Home A simple traffic-light semiotic model for tagmemic theory
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A simple traffic-light semiotic model for tagmemic theory

  • Vern Poythress EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 31, 2018

Abstract

The complexity and flexibility of tagmemic theory, as a semiotic theory developed by Kenneth L. Pike, can be better understood by examining how it applies to a simple semiotic system like traffic lights. We can then compare the result with how it functions in analyzing a piece of natural language. Tagmemic theory introduces three observer viewpoints – the particle view, the wave view, and the field view. Each view generates a suite of questions to answer. Any one of the views results in a “complete” description of traffic lights, from which the information about the other views can be inferred. And yet each view is distinct in texture from the others, and the existence of such multiple views – each with a claim to emic integrity and each serving as a perspective on the whole – has to be accounted for in a robust semiotic approach. The same phenomena occur when we apply the three views to the analysis of meaning in natural language. The chief illustration is to analyze the meaning of the word dog in multiple ways. The multi-dimensional potential for semiotic analysis highlights the limitations of Aristotelian logic and symbolic logic, both of which simplify for the sake of rigor.

References

Atkin, Albert. 2013. Peirce’s theory of signs. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics/ (accessed 8 August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Birkhoff, Garrett. 1948. Lattice theory. New York: American Mathematical Society.Search in Google Scholar

Fontaine, Lise. 2012. Language as social semiotic in Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics. Semiotix XN-7http://semioticon.com/semiotix/2012/03/language-as-social-semiotic-in-hallidays-systemic-functional-linguistics/ (accessed 8 August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Headland, Thomas N., Kenneth L. Pike & Marvin Harris (eds.). 1990. Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Hébert, Louis. 2016. Elements of semiotics. Signohttp://www.signosemio.com/elements-of-semiotics.asp (accessed 8 August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Hong, Chong-Min, David Lurie & Jiro Tanaka. 1993. Umberto Eco: On semiotics and pragmatism: Interview. Harvard Review of Philosophy 3(1). 14–22.10.5840/harvardreview1993312Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior, 2nd edn. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783111657158Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1972 [1959]. Language as particle, wave, and field. In Ruth M. Brend (ed.), Kenneth L. Pike: Selected writings to commemorate the sixtieth birthday of Kenneth Lee Pike, 129–143, The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110812213-010Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1976. Toward the development of tagmemic postulates. In Ruth M. Brend & Kenneth L. Pike (eds.), Tagmemics Vol. 2, 91–127. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. 1982. Linguistic concepts: An introduction to tagmemics. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth L. & Evelyn G. Pike. 1977. Grammatical analysis. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 1976. Tagmemic analysis of elementary algebra. Semiotica 17(2). 131–151.10.1515/semi.1976.17.2.131Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 1982. A framework for discourse analysis: The components of a discourse, from a tagmemic viewpoint. Semiotica 38(3/4). 277–298.10.1515/semi.1982.38.3-4.277Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2009. In the beginning was the word: Language – A God-centered approach. Wheaton, IL: Crossway.Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2013a. Information-theoretic confirmation of semiotic structures. Semiotica 193(1/4). 67–82.10.1515/sem-2013-0004Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2013b. An information-based semiotic analysis of theories concerning theories. Semiotica 193(1/4). 83–99.10.1515/sem-2013-0005Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2013c. Logic: A God-centered approach to the foundation of western thought. Wheaton, IL: Crossway.Search in Google Scholar

Poythress, Vern S. 2015. Redeeming mathematics: A God-centered approach. Wheaton, IL: Crossway.Search in Google Scholar

Waterhouse, Viola G. 1974. The history and development of tagmemics. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783111348919Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-10-31
Published in Print: 2018-11-06

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Genome as (hyper)text: From metaphor to theory
  3. The work of Peirce’s Dicisign in representationalizing early deictic events
  4. The double function of the interpretant in Peirce’s theory of signs
  5. Integration mechanism and transcendental semiosis
  6. The communicative wheel: Symptom, signal, and model in multimodal communication
  7. Discursive representation: Semiotics, theory, and method
  8. Translation as sign exploration: A semiotic approach based on Peirce
  9. When does the ritual of mythic symbolic type start and when does it end?
  10. Iconoclasms of Emmett Till and his killers in Lewis Nordan’s Wolf Whistle: A new generation of historiographic metafiction
  11. A dialogical semiosis of traveling narratives for self-interpretation: Towards activity-semiotics
  12. Entre éthologie et sémiotique : Mondes animaux, compétences et accommodation
  13. A pentadic model of semiotic analysis
  14. Linguistic violence and the “body to come”: The performativity of hate speech in J. Derrida and J. Butler
  15. Cultural tourism as pilgrimage
  16. A simple traffic-light semiotic model for tagmemic theory
  17. From resistance to reconciliation and back again: A semiotic analysis of the Charlie Hebdo cover following the January 2015 events
  18. Bilingual and intersemiotic representation of distance(s) in Chinese landscape painting: from yi (‘meaning’) to yi (‘freedom’)
  19. Power-organizing and Ethic-thinking as two paralleled praxes in the historical existence of mankind: A semiotic analysis of their functional segregation
  20. Semiosic translation
  21. Construction of new epistemological fields: Interpretation, translation, transmutation
  22. A biosemiotic reading of Michel Onfray’s Cosmos: Rethinking the essence of communication from an ecocentric and scientific perspective
  23. Coherence and truthfulness in communication: Intracommunicational and extracommunicational indexicality
  24. Poetic logic and sensus communis
  25. Intrinsic functionality of mathematics, metafunctions in Systemic Functional Semiotics
  26. Ciudadanos: The myth of neutrality
  27. Multilingualism and sameness versus otherness in a semiotic context
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2017-0025/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button