Startseite Naturwissenschaften Novel nanoparticle materials for drug/food delivery-polysaccharides
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Novel nanoparticle materials for drug/food delivery-polysaccharides

  • Lei Chen EMAIL logo , Xingxun Liu und Ka-Hing Wong
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. August 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

1 Introduction

As condensation polymers, polysaccharides are generally termed as glycans, in which more than ten monosaccharide units are mutually joined together by O-glycosidic bonds [1]. The general formula of polysaccharides can be represented as (C6H10O5)n where 40 ≤ n ≤ 3000 [2, 3]. Polysaccharides are often quite heterogeneous, with structures ranging from linear to highly branched.

Polysaccharides are the most abundant resources in nature that are commonly applied in daily life, including cellulose, pectin, chitosan, starch, etc. Depending on the type of monosaccharide building units, polysaccharides can be divided into homopolysaccharide (also called homoglycan, containing the same type of monosaccharide) and heteropolysaccharide (or heteroglycan, composed of more than one type of monosaccharide) based on the definition given in the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). Both homopolysaccharides and heteropolysaccharides may possess homo-linkages or hetero-linkages with respect to configuration and/ or linkage position. These macromolecules can also be divided into storage polysaccharides (such as starch and glycogen) and structural polysaccharides (such as cellulose and chitin) based on their biological functions [4]. Starch is made up of a mixture of amylose and amylopectin. The amylose content in starch depends on the biological source, accounting about 20–30% in most starch [5]. Amylose is linear chain glucan with α-1,4 linkage, whereas amylopectin consists of several side chains on O-6 site of the glucose in α-1,4 backbone with α-1,6-bonds occurring every 24 to 30 glucose units. Starch is used as a storage polysaccharide in plants, while glycogen serves as the form of energy storage in animals and fungi [6]. The structure of glycogen is similar to amylopectin but is more extensively branched and compact than starch [7]. As a hyperbranched biopolymer, glycogen consists of linear glucose chains with side chains branching off every ten glucoses or so. Overall, most of the storage polysaccharides are hyperbranched molecules.

As the most common structural polysaccharide, cellulose is the structural component of the primary cell wall of plants and considered as the most abundant natural resource. This type of polysaccharide consist of a linear chain ranging from one hundred to over ten thousand β-1,4 linked D-glucose units [8]. The other common structural polysaccharide is chitin, which is a long-chain polymer of N-acetylglucosamine [9]. Chitin is the main component of the cell walls of fungi, the exoskeletons of arthropods and insects, the radulas ofmollusks, and the beaks and internal shells of cephalopods [10]. Chitin plays the role of cellulose in structure, but serves as keratin in function. As a naturally occurring polymer, chitin has also been proven its usefulness in medical and industrial applications.

Some studies have described several health benefits of polysaccharides including immunomodulatory, antitumor, antimicrobial effects and hypocholesterolemic effects [1113]. With excellent properties (including highly stable, safe, nontoxic, hydrophilic and biodegradable) and abundant resources, polysaccharides have been studied and applied in biomaterial fields. Particularly, the application of polysaccharides in nanoparticle delivery systems (NPDSs) has attracted increasing attention in recent decades.

Nanoparticles are defined as solid, colloidal particles consisting of macromoleculeswith a size in the range of 10–1000 nm[14]. Nanoparticlematerial is an important application field of nanotechnology, which has been applied in various fields such as food, feed, biomedical sciences, and drug/ gene delivery systems [1517]. In particular, NPDSs have been attracting increasing attention recently and are became a focus. NPDSs are generally referred to as nanometric carriers with various morphologies, including nanospheres, nanocapsules, nanomicelles, nanoliposomes, and nanodrugs, etc. [18]. Presently, nanoparticles have been widely employed to deliver food ingredients, drugs, polypeptides, proteins, genes, and other biomolecules.

