Home Teaching Philosophy from Scratch: Designing Dynamic Pedagogy for Adult ‘Firsts’
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Teaching Philosophy from Scratch: Designing Dynamic Pedagogy for Adult ‘Firsts’

  • Naomi Zack EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 12, 2023

Abstract

I describe dynamic teaching to adult, mainly immigrant students, who are new to philosophy and often are college “firsts.” Adult students have family, financial, and work obligations, whereas standard students are leisured outside of class and approach philosophy as consumers. I teach from assigned texts, dismissing as a conceit of philosophers that philosophical questions arise from real life experience. My students are intensely focused on their grades, frugal with their expenditure of academic effort, and prone to submit all of their coursework at the end of the semester. A syllabus requiring weekly assignments with citations curtails that. For immigrant students, who value their college degree as entry to the American dream, the hard work usually ascribed to them is, here, academic work. Learning to do philosophy in this way can result in enduring meta-skills of time management, focused reading, thinking, and group participation that carry over to other subjects and real life.


Corresponding author: Naomi Zack, Department of Philosophy, Lehman College, CUNY, 5800 Arlington Av, Apt 18M, Bronx, NY 10471, USA, E-mail:

Appendix: Sample Syllabus for Teaching from Scratch

Phil 172-H01 Contemporary Moral Issues Mo 12:00 pm–1:15 pm Aug 25–Dec 21, 2022

Syllabus – TOPIC: CONTEMPORARY MORAL ISSUES – See also appendix at end of this syllabus and Lehman Fall undergraduate calender: https://www.***.

Prof. Naomi Zack, Office hours CA 371, Mon. 3–4 and Tues 3–4, or by appointment, including phone. EMAIL>***

About this Course Moral issues are ethical issues. In Philosophy, Morality = Ethics. What is ethics? Why does it matter? Both of these questions have the same answer: Human life or well-being is at stake. An ethical situation or an ethical aspect to something involves human harm or well-being or life or death. Human well-being and life are universally considered important and valuable. This course will present classical ethics writings in philosophy, contemporary moral/ethical topics, and tools for reading, thinking, speaking, and writing about ethics.

Learning Objectives – General: Become familiar and fluent with an important branch of philosophy and ordinary life.

Specific Learning Objectives for PHI 172: (1) Learn how to recognize ethical issues; (2) Discover your own ethical perspective; (3) Use philosophical tools and methods to read, think, speak, and write about ethics.

Grading – (Based on 100 %): D: 63–66, D+: 67–69, C: 73–76, C+: 77–79, B−: 80–82, B: 83–86, B+: 87–89, A−: 90–92, A: 93–96. Incomplete: requires completing 50 % of assigned work, and must be requested by the student. UW (Unofficial Withdrawal): issued if the student stops attending or doesn’t submit work. You should avoid this grade, because it may result in a Department of Education request that tuition money be returned.

Grade components for this course: The class meets 14 times, once a week. Grade components: 14 written assignments. You are required to write them all, but only your 8 highest grades will count toward your final grade. You will lose 2 points for each assignment you do not write. You must attend class because a record of your participation in class is to be submitted using the form on Blackboard, when your midterm assignment is due and again with your final paper for the second half of the course = 21 points total, or 1½ points for each day you participate. You are required to attend all classes in order to participate. See the form on Blackboard for this. Group discussion will take place regularly in class. Leadership of the group will rotate. Your participation in group discussions should be noted by you on your class participation form (download it, fill it out and email it to me when due for midterm and final grades). Please do not inform me if you are going to miss class but do not take credit for participation in a class you have missed, which would be academic misconduct. If you have an official excuse, provide a 100 word answer to the Discussion question related to the assignment and add it to your class participation record. Treat this as an independent make-up assignment with citations and fulfilment of the writing requirements for assignments. Assignments are due whether or not you are present in class. The official excuse to make up for missed class participation must come from your Lehman advisor or the office of disability services; see Appendix below. DO NOT send me documentation directly.

