique achievement of Red sorghum: A novel of China. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities 11. 128–131Search in Google Scholar

Fang, Hanwen. 2005. A comparative literature history between East and West. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fang, Hanwen, Xu Wen & Zou Ting. 2013. Mo Yan’s native culture fable in the context of world literature. Journal of Chizhou University 1. 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, Hongxia. 2012. The representation of Faulkner’s “native soil” complex in modern Chinese literature. Gansu Social Science 1. 69–73.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Tiesheng & Xia Wenjing. 2014. Faulkner’s influence and Mo Yan’s innovation in literary creation. Seeking Truth 1. 126–133.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Xiaolin. 2012. Founder of literary kingdom: A comparative study between Mo Yan and Faulkner. Journal of Zaozhuang University 6. 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Inge, Thomas. 2000. Mo Yan: Through western eyes. World Literature Today 3. 501–506.10.2307/40155816Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yingfeng. 2002. Faulkner and Mo Yan: Construction and elucidation of hometown mythology. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 1. 91–94.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Xianghui. 2014. An ethical study of the novels of Mo Yan and Faulkner. Jiang Xi Social Science 6. 109–113.Search in Google Scholar

Mo, Yan. 2003. Red sorghum. London: Arrow.Search in Google Scholar

Qiao, Guoqiang. 2008. The narrative strategy of Chinese avant-garde novels: The case of Mo Yan. Semiotica 170(1/4). 211–220.10.1515/SEM.2008.057Search in Google Scholar

Song, Jianhua & Zhang Ji. 2006. Historical end of the legendary myth about revolutionary hero: On the significance of Red Sorghum Clan by Mo Yan in literature history. Journal of Hunan University (Social Science) 5. 91–96.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Zhiying & Ding Fan (eds.). 2002. Main trend of Chinese modern novels. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Binzhong. 2006. A conversation across space and time: A comparative study of William Faulkner and Mo Yan. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-08-19
Published in Print: 2019-03-05

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Spatializing food: Signs, spaces, and the legal (dis-)composition of what we eat
  4. A review of the comparative study of Mo Yan and Faulkner in China
  5. Expounding knowledge through explanations: Generic types and rhetorical-relational patterns
  6. A semiosic translation of the term “Bild” in both the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and The Philosophical Investigations
  7. Talking green and acting green are two different things: An experimental investigation of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes and low carbon consumer choice
  8. De l’explosion dans Le Transperceneige de Joon-ho Bong
  9. Using semantic tagging to examine the American Dream and the Chinese Dream
  10. Faith in fakes: Secrets, lies, and conspiracies in Umberto Eco’s writings
  11. The semiotics of breast cancer: Signs, symptoms, and sales
  12. Finite semiotics: Recovery functions, semioformation, and the hyperreal
  13. The urgency of engaging with oddities and ambiguities: Reciprocity and cooperation visited as semio-aesthetic notions in bridging nature and culture
  14. Concepts of narrative, founding violence, and multiculturalism in the Americas: Greimas, Girard, and Kymlicka
  15. Language mediated mentalization: A proposed model
  16. Immanuel Kant on the philosophy of communicology: The tropic logic of rhetoric and semiotics
  17. Voice and bodily deixis as manifestation of performativity in written texts
  18. Review Articles
  19. Review of The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the Internet
  20. The semiotics of intuition, care, and esotericism in education
  21. Book Review
  22. Fiction as semiotics
Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0027/html
Scroll to top button