Home Ciudadanos: The myth of neutrality
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Ciudadanos: The myth of neutrality

  • Marcello Serra ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Rayco González
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2018

Abstract

Ciudadanos is a new Spanish political party that, in the last two years, has won a position as an important force in Parliament. Among the distinctive characteristics of its discourse, the use of the neutral stands out, which the party uses to distance itself from old-style politics. This article analyzes the discursive strategy of Ciudadanos from its founding up through the present day, and uncovers the operations of ideological camouflage that it uses to construct its apparent neutrality. In this way, the article seeks to recover the spirit of the Barthesian mythological analyses, dedicated to unmasking contemporary myths.

Funding statement: This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (10.13039/501100003329), Grant Number: CSO2014-55527-P.

References

Aristotle. 1999. Treatise on rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1967 [1953]. Writing degree zero. London: Jonathan Cape.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1991 [1957]. Mythologies. New York: Noonday Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 2005 [2002]. The neutral: Lecture course at the College de France (1977–1978). New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bertrand, Denis, Alexandre Dézé & Jean-Louis Missika. 2007. Parler pour gagner: Sémiotique des discours de la campagne présidentielle 2007. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.10.3917/scpo.bertr.2007.01Search in Google Scholar

Carr, Raymond. 2005. El rostro cambiante de Clío. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.Search in Google Scholar

Clerc, Thomas. 2002. Roland, le neutre. Revue de Sciences Humaines 268. 41–53.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1990 [1976]. The social sciences: A semiotic view. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien & Joseph Courtés. 1982 [1979]. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hartog, François. 2015 [2003]. Regimes of historicity: Presentism and experiences of time. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/hart16376Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1984 [1932]. Structure of the Russian verb. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981, 1–14. New York: Mouton Publishers.10.1515/9783110822885.1Search in Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004 [1979]. Futures past: On the semantics of historical times. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1952. Race and history. Liège: G. Thone.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Jurij Michailovič. 1973. Il problema del segno e del sistema segnico nella tipologia della cultura russa prima del XX secolo. In Jurij Michailovič Lotman & Boris Uspenskij (eds.), Ricerche semiotiche: Nuove tendenze delle scienze umane nell’URSS, 40–61. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar

Lozano, Jorge & Marcello Serra. 2011. 15 M: Año cero. Revista De Occidente 364. 121–124.Search in Google Scholar

Marin, Louis. 1973. Utopiques: Jeux d’espaces. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar

Marsciani, Francesco. 1999. La maschera neutra. In Francesco Marsciani (ed.), Esercizi di semiotica generativa: Dalle parole alle cose, 123–138. Bologna: Esculapio.Search in Google Scholar

Samoyault, Tiphaine. 2015. Roland Barthes. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-31
Published in Print: 2018-11-06

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Genome as (hyper)text: From metaphor to theory
  3. The work of Peirce’s Dicisign in representationalizing early deictic events
  4. The double function of the interpretant in Peirce’s theory of signs
  5. Integration mechanism and transcendental semiosis
  6. The communicative wheel: Symptom, signal, and model in multimodal communication
  7. Discursive representation: Semiotics, theory, and method
  8. Translation as sign exploration: A semiotic approach based on Peirce
  9. When does the ritual of mythic symbolic type start and when does it end?
  10. Iconoclasms of Emmett Till and his killers in Lewis Nordan’s Wolf Whistle: A new generation of historiographic metafiction
  11. A dialogical semiosis of traveling narratives for self-interpretation: Towards activity-semiotics
  12. Entre éthologie et sémiotique : Mondes animaux, compétences et accommodation
  13. A pentadic model of semiotic analysis
  14. Linguistic violence and the “body to come”: The performativity of hate speech in J. Derrida and J. Butler
  15. Cultural tourism as pilgrimage
  16. A simple traffic-light semiotic model for tagmemic theory
  17. From resistance to reconciliation and back again: A semiotic analysis of the Charlie Hebdo cover following the January 2015 events
  18. Bilingual and intersemiotic representation of distance(s) in Chinese landscape painting: from yi (‘meaning’) to yi (‘freedom’)
  19. Power-organizing and Ethic-thinking as two paralleled praxes in the historical existence of mankind: A semiotic analysis of their functional segregation
  20. Semiosic translation
  21. Construction of new epistemological fields: Interpretation, translation, transmutation
  22. A biosemiotic reading of Michel Onfray’s Cosmos: Rethinking the essence of communication from an ecocentric and scientific perspective
  23. Coherence and truthfulness in communication: Intracommunicational and extracommunicational indexicality
  24. Poetic logic and sensus communis
  25. Intrinsic functionality of mathematics, metafunctions in Systemic Functional Semiotics
  26. Ciudadanos: The myth of neutrality
  27. Multilingualism and sameness versus otherness in a semiotic context
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2017-0020/html
Scroll to top button