Please note – This course is modular. You will receive a midterm grade for half of the work and then a separate grade for the second half after the midterm. The addition of both will equal your final grade. Your midterm grade and the work contributing to that cannot be changed after the midterm date.

Course Requirements: This is a hybrid course. We meet once a week in person and the rest of the work is done online, in submitting your weekly assignments by email, immediate feedback on them, and individual discussion of content and grade related questions with the instructor by email. All course material is in one book. Announcements and further notes pertaining to the in-person lecture will be posted on Blackboard. Please make sure that you are able to access Blackboard for this course.

Required reading, on sale in Lehman bookstore and Amazon:

 

Ethics: The Essential Writings
, ed. Gordon Marino. Cost – $15 kindle, $19 print, cheaper used. Must have to pass course! Please plan to read 20 pages per week.

Ethics: The Essential Writings , ed. Gordon Marino. Cost – $15 kindle, $19 print, cheaper used. Must have to pass course! Please plan to read 20 pages per week.

All weekly assignments must be submitted by email as a Word.doc, as an attachment or copied and pasted into your email. No other formats will be accepted. EMAIL>***. Each assignment should be about 1 page double-spaced, 12 pt font (about 200 words). Line up your answers with the a, b, c, etc. parts of the question. Put the assignment number in the subject field of your email. Assignments are usually due within one week, because they are due at 9 AM the day the next class meets. However, several assignments have longer times because there is a break between classes. You can have an excused absence only with official documentation and you then need to accompany your assignment with a one-page essay in answer to the discussion question. Otherwise, you will lose two points for the missing assignment and 1½ points for the missed participation. The last assignment and participation form cannot be late. Assignments must be completed in order.

Specific Writing Requirements:

  1. Create your own record of this course through reading notes and course notes (including instructor and peer discussion), lectures, your own reports. You will return to these for writing weekly assignments and then for your midterm and final papers.

  2. Learn how to edit your formal writing for the course, for clarifying your ideas, as well as improving the craft of your writing in terms of writing mechanics, including scholarly citations and introductions.

  3. Citations and references are required for all assignments to get higher than a D. Here is how they work. Include citations of this form throughout your assignments: (author’s last name, page numbers from which you are getting what you write). At the end of your paper, give a list of works cited, in any consistent format. If you are citing the lecture, give the (instructor’s last name and date). If you use the book introductions, cite them. If you have a quotation, cite the page number on which it occurs.

For example, you write “David Hume begins by distinguishing between the easy and abstruse philosophy (Hume, p. 1).” – Your References list the sources you cite.

References, e.g.:

David Hume, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Eric Steinberg, ed., Hackett Publishing Co, 1993.

If you use a source that you do not cite or give references for, that is plagiarism, and it is a disciplinary offense according to Lehman College and CUNY rules. I will report plagiarism. – NZ.

To recap: Email all course work to me: ***.

In your email ‘subject’, write the course number and what you are submitting with this email, e.g., PHI 172, Week 1, or Week 2, etc.

Use your Lehman email, only. Other email addresses may be rejected by the system and you will not be informed but simply lose credit.

Submit your assignment either directly in the body of an email or as a Word.doc attachment. No other formats will be accepted, including pdfs.

Repeat the assignment question at the top of your assignment.

If the assignment has two parts, a, and b, separate your answer into a, and b.

Check and edit your assignment for citations, writing mechanics, grasp of main ideas read and discussed. In the first half of the course, you will lose 1 point each for lack of citations, grasp of main ideas, or writing mechanics. In the second half of the course, you will lose 2 points for each.

Drafts are NOT accepted. Students are expected to apply comments on their assignments to future assignments; your lower grades will drop out.

Each week’s assignment should be 200–300 words. Less than 200 words will not provide enough depth and detail; more than 300 words will be overdoing it. All assignments have their due dates in the syllabus. You must attend the lectures for key ideas in order to do well on your assignments.

