Home Approaching the abstract: Building blocks for an epistemology of abstract objects
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Approaching the abstract: Building blocks for an epistemology of abstract objects

  • Søren Harnow Klausen

    Søren Harnow Klausen (b. 1966) is a professor at the University of Southern Denmark 〈harnow@ifpr.sdu.dk〉. His research interests include epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of science. His publications include “Two notions of epistemic normativity” (2009); and “The notion of creativity revisited” (2010).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 6, 2013

Abstract

Abstract objects are widely held to pose a formidable epistemological challenge. It has seemed mysterious to many how we can have access to such strange and intangible entities. The article considers five influential ways to meet the challenge: Transcendental arguments, the indispensability argument, insisting that we just are able to grasp abstract objects and that no further explanation is needed, abstractionist accounts, and ontological reduction. None of these approaches is by itself sufficient or completely convincing, but together they make out a strong cumulative case for the accessibility of abstract objects.


University of Southern Denmark

About the author

Søren Harnow Klausen

Søren Harnow Klausen (b. 1966) is a professor at the University of Southern Denmark 〈harnow@ifpr.sdu.dk〉. His research interests include epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of science. His publications include “Two notions of epistemic normativity” (2009); and “The notion of creativity revisited” (2010).

Published Online: 2013-04-06
Published in Print: 2013-04-05

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2013-0019/html
Scroll to top button