Abstract
Perpetuating the discipline of philosophy is not the main educational responsibility of philosophers. Instead, it is to equip students with those distinctively philosophical intellectual resources that will serve students in serving the public good through participation in the economy (broadly conceived) and democratic life. Given this responsibility philosophers, individually and collectively, have a duty to take teaching and learning more seriously than they do. The paper offers some confident ideas about what this means when it comes to approaching training and professional development and some more tentative ideas about what it means, specifically, for the Philosophy curriculum and the pedagogical strategies philosophers should adopt in the classroom.
References
Anderson, E. 2013. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Autor, D. 2014. Polanyi’s Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth. Washington: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w20485Suche in Google Scholar
Boisjoly, J., G. J. Duncan, M. Kremer, D. M. Levy, and J. Eccles. 2006. “Empathy or Antipathy? The Impact of Diversity.” American Economic Review 96 (5): 1890–905. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1890.Suche in Google Scholar
Bok, D. 2008. Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at how much Students Learn and why they should be Learning More. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831333Suche in Google Scholar
Brighouse, H. 2023. “Structured Academic Controversy: A Variant.” Crooked Timber. Also available at: https://crookedtimber.org/2023/01/11/structured-academic-controversy-a-variant/ (accessed February 14, 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Cahn, S. M. 2020. Navigating Academic Life: How the System Works. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003110163Suche in Google Scholar
Concepción, D. W., M. Messineo, S. Wieten, and C. Homan. 2016. “The State of Teacher Training in Philosophy.” Teaching Philosophy 39 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil201621942.Suche in Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., and A. Kalev. 2016. “Why Diversity Programs Fail. (And what Works Better).” Harvard Business Review 90: 7.Suche in Google Scholar
Fish, S. 2008. Save the World on Your Own Time. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195369021.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. 1998. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Belknap Press (Harvard University Press).Suche in Google Scholar
Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400826339Suche in Google Scholar
Harvard College. n.d. Mission, Vision, & History. Also available at: https://college.harvard.edu/about/mission-vision-history.Suche in Google Scholar
Harvard University. n.d. Funding. https://philosophy.fas.harvard.edu/funding-graduate (accessed February 14, 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Laden, A. S. 2019. “Two Concepts of Civility.” In A Crisis of Civility: Political Discourse and its Discontents, edited by R. G. Boatright, T. J. Shaffer, S. Sobieraj, and D. G. Young, 9–31. New York & Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9781351051989-2Suche in Google Scholar
Little, J. W. 1981. The Power of Organizational Setting: School Norms and Staff Development. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.Suche in Google Scholar
Mehta, N., R. Stinebrickner, and T. Stinebrickner. 2019. “Time‐Use and Academic Peer Effects in College.” Economic Inquiry 57 (1): 162–7110.1111/ecin.12730Suche in Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T., and L. Tropp. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.Suche in Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T., and L. Tropp. 2008. “How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators.” European Journal of Social Psychology 38 (6): 922–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504.Suche in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2005. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Stephan, W., and K. Finlay. 1999. “The Role of Trust in Intergroup Contact: Its Significance and Implications for Improving Relations between Groups.” Improving Intergroup Relations 55 (4): 91–106.10.1111/0022-4537.00144Suche in Google Scholar
Stinebrickner, R., and T. Stinebrickner. 2006. “What Can Be Learned about Peer Effects Using College Roommates? Evidence from New Survey Data and Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds.” Journal of Public Economics 90 (8–9): 1435–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar
University of Wisconsin-Parkside. n.d. Mission and Vision. Also available at: https://www.uwp.edu/explore/aboutuwp/mission_vision.cfm.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Woerden, I., D. Hruschka, A. Brewis, D.R. Schaefer, and M. Bruening. 2020. “First-year College Students’ Weight Change Is Influenced by Their Randomly Assigned Roommates’ BMI.” PLoS One 15 (11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242681.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers – SATS Special Issue: Introduction
- Ethics for Philosophers: An Introduction
- The Evolution of the Thought of Richard Peters: Neglected Aspects
- The Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers
- Teaching Philosophy from Scratch: Designing Dynamic Pedagogy for Adult ‘Firsts’
- Teaching Philosophy: Finding a Balance between the Factors that Motivate Philosophy, Students’ Imagination, and their Interests
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers – SATS Special Issue: Introduction
- Ethics for Philosophers: An Introduction
- The Evolution of the Thought of Richard Peters: Neglected Aspects
- The Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers
- Teaching Philosophy from Scratch: Designing Dynamic Pedagogy for Adult ‘Firsts’
- Teaching Philosophy: Finding a Balance between the Factors that Motivate Philosophy, Students’ Imagination, and their Interests