2 Nanoparticles for delivery systems

Previous studies and applications of nanoparticles weremainly focused on drug delivery, because nanoparticles can entrap drugs or biomolecules into their interior structures and/ or absorb drugs or biomolecules onto their exterior surfaces. Therefore, the most important application of nanoparticles was nanovectors. Additionally, previous studies have summarized various outstanding advantages of nanoparticle drug delivery systems, including [19]: (1) they can pass through the smallest capillary vessels because of their ultra-tiny volume and avoid rapid clearance by phagocytes so that their duration in blood stream is greatly prolonged; (2) they can penetrate cells and tissue gaps to arrive at target organs such as liver, spleen, lung, spinal cord and lymph; (3) they could show controlled release properties due to the biodegradability, pH, ion and/ or temperature sensibility of materials; (4) they can improve the utility of drugs and reduce toxic side effects; etc.

With these superiorities, nanoparticle drug delivery systems have been widely studied in biological, medical and pharmaceutical applications. Meanwhile, nanoparticles have also attracted increasing attention for food delivery systems to provide maximum protection for sensitive food components against oxidation, enzyme degradation and pH before reaching the target [20, 21]. Several bioactive food components have been found effective in treatment of coronary heart diseases, inflammation, and immune disorder etc. in corporation with the diet [21, 22]. They are mainly grouped into isoprenoids, fatty acids, proteins and amino acids, polysaccharides and minerals. However, some of these components have poor properties, such as instability during digestion, poor solubility and bioavailability, ingredient interactions, and unpleasant taste. Thereby, nanoparticles were employed to improve the bioavailability of bioactive food ingredients, provide maximum stability, introduce controlled/ target release of encapsulated compound during mastication and digestion for efficient absorption into the body system.

Based on the method of preparation, nanoparticles can be designed and constructed to possess different properties and release characteristics for the best delivery or encapsulation of the therapeutic agent [23]. The nanoparticles currently used and studied as nanovectors can be grouped into three main classes or “generations” [24, 25]. The first class focuses on a passive delivery system for the target site. For example, the size of particles could enable the driving systems to the tumor site, but not specific recognition of the targets [26]. The second class of nanovectors includes additional functional groups that allow for molecular recognition of the target tissue. These functional groups include ligands, aptamers, and small peptides that bind to specific target-cell surface markers or surface markers expressed in the disease microenvironment [27]. Meanwhile, pH-sensitive polymers are included in this category. Finally, the third class aimed to successfully overcome the natural barriers that the vector needs to efficiently deliver the drug to the target site. This goal will only be reached by a “multistage” approach, and such a system has been recently reported [28]. Currently, particles of the first generation have been approved by FDA for their use in metastatic breast cancer [29]. Numerous clinical trials are also ongoing for the targeted second class nanovectors, particularly in cancer applications [30].

Compared with nondegradable materials, biodegradable systems have some advantages in the application of nanoparticles, including nontoxic, biotolerable, biocompatible, biodegradable, and water-soluble properties. Polysaccharides, as the most popular natural biopolymer, have their unique features in developing nanoparticles [3133].

3 Polysaccharides and their nanoparticles

A variety of polysaccharides have been modified with various reactants and investigated for the synthesis and application of nanoparticles using various methods [3436]. From the viewpoint of polyelectrolyte, polysaccharides can be divided into nonpolyelectrolytes (including starch, dextran, cellulose, etc.) and polyelectrolytes as listed in Table 1, the latter can be further divided into positively charged polysaccharides (chitosan) and negatively charged polysaccharides (alginate, pectin, hyaluronic acid, etc.).

3.1 Nonpolyelectrolyte polysaccharides

3.1.1 Starch and its derivation

Starch-based nanoparticles have attracted increasing attention due to their good hydrophilicity, biocompatibility and biodegradability. Starch is made up of two main structural components: amylose and amylopectin [65, 66], the former consists of a linear backbone of α-1,4-linked glucose with/without a low level of branching with a α-1,6-linkage, while amylopectin is a highly branched form of ‘amylose’ [39, 67] (Fig. 1). As the second most abundant biomaterial in nature, starch has been modified with various reactants by way of chemical reaction with hydroxyl groups in the starch molecule for preparation of nanoparticles [68].

Fig. 1: Chemical structure of starch (adapted from [2]).
Fig. 1:

Chemical structure of starch (adapted from [2]).

