Natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in karstic coastal area (Kaštela Bay, Adriatic Sea, Croatia) exposed to anthropogenic activities: distribution, sources, and influencing factors
Abstract
40K, 226Ra, 232Th, 238U, and 137Cs massic activities were determined by gamma-spectrometry in limestones, marls, stream sediments, and soils of Kaštela Bay (Adriatic Sea, Croatia) coastal area. Their distribution, sources and potential influencing factors were studied. The lowest 40K, 226Ra, 232Th, and 238U massic activities were determined in limestones and the highest in soils, with the following median values, respectively: 7.2, 14, 0.8, and 5.3 Bq/kg in limestones and 518, 72, 71, and 31 Bq/kg in soils. All four radionuclides were of natural origin and reflected background values of the karstic area influenced by flysch/marl and terra rossa soil. Local TENORM disposal site did not influence the study area, but it will be needed to study its potential influence on marine sediments. Strong disequilibrium between 226Ra and 238U was found in limestones s.l. and soils, but not in marls and only moderately in stream sediments. This implies that limestones are more susceptible to selective 238U leaching than marls, and soils more than stream sediments. 137Cs was the only radionuclide of anthropogenic origin, with a global source only. It was detected in stream sediments and soils with median values of 5.4 and 31 Bq/kg, respectively. 137Cs distribution was more heterogeneous in stream sediments than in soils, but soils generally presented higher activities. Soil is considered the most important reservoir of 137Cs and its potential source.
Funding source: Ministry of Science, Education, and Sports of the Republic of Croatia
Award Identifier / Grant number: 098-0982934-2713
Acknowledgements
Gamma-spectrometry measurements were performed in the Laboratory for Radioecology of the Ruđer Bošković Institute (RBI) and the article was prepared in the Laboratory for Low-Level Radioactivities of the RBI.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: The work presented here was financially supported by the Ministry of Science, Education, and Sports of the Republic of Croatia through the “Radionuclides and trace elements in environmental systems” project (project number 098-0982934-2713).
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Lovrenčić Mikelić, I., Barišić, D. Radiological risks from 40K, 226Ra and 232Th in urbanised and industrialised karstic coastal area (Kaštela Bay, Croatia). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 54632–40; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19741-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Lovrenčić Mikelić, I., Oreščanin, V., Barišić, D. 40K, 226Ra, 232Th, 238U and 137Cs relationships and behaviour in sedimentary rocks and sediments of a karstic coastal area (Kaštela Bay, Croatia) and related rocks and sediments’ differentiation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 51497–510; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14240-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Marović, G., Senčar, J. Assessment of radioecological situation of a site contaminated by technologically enhanced natural radioactivity in Croatia. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1999, 241, 569; https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02347214.Search in Google Scholar
4. Lovrencic, I., Orescanin, V., Barisic, D., Mikelic, L., Rozmaric Macefat, M., Lulic, S., Pavlovic, G. Characterization of TENORM and sediments of Kastela Bay and the influence of TENORM on the quality of sediments. Glob. NEST J. 2005, 7, 188.10.30955/gnj.000330Search in Google Scholar
5. Lovrencic, I., Barisic, D., Orescanin, V., Lulic, S. In situ determination of radon concentration and total gamma radiation in Kastel Gomilica, Croatia. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2007, 263, 186; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.04.084.Search in Google Scholar
6. Marović, G., Senčar, J., Bronzović, M., Franić, Z., Kovač, J. Radioactive waste due to electric power and mineral fertiliser production. Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol. 2006, 57, 333 (in Croatian).Search in Google Scholar
7. Oreščanin, V., Barišić, D., Mikelić, L., Lovrenčić, I., Rožmarić Mačefat, M., Pavlović, G., Lulić, S. Chemical and radiological profile of the coal ash landfill in Kaštel Gomilica. Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol. 2006, 57, 9.Search in Google Scholar
8. Skoko, B., Marović, G., Babić, D. Radioactivity in the Mediterranean flora of the Kaštela Bay, Croatia. J. Environ. Radioact. 2014, 135, 36; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.04.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Skoko, B., Marović, G., Babić, D., Šoštarić, M., Jukić, M. Plant uptake of 238U, 235U, 232Th, 226Ra, 210Pb and 40K from a coal ash and slag disposal site and control soil under field conditions: A preliminary study. J. Environ. Radioact. 2017, 172, 113; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.03.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Skoko, B., Babić, D., Marović, G., Papić, S. Environmental radiological risk assessment of a coal ash and slag disposal site with the use of the ERICA Tool. J. Environ. Radioact. 2019, 208–209, 106018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.106018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Miloš, B., Bensa, A. Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in terraced soil on flysch deposits of Kaštela Bay 574 coastal area, Croatia. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2019, 20, 974; https://doi.org/10.5513/jcea01/20.3.2288.Search in Google Scholar
