Startseite Radiochemical separation and purification of non-carrier-added silicon-32
Artikel Open Access

Radiochemical separation and purification of non-carrier-added silicon-32

  • Mario Veicht , Ionut Mihalcea EMAIL logo , Đorđe Cvjetinovic und Dorothea Schumann
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 31. August 2021

Abstract

32Si (T 1/2 = 153(19) y) is an extremely rare, naturally-occurring isotope that has been considered as a geochronometer suitable for radiometric dating over the time span from 100 to 1000 years ago – a time span that has proved rather difficult to explore in this manner. Past attempts to determine the 32Si half-life have resulted in a wide range of values possessing significant uncertainties because only low-activity samples could be made available for such measurements. Utilizing the 590 MeV ring cyclotron at PSI, megabecquerel quantities of 32Si have been produced by exposing metallic vanadium discs to high-energy protons in order to induce spallation. A radiochemical separation procedure has been successfully developed and applied to the irradiated discs as part of the SINCHRON project, based on a combination of ion-exchange and extraction resins. The process was shown to be reliable and robust with a high chemical yield. Radiochemically pure 32Si solutions with activity concentrations of up to several kBq/g can be produced to perform individual measurements (AMS, ICP-MS, LSC) for various studies. Thus, a careful redetermination of the 32Si half-life has become feasible to begin the first steps toward the confident implementation of this radionuclide for geochronological purposes.

1 Introduction

Radiometric dating has proved to be a versatile tool, which is well-known, for instance, for radiocarbon (14C), potassium-argon (40K/40Ar), and uranium-lead (e.g., 238U/206Pb) dating. The nuclides are specifically chosen based on their different half-lives (T 1/2) to account for the timescale over which they can be accurately employed, but also related to their typical accumulation in the environment. As an example, radiometric dating of sediments is considered as an archive that provides extensive information [1]. Typically, 210Pb (T 1/2 = 22.20(22) y) and 14C (T 1/2 = 5700(30) y) are used to extract such information. However, because of their individual half-lives, an accurate age determination in the range of 100–1000 years has not yet been established, resulting in a visible dating gap (Figure 1a).

Figure 1: 
(a) Weakness found in dating capabilities between 100 and 1000 years, and (b) compilation of previous 32Si half-life determinations [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], modified after Fifield & Morgenstern [11].
Figure 1:

(a) Weakness found in dating capabilities between 100 and 1000 years, and (b) compilation of previous 32Si half-life determinations [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], modified after Fifield & Morgenstern [11].

That time span is of particular interest, as sedimentary reconstructions potentially reveal anthropogenic activities during the industrialization period, or generally allow focusing on age horizons associated with human activity ([1] and references therein).

Since, the cosmogenic isotope 32Si (T 1/2 = 153(19) y [12]) can fill the sediment geochronology gap between 210Pb and 14C, serious limitations are to be found in the high uncertainty as well as in the wide range of published half-life values (Figure 1b), which was highlighted by Fifield and Morgenstern [11], and generally related to the lack of sufficient 32Si sample material.

Already in the mid-1980s, Polak et al. [13] reported on the artificial production of 32Si through proton-irradiation of vanadium. Furthermore, proton-irradiation not only produces 32Si, but also other rare radionuclides, such as 26Al, 41Ca, and 44Ti/44Sc.

Due to the long-term exposure of the V-discs at the PSI facility, extensive amounts of these nuclides were produced, with particular interest focused on 32Si. Here, we report on the artificial production of a significant amount of 32Si, and the subsequent development of a reliable, robust chemical separation procedure to provide radiochemically pure 32Si solutions with high activity concentrations.

Consequently, the SINCHRON project (32Si – a new chronometer) aims to redetermine the half-life of this cosmogenic nuclide. One approach is to determine the decay of the radionuclide sample after a given time interval, where the decay constant ( λ ) can be calculated from fitting procedures that fit the data to exponential decays, and thus the T 1/2 can be derived according to: T 1 / 2 = ln ( 2 ) / λ . For such measurements, the long-term stability of both the sample and the measurement device (e.g., ionization chamber) is vital. Another approach concerns the measurement of the specific nuclide’s number of atoms (N) by means of mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, AMS), and additionally, the activity (A) determination, through LSC, for the identical sample. Here, the T 1/2 can be determined from the relationship: T 1 / 2 = N ln ( 2 ) / A . Finally, with complementary measurements, the 32Si T 1/2 can be validated. As a result, our aim in the future will be to provide a new recommended half-life value with a relative standard uncertainty of less than 5%.