Do not arrive late. Arrive on time to avoid penalties for persistent lateness.

Schedule. Note: The numbers below correspond to our class meetings and the weeks of the course. You should plan to read about 20 pages each week. If there is any change—and there may be—I will let you know on Blackboard Announcements. The in-class reading assignments will be based on the lectures that are drawn from these essays in the anthology.

Key ideas relevant to the readings will discussed in the lectures. The pages below are the required reading range for each essay.

Reading Assignments are due one week from the class meeting, always at 9 AM on Monday.

PLEASE WRITE THE COURSE No. and ASSIGNMENT WEEK No. in the subject of your email. Copy the question for the assignment question at the top. All of this speeds up accurate grading and recording of grades.

LATE PAPERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED and 2 points will be deducted from the final grade for each unsubmitted paper.

August 29. FIRST DAY – Course Introduction and Syllabus

Assignment 1. Due 9 AM Sept. 12. (You may copy and paste this section with syllabus questions or just provide the numbers and your answers.)

  1. What does ethics mean to you, apart from this course? (5 points);

  2. Answer these questions about the syllabus. Cite the syllabus page numbers where your answers are (5 points).

    1. What are the grade components for the course, by percentage?

    2. Why is it important to attend?

    3. What happens if you do not submit an assignment? What happens if you are absent?

    4. Explain in-text citations that are required for all of your writing to get full credit.

    5. Do you have the book? If not, when will you have it?

    6. Provide the Lehman email address you will use for Blackboard and to submit assignments by email, for this course.

    7. Attendance will not be taken for in-person classes. So why should you attend?

    8. Provide a sample of an in-text citation and its reference at the end.

    9. How and where do you submit your assignments?

    10. Do you have access to Blackboard on the internet? For information on getting equipment or access to the internet if you need that, please see the Lehman home page.

Discussion question: Given what ethics means to you, is it OK to judge others ethically?

Classics

September 12. Plato, Euthyphro, pp. 3–5 and 16–17. Or, if you have time, the whole dialogue.

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, pp. 43–5, Introduction and pp. 56–58 and 71–73.

Assignment 2: (a) Explain how Plato separated ethics from religion. (b) How are virtues connected to happiness, according to Aristotle? Due 9 AM, Sept. 19.

Discussion question: How can people be ethical if they think their ethics comes from religion but there is no logical connection between the two?

September 19 Epictetus, The Enchiridion, pp. 85–92.

St. Augustine, City of God, Book XIX, pp. 107–118.

Assignment 3: Due 9 Am Sept. 26. (a) Why is it important to know what is under your control, according to Epictetus? (b) How did St. Augustine think we could find happiness? (c) What is the nature of evil according to St. Augustine?

September 29 Note—this class is Thursday rather than Monday.

St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Question XCIV, pp. 119–133.

Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, Pt I. Of Man; Pt II. Of Commonwealth, pp. 134–143.

Assignment 4: Due 9 AM Oct. 3 (a) What is the natural law, according to Aquinas? (b) How does Hobbes describe human life without government?

Discussion question: Do you need natural or human-made law in order to be ethically good?

October 3. Immanuel Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, pp. 188–203.

Assignment 5: Due 9AM Oct. 17. (a) What are the two formulations of Kant’s Categorical Imperative? (b) How is categorical reasoning different from hypothetical reasoning according to Kant?

Discussion question: What are some problems with Kant’s moral theory?

October 17. John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism, pp. 225–242.

Assignment 6: Due 9 AM Oct. 24. (a) What is Mill’s reasoning to justify utilitarianism? (b) What is utilitarianism? (c) What are higher and lower pleasures and act vs. rule utilitarianism (based on lecture).

Discussion question: What are some problems with utilitarianism?

October 24. Review.

Assignment 7: Due 9 AM Oct. 31. With reference to Aristotle, Kant, and J. S. Mill, and citations and references to the readings, describe the three main philosophical moral systems, by name and in terms of their broad ideas. Which one do you prefer and why? This assignment will require citations and a list of references. Do not cite or refer to material outside of the required readings.