12. Lovrenčić Mikelić, I., Oreščanin, V., Barišić, D. Distribution and origin of major, minor, and trace elements in sediments and sedimentary rocks of the Kaštela Bay (Croatia) coastal area. J. Geochem. Explor. 2013, 128, 1; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.01.003.Search in Google Scholar
13. Gaspar, L., Lizaga, I., Navas, A. Spatial distribution of fallout and lithogenic radionuclides controlled by soil carbon and water erosion in an agroforestry South-Pyrenean catchment. Geoderma 2021, 391, 114941; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.114941.Search in Google Scholar
14. UNEP-MAP, Ed. CAMP “Kaštela bay”, Croatia, Proceedings of the MAP/METAP Workshop “Coastal Area Management Programmes: Improving the Implementation”; UNEP-MAP/PAP: Split, 2002; pp. 59–74.Search in Google Scholar
15. Marinčić, S., Magaš, N., Borović, I. Basic Geological Map of Yugoslavia, Sheet Split, 1:100 000; Federal Geological Survey: Belgrade, 1971 (in Croatian).Search in Google Scholar
16. Fritz, F. On the appearance of a Brackish Spring 30 m above sea level near Trogir (Southern Croatia). Geol. Croat. 1994, 47, 215.Search in Google Scholar
17. Ujević, I., Odžak, N., Barić, A. Trace metal accumulation in different grain size fractions of the sediments from a semi-enclosed bay heavily contaminated by urban and industrial wastewaters. Water Res. 2000, 34, 3055; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00376-0.Search in Google Scholar
18. Marasović, I., Ninčević, Ž., Kušpilić, G., Marinović, S., Marinov, S. Long-term changes of basic biological and chemical parameters at two stations in the middle Adriatic. J. Sea Res. 2005, 54, 3; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2005.02.007.Search in Google Scholar
19. Kljaković-Gašpić, Z., Odžak, N., Ujević, I., Zvonarić, T., Horvat, M., Barić, A. Biomonitoring of mercury in polluted coastal area using transplanted mussels. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 368, 199; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.080.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Magaš, N., Marinčić, S. An Explanation of the Basic Geological Map of Yugoslavia, Split and Primošten, 1:100 000; Federal Geological Survey: Belgrade, 1973 (in Croatian).Search in Google Scholar
21. Komatina, M. Opšti strukturni plan dalmatinskih, zapadnobosanskih i hercegovačkih Dinarida. Vesnik – Geol. 1968, 26A, 19.Search in Google Scholar
22. Oluić, M., Grandić, S., Haček, M., Hanich, M. Tektonska građa Vanjskih Dinarida Jugoslavije. Nafta 1972, 1–2, 3.Search in Google Scholar
23. Marjanac, T. Deposition of megabeds (megaturbidites) and sea-level change in a proximal part of the Eocene-Miocene flysch of central Dalmatia (Croatia). Geology 1996, 24, 543; https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0543:dommas>2.3.co;2.10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0543:DOMMAS>2.3.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
24. Tišljar, J. Sedimentne Stijene; Školska knjiga: Zagreb, 1994; p. 433 (in Croatian).Search in Google Scholar
25. Canberra Industries Inc. Genie 2000 Spectroscopy Software: Customization Tools, Vol. V3.1; Canberra Industries Inc.: Meriden, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
26. Saïdou, Bochud, F., Laedermann, J.-P., Kwato Njock, M. G., Froidevaux, P. A comparison of alpha and gamma spectrometry for environmental natural radioactivity surveys. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2008, 66, 215; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.07.034.Search in Google Scholar
27. Papachristodoulou, C. A., Assimakopoulos, P. A., Patronis, N. E., Ioannides, K. G. Use of HPGe γ-ray spectrometry to assess the isotopic composition of uranium in soils. J. Environ. Radioact. 2003, 64, 195; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0265-931x(02)00049-8.Search in Google Scholar
28. Lovrenčić Mikelić, I., Oreščanin, V., Škaro, K. Variation of sedimentation rate in the semi-enclosed bay determined by 137Cs distribution in sediment (Kaštela Bay, Croatia). J. Environ. Radioact. 2017, 166, 112; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.03.027.Search in Google Scholar
29. UNSCEAR United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Ed.; Annex A: Exposures from Natural Sources of Radiation, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR 1993 Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations: New York, 1993; pp. 34–89.Search in Google Scholar
30. Tzortzis, M., Tsertos, H., Christofides, S., Christodoulides, G. Gamma-ray measurements of naturally occurring radioactive samples from Cyprus characteristic geological rocks. Radiat. Meas. 2003, 37, 221; https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-4487(03)00028-3.Search in Google Scholar
31. Brai, M., Bellia, S., Hauser, S., Puccio, P., Rizzo, S., Basile, S., Marrale, M. Correlation of radioactivity measurements, air kerma rates and geological features of Sicily. Radiat. Meas. 2006, 41, 461; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.09.004.Search in Google Scholar