2 Experimental studies

Unless otherwise stated, all declared chemical reagents are commercially available and were used without further purification. All required solutions were prepared by dissolution or dilution of commercial products with ultra-pure water (utp-H2O, 18.2 MΩ cm, Veolia S.A.) and brought to desired concentrations volumetrically. Moreover, any glassware was avoided, and instead, plastic (e.g., polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)) was used.

2.1 Isotope production

The initial, inactive natural metallic vanadium discs (typical mass ≈ 420 mg, diameter ≈ 9.20 mm, thickness ≈ 1.0 mm chemical purity of vanadium: 99.8%) were provided by Goodfellow Cambridge Limited (U.K.). The manufacturer’s certificate states typical impurities (upper limit in %) to be: Si (<0.2), Nb (<0.1), Mo (<0.1), Ta (<0.1), Al (<0.05). In order to determine the silicon content more precisely, ICP-OES measurements were employed (see Supplementary Material), and a Si content of 200 ppm per V-disc (0.02%) on average was determined. Although working without silicon-carrier, we refer deliberately to non-carrier added (nca) 32Si because of the unavoidable initial presence of Si in the discs and subsequent 32Si sources.

In total, 150 vanadium discs were used as targets in the SINQ (the Swiss Spallation Source) Target Irradiation Program (STIP) [14], using PSI’s High-Intensity Proton Accelerator (HIPA), and all simultaneously exposed to high-energy protons (E max = 590 MeV) over two years (2010–2012). The irradiated vanadium discs were then recovered from SINQ, and stored at PSI to allow the short-lived isotopes to decay.

2.2 Radiochemical separation procedure

The separation of nca 32Si from the vanadium matrix required a step-wise approach in order to account for its complexity and to separate other valuable radionuclides. For the radiochemical separations, we chose ion-exchange chromatography in combination with extraction/chelating resins that allowed us to design a highly-selective and robust separation procedure.

Generally, the procedure is composed of three steps: (1) a Loading Step (Load) in which the initial solution is brought into contact with the stationary phase; (2) a Washing Step (Wash), designed to remove all remaining non-binding elements from the resin, and (3) an Elution Step (Elute), employed to gather the fractions, e.g., for further processing. While the separation procedure was developed to process approximately 150 proton-irradiated vanadium specimens, we also focused firmly on high reproducibility and a generalized purification procedure to account for the different irradiation conditions, leading to a diverse nuclide inventory for each of the vanadium discs. Peristaltic pumps (REGLO Digital MS-2/8, Cole-Parmer Instrument Company, LLC., U.S.A.) were used for the separations, with the same squeeze tubes (Ismaprene PharMed®, SC0307, Cole-Parmer Instrument Company, LLC., U.S.A.). The method development focused primarily on cold non-active model solutions matching precisely the chemical composition of the active solutions. However, the procedure was ultimately also applied to active solutions in order to study and to confirm the element’s behavior in the respective matrix.

2.3 Instrumental analysis

The cold solutions were analyzed using ICP-OES (Agilent 5110, Agilent Technologies, U.S.A.). When measuring samples containing hydrofluoric acid (HF), an HF-resistant setup from the supplier was utilized. Single-element standards (1000 mg/L, TraceCERT®, Merck KGaA, Germany) in various dilutions were used to prepare the calibration curves for the measurements.

γ-ray spectroscopic studies of the active solutions were undertaken by means of a high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector (Mirion Technologies, California, U.S.A.). A Packard Tri-Carb® 2250CA was used for liquid scintillation counting (LSC) to identify pure beta-emitting nuclides (e.g., 32Si/32P).

