Abstract
This paper asks: What is philosophy and what are some current challenges and future prospects for pursuing and teaching it? What role can and should students’ imagination, interests, and circumstances play in addressing these challenges and prospects? It argues, first, that there are at least six senses of the term “philosophy”: the personal, social, branch of inquiry, theory, school of thought, and wise sayings senses; second, that a variety of stimuli contribute to motivate philosophy in all of its senses. Third, it argues that teaching philosophy involves not just teaching one or more philosophies historically held, nor just partially or totally defending one or another of these philosophies; but also engaging in the third sense of “philosophy” above listed: philosophy as a branch of inquiry. Finally, the paper argues that by relying on the interests of philosophy learners that match the stimuli motivating philosophy, philosophy teaching sensitizes philosophy learners to the grounds that make this investigation viable and promising, and motivates them to engage in it.
References
Aristotle. 1966. Metaphysics. In R. McKeon & tr., The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House, 689–926.Search in Google Scholar
Barron, F. 1969. Creative Person and Creative Process. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar
Cavell, S. 1988. “The Uncanniness of the Ordinary.” In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values VIII, edited by S. M. McMurrin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Salt Lake City, U.S.A.: University of Utah Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, C. 1991. The Idea of Absolute Music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.2307/431491Search in Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. New York: The Macmillan Company; Cambridge, Eng., The University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Frank, A. 2015. Why Doesn’t Your Butt Fall through the Chair? National Public Radio (USA), All Things Considered. https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/04/07/398008378/why-doesn-t-your-butt-fall-through-the-chair (accessed August 10, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Golder, G. 2016. “A Response to ‘A Response to ‘The Empty Brain’’—The Information Processing Brain.” Medium.com: https://medium.com/@gdoteof/a-response-to-a-response-to-the-empty-brain-the-information-processing-brain-dde4c6d3aecd (accessed March 31, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Green, M. 1987. “Puzzled Notes on a Puzzling Profession.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 61 (1): 75–80.Search in Google Scholar
Iannone, A. P. 2022. Imagination in Inquiry: A Philosophical Model and its Applications. Lanham: Lexington Books/Rowman & Littlefield.10.5771/9781793649737Search in Google Scholar
James, W. 1969. Pragmatism. Cleveland: World Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, A. E. 1963. “The Philosophic Mind and the Contemporary World.” In Reason and the Common Good, edited by W. H. Hay, M. G. Singer, and A. E. Murphy, 365–75. Englewood: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Nilsen, K. 1987. “Philosophy as Critical Theory.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 61 (1): 89–108.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1958. “The Fixation of Belief.” In Charles S. Peirce: Selected Writings, edited by P. P. Wiener, 98–112. New York: Dover.Search in Google Scholar
Plato. 1966. Theaetetus. In B. Jowett ed. & tr., The Dialogues of Plato Translated into English with Analyses and Introductions, Vol. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1892; 3rd ed. revised and corrected, 3:317–442.Search in Google Scholar
Sard, M. 2005. “Reflected Words: Meaning and Silence in Language and Translation.” Macalester Journal of Philosophy 15 (1): 15–33.Search in Google Scholar
Stein, R. 2018. “The Empty Brain.” In Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/your-brain-does-not-process-information-and-it-is-not-a-computer (accessed March 31, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Stevens, W. 1951. The Necessary Angel: Essays on Reality and the Imagination. New York: Random House; rpt.: New York, Knopf-Doubleday, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers – SATS Special Issue: Introduction
- Ethics for Philosophers: An Introduction
- The Evolution of the Thought of Richard Peters: Neglected Aspects
- The Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers
- Teaching Philosophy from Scratch: Designing Dynamic Pedagogy for Adult ‘Firsts’
- Teaching Philosophy: Finding a Balance between the Factors that Motivate Philosophy, Students’ Imagination, and their Interests
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers – SATS Special Issue: Introduction
- Ethics for Philosophers: An Introduction
- The Evolution of the Thought of Richard Peters: Neglected Aspects
- The Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers
- Teaching Philosophy from Scratch: Designing Dynamic Pedagogy for Adult ‘Firsts’
- Teaching Philosophy: Finding a Balance between the Factors that Motivate Philosophy, Students’ Imagination, and their Interests