The hydrophobic derivative of starch by grafting hydrophobic poly (lactic acid) chains (PLA) was prepared to nanoparticles through crosslinked method and used for drug delivery taking Indomethacin as the model drug [69, 70]. Besides, propyl-starch nanoparticles were prepared to entrap docetaxel for cancer therapy and revealed high encapsulation efficiency [71, 72].

3.1.2 Cellulose and its derivation

Cellulose is the most abundant polysaccharide available on Earth with the formula of (C6H10O5)n [7375]. The cellulose molecule is formed by a linear chain of β-1,4-linked D-glucose units with different lengths (Fig. 2). Due to the insolubility of cellulose, nanoparticles are usually prepared from its derivative. Several studies have been conducted on the Poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) modification of soluble cellulose and its derivate [7678]. Besides, chitosan or its oligomer could complex carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, anionic derivative of cellulose) to form stable cationic nanoparticles for coating with plasmid DNA in genetic immunization [79].

3.1.3 Dextran and its derivation

Dextrans are a class of polysaccharides consisting of a linear backbone with mainly α-1,6-linked glucose, and a variable amount of α (1→2), α (1→3) and α (1→4) branched linkages [80] (Fig. 3). Currently, dextran is widely applied in fields of chemical, pharmaceutical, clinical and food industry playing the function of adjuvant, emulsifier, carrier, drug, stabilizer, and thickener of jam and ice cream [81, 82]. Dextrans are colloidal, hydrophilic and water-soluble substances, and can be decomposed in human feces due to bacterial action [44]. Hence, various drug-dextran prodrugs could be able to keep integrity in stomach and the small intestine but release in colon [83].

Fig. 2: Chemical structure of cellulose (adapted from [2]).
Fig. 2:

Chemical structure of cellulose (adapted from [2]).

Fig. 3: Chemical structure of dextran (adapted from [2]).
Fig. 3:

Chemical structure of dextran (adapted from [2]).

Dextrans have been modified to extend their surface-active properties and potential applications in pharmacy, biochemistry and medicine. Either water-soluble or water-insoluble dextran derivatives have been prepared based on the extent of modification. The water-insoluble derivatives could be solubilized in organic solvents like tetrahydrofuran or dichloromethane saturated with water [8486]. With food availability, biocompatibility and biodegradability, dextran has been widely selected as promising biomaterial in the preparation of nanovectors.

3.1.4 Cyclodextrins and their derivation

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are cyclic oligosaccharides composed of at least five α-1,4-linked glucopyranose units in a rigid 4C1 chair conformation, prepared by enzymatic degradation of starch. The most common CDs contain 6–8 D-glucose units and are known as α-CD, β-CD, and γ-CD, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4 [8789]. CDs are neither hydrolyzed nor absorbed in stomach and small intestine, but are absorbed in the large intestine so that the vast microflora present in the colon could degrade them into small saccharides [90, 91]. This property ensures CDs as a colon targeting carrier.

Fig. 4: Chemical structure of cyclodextrins.
Fig. 4:

Chemical structure of cyclodextrins.

Cyclodextrins are considered to be the most widely explored materials applied for nanoparticle formation. CD-based nanoparticles were usually prepared by self-assembling method, because the three-dimensional ring structure of CDs allows for encapsulation of hydrophobic molecules within the oligosaccharide cavity [9294]. Harada et al. have reported that αCD-based nanoparticles could be formed with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) for drug delivery [95]. Besides, modified CDs have been used to prepare nanoparticles for delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA), as well as controlled release of antimalarial artemisinin [96].

3.1.5 Pullulan

Pullulan is a linear glucan produced from starch by the fungus Aureobasidium pullulans [97, 98]. The backbone of pullulan is formed by maltotriose units (α-1,4-D-glucopyranose) through α-1,6 glycosidic linkage in a ratio of 2 : 1 (Fig. 5). Due to existence of an α-1,6 linkage in the molecule, pullulan tends to perform as a random flexible coil in aqueous solution, which may result in its biodegradability and it has high adhesion, structural flexibility and solubility [99].