2.4 Initial preparation for the chemical separation procedure

Before each dissolution, an irradiated vanadium disc was pre-cleaned in 5 mL 8 M HCl to remove a blackish layer that was present on the surface of the disc and contained mostly 60Co, as confirmed by γ-ray spectroscopy. Subsequently, a single disc was placed into a 15 mL PP-tube before adding an acidic cocktail composed of 2.5 mL 8 M HCl and 2.5 mL 8 M HNO3 for dissolution. During this dissolution process, the PP-tube was placed in an ice-water mixture to quench the exothermic dissolution reaction. This step was necessary, as previous tests with unquenched dissolution experiments showed a solid residue, indicating the likely formation of an insoluble vanadium compound (e.g., V2O5). Thus, the addition of HCl is of further advantage because vanadium(V) forms various chemically stable and soluble chloride complexes [15], which prevents the formation of any solid residues.

In order to diminish the escape of gaseous species (NOx, 3H2, HCl(g), 39Ar, 42Ar) that are created during the dissolution procedure, a cylindrical cap filled with activated carbon was screwed on the PP-tube and replenished after each dissolution procedure. Upon the complete dissolution, a dense, dark-blue-colored solution resulted that was added to 50 mL utp-H2O. The PP-tube was thoroughly rinsed with 12 mL utp-H2O. Afterwards, 8 mL 0.5 M N2H4 solution was added, and the solution immediately stirred. The addition of hydrazine was necessary to reduce V(V) to the preferred oxidation state of V(IV), which generally shows a higher affinity regarding the cation exchanger [16]. Finally, the volume of the solution was adjusted to 100 mL, and the resulting pH was typically in the range of 1.25 ± 0.05.

2.5 Separation from the bulk vanadium matrix

Cation exchange chromatography (Dowex® 50WX8-200, 200–400 mesh; Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was initially applied, hosting the resin in tailor-made PMMA columns (length = 300 mm; inner diameter = 10 mm) to a height of 220 mm. Before use, a typical resin-batch was pre-cleaned with 25 mL 6 M HCl, further treated with 50 mL 3 M HNO3, and washed with 50 mL utp-H2O. Consequently, the matrix solution was loaded at a fixed flow-rate of 1.50 mL min−1. The Wash consisted of 20 mL utp-H2O and was collected together with the initial Load, which was treated as 32Si fraction (V total = 120 mL). An Elution stage of 50 mL 3 M HNO3 followed, and was stored for further radiochemical separations of other products of interest from the initial matrix. Finally, post-conditioning of the resin-batch was undertaken with utp-H2O until pH reached 4. Each resin batch was used on average six times before replacement with a fresh batch.

2.6 Purification steps to remove trace impurities

After the cation-exchange chromatography, traces of 22Na, 42Ar/42K, 44Ti/44Sc, 60Co, 94Nb, 172Hf/172Lu and 173Lu were typically noticeable, as confirmed by γ-ray spectroscopy. Subsequent purification steps were implemented to remove these radionuclides selectively.

2.6.1 LN (extraction) resin: 44Ti/44Sc, 173Lu and 172Hf/172Lu

Extraction chromatography was initially applied by means of LN resin (20–50 µm TrisKem SAS, Bruz, France), which is composed of di(2-ethylhexyl)orthophosphoric acid (HDEHP) impregnated onto an inert support. As only trace impurities had to be removed, a shorter in-house-made PMMA column (length = 100 mm; inner diameter = 10 mm) was chosen and filled with 35 mm resin. Before separation, the resin was pre-conditioned with 20 mL 0.10 M HCl/HNO3 to account for the composition of silicon solution since the pH was typically measured to be 1.00 ± 0.05. The 32Si fraction was loaded at a fixed flow-rate of 1.25 mL min−1. Due to the short resin height, the Wash consisted of only 5 mL utp-H2O, and was collected together with the Load. Each resin batch was used for six independent purification procedures before being replaced with a fresh one.

