Home The basic distinctions in Der Streit
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The basic distinctions in Der Streit

  • Ingvar Johansson

    Ingvar Johansson (b. 1943) is Professor Emeritus at Umeå University 〈ingvar.johansson@philos.umu.se〉. His research interests include ontology and philosophy of science. His publications include A critique of Karl Popper's methodology (1975); Ontological investigations: An inquiry into the categories of nature, man, and society (2004 [1989]); and Medicine & philosophy: A twenty-first century introduction (with N. Lynøe, 2008).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 6, 2013

Abstract

The paper presents Ingarden's views on what he calls “modes of being” (“ways of existence”) and “existential moments”; the latter being constitutive parts of the former. Mainstream analytic philosophy has been dominated by the view that “existence” can mean only existence simpliciter. Ingarden, on the other hand, discerns four possible modes of being, one of which is of special interest to semiotics: purely intentional being. It is of relevance for the ontological understanding not only of texts, but also of pictures and other sign-related entities. At the end, an extrapolated Ingardenian semiotic triangle is presented.


Umeå University

About the author

Ingvar Johansson

Ingvar Johansson (b. 1943) is Professor Emeritus at Umeå University 〈ingvar.johansson@philos.umu.se〉. His research interests include ontology and philosophy of science. His publications include A critique of Karl Popper's methodology (1975); Ontological investigations: An inquiry into the categories of nature, man, and society (2004 [1989]); and Medicine & philosophy: A twenty-first century introduction (with N. Lynøe, 2008).

Published Online: 2013-04-06
Published in Print: 2013-04-05

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 19.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2013-0025/pdf
Scroll to top button