Fig. 5: Chemical structure of pullulan (adapted from [2]).
Fig. 5:

Chemical structure of pullulan (adapted from [2]).

The FDA has approved pullulan for various applications, due to its hemocompatible, nonimmunogenic, and noncarcinogenic properties [100]. The applications of pullulan extend to a variety of fields: in biomedical fields as drug and gene delivery [101], tissue engineering [102], and wound healing [103]; in pharmaceuticals as a coating agent [49, 52]; in foods and beverages as a filler; as an edible, mostly tasteless polymer, as well as edible films [104, 105].

Pullulan needs to be modified with hydrophobic molecules for self-assembling in water solution which will then behave as carriers of agents. Hydrophobic molecules including cholesterol, hexadecanol, vitamin H, etc. have been used to derive pullulan to obtain amphiphilic micelles [19]. The partially hydrophobized pullulan shows unique association and potential application in delivery systems. For example, both cholesterol-pullulan and a copolymer of N-isopropylacrylamide and N-[4(1-pyrenyl)butyl]-N-noctadecylacrylamide, and hexadecyl group-bearing pullulan have been self-assembly prepared for nanoparticle delivery carriers [106108]. Pullulan acetate (PA) is the other important hydrophobized pullulan, which can form self-aggregation nanoparticles as well as its modified materials [109, 110].

3.1.6 Guar gum

Guar gum, also called guaran, is formed by a linear chain of β-1,4-D-mannopyranosyl residues with branching points at O-6 site having α-D-galactopyranosyl units as the side chains (Fig. 6) [111]. With water solubility, guar gum is a nonionic natural polysaccharide derived from the seeds of Cyamopsistetra gonolobusis.

Fig. 6: Chemical structure of guar gum.
Fig. 6:

Chemical structure of guar gum.

Guar gum hydrates in cold water to form highly viscous colloidal dispersions or sols [112]. Guar gum solution is stable under pH range 5–7, but extreme pH and high temperature conditions (e.g. pH 3 at 50 °C) can degrade its structure [113]. With properties of being nontoxic, highly viscous and easily available, guar gumis commonly used for various applications: in food industry as thickener for sauces, ice creams, etc.; in pharmaceuticals as binder and disintegrant for solid dosage and as hydrophilic matrix for oral controlled release dosage [111, 112]. Besides, guar gum has been extensively applied in colon-specific drug delivery due to its drug sustained release property and susceptibility to microbial degradation in the colon [114]. In addition, guar gum has been found to be a better stabilizer of the nanoparticles [113].

3.2 Positively charged polyelectrolyte polysaccharides

3.2.1 Chitin and chitosan

Chitin is the main component of fungal cell walls, the exoskeleton of crustaceans (such as crabs and shrimp) and insects [115117]. As shown in Fig. 7, chitin consists of a linear chain of N -acetylglucosamine. The role of chitin is analogous to cellulose in structure and to keratin in function. As the deacetylation product of chitin, chitosan is composed of glucosamine andN -acetylglucosamine by β-1,4-glycosidic bonds forming linear backbone. Chitosan is produced industrially by alkali treatment to hydrolyze the amino-acetyl groups of chitin with the degree of deacetylation (%DD) in range 60–100%[117, 118].

Fig. 7: Chemical structure of chitin and chitosan.
Fig. 7:

Chemical structure of chitin and chitosan.

Chitosan is considered as a biocompatible, biodegradable and nontoxic biomaterial and widely applied in pharmaceutical and biomedical fields [119]. In the field of nanomedicine, chitosan has received considerable attention as vector in novel bioadhesive drug delivery systems which prolong the residence time of the drugs at the site of absorption and increase the drug bioavailability [54]. However, this biopolymer can only solubilize in diluted acidic aqueous solution (pH < 6.5) for the glucosamine units converting into a soluble form with protonated amine groups [120]. The insolubility in water and organic solvents limited its application, but chitosan could be hydrophobically modified to obtain nanoparticles and applied as nanocarriers for drugs due to their biocompatibility in vivo [121]. Experimental in vitro and in vivo results show chitosan as a promising nanocarrier for controlled release of various drugs with excellent encapsulated efficacy.