2.6.2 Monophos (chelating) resin: 94Nb

Monophos (100–200 mesh; TrisKem SAS, Bruz, France) was used in the next step as the chelating ion-exchange resin. The preparatory steps for the system were identical to the LN purification, except that the PMMA column was changed to a smaller ISOLUTE® PE column (length = 60 mm; inner diameter = 9 mm, Biotage Sweden AB, Sweden), and the height of the resin bed was reduced to 30 mm. A 130 mL 32Si fraction was obtained as a consequence of this particular separation procedure.

2.6.3 Evaporation to dryness: 3H and 39,42Ar

Dissolved radioactive gases were removed by evaporating the 32Si fraction to dryness in a PTFE evaporating dish (flat shape, 25 mL) on a hot plate (Fisherbrand® Isotemp® 4 × 4, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., U.S.A.) with the temperature set to 175 ± 5 °C. After reaching complete dryness, 25 mL utp-H2O were added and re-evaporated. The procedure was repeated nine consecutive times to reach a total evaporated volume of 250 mL. Finally, the 32Si recovery was achieved by washing the dish twice with 1 mL 1 M HF, topped up to 10 mL with utp-H2O, and eventually transferring into a 50 mL PP-Tube for intermediate storage of the solution.

2.6.4 Dowex® 1X8: preparation of the final 32Si solution

Generally, with each processed vanadium disc, a 20 mL 0.1 M HF 32Si solution is obtained. Initially, the LN and Monophos resins removed those ions known to form stable, anionic fluoride complexes. Consequently, similar chemical behavior to Si will hinder further separation as anion exchange is applied. Ideal separation conditions for Si were investigated by employing dedicated batch studies for the expected matrix, including known trace impurities (see Supplementary Material). A similar approach is also described in the literature [17] as providing the basis for the separation from alkali and alkaline-earth metal cations, but also from cobalt and vanadium by using a mixture of HF/HCl. A ISOLUTE® PE column (length = 60 mm; inner diameter = 9 mm, Biotage Sweden AB, Sweden) was filled with 30 mm anion exchange resin (Dowex® 1X8, 200–400 mesh; Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Before processing each 32Si solution, the column was washed with 50 mL 0.10 M HF/0.10 M HCl, 50 mL 0.10 M HF/0.13 M HCl, 25 mL 0.10 M HF/0.16 M HCl, and 20 mL 0.50 M HCl. The column was subsequently washed with utp-H2O until pH reached 4, after which 50 mL 0.10 M HF were used to pre-condition the column for the Load. The different initial pre-conditioning steps account for an implemented procedure, which will ensure the removal of any sulfur present in the solution, which is vital for ICP-MS and AMS measurements. 50 mL 0.10 M HF/0.10 M HCl (m(natS) = 30 mg) were added, followed by 50 mL 0.10 M HF/0.13 M HCl. Sulfur was quantitatively removed from the column in the last step using 25 mL 0.10 M HF/0.16 M HCl, and monitored by ICP-OES measurements. Consequently, the 32Si Elute was obtained within 20 mL 0.50 M HCl.

3 Results and discussion

32Si has been previously produced by various nuclear reactions, such as non-carrier free by double neutron capture 30Si(n,γ)31Si(n,γ)32Si [18] using natural or enriched silicon samples [11], and also with tritons according to 30Si(t,p)32Si [6, 18, 19]. However, these reactions suffer from a relatively low 32Si production yield, caused by the low natural abundance of 30Si (=3.092%) and low cross-section values for 30Si and 31Si, respectively. Further, phosphorous was studied as a source for 32Si, utilizing the reaction 31P(n,γ)32P(n,p)32Si [20, 21], as a production route. Proton-induced spallation reactions on heavier elements such as chlorine [22], [23], [24], [25], iron [26], sulfur [27], and vanadium [13] have also been investigated, and the authors have reviewed the production of 32Si. Other products of interest were created during these spallation processes.

As for the metallic vanadium discs used in this work as targets, additional security concerns were necessary, since salts such as Mg2P2O7 and KCl are forbidden as targets in SINQ due to their water solubility, so that the use of metal was vital. Although successfully used in previously reported vanadium dissolution experiments [4], H2SO4 was avoided in our method due to 32S/32Si isobar interferences in ICP-MS and AMS measurements.