Discussion question: Provide your own review of assignments 1–6.

More Contemporary Issues

October 31. This is Hallowe’en. Feel free to dress up! I will. – nz .

Ruth Benedict, ‘Anthropology and the Abnormal’, pp. 309–321.

Mary Midgley, ‘Trying Out One’s New Sword’, pp. 321–327.

Assignment 8: Due 9 AM Nov. 7. (a) Explain what Benedict thinks about cultural difference and mental illness. (b) What do you think about “trying out one’s new sword” as Midgley describes it?

Discussion question: Do you think there are fundamental differences in what is right from culture to culture? If so, what can individuals do about that? If not, explain.

November 7. Robert Coles, ‘The Disparity Between Intellect and Character’, pp. 350–355.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’, pp. 356–378.

Assignment 9: Due 9AM on Nov. 14. (a) What is the difference between intellect and character according to Coles? (b) How is M.L. King’s letter related to this distinction?

Discussion question: If intellect is what you know and character is what you do, explain why both are necessary.

November 14. Jean-Paul Sartre, ‘Existentialism and Human Emotion’, pp. 329–332.

Assignment 10: Due 9AM, Nov. 21. (a) Explain how Sartre thinks we have to choose a moral system to get a moral answer. (b) Considering intellect and character, do you think one chooses either path when they conflict? (Intellect is just knowing. Character is knowing plus doing.).

Discussion question: Give an example like Sartre’s but different, where one must choose a moral system in order to make a moral (or ethical) decision.

November 21. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, pp. 378–386.

Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue, pp. 396–410.

Assignment 11: Due 9AM on Nov. 21. (a) How does Rawls think we can arrive at justice in his thought experiment? (b) What does MacIntyre mean by “after virtue”?

Discussion question: What is most important to Rawls and MacIntyre, in contrast/comparison?

November 28. Nel Noddings, ‘Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education’, pp. 424–235.

Susan Wolf, ‘Moral Saints’, pp. 462–472.

Assignment 12: Due 9AM Dec. 5. (a) How does Noddings derive care ethics from motherhood? (b) Would Wolf consider Noddings’s carer to be a moral saint? Explain why or why not.

Discussion question: Do you want to be a moral saint? Why or why not?

December 5 Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac: The Land Ethic, pp. 486–505.

Peter Singer, ‘Rich and Poor’, pp. 506–518.

Assignment 13: Due Dec. 12, 9AM. (a) What is the land ethic? (b) What does Singer’s view of the poor share with the land ethic?

Discussion question: What do you think about the land ethic and the poor ethic? Give reasons.

14. December 12. LAST DAY – Tom Regan, ‘The Case for Animal Rights’, pp. 530–554.

Michael Walzer, ‘Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands’, pp. 545–566.

Last Assignment 14: Due Dec 19, 9AM. (a) What is Regan’s case for animal rights? (b) What is the “problem of dirty hands” and how does it relate to animal rights? (c) Do you agree with including animals in the moral universe or not? Give reasons.

Discussion question: Why would people not want to include animals in the moral universe?

Your class participation form is also due on Dec. 19 at 9 AM. Attach or copy both the assignment and the form in the same email. This is an absolute deadline for both the assignment and the participation form.

Appendix: Writing and Citation, Plagiarism, Accommodation

Accessibility, Accommodations, Abilities: It is our goal for students to feel comfortable in discussing how to maximize student learning, participation and access to the course. If any student has specific accommodation needs, please let the instructor know as soon as possible so they can be addressed. Please don’t hesitate to contact your instructor by email, telephone or before or after class to discuss these issues. To make arrangements for accommodations, please contact the Office of Student Disability Services at 718-960-8441 or visit the Disability Services website http://www.lehman.edu/student-disability-services/.

Writing and Citation: How to write good academic papers – You may see the letters in parentheses used in comments on your papers and this is what they refer to.

  1. CLARITY (CL) Make sure that you define your terms and give reasons for claims. All of your ideas should be explicitly stated and not left to the reader to infer. Spell everything out.

  2. PRECISION (P) Try not to make vague claims or general statements about the ideas in the readings. Be accurate in reporting the views of others and exact in stating your own.

  3. ORGANIZATION (O) Organize the ideas in the paper into a few coherent paragraphs. Summarize the main claims of your paper in 2 or 3 sentences that you write after you write the paper, but put at the very beginning of the paper. This is an appropriate introductory paragraph for an academic paper, not a filler or a fluffy beginning.

  4. WRITING MECHANICS (WR) The mechanics include spelling, punctuation, syntax and complete sentence structure. Make sure that you already have these down or consult a source if you don’t. Highly recommended is Strunk and White’s The Elements of Style. This is available on line at www.bartleby.com/141/.

  5. ANALYSIS (A) Analyze claims. This means breaking your ideas down into their simpler components, and defining them. Do not start with or rely on dictionary definitions, but use your own words and cite the dictionary only if necessary. Dictionary definitions report usage, whereas a philosophical definition may be critical of current usage or find it vague. Examine the logical consequences of your claims and the claims of others.

  6. QUOTATIONS (Q) Quotations should be used to illustrate a claim that you are making about an author. They are not a substitute for explaining the author’s thought in your own words. A good strategy is to state the author’s ideas in your own words first and then “prove” your interpretation with a short quote.

  7. DIRECT (D) Be direct. Make sure that you give a direct and focused answer to the question for the paper. This is the most important requirement for papers to reach the B and A range.

  8. Use an introduction but no puffery. Write your paper first and then summarize it at the top in a few short sentences––this is the best introduction for a philosophy paper.

CITATION (C)

For lecture notes: (N. Zack, Lecture for PHI 338, April 1, 2000)

For Internet/website citations: Name of author or if there isn’t one, name of website, title of article, name of website, date, url

For example, Bill McGee, “Focus on Terrorism May Obscure Other Airline Safety Threats,” USA Today, October 3, 2007; www.usatoday.com/travel/columnist/mcgee/2007-10-03-airline-safety-threats_N.htm.

You need both In-Text CITATIONs and a list of references at the end.

Use the author, date, page no. system in your written text and at the end list all references,

For examples, in text after your writing about a subject or idea (Zack, lecture, date) or (Aristotle, date, p._).

References – List full source under “References”:

For example, Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, in Marino, ed., pp. ____.

PLEASE REMEMBER that articles and essays are mentioned in quotation marks whereas book titles are in italics. See the following if this is still not clear: https://www.scribbr.com/chicago-style/author-date/#:∼:text=In%20 author%2Ddate%20style%2C%20an.full%20details%20of%20the%20source.&text=McGuire%2C%20Ian.

Writing Support: The Academic Center for Excellence (ACE) and the Science Learning Center (SLC). The Academic Center for Excellence (ACE) and the Science Learning Center (SLC) are two of the tutoring centers on campus. The ACE provides appointment-based and drop-in tutoring in the humanities, social sciences, and writing, as well as general writing and academic skills workshops. The SLC provides drop-in tutoring for natural science courses. To obtain more information about the ACE and the SLC, please visit their website at http://www.lehman.edu/issp, or please call the ACE at 718-***, or the SLC at 718-***.

Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Cheating: This class will be governed by Lehman College’s general policies on intellectual property, academic misconduct, and plagiarism. Students are expected to bear individual responsibility for their work, to learn the rules and definitions that underlie the practice of academic integrity, and to uphold its ideals. A student who plagiarizes may incur academic and disciplinary penalties, including failing grades, suspension, and expulsion. Note: You may use sources outside of the assigned reading, although you will get less credit for that. But if you do use such sources, cite them in your text and in the list of references.

Plagiarism is presenting another person’s ideas, research or writings as your own. Here are some examples of plagiarism: Copying another person’s actual words without the use of quotation marks and citations and references, attributing the words to their source;

Presenting another person’s ideas or theories in your own words without acknowledging the source;

Using information that is not common knowledge without acknowledging the source;

Failing to acknowledge collaborators on homework. Failing to cite rewording of lecture notes – these should be cited by the class date, e.g., (N.Zack, lecture, Course No, date).

Internet Plagiarism includes submitting downloaded term papers or parts of term papers, paraphrasing or copying information from the internet without citing the source, and “cutting & pasting” from various sources without proper attribution.

Fabrication is the intentional use of information that the author has invented when he or she states or implies otherwise, or the falsification of research or other findings with the intent to deceive.

Examples include, but are not limited to: 1. citing information not taken from the source indicated; 2. listing sources in a reference not used in the academic exercise; 3. inventing data or source information for research or other academic exercises.

Cheating: Cheating is an act of deception by which a student misrepresents or misleadingly demonstrates that he or she has mastered information on an academic exercise that he or she has not mastered, including the giving or receiving of unauthorized help in an academic exercise.

Examples include, but are not limited to:

  1. copying from another student’s paper or what they said to you.

  2. collaborating without authority or allowing another student to copy one’s work.

  3. resubmitting substantially the same work that was produced for another assignment or in another course without the knowledge and permission of the instructor.

  4. writing a paper for someone else.

Penalties for Academic Misconduct: A student who cheats or plagiarizes may incur both academic and disciplinary penalties. Academic penalties are grade penalties assigned by the instructor. In this course, students caught cheating and/or plagiarizing, if they admit plagiarizing, will receive a grade of 0 (zero) for the relevant assignment and be required to rewrite the assignment.

Disciplinary penalties are penalties assigned by the College, including suspensions and expulsion.

For more complete information about expectations regarding academic integrity, please see the section entitled “Academic Integrity” in the “Academic Services and Policies” section of Lehman’s Undergraduate Bulletin at the following website: http://lehman.smartcatalogiq.com/2017-2019/Undergraduate-Bulletin/Academic-Services-and-Policies/Academic-Integrity.

References

Bhat, S. 2022. “Poverty: Trends to Watch for the Future of NYC: Pre-pandemic, Fewer New Yorkers Were Poor than a Decade Earlier – Everywhere but the Bronx.” In The City. https://www.thecity.nyc/2022/1/3/22865699/poverty-trends-future-nyc (accessed January 3, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Hanson, M. 2022. “College Enrollment & Student Demographic Statistics.” In Education Data Initiative: EducationData.org. https://educationdata.org/college-enrollment-statistics (accessed July 26, 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Kaufmann, K. D. 2015. “A Legal Analysis and Contrarian View of the Syllabus-As-Contract Perspective.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 26 (2): 177–97.Search in Google Scholar

Lesko, N. 2013. “Act Your Age: A Cultural Construction of Adolescence.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 42: 1108–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9955-z.Search in Google Scholar

Macan, T. H., C. Shahani, R. L. Dipboye, and A. P. Phillips. 1990. “College Students’ Time Management: Correlations with Academic Performance and Stress.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (4): 760–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.760.Search in Google Scholar

Singer, J. N. 2016. “African American Male College Athletes’ Narratives on Education and Racism.” Urban Education 51 (9): 1065–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916669749.Search in Google Scholar

Zack, N. 2010. “The Fluid Symbol of Mixed Race.” Hypatia 25 (4): 875–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01121.x.Search in Google Scholar

Zack, N. 2021a. “Philosophy and Me.” John Dewey Lecture. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 95: 125–40.Search in Google Scholar

Zack, N. 2021b. “Pedagogical Challenges.” American Philosophical Association, Eastern Division, Teaching Hub. https://www.apaonline.org/page/2021E_TeachingHub (accessed September 01, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-07-12
Published in Print: 2023-07-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sats-2023-0005/html
Scroll to top button