3.3 Negatively charged polyelectrolyte polysaccharides

3.3.1 Alginate

Alginate is an anionic linear polysaccharide derived from cell walls and intercellular spaces of marine brown algae. The structure of alginate consists of a backbone of β-1,4-linked D-mannuronic acid (M unit) and α-1,4-linked L-guluronic acid (G unit) arranged of various compositions and sequences depending on the source of the alginate (Fig. 8). M block segments provide linear and flexible conformation, while G block segments serve folded and rigid structural conformations [122]. Moreover, the ratio of M unit against G unit has been reported to affect its physicochemical properties, as well as its further applications [100].

Fig. 8: Chemical structure of alginate.
Fig. 8:

Chemical structure of alginate.

Alginate is a biopolymer with biocompatible, nonimmunogenic, nontoxic and biodegradable properties [123]. A large number of free hydroxyl and carboxyl groups in the backbone of alginate may be modified to achieve solubility, hydrophobicity, physicochemical and biological characteristics, as well as various potential applications [122]. The applications of alginate have extended to various industries: as food additive and thickener in food industry [124]; as scaffolds in tissue engineering [125]; and as controlled drug release devices in biomedicine [126]. Besides, previous studies have indicated that the muco-adhesive, biocompatible and biodegradable properties of alginate make it an important and hopeful tool in the preparation of controlled drug-delivery systems achieving an enhanced drug bioavailability [124, 126].

3.3.2 Pectin

Pectin exists in the cell wall of plants to function as cell adhesion. Pectins are a family of complex polysaccharides containing 1,4-linked D-galacturonic acid residues and were usually divided into homogalacturonans (HG), rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I), and rhamnogalacturonan II (RG-II), xylogalacturonan (XGA) and apiogalacturonan (AGA) based on their structural features [61, 127]. The common pectin type is HG as shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9: Chemical structure of pectin.
Fig. 9:

Chemical structure of pectin.

Pectin can resist the degradation in the physiological environment of the stomach and the small intestine, but can be decomposed by pectinases secreted by microflora of the human colon [128]. Thanks to these properties, pectin could function as prebiotics and delivery vector for components from the mouth to the colon [129, 130]. However, pectin cannot protect its encapsulated components during its delivery through the stomach and small intestine due to its high water solubility [129, 130]. Hence, studies mainly focused on pectin derivatives with water resistant and enzymatic degradation. For this purpose, calcium pectinate was deeply studied as a drug carrier for colon-specific delivery because this complex can reduce the solubility of pectin and keep stable in low pH environment [128]. Besides, pectin has been combined with other polymers, including 4-aminothiophenol [131], chitosan [132], hyaluronic acid [133] or poly (lactide-co-glycolide) [134], showing good results as controlled drug release devices.

3.3.3 Hyaluronic acid

Hyaluronic acid (HA) (also called hyaluronan, hyaluronate) is an anionic polysaccharide composed of repeating disaccharide units of D-glucuronic acid and N -acetyl D-glucosamine linked via altering β-1,3 andβ-1,4 glycosidic bonds as shown in Fig. 10 [135]. HA has been reported to associate with several cellular processes, including angiogenesis and the regulation of inflammation [136].

Fig. 10: Repeating unit of hyaluronic acid.
Fig. 10:

Repeating unit of hyaluronic acid.

As described in previous studies, HA is a biodegradable, bioactive, nonimmunogenic and noncytotoxic polysaccharide [137]. Similar to other glycosaminoglycans, hyaluronan can function as a targeting vector for the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to cancerous tissues, as many tumors overexpress the hyaluronan CD44 and RHAMM receptors [138]. As a drug delivery carrier, HA has several advantages including the negligible nonspecific interaction with serum components due to its polyanionic characteristics [139] and the highly efficient targeted specific delivery to the liver tissues with HA receptors [140].