The first separation step is designed to isolate silicon from the bulk of the matrix materials, while the dilution to 100 mL is needed to adjust the acidity, and thereby enhance the affinity of all cations in solution toward the cation exchange resin. The addition of hydrazine not only reduces V(V) to V(IV), but as a weak base also increases the pH. When applying cation exchange chromatography under these conditions, most of the matrix components are removed (V, Na, Fe, Co, Sc, and Ti), while Si passes through as Si(OH)4. Washing the column with 20 mL utp-H2O ensures that silicon is quantitatively separated. Although using a strong reducing agent, there is still an equilibrium between V(V) and V(IV) species. Therefore, traces of vanadium were usually found in the 32Si solution, and were determined in cold experiments to be in the range of 1–2 µg per Si fraction (see Supplementary Material). Furthermore, the 32Si fraction typically contained several other nuclides, which were identified by means of γ-ray spectroscopy (Figure 2). As a result, extraction resins were explicitly chosen based on their affinity towards these nuclides. LN is an extraction resin designed especially for lanthanide separation [28]. However, this resin exhibits a high affinity towards 44Ti(IV)/44Sc(III), 173Lu(III), 172Hf(IV)/172Lu(III), and lower affinity regarding 94Nb(V) while showing no retention of 32Si(IV) (see Supplementary Material), which is present as the hydrolyzed species Si(OH)4. A typical spectrum after LN-separation is presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2: 
Example γ-ray spectra of a 32Si fraction after processing through Dowex® 50 (orange), and the subsequent first purification using the LN resin (gray).
Figure 2:

Example γ-ray spectra of a 32Si fraction after processing through Dowex® 50 (orange), and the subsequent first purification using the LN resin (gray).

The Monophos resin used in the second subsequent purification step is commercially designed for the actinide and polyvalent cations separation [29]. This particular resin possessed a high affinity towards 94Nb(V) (Figure 3), while showing (in a similar manner to the LN resin) no retention regarding Si (see Supplementary Material).

Figure 3: 
Example γ-ray spectra of a 32Si fraction after LN (gray), and the second stage of purification by means of the Monophos resin (blue).
Figure 3:

Example γ-ray spectra of a 32Si fraction after LN (gray), and the second stage of purification by means of the Monophos resin (blue).

Evaporation to complete dryness was required to remove the volatile β-emitting 3H and 39,42Ar radionuclides. The removal of these radionuclides was monitored by LSC, along with confirming the absence of the short-lived daughter (42K) of 42Ar by searching for the possible emission of 1525 keV gamma rays in order to demonstrate the successful removal of 42Ar.

While silicon was present as hydrolyzed species during the separation procedure, the recovery from the evaporation dish using HF changed the silicon speciation into hexafluorosilicate (SiF6 2−), according to Eq. (1):

(1) SiO 2 ( s ) + 6 HF ( aq ) H 2 SiF 6 ( aq ) + 2 H 2 ( l )

Batch studies were performed in order to define the optimum conditions to achieve high retention (log(K d ) > 103) of SiF6 2− in 0.10 M HF and low retention (log(K d ) ≈ 1) when using 0.50 M HCl. Generally, this separation step was designed to ensure the successful occurrence of the following stages: (a). production of 32Si solutions with differing activity concentrations ‒ up to ten 32Si fractions can be processed (V total = 200 mL) for subsequent concentration on the anion exchange resin; (b). trace impurities such as 22Na, V(IV, V), and 60Co have a low or no affinity towards the resin, and can also be removed. However, as both V(IV) and V(V) tend to form fluoride complexes, care was taken to elute vanadium while not eluting silicon from the column. Moreover, a third step was implemented to remove the sulfur isobar (m(32S) = m(32Si)) that would adversely affected the ICP-MS measurements. Finally, 32Si was quantitatively removed from the column with 20 mL 0.50 M HCl. Subsequent long-term HPGe γ-ray measurements (>90 h) and β counting by LSC of the final silicon fraction confirmed the absence of any γ-emitting nuclides (Figure 4a) and the presence of 32Si/32P (Figure 4b), respectively. The complete separation scheme is summarized in Figure 5.