32. Rankama, K., Sahama, T. G. Geochemistry; The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1968.Search in Google Scholar
33. Ivanovich, M., Harmon, R. S., Eds. Geochemistry of the actinides and their daughters, Uranium Series Disequilibrium: Applications of Environmental Problems; Claredon Press: Oxford, 1982; pp. 33–55.Search in Google Scholar
34. Lima, A., Albanese, S., Cicchella, D. Geochemical baselines for the radioelements K, U and Th in the Campania region, Italy: a comparison of stream-sediment geochemistry and gamma-ray surveys. Appl. Geochem. 2005, 20, 611; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.09.017.Search in Google Scholar
35. von Gunten, H. R., Surbeck, H., Rössler, E. Uranium series disequilibrium and high thorium and radium enrichments in Karst formations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 1268; https://doi.org/10.1021/es950473j.Search in Google Scholar
36. Dowdall, M., O’Dea, J. Speciation of 226Ra, 238U and 228Ra in an upland organic soil overlying a uraniferous granite. Radiochim. Acta 1999, 87, 109.10.1524/ract.1999.87.34.109Search in Google Scholar
37. Przylibski, T. A. Concentration of 226Ra in rocks of the southern part of Lower Silesia (SW Poland). J. Environ. Radioact. 2004, 75, 171; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2003.12.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
38. Cowart, J. B., Burnett, W. C. The distribution of uranium and thorium decay-series radionuclides in the environment – a review. J. Environ. Qual. 1994, 23, 651; https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300040005x.Search in Google Scholar
39. Swarzenski, P., Campbell, P., Porcelli, D., McKee, B. The estuarine chemistry and isotope systematics of 234, 238U in the Amazon and Fly Rivers. Continent. Shelf Res. 2004, 24, 2357; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2004.07.025.Search in Google Scholar
40. Payne, T. E., Airey, P. L. Radionuclide migration at the Koongarra uranium deposit, Northern Australia – lessons from the Alligator Rivers analogue project. Phys. Chem. Earth 2006, 31, 572; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.04.008.Search in Google Scholar
41. Sakaguchi, A., Yamamoto, M., Sasaki, K., Kashiwaya, K. Uranium and thorium isotope distribution in an offshore bottom sediment core of the Selenga Delta, Lake Baikal, Siberia. J. Paleolimnol. 2006, 35, 807; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-005-5621-0.Search in Google Scholar
42. Silva, P. S. C., Mazzilli, B. P., Fávaro, D. I. T. Distribution of radionuclides and elements in Cubatão River sediments. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2006, 269, 767; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-006-0258-7.Search in Google Scholar
43. Al-Masri, M. S., Byrakdar, M. E., Mamish, S., Al-Haleem, M. A. Determination of natural radioactivity in Euphrates river. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2004, 261, 349.10.1023/B:JRNC.0000034870.73873.8aSearch in Google Scholar
44. El-Gamal, A., Nasr, S., El-Taher, A. Study of the spatial distribution of natural radioactivity in the upper Egypt Nile River sediments. Radiat. Meas. 2007, 42, 457; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.02.054.Search in Google Scholar
45. Powell, B. A., Hughes, L. D., Soreefan, A. M., Falta, D., Wall, M., De Vol, T. A. Elevated concentrations of primordial radionuclides in sediments from the Reedy River and surrounding creeks in Simpsonville, South Carolina. J. Environ. Radioact. 2007, 94, 121; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.12.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
46. van der Graaf, E. R., Koomans, R. L., Limburg, J., de Vries, K. In situ radiometric mapping as a proxy of sediment contamination: Assessment of the underlying geochemical and -physical principles. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2007, 65, 619; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.11.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
47. Begy, R.-C. S., Simon, H., Cosma, C. Radiological assessment of stream sediments between Băiţa-Plai and Beiuş. Rom. J. Phys. 2013, 58, S22.Search in Google Scholar
48. UNSCEAR United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Ed.; Annex B: Exposures of the Public and Workers from Various Sources of Radiation, UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations: New York, Vol. I, 2008; pp. 221–463.Search in Google Scholar
49. Bellia, S., Brai, M., Hauser, S., Puccio, P., Rizzo, S. Natural radioactivity in a Volcanic Island: Ustica, Southern Italy. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1997, 48, 287; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(96)00150-9.Search in Google Scholar
50. Navas, A., Soto, J., López-Martínez, J. Radionuclides in soils of Byers Peninsula, South Shetland Islands, Western Antarctica. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2005, 62, 809; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.11.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
51. Rani, A., Singh, S. Natural radioactivity levels in soil samples from some areas of Himachal Pradesh, India using γ-ray spectrometry. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 6306; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.050.Search in Google Scholar
52. Singh, S., Rani, A., Mahajan, R. K. 226Ra, 232Th and 40K analysis in soil samples from some areas of Punjab and Himachal Pradesh, India using gamma ray spectrometry. Radiat. Meas. 2005, 39, 431; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
53. Abdi, M. R., Faghihian, H., Mostajaboddavati, M., Hasanzadeh, A., Kamal, M. Distribution of natural radionuclides and hot points in coasts of Hormozgan, Persian Gulf, Iran. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2006, 270, 319; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-006-0351-y.Search in Google Scholar
54. Merdanoğlu, B., Altınsoy, N. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples from Kestanbol granite area. Turkey. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2006, 121, 399; https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl055.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
55. Bolca, M., Saç, M. M., Çokuysal, B., Karalı, T., Ekdal, E. Radioactivity in soils and various foodstuffs from the Gediz River Basin of Turkey. Radiat. Meas. 2007, 42, 263; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.12.001.Search in Google Scholar
56. Kam, E., Bozkurt, A. Environmental radioactivity measurements in Kastamonu region of northern Turkey. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2007, 65, 440; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.11.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
57. Dai, L., Wei, H., Wang, L. Spatial distribution and risk assessment of radionuclides in soils around a coal-fired power plant: A case study from the city of Baoji, China. Environ. Res. 2007, 104, 201; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2006.11.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
58. Vaupotič, J., Barišić, D., Kobal, I., Lulić, S. Radioactivity and Radon potential of the terra rossa soil. Radiat. Meas. 2007, 42, 290; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.01.034.Search in Google Scholar
59. UNSCEAR United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Ed.; Annex B: Exposures from Natural Radiation Sources, UNSCEAR 2000 Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations: New York, Vol. I, 2000; pp. 84–156.Search in Google Scholar
60. Florou, H., Trabidou, G., Nicolaou, G. An assessment of the external radiological impact in areas of Greece with elevated natural radioactivity. J. Environ. Radioact. 2007, 93, 74; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.11.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
61. UNSCEAR United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Ed.; Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR 2016 Report, Report to the General Assembly; Scientific annexes A, B, C and D. United Nations: New York, 2016; pp. 19–400.Search in Google Scholar
62. Uosif, M. A. M. Gamma-ray spectrometric analysis of selected samples from Nile river sediments in upper Egypt. Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 2007, 123, 215; https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl103.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
63. Justo, J., Evangelista, H., Paschoa, A. S. Direct determination of 226Ra in NORM/TENORM matrices by gamma-spectrometry. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2006, 269, 733; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-006-0293-4.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Papers
- Cross sections and calculated yields of some radionuclides of yttrium, strontium and rubidium formed in proton-induced reactions on enriched strontium-86: possibility of production of 85gSr, 83Rb and 82mRb in no-carrier-added form
- Kaolinite/thiourea-formaldehyde composite for efficient U(VI) sorption from commercial phosphoric acid
- Soya bean derived activated carbon as an efficient adsorbent for capture of valuable heavy metals from waste aqueous solution
- Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide/alginate and application of central composite design in the adsorption of Th(IV) on the nanobiocomposites
- Characterization of toothpastes for fluorine and other elements by INAA and ICP-OES
- Evaluation of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) polymer reinforced with Bi and TiO2 nanopowders for gamma and neutron shielding
- Natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in karstic coastal area (Kaštela Bay, Adriatic Sea, Croatia) exposed to anthropogenic activities: distribution, sources, and influencing factors
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Papers
- Cross sections and calculated yields of some radionuclides of yttrium, strontium and rubidium formed in proton-induced reactions on enriched strontium-86: possibility of production of 85gSr, 83Rb and 82mRb in no-carrier-added form
- Kaolinite/thiourea-formaldehyde composite for efficient U(VI) sorption from commercial phosphoric acid
- Soya bean derived activated carbon as an efficient adsorbent for capture of valuable heavy metals from waste aqueous solution
- Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide/alginate and application of central composite design in the adsorption of Th(IV) on the nanobiocomposites
- Characterization of toothpastes for fluorine and other elements by INAA and ICP-OES
- Evaluation of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) polymer reinforced with Bi and TiO2 nanopowders for gamma and neutron shielding
- Natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in karstic coastal area (Kaštela Bay, Adriatic Sea, Croatia) exposed to anthropogenic activities: distribution, sources, and influencing factors