3.4 Hyperbranched polysaccharides

The above described polysaccharides are mainly attributed to linear polysaccharides or partially branched polysaccharides. However, hyperbranched polysaccharides (HBPs), including amylopectin, glycogen and some glucans from mushroom cell walls, have attracted increasing attention in the fields of nanotechnology and pharmacology because of their unique structures and properties [141143]. The spherical architecture of highly branched macromolecules provides numerous terminal units that can be converted into various functional groups leading to novel nanomaterials [32, 144]. HBPs can also form polymeric micelles that are spherical aggregates of amphiphilic blocks of copolymers which enhance water solubility and decrease the toxicity of hydrophobic drugs [145].

Compared with synthetic highly branched polymers, research interest in natural HBPs is emerging in the field of biomaterials due to their nontoxicity, good biocompatibility and biodegradability [19]. Unlike other highly branched polymers, spherical HBPs do not only provide reaction sites for the formation of nanoparticles, but they also protect the nanoparticles in a shell structure with excellent dispersion in water [32, 33, 146]. These unique properties of HBPs can be applied in the fields of drug delivery and controlled release [33, 146]. For example, hyperbranched cationic amylopectin derivatives have been designed for gene delivery with high transfection efficiency and exhibited potential as nonviral gene vectors [147]. HBPs were shown to interact strongly with lectins due to the clustering or multivalent effects of the numerous nonreducing saccharide units on their surfaces [148]. HBPs have also potent bioactivity including immune-modulatory and antitumor effects [31, 149]. Recent studies on HBPs have been focused on obtaining them from natural sources and characterizing their physical properties including solubility, shrinking factors, and rheological properties [150152].

3.5 Other polysaccharides

Besides, various fungal polysaccharides have attracted increasing attention in the dispersion of nanoparticles. These polysaccharides mainly contain helical chains structures, including lentinan, scleroglucan, schizophyllan, etc. Lentinan is a structural polysaccharide from the fruiting body of Lentinus edodes, with a β-(1→3)-D-glucan backbone and two β-(1→6) linked glucoses as side groups every five (1→3)-D-glucoside residues. Lentinan has been identified as triple helical chains in aqueous solutions and single flexible chains in DMSO or high concentration of alkali solutions. These structural properties of lentinan have been applied to disperse silver nanoparticles in water [153]. Triple helical schizophyllan has also been applied as reducing and stabilizing agent to prepare silver nanoparticles [154]. Moreover, CaCO3–lentinan microspheres have been obtained by self-assembly nanoparticles and applied as an anticancer drug carrier [155]. Scleroglucan (SCL) is the other β-(1→3) and β-(1→6) glucan with triple helical chains, produced by fungi of the genus Sclerotium. SCL was used to prepare scleroglucan gels for investigation of drug-loading effects on release by using theophylline as the model drug [156]. In addition, SCL-PVA (polyvinylalcohol) hydrogels containing magnetic nanoparticles have been prepared to study drug release behavior [157].

4 Nanoparticle preparation based on polysaccharides

Recent reviews have presented excellent summaries of the preparation and application of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles, mainly focusing on starch, chitosan, cellulose, pectin, etc. Along with the study of nanoparticles furthering the ‘third generation’, more polysaccharide-based nanovectors emerged in the field of drug, gene and food delivery systems. Based on structural characteristics, polysaccharide nanoparticles are prepared mainly by four mechanisms, including covalent crosslinking, ionic crosslinking, polyelectrolyte complexation, and self-assembly of hydrophobically modified polysaccharides.

4.1 Covalent crosslinking polysaccharide nanoparticles

The method of covalent crosslinking was first performed on the preparation of chitosan-based nanoparticles. In this method, a crosslinker is necessary to obtain the desired nanoparticles. For example, glutaraldehyde was used as the crosslinker to crosslink chitosan-based nanoparticles [158, 159]. However, the toxicity of glutaraldehyde on cell viability limits its utility in delivery systems. Carbodiimide was then employed as a water-soluble condensation agent and biocompatible crosslinker for covalent crosslinking [160]. With the aid of this crosslinker, natural di- and tricarboxylic acids were used for intermolecular crosslinking of chitosan nanoparticles [160, 161]. Furthermore, hyaluronic acid has also been used to prepare nanoparticles by using a