Home Linguistic violence and the “body to come”: The performativity of hate speech in J. Derrida and J. Butler
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Linguistic violence and the “body to come”: The performativity of hate speech in J. Derrida and J. Butler

  • Julia Ponzio EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2018

Abstract

This text analyzes the question of linguistic violence in J. Derrida and in J. Butler and shows how this question implies a consideration of the relation between language and body. The starting point is Derrida’s critic of Austin’s theory of speech acts. Through this critic Derrida establishes a relation between speech acts and writing. This connection brings to the fore the importance of the iterability as a structural feature of speech acts. The iterability becomes fundamental in Butler’s analysis of hate speech in Excitable Speech. In this book the iterability is interpreted as the ritual character of the hate speech, which reveals its political dimension. Comparing Butler and Derrida’s ideas of speech act, I try in this text to make emerge the idea of a textual body as the possibility of the resistance to the linguistic violence.

References

Austin, John, L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 2003. Afterword. In Shoshana Felman (ed.), The scandal of the speaking body: Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or seduction in two languages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804766890-008Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1982 [1967]. Signature, event, context. In Margins of philosophy, Alan. Bass (trans.), 307–347. Brighton: The Harvester Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hekman, Susan. 2004. Private selves, public identities. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.10.1515/9780271031965Search in Google Scholar

Matsuda, Mari J, Charles R. Lawrence, III, Richard Delgado & Kimberle Williams Crenshaw. 1993. Words that wound. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

McKinnon, Katharine, A. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-31
Published in Print: 2018-11-06

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Genome as (hyper)text: From metaphor to theory
  3. The work of Peirce’s Dicisign in representationalizing early deictic events
  4. The double function of the interpretant in Peirce’s theory of signs
  5. Integration mechanism and transcendental semiosis
  6. The communicative wheel: Symptom, signal, and model in multimodal communication
  7. Discursive representation: Semiotics, theory, and method
  8. Translation as sign exploration: A semiotic approach based on Peirce
  9. When does the ritual of mythic symbolic type start and when does it end?
  10. Iconoclasms of Emmett Till and his killers in Lewis Nordan’s Wolf Whistle: A new generation of historiographic metafiction
  11. A dialogical semiosis of traveling narratives for self-interpretation: Towards activity-semiotics
  12. Entre éthologie et sémiotique : Mondes animaux, compétences et accommodation
  13. A pentadic model of semiotic analysis
  14. Linguistic violence and the “body to come”: The performativity of hate speech in J. Derrida and J. Butler
  15. Cultural tourism as pilgrimage
  16. A simple traffic-light semiotic model for tagmemic theory
  17. From resistance to reconciliation and back again: A semiotic analysis of the Charlie Hebdo cover following the January 2015 events
  18. Bilingual and intersemiotic representation of distance(s) in Chinese landscape painting: from yi (‘meaning’) to yi (‘freedom’)
  19. Power-organizing and Ethic-thinking as two paralleled praxes in the historical existence of mankind: A semiotic analysis of their functional segregation
  20. Semiosic translation
  21. Construction of new epistemological fields: Interpretation, translation, transmutation
  22. A biosemiotic reading of Michel Onfray’s Cosmos: Rethinking the essence of communication from an ecocentric and scientific perspective
  23. Coherence and truthfulness in communication: Intracommunicational and extracommunicational indexicality
  24. Poetic logic and sensus communis
  25. Intrinsic functionality of mathematics, metafunctions in Systemic Functional Semiotics
  26. Ciudadanos: The myth of neutrality
  27. Multilingualism and sameness versus otherness in a semiotic context
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2017-0012/html
Scroll to top button