Two assumptions in legal discourse: To answer for self and to tell the truth
-
Susan Petrilli
Abstract
The distinction between “initial meanings” and “additional meanings” which corresponds to that between “explicit meanings” and “implicit meanings,” evidences the complex stratification of signifying processes that subtend and orient discourse. Hidden meanings are implicit, mediated, indirect meanings, additional meanings. They are traceable not only in meanings determined by context, but also in meanings more independent from context. Initial, explicit meaning is meaning fixed by use and tradition, but all the same it is somehow conditioned by additional, implicit meaning, by hidden meaning. This paper focuses on two related assumptions, or hidden meanings that are no less than central to legal discourse: answering for self and telling the truth. Though the hidden meaning in these assumptions is not explicated, it in fact orientates legal discourse. Hidden meaning involves shared knowledge which is implied and taken for granted even though it is not voiced. The important question is: what is the collective, social conception of the subject that is tacitly implied in legal discourse, such to be capable of answering for self and of telling the truth?
References
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Currents issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Radical priorities, Carlos P. Otero (ed.). Montreal: Black Rose.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Language and politics. Montreal: Black Rose.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Michel Foucault. 1974. Human nature: Justice versus power. In Fons Eiders (ed.), Reflexive water: The basic concerns of mankind, 133–197. London: Souvenir Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deely, John, Susan Petrilli & Augusto Ponzio. 2005. The semiotic animal. Ottawa: Legas.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1975. Le facteur de la vérité. Poétique 21. 96–147.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. L’ordre du discourse. L’ordre du discourse. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1983. Why study power: The question of the subject. In H. Deyfus, P. Rabinow & M. Foucault (eds.), Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 206–216. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2007. Gestire la legalità (recorded in January 1975). In Roger-Pol Droit, Fabio Polidori (eds.), Conversazioni. Interviste, 29–34. Milan: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2012. Sull’origine dell’ermeneutica del sé. Due conferenze al Dartmouth College, Laura Cremonesi, Daniele Lorenzini, Orazio Irrera & Martina Tazzioli (eds.). Naples: Cronopio.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2013. Mal fare, dir vero. Funzione della confessione nella giustizia, Corso di Lovanio (1981), Valeria Zini (trans.). Turin: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar
Heraclitus. 1979. The art and thought of Heraclitus, Charles H. Kahn (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627392Search in Google Scholar
Krämer Institor, Heinrich & Jakob Sprenger. 2006. Malleus maleficarum (1486–1487), Armando Verdiglione (trans.). Milan: Spirali.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 Vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s Papers will be Designated CP Followed by Volume and Paragraph Number.]Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2003. Semioetica. Rome: Meltemi.Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2005. Semiotics unbounded: Interpretive routes in the open network of signs. Toronto: Toronto University Press.10.3138/9781442657113Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2008. Lineamenti di semiotica e di filosofia del linguaggio. Bari: Graphis.Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan & Augusto Ponzio. 2010. Semioethics. In P. Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics, 150–162. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan. 2010. Sign crossroads in global perspective: Semioethics and responsibility. New Brunswick & London: Transaction.Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan. 2012a. Altrove e altrimenti. Filosofia del linguaggio, critica letteraria e teoria della traduzione in, intorno e a partire da Bachtin. Milan: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan. 2012b. Un mondo di segni. L’avere senso e il significare qualcosa. Bari: Giuseppe Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan. 2013. The self as a sign, the world and the other. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Search in Google Scholar
Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio. 1961. Significato, comunicazione e parlare comune. Venice: Marsilio.Search in Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N. 1976. Freudianism: A Marxist critique, Neal H. Bruss & T. R. Titunic (eds.), T. R. Titunic (trans.). London & New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: Hidden meanings in legal discourse
- Comparing the incomparable and legal discourse
- Two assumptions in legal discourse: To answer for self and to tell the truth
- Le sens caché: Refoulement et impensé dans le discours de la loi sémiotique des significations cachées du discours juridique
- Multiple historical and social layers of interpretation of marital rape in England
- Revisiting judgment translation in Hong Kong
- Exemption and exegesis: Judicial interpretation of exemption clauses in England, Australia, and India
- Identifying the meanings hidden in legal texts: The three conditions of relevance theory and their sufficiency
- The consequences and effects of language transformations in legal discourse
- Exploring identities in police interrogations
- Rights, responsibilities, and resistance: Legal discourse and intervention legislation in the Northern Territory in Australia
- An exploration of the semantic domain of legal language
- The hidden meanings in the case law of the European Court for Human Rights
- Crimes of the sign: Politics and performatives in the Treason Trials of 1794
- Showing what “marriage” is: Law’s civilizing sign
- A sociosemiotic approach to the legal dispute over the crime of whoring with an underage girl in China
- Uncovering hidden meanings in legal discourse on the elderly: A semioethical perspective
- Deontic meaning making in legislative discourse
- Hidden meanings of the words “religion” and “religious” in legal discourse
- Hidden cultures in law: Metaphor and translation in legal discourse
- Negotiating language status in multilingual jurisdictions: Rhetoric and reality
- Burying attitudes in words: Linguistic realization of the shift of judges’ court conciliation style
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: Hidden meanings in legal discourse
- Comparing the incomparable and legal discourse
- Two assumptions in legal discourse: To answer for self and to tell the truth
- Le sens caché: Refoulement et impensé dans le discours de la loi sémiotique des significations cachées du discours juridique
- Multiple historical and social layers of interpretation of marital rape in England
- Revisiting judgment translation in Hong Kong
- Exemption and exegesis: Judicial interpretation of exemption clauses in England, Australia, and India
- Identifying the meanings hidden in legal texts: The three conditions of relevance theory and their sufficiency
- The consequences and effects of language transformations in legal discourse
- Exploring identities in police interrogations
- Rights, responsibilities, and resistance: Legal discourse and intervention legislation in the Northern Territory in Australia
- An exploration of the semantic domain of legal language
- The hidden meanings in the case law of the European Court for Human Rights
- Crimes of the sign: Politics and performatives in the Treason Trials of 1794
- Showing what “marriage” is: Law’s civilizing sign
- A sociosemiotic approach to the legal dispute over the crime of whoring with an underage girl in China
- Uncovering hidden meanings in legal discourse on the elderly: A semioethical perspective
- Deontic meaning making in legislative discourse
- Hidden meanings of the words “religion” and “religious” in legal discourse
- Hidden cultures in law: Metaphor and translation in legal discourse
- Negotiating language status in multilingual jurisdictions: Rhetoric and reality
- Burying attitudes in words: Linguistic realization of the shift of judges’ court conciliation style
