Home What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand

  • W. C. Watt EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 17, 2015

Abstract

Our signs are what we make them. To convey what they mean they must be interpreted, and how they’re interpreted depends partly on what form they take, misleading or otherwise. So the means by which we realize our interior signs into the exterior world must retain a perennial interest, because we can achieve such realizations only via our physiology, which affects our signs’ forms. Our mouths affect our spoken signs; our writing hands affect our written signs. (How could it be otherwise? Both tongues and fingers have limitations.) So a close look at how our writing hands realize our signs on the paper promises to be a good candidate for extending our understanding of how we physically realize our signs, and of how this both binds and frees us.

Acknowledgments

I thank Kate C. Watt for many helpful suggestions; Tracy Kennedy-Pearson for two more no less crucial; and a pretty barmaid at the “Hoot’n Howl” in Goodyear, Arizona, for another such.

References

DeBellis, M., M. S.Keshaven, S. R.Beers, J.Hall, K.Frustaci, A.Masalehdan, J.Noli & gA. M.Boring. 2001. Sex differences in brain maturation during childhood and adolescence. Cerebral Cortex11. 552557.10.1093/cercor/11.6.552Search in Google Scholar

Castellanos, D.2013. A different slant on cursive. Los Angeles Times, April 3. AA3.Search in Google Scholar

Frith, U.1971. Why do children reverse letters?British Journal of Psychology62. 459468.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1971.tb02059.xSearch in Google Scholar

Guiard, Y. & F.Millerat.1984. Writing postures in left-handers: Inverters are hand-crossers. Neuropsychologia22. 535538.10.1016/0028-3932(84)90051-4Search in Google Scholar

Hécaen, H. & J.de Ajuriaguerra.1964. Left-handedness. New York & London: Grune & Stratton.Search in Google Scholar

Herron, J.1980a. Two hands, two brains, two sexes. In J.Herron (ed.), Neuropsychology of left-handedness, 233260. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-343150-9.50015-9Search in Google Scholar

Herron, J. (ed.). 1980b. Neuropsychology of left-handedness. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kinsbourne, M.2009. Development of cerebral lateralization in children. In C. R.Reynolds & E.Fletcher-Janzen (eds.), Handbook of clinical child neuropsychology, 3rd edn., 4766. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-78867-8_3Search in Google Scholar

Levy, J. & M. L.Reid.1976. Variations in writing posture and cerebral organization. Science194. 337.10.1126/science.968487Search in Google Scholar

Levy, J. & R. C.Gur.1980. Individual differences in psychoneurological organization. In J.Herron (ed.), Neuropsychology of left-handedness, 199210. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-343150-9.50013-5Search in Google Scholar

Merrell, F.1994. On bifurcating semiosis: Or, How to stop worrying about those elusive signs and learn to live with them. Semiotica99(1/4). 101125.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, M.1985. Incidence of left-handed writers and the inverted hand position in a sample of 2194 German elementary school children. Neuropsychologia24. 429433.10.1016/0028-3932(86)90030-8Search in Google Scholar

Sassoon, R.1990. La tenue de la plume: Applications et implications d’une classification. In C.Sirat, J.Irigoin & E.Poulle (eds.), L’écriture: Le cerveau, l’oeil,et la main (Bibliogia: Elementa ad Librorum Studia Pertinentia 10), 139144. Turnhout: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar

Schwellnus, H., H.Carnahan, A.Kushki, C. M.Polatajko & T.Chao. 2013. Writing forces associated with four pencil grasp patterns in grade four children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy67. 218227.10.5014/ajot.2013.005538Search in Google Scholar

Searleman, A. & C.Porac.2003. Lateral preference profiles and right shift attempt histories of consistent and inconsistent left-handers. Brain and Language52. 175180.10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00053-8Search in Google Scholar

Smith, L. C. & M.Moscovitch.1979. Writing posture, hemispheric control of movement and cerebral dominance in individuals with inverted and noninverted hand postures during writing. Neuropsychologia17. 637644.Search in Google Scholar

Tan, L. E.1985. Laterality and motor skills in four-year-olds. Child Development56. 119124.10.2307/1130179Search in Google Scholar

Wang, R., M.Perreau-Guimaraes, C.Carvalaes & P.Suppes. 2012. Using phase to recognize English phonemes and their distinctive features in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences US109(50). 2068520690.10.1073/pnas.1217500109Search in Google Scholar

Watt, W. C.1979. Iconic perspectives on linguistic explanation. In G.Prideaux (ed.), Perspectives on experimental linguistics (Current issues in linguistic theory 10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.10.03watSearch in Google Scholar

Watt, W. C.1980. What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? II: Composition. Ars Semeiotica3. 346.Search in Google Scholar

Watt, W. C.1994. Introduction to Part III. In W. C.Watt (ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics, 337346. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Watt, W. C.2012. What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VI: Three-finger exercises. Semiotica190(1/4). 177209.10.1515/sem-2012-0046Search in Google Scholar

Weil, M. J. & S. J.Cunningham Amundson.1994. Relationship between visuomotor and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten. American Journal of Occupational Therapy48. 982988.10.5014/ajot.48.11.982Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, F. R.1998. The hand. New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-7-17
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Sports utility semiotics: A semantic differential study of symbolic potential in automobile design
  3. Making meaning in women’s spiritual autobiography: Language, materiality, and agency in colonial New Granada
  4. What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand
  5. Towards a semiotics of multilingualism
  6. In the arena: Communication between animals and Christians in damnatio ad bestias
  7. Dire l’indicible et décrire l’indescriptible: Ressources imagières et linguistiques des poilus
  8. Mathematics and Peirce’s semiotic
  9. Icarus ignored: Riffaterre and Eagleton on Auden’s Musée des Beaux Arts
  10. The “monster” of Seymour Avenue: Internet crime news and Gothic reportage in the case of Ariel Castro
  11. Kenneth L. Pike and science fiction
  12. Environmental communications: The reader’s perspective
  13. A Peircean typology of cultural prime symbols: Culture as category
  14. The poetry of sound and the sound of poetry: Navajo poetry, phonological iconicity, and linguistic relativity
  15. The language of fashion in postmodern society: A social semiotic perspective
  16. From Saussure to sociology and back to linguistics: Niklas Luhmann’s reception of signifiant/signifié and langue/parole as the basis for a model of language change
  17. The machine or the garden: Semiotics and the American yard
  18. Photogénie as “the Other” of the semiotics of cinema: On Yuri Lotman’s concept of “the mythological”
  19. Who said it? Voices in news translation, from a semiotic perspective
  20. Why semiotics, why poetry?
  21. How brands (don’t) do things: Corporate branding as practices of imagining “commens
  22. Film space as mental space
  23. Netizen communicology: China daily and the Internet construction of group culture
  24. Questions toward a Peircean phenomenological description of association
  25. Colonial bodies: Slavery, wage-slavery, and the representation of race
  26. Discourse analysis with Peirce? Making sense of discursive regularities: The case of online university prospectuses
  27. Heidegger and the signs of history
  28. To be continued: meaning-making in serialized manga as functional-multimodal narrative
  29. Empiricism within the limits of postmodernism alone: On the emergence of the logically real within the multi-perspectival field
  30. Propaganda mala fide: Towards a comparative semiotics of violent religious persuasion
  31. Review article
  32. Peircean visual semiotics: Potentials to be explored
Downloaded on 19.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2015-0064/pdf
Scroll to top button