Abstract
3D printer technology has recently become easily reachable technology and are used to create simple or complex structures with high-quality. Its superior advantages could also be useful on the production of effective radiation shielding materials. On this purpose, the presented work studies the gamma and neutron shielding effectiveness of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) sample, a 3D printing material, reinforced with Bi and TiO2 nanopowders at various gamma and neutron energies. The gamma shielding properties were evaluated using experimental (High Purity Germanium detector system), theoretical (WinXCOM computer program) and simulation techniques (GEANT4 and FLUKA) in a wide gamma energy region ranging from 59.5 to 1332.5 keV. The investigation on neutron attenuation capabilities of the printed composites were performed with help of simulation and theoretical approaches for various sample thickness and neutron energies. The half value layer of ABS-Bi10 sample is found to be as 4.9565 cm, which is much smaller than some commercial polymers: polyvinylidenechloride, polyamide, polyacrylonitrile, polyphenylenesulfide, and unsaturated polyester. With the usage of 3D printing technology, significant enhancements in neutron and gamma shielding were reported.
Acknowledgement
The numerical calculations reported in this paper were partially performed at TUBITAK ULAKBIM, High Performance and Grid Computing Center (TRUBA resources).
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Ogul, H., Karaagac, M. O. Public attitudes toward nuclear power plants in Turkey. PAJES 2019, 25, 423–429. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2018.97415.Search in Google Scholar
2. Yuan, X., Zuo, J., Ma, R., Wang, Y. How would social acceptance affect nuclear power development? A study from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 163, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.049.Search in Google Scholar
3. Bird, D. K., Haynes, K., Honert, R., McAneney, J., Poortinga, W. Nuclear power in Australia: a comparative analysis of public opinion regarding climate change and the Fukushima disaster. Energy Pol. 2014, 65, 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.047.Search in Google Scholar
4. Roh, S. Big data analysis of public acceptance of nuclear power in Korea. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2017, 49, 850–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.12.015.Search in Google Scholar
5. Kim, J. H. Three principles for radiation safety: time, distance, and shielding. Kor. J. Pain. 2018, 31, 145–146. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.3.145.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Viskadourakis, Z., Vasiolopoulos, K. C., Economou, E. N., Soukoulis, C. M., Kenanakis, G. Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of 3D printed polymer composites. Appl. Phys. A 2017, 123, 736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-017-1353-z.Search in Google Scholar
7. Ogul, H. Radiation attenuation properties of polymer composites mixed with tantalum carbide. Radiat. Eff. Defect Solid 2022, 177, 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2022.2063124.Search in Google Scholar
8. Woosley, S., Galehdari, N. A., Kelkar, A., Aravamudhan, S. Fused deposition modeling 3D printing of boron nitride composites for neutron radiation shielding. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 3657–3664. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.316.Search in Google Scholar
9. Alssabbagh, M., Tajuddina, A. A., Abdulmanap, M., Zainon, R. Evaluation of 3D printing materials for fabrication of a novel multi-functional 3D thyroid phantom for medical dosimetry and image quality. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017, 135, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.02.009.Search in Google Scholar
10. Olukotun, S. F., Gbenu, S. T., Ibitoye, F. I., Oladejo, O. F., Shittu, H. O., Fasasi, M. K., Balogun, F. A. Investigation of gamma radiation shielding capability of two clay materials. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2018, 50, 957–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.05.003.Search in Google Scholar
11. Olukotun, S. F., Mann, K. S., Gbenu, S. T., Ibitoye, F. I., Oladejo, O. F., Joshie, A., Tekin, H. O., Sayyed, M. I., Fasasi, M. K., Balogunc, F. A., Korkut, T. Neutron shielding behaviour investigations of some clay-materials. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2019, 51, 1444–1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.03.019.Search in Google Scholar
12. El-Sayed, T. A. Performance of heavy weight concrete incorporating recycled rice straw ash as radiation shielding material. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2021, 135, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103693.Search in Google Scholar
13. Mokhtari, K., Kheradmand Saadi, M., Ahmadpanahi, H., Jahanfarnia, G. Fabrication, characterization, simulation and experimental studies of the ordinary concrete reinforced with micro and nano lead oxide particles against gamma radiation. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2021, 53, 3051–3057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.04.001.Search in Google Scholar
14. Zalegowski, K., Piotrowski, T., Garbacz, A., Adamczewski, G. Relation between microstructure, technical properties and neutron radiation shielding efficiency of concrete. Construct. Build. Mater. 2020, 235, 117389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117389.Search in Google Scholar
15. Ersundu, E., Büyükyıldız, M., Çelikbilek Ersundu, M., Şakar, E., Kurudirek, M. The heavy metal oxide glasses within the WO3-MoO3-TeO2 system to investigate the shielding properties of radiation applications. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2018, 104, 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.10.008.Search in Google Scholar
16. Sayyed, M. I., Tekin, H. O., Altunsoy, E. E., Obaid, S. S., Almataria, M. Radiation shielding study of tellurite tungsten glasses with different antimony oxide as transparent shielding materials using MCNPX code. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2018, 498, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.06.022.Search in Google Scholar
17. Al-Buriahi, M. S., Sriwunkum, C., Arslan, H., Tonguc, B. T., Bourha, M. A. Investigation of barium borate glasses for radiation shielding applications. Appl. Phys. A 2020, 126, 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-3254-9.Search in Google Scholar
18. Kebaili, I., Boukhris, I., Al-Buriahi, M. S., Alalawi, A., Sayyed, M. I. Ge-Se-Sb-Ag chalcogenide glasses for nuclear radiation shielding applications. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 1303–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.251.Search in Google Scholar
19. Akman, F., Khattari, Z. Y., Kaçal, M. R., Sayyed, M. I., Afaneh, F. The radiation shielding features for some silicide, boride and oxide types ceramics. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2019, 160, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
20. Turhan, M. F., Akman, F., Taşer, A., Dilsiz, K., Oğul, H., Kaçal, M. R., Agar, O. Gamma radiation shielding performance of CuxAg(1−x)-alloys: experimental, theoretical and simulation results. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2022, 143, 104036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104036.Search in Google Scholar
21. Mhareb, M. H. A., Zeama, M., Elsafi, M., Alajerami, Y. S., Sayyed, M. I., Saleh, G., Hamad, R. M., Hamad, M. Radiation shielding features for various tellurium-based alloys: a comparative study. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 26798–26811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-07057-0.Search in Google Scholar
22. Olsson, A., Hellsing, M. S., Rennie, A. R. New possibilities using additive manufacturing with materials that are difficult to process and with complex structures. Phys. Scripta 2017, 92, 053002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aa694e.Search in Google Scholar
23. Villani, D., Savi, M., Andrade, M. A. B., Campos, L. L., Potiens, M. P. A. Characterization of ABS+W and ABS+Bi 3D printing filaments attenuation for different photon beams. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1826, 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1826/1/012037.Search in Google Scholar
24. Dhinesh, S. K., Arun, P. S., Senthil, K. K. L., Megalingam, A. Study on flexural and tensile behavior of PLA, ABS and PLA-ABS materials. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 1175–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.546.Search in Google Scholar
25. Guo, Q., Zhou, C., Ma, Z., Yang, X. Fundamentals of TiO2 photocatalysis: concepts, mechanisms, and challenges. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1901997. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901997.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Gerward, L., Guilbert, N., Jensen, K., Levring, H. WinXCom – a program for calculating X-ray attenuation coefficients. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2004, 71, 653–654.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.040.Search in Google Scholar
27. Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Araujo, H., Arce, P., Asai, M., Axen, D., Banerjee, S., Barrand, G., Behner, F., Bellagamba, L., Boudreau, J., Broglia, L., Brunengo, A., Burkhardt, H., Chauvie, S., Chuma, J., Chytracek, R., Cooperman, G. Geant4—a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 2003, 506, 250–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8.Search in Google Scholar
28. Böhlen, T. T., Cerutti, F., Chin, M. P. W., Fassò, A., Ferrari, A., Ortega, P. G., Mairani, A., Sala, P. R., Smirnov, G., Vlachoudis, V. The FLUKA Code: developments and challenges for high energy and medical applications. Nucl. Data Sheets 2014, 120, 211–214.10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.049Search in Google Scholar
29. Kaçal, M. R., Akman, F., Sayyed, M. I., Akman, F. Evaluation of gamma-ray and neutron attenuation properties of some polymers. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2019, 51, 818–824.10.1016/j.net.2018.11.011Search in Google Scholar
30. Özkalaycı, F., Kaçal, M. R., Agar, O., Polat, H., Sharma, A., Akman, F. Lead(II) chloride effects on nuclear shielding capabilities of polymer composites. J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 2020, 145, 109543.10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109543Search in Google Scholar
31. Cevik, U., Baltas, H. Measurement of the mass attenuation coefficients and electron densities for BiPbSrCaCuO superconductor at different energies. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2007, 256, 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.131.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Papers
- Cross sections and calculated yields of some radionuclides of yttrium, strontium and rubidium formed in proton-induced reactions on enriched strontium-86: possibility of production of 85gSr, 83Rb and 82mRb in no-carrier-added form
- Kaolinite/thiourea-formaldehyde composite for efficient U(VI) sorption from commercial phosphoric acid
- Soya bean derived activated carbon as an efficient adsorbent for capture of valuable heavy metals from waste aqueous solution
- Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide/alginate and application of central composite design in the adsorption of Th(IV) on the nanobiocomposites
- Characterization of toothpastes for fluorine and other elements by INAA and ICP-OES
- Evaluation of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) polymer reinforced with Bi and TiO2 nanopowders for gamma and neutron shielding
- Natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in karstic coastal area (Kaštela Bay, Adriatic Sea, Croatia) exposed to anthropogenic activities: distribution, sources, and influencing factors
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Papers
- Cross sections and calculated yields of some radionuclides of yttrium, strontium and rubidium formed in proton-induced reactions on enriched strontium-86: possibility of production of 85gSr, 83Rb and 82mRb in no-carrier-added form
- Kaolinite/thiourea-formaldehyde composite for efficient U(VI) sorption from commercial phosphoric acid
- Soya bean derived activated carbon as an efficient adsorbent for capture of valuable heavy metals from waste aqueous solution
- Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide/alginate and application of central composite design in the adsorption of Th(IV) on the nanobiocomposites
- Characterization of toothpastes for fluorine and other elements by INAA and ICP-OES
- Evaluation of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) polymer reinforced with Bi and TiO2 nanopowders for gamma and neutron shielding
- Natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in karstic coastal area (Kaštela Bay, Adriatic Sea, Croatia) exposed to anthropogenic activities: distribution, sources, and influencing factors