Figure 4: 
Spectral comparison of (a) 95 h γ-ray measurements, and (b) LSDC spectra of 32Si master solution directly after separation, and 92 days later to allow in-growth of 32P daughter.
Figure 4:

Spectral comparison of (a) 95 h γ-ray measurements, and (b) LSDC spectra of 32Si master solution directly after separation, and 92 days later to allow in-growth of 32P daughter.

Figure 5: 
Step-wise separation of nca 32Si from proton-irradiated vanadium matrix.
Figure 5:

Step-wise separation of nca 32Si from proton-irradiated vanadium matrix.

4 Conclusions and outlook

Following the proton-irradiation of the metal vanadium targets, a series of subsequent purification steps were designed and implemented to obtain a radiochemically pure 32Si solution. The results demonstrated that the separation scheme provides a robust and reliable method with a high-yield of 32Si recovery, which will allow the content of up to 150 active vanadium discs to be separated and purified. Consequently, sufficient amounts of 32Si can now be provided to perform a range of individual measurements, focusing initially on a precise determination of the half-life of 32Si. Furthermore, the proton-induced spallation reactions within the vanadium discs are considered to be a valuable source for other rare carrier-free radionuclides (such as 26Al, 41Ca and 44Ti/44Sc) that can also be recovered from the existing metal matrix.


Corresponding author: Ionut Mihalcea, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland, E-mail:

Funding source: Swiss National Science Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711

Award Identifier / Grant number: 177229

Funding source: European Union Horizon 2020 Program http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010665

Award Identifier / Grant number: 701647

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This project is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) as part of SINERGIA (No. 177229) and receives additional financial support from the European Union Horizon 2020 Program under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 701647.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Finch, Z. S., Seiner, B. N., Arrigo, L. M., Strivens, J. E., Keillor, M. E., Hossbach, T. W., Myers, A. W., Gill, G. A. Toward sufficient reduction of radio-impurities for 32Si sediment age dating. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2016, 307, 2451–2458; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4651-y.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Clausen, H. B. Dating of polar ice by 32Si. J. Glaciol. 1973, 12, 411–416; https://doi.org/10.3189/s0022143000031828.Suche in Google Scholar

3. DeMaster, D. J., Cochran, J. K. Particle mixing rates in deep-sea sediments determined from excess 210Pb and 32Si profiles. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 1982, 61, 257–271; https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(82)90057-7.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Elmore, D., Anantaraman, N., Fulbright, H. W., Gove, H. E., Hans, H. S., Nishiizumi, K., Murrell, M. T., Honda, M. Half-life of 32Si from tandem-accelerator mass spectrometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980, 45, 589–592; https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.45.589.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Kutschera, W., Henning, W., Paul, M., Smither, R. K., Stephenson, E. J., Yntema, J. L., Alburger, D. E., Cumming, J. B., Harbottle, G. Measurement of the 32Si half-life via accelerator mass spectrometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980, 45, 592–596; https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.45.592.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Alburger, D. E., Harbottle, G., Norton, E. F. Half-life of 32Si. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 1986, 78, 168–176; https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(86)90058-0.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Hofmann, H. J., Bonani, G., Suter, M., Wölfli, W., Zimmermann, D., von Gunten, H. R. A new determination of the half-life of 32Si. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 1990, 52, 544–551; https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583x(90)90474-9.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Thomsen, M. S., Heinemeier, J., Hornshøj, P., Nielsen, H. L., Rud, N. Half-life of 32Si measured via accelerator mass spectrometry. Nucl. Phys. A 1991, 534, 327–338; https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(91)90501-v.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Chen, Y., Kashy, E., Bazin, D., Benenson, W., Morrissey, D. J., Orr, N. A., Sherrill, B. M., Winger, J. A., Young, B., Yurkon, J. Half-life of 32Si. Phys. Rev. C 1993, 47, 1462–1465; https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.47.1462.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Nijampurkar, V. N., Rao, D. K., Oldfield, F., Renberg, I. The half-life of 32Si: a new estimate based on varved lake sediments. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 1998, 163, 191–196; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-821x(98)00186-1.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Fifield, L. K., Morgenstern, U. Silicon-32 as a tool for dating the recent past. Quat. Geochronol. 2009, 4, 400–405; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2008.12.006.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Ouellet, C., Singh, B. Nuclear data sheets for A = 32. Nucl. Data Sheets 2011, 112, 2199–2355; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.08.004.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Polak, P., Garcia, S. R., Taylor, W. A., Barnes, J. W., Lindner, L., O’Brien, H. A., Thomas, K. E. A 32Si source from proton spallation of vanadium. Radiochim. Acta 1985, 38, 73–78; https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1985.38.2.73.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Dai, Y., Bauer, G. S. Status of the first SINQ irradiation experiment, STIP-I. J. Nucl. Mater. 2001, 296, 43–53; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3115(01)00544-x.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Kurbatova, L. D., Polupanova, T. I., Kurbatov, D. I. Vanadium(V) complexes in hydrochloric acid solutions. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2002, 75, 1216–1218; https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020928020273.10.1023/A:1020928020273Suche in Google Scholar

