Home When does the ritual of mythic symbolic type start and when does it end?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

When does the ritual of mythic symbolic type start and when does it end?

  • Mina Meir Dviri EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2018

Abstract

Mythic symbolic type is a unique cultural structure that permits no exit to the one who has lost his “self” to it. The semi-commune Little Home housed a community of mythic symbolic types which engendered a ritual of their own in which the men trapped within the type moved between its two edges, purity and impurity. But since there is no exit from the type, the question is how and when the ritual begins and ends? What kind of ritual is the mythic symbolic type’s? As an answer, the following article presents an ethnography of the ritual in the semi-commune Little Home where mythic symbolic type was found, and a conceptual map of this world with the help of Bateson’s play paradox and a self-correcting model.


Note

This article is based on a draft named “A moment of repair: Naming the mythic symbolic type,” ISBN: 978–965–92,559–3-1.


References

Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.Search in Google Scholar

Grathoff, Richard. 1970. The structure of social inconsistencies: A contribution to a unified theory of play, game, and social action. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-3215-5Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don. 1977. Play and ritual: Complementary frames of metacommunication. In Antony J. Chapman & Hugh C. Foot (eds.), It’s a funny thing, humor, 185–192. London: Pergamon Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-021376-7.50039-5Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don. 1981. The ritual clown: Attributes and affinities. Anthropos 76. 321–370.Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don. 1985. Charisma, liminality, and symbolic types. In E. Cohen, M. Lissak & U. Almagor (eds.), Comparative social dynamics: Essays in honor of S. N. Eisenstadt, 346–359. Boulder, CA: Westview.10.4324/9780429044755-24Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don. 1990. Models and mirrors: Towards an anthropology of public events. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don. 1991. Symbolic types, the body, and circus. Semiotica 85. 205–225.10.1515/semi.1991.85.3-4.205Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don. 1992. Passages to play: Paradox and process. Play and Culture 5. 1–19.10.2307/j.ctv287sc31.11Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don. 1994. Insights: Symbolic type. Semiotic Review 5(1). 10–11.Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don. 2009. Clowns in ritual: Are ritual boundaries lineal? Moebius-like? In Katja Gvozdeva & Werner Rocke (eds.), Risus sacer – Sacrum risibile: Interaktionsfelder von Sakralität und Gelächter im kulturellen und historischen Wandel, 307–325. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don & Bruce Kapferer. 1980. Symbolic types, mediation and the transformation of ritual context: Sinhalese demons and Tewa clowns. Semiotica 26. 44–71.10.1515/semi.1980.30.1-2.41Search in Google Scholar

Handelman, Don & Galina Lindquist. 2011. Prologue and introduction. In Galina Lindquist & Don Handelman (eds.), Religion, politics and globalization: Anthropological approaches, 1–66. New York: Berghahn.Search in Google Scholar

Kidron, Carol & Don Handelman. 2016. The symbolic type revisited: Semiotics in practice and the reformation of the Israeli commemorative context. Symbolic Interaction 39(3). 421–445.10.1002/symb.234Search in Google Scholar

Lavie, Smadar. 1990. The poetics of military Bedouin identity under Israeli and Egyptian rule. Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520911604Search in Google Scholar

Meir Dviri, Mina. 2010. Between stigma and repair: Anthropological analysis of socialization, symbolic types, and identity construction in a shelter of youth at risk. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem dissertation (In Hebrew).Search in Google Scholar

Meir Dviri, Mina. 2013. Waves of communication: Symbolic type and systematically distorted communication [in Hebrew]. Israeli Sociology 16(1). 83–97.Search in Google Scholar

Meir Dviri, Mina. 2016a. Symbolic type: A ritual of impurity. Anthropology of Consciousness 27(1). 7–27.10.1111/anoc.12049Search in Google Scholar

Meir Dviri, Mina. 2016b. Metrodan strike: Bus of desire. In mythic symbolic type. Mythic Symbolic Type is a collection of drafts in which Metrodan Strike is part, 46–91. Asdod.Search in Google Scholar

Meir Dviri, Mina. accepted. Mythic symbolic type and body without organs. Semiotica.10.1515/sem-2017-0129Search in Google Scholar

Meir Dviri, Mina & Aviad Raz. 1995. Ritual of exchange in the social world of Israeli beggars: An exploratory study. Symbolic Interaction 18(2). 99–119.10.1525/si.1995.18.2.99Search in Google Scholar

Meir-Dviri, Mina. 2018. Men and the menstruation dynamic: Anthropology, history, and body without organs. Anthropos 113. 258–267.10.5771/0257-9774-2018-1-258Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Stephen. 1969. End, means, and galumphing: Some leitmotifs of play. American Anthropologist 75(1). 87–98.10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00050Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-31
Published in Print: 2018-11-06

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Genome as (hyper)text: From metaphor to theory
  3. The work of Peirce’s Dicisign in representationalizing early deictic events
  4. The double function of the interpretant in Peirce’s theory of signs
  5. Integration mechanism and transcendental semiosis
  6. The communicative wheel: Symptom, signal, and model in multimodal communication
  7. Discursive representation: Semiotics, theory, and method
  8. Translation as sign exploration: A semiotic approach based on Peirce
  9. When does the ritual of mythic symbolic type start and when does it end?
  10. Iconoclasms of Emmett Till and his killers in Lewis Nordan’s Wolf Whistle: A new generation of historiographic metafiction
  11. A dialogical semiosis of traveling narratives for self-interpretation: Towards activity-semiotics
  12. Entre éthologie et sémiotique : Mondes animaux, compétences et accommodation
  13. A pentadic model of semiotic analysis
  14. Linguistic violence and the “body to come”: The performativity of hate speech in J. Derrida and J. Butler
  15. Cultural tourism as pilgrimage
  16. A simple traffic-light semiotic model for tagmemic theory
  17. From resistance to reconciliation and back again: A semiotic analysis of the Charlie Hebdo cover following the January 2015 events
  18. Bilingual and intersemiotic representation of distance(s) in Chinese landscape painting: from yi (‘meaning’) to yi (‘freedom’)
  19. Power-organizing and Ethic-thinking as two paralleled praxes in the historical existence of mankind: A semiotic analysis of their functional segregation
  20. Semiosic translation
  21. Construction of new epistemological fields: Interpretation, translation, transmutation
  22. A biosemiotic reading of Michel Onfray’s Cosmos: Rethinking the essence of communication from an ecocentric and scientific perspective
  23. Coherence and truthfulness in communication: Intracommunicational and extracommunicational indexicality
  24. Poetic logic and sensus communis
  25. Intrinsic functionality of mathematics, metafunctions in Systemic Functional Semiotics
  26. Ciudadanos: The myth of neutrality
  27. Multilingualism and sameness versus otherness in a semiotic context
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2017-0032/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button