Political Insulation, Technical Expertise and the Technocrat’s Paradox

References

Ackerman, Bruce, and William Hassler. 1981. Clean Coal, Dirty Air: Or How the Clean Air Act Became a Multibillion-Dollar Bail-Out for High-Sulfur Coal Producers. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1cc2k9rSearch in Google Scholar

Aghion, Philippe, and Jean Tirole. 1997. “Formal and Real Authority in Organizations,” 105 (1)Journal of Political Economy 1–29.10.1086/262063Search in Google Scholar

Bawn, Kathleen. 1995. “Political Control Versus Expertise: Congressional Choices About Administrative Procedures,” 89 (1)American Political Science Review 62–73.10.2307/2083075Search in Google Scholar

Bendor, Jonathan, and Adam Meirowitz. 2004. “Spatial Models of Delegation,” 98 (2)American Political Science Review 293–310.10.1017/S0003055404001157Search in Google Scholar

Corbo, Vittorio, and Leonardo Hernández. 2005. Ochenta años de historia del Banco Central de Chile. Documento de Trabajo No. 345 Banco Central de Chile.Search in Google Scholar

Cordero, Eduardo. 2012. “La administración del Estado en Chile y el concepto de autonom&’ıa,” in Ramiro Mendoza, ed. Contralor&’ıa General de la República: 85 años de vida institucional (1927–2012). Contralor&’ıa General de la República, pp. 1927–2012.Search in Google Scholar

Dewatripont, Mathias, and Jean Tirole. 1994. The Prudential Regulation of Banks. Massachussets: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drake, Paul. 1989. The Money Doctor in the Andes: The KEMMERER MISSIONS, 1923-1933. Durham: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11cw52mSearch in Google Scholar

Edwards, Sebastian. 1998. “The Chilean Pension Reform: A Pioneering Program,” in Martin Feldstein ed. Privatizing social security. University of Chicago Press, pp. 33–62.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, David, and Sharyn O’Halloran. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609312Search in Google Scholar

Ferrada, Juan Carlos. 1998. “La autonomia como tecnica de reparto de potestades públicas: El caso del Banco Central de Chile,” 25 (1)Revista chilena de derecho 335–344.Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1986. “Legislator Uncertainty, Legislative Control, and the Delegation of Legislative Power,” 2 (1)Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 33–51.Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris, and Roger Noll. 1978. “Voters, Legislators and Bureaucracy: Institutional Design in the Public Sector,” 68(2)The American Economic Review 256–260.Search in Google Scholar

Foxley, Alejandro. 1983. Latin American experiments in neoconservative economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520330399Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody, and Jim Rossi. 2012. “Agency Coordination in Shared Regulatory Space,” 125(5)Harvard Law Review 1131–1211.Search in Google Scholar

Gailmard, Sean. 2002. “Expertise, Subversion, and Bureaucratic Discretion,” 18 (2)Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 536–555.10.1093/jleo/18.2.536Search in Google Scholar

Garc&’ıa, José Francisco. 2009. “?‘ Inflación de superintendencias? Un diagnóstico cr&’ıtico desde el derecho regulatorio,” Revista Actualidad Jur&’ıdica 10.Search in Google Scholar

Garc&’ıa, José Francisco, and Luis Cordero. 2012. “Elementos para la discusión sobre agencias independientes en Chile. El caso de las superintendencias,” in Javier Couso, ed. Anuario de Derecho Público 2012. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales, pp. 415–435.Search in Google Scholar

Garc&’ıa, José Francisco, and Sergio Verdugo. 2010. “De las superintendencias a las agencias regulatorias independientes en Chile: Aspectos constitucionales y de diseño regulatorio,” 22 Actualidad Jur&’ıdica 263–305.Search in Google Scholar

Gersen, Jacob. 2010. “Designing Agencies,” in Daniel Farber and Anne Joseph O’Connell, eds. Research Handbook on Public Choice and Public Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 333–362.Search in Google Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2002. “Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis,” 9 (6)Journal of European Public Policy 873–893.10.1080/1350176022000046409Search in Google Scholar

Glaser, Elisabeth. 2003. “Chile’s Monetarist Money Doctors, 1850–1988,” in Marc Flandreau, ed. Money Doctors: The Experience of International Financial Advising, 1850–2000. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 166–198.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, Oliver, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W Vishny. 1997. “The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1127–1161.10.1162/003355300555448Search in Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” 35 (4)The American Economic Review 519–530.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, John D, and Charles R Shipan. 2006. “Politics, Delegation and Bureucracy,” in The Oxford handbook of political economy, vol. 7 New York, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 256.Search in Google Scholar

Huneeus, Carlos, and Lake Sagaris. 2007. The Pinochet Regime. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.10.1515/9781626371583Search in Google Scholar

Issacharoff, Samuel, and Laura Miller. 2010. “Democracy and Electoral Processes,” in Daniel Farber and Anne Joseph O’Connell, eds. Research Handbook on Public Choice and Public Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 221–258.Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, Elena. 2001. “Presidential Administration,” Harvard Law Review 2245–2385.10.2307/1342513Search in Google Scholar

Kiewiet, Roderick, and Mathew McCubbins. 1991. The logic of delegation. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kydland, Finn, and Edward Prescott. 1977. “Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans,” The Journal of Political Economy 473–491.10.1086/260580Search in Google Scholar

Lazear, Edward. 2000. “The Power of Incentives,” 90 (2)The American Economic Review 410–414.10.1257/aer.90.2.410Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 2004. Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946–1997. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804766913Search in Google Scholar

Macey, Jonathan R. 1992. “Organizational Design and Political Control of Administrative Agencies,” 8 (1)Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 93–110.Search in Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico. 2001. “Nonmajoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic Governance: A Political Transaction-Cost Approach,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 57–78.10.1628/0932456012974747Search in Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew. 1985. “The Legislative Design of Regulatory Structure,” American Journal of Political Science 721–748.10.2307/2111178Search in Google Scholar

Meier, Kenneth, and George Krause. 2003. “The Scientific Study of Bureaucracy: An Overview,” Politics, Policy, and Organizations 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Geoffrey. 1986. “Independent Agencies,” 1986 The Supreme Court Review 41–97.10.1086/scr.1986.3109519Search in Google Scholar

Moe, Terry. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency,” in John Chubb and Paul Peterson, eds. The new direction in American politics. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, pp. 235–271.Search in Google Scholar

Moe, Terry. 1997. “Positive Theory of Public Bureaucracy,” in Perspectives on public choice: A handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 455–480.10.1017/CBO9780511664458.022Search in Google Scholar

Morandé, Felipe, and Juan Daniel D&’ıaz, eds. 2010. Chile en el club de los pa&’ıses desarrollados. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Search in Google Scholar

North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808678Search in Google Scholar

OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development. 2014. The Governance of Regulators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1986. “Reforming Public Bureaucracy through Economic Incentives?” 2 (1)Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 131–61.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, Eduardo. 1996. The State and Capital in Chile: Business Elites, Technocrats, and Market Economics. Oxford: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, Patricio. 1991. “Technocrats and Politics in Chile: from the Chicago Boys to the CIEPLAN Monks,” 23 (2)Journal of Latin American Studies 385–410.10.1017/S0022216X00014048Search in Google Scholar

Spiller, Pablo. 1995. “Regulatory Commitment and Utilities Privatization, Implications for Future Comparative Research,” in Jeffrey Banks and Eric Hanusek, eds. Modern Political Economy: Old Topics, New Directions. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press Cambridge chapter 2, pp. 63–79.10.1017/CBO9780511625725.005Search in Google Scholar

Stephenson, Matthew. 2007. “Bureaucratic Decision Costs and Endogenous Agency Expertise,” 23 (2)Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 469–498.10.1093/jleo/ewm030Search in Google Scholar

Stephenson, Matthew. 2008. “Optimal Political Control of the Bureaucracy,” Michigan Law Review 53–110.Search in Google Scholar

Talley, Eric. 2012. “Law, Economics, and the Burden (s) of Proof,” in Jennifer Arlen, ed. Research Handbook on the Economics of Torts. New York: Edward Elgar Publications.10.2139/ssrn.2170469Search in Google Scholar

Tirole, Jean. 1994. “The Internal Organization of Government,” Oxford Economic Papers 1–29.10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042114Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1956. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, James. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, Dan, and John Bothe. 2004. “Political Transaction Costs and the Politics of Administrative Design,” 66 (1)Journal of Politics 176–202.10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00147.xSearch in Google Scholar