16. Strelow, F. W. E., Rethemeyer, R., Bothma, C. J. C. Ion exchange selectivity scales for cations in nitric acid and sulfuric acid media with a sulfonated polystyrene resin. Anal. Chem. 1965, 37, 106–111; https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60220a027.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Engström, E., Rodushkin, I., Baxter, D. C., Öhlander, B. Chromatographic purification for the determination of dissolved silicon isotopic compositions in natural waters by high-resolution multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 250–257; https://doi.org/10.1021/ac051246v.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Fortune, H. T., Bland, L., Watson, D. L., Abouzeid, M. A. 32Si from 30Si(t, p). Phys. Rev. C 1982, 25, 5–12; https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.25.5.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Geithoff, D. Über die Herstellung von Si32 durch einen (t, p)-Prozeß. Radiochim. Acta 1962, 1, 3–6; https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1962.1.1.3.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Forberg, S. On nuclear reactor production of carrier-free 32Si. Radiochim. Acta 1972, 18, 194–197; https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1972.18.4.194.Suche in Google Scholar

21. He, M., Wang, X., Zhen, G., Gong, J., Ruan, X., Li, C., Dong, K., Li, Z., Hu, H., Jiang, S. AMS measurement of 32Si at the China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2013, 294, 104–106; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2012.01.018.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Lindner, M. New nuclides produced in chlorine spallation. Phys. Rev. 1953, 91, 642–644; https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.91.642.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Brodzinski, R. L., Finkel, J. R., Conway, D. C. β-spectrum of 32Si. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1964, 26, 677–681; https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(64)80309-2.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Brzezinski, M. A., Phillips, D. R. Evaluation of 32Si as a tracer for measuring silica production rates in marine waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1997, 42, 856–865; https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.5.0856.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Phillips, D. R., Hamilton, V. T., Jamriska, D. J., Brzezinski, M. A. Application of sephadex to radiochemical separations. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1995, 195, 251–261; https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02035964.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Honda, M., Lal, D. Spallation cross sections for long-lived radionuclides in iron and light nuclei. Nucl. Phys. 1964, 51, 363–368; https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(64)90277-9.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Lindner, L., Polak, P. On the production of no-carrier-added 32Si, a potential research tool. Radiochim. Acta 1982, 31, 23–26; https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1982.31.12.23.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Pin, C., Zalduegui, J. F. S. Sequential separation of light rare-earth elements, thorium and uranium by miniaturized extraction chromatography: application to isotopic analyses of silicate rocks. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 339, 79–89; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(96)00499-0.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Chiarizia, R., Horwitz, E. P., Alexandratos, S. D., Gula, M. J. Diphonix(R) resin: a review of its properties and applications. Separ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 32, 1–35.10.1080/01496399708003184Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2021-1070).


Received: 2021-06-25
Accepted: 2021-08-19
Published Online: 2021-08-31
Published in Print: 2021-10-26

© 2021 Mario Veicht et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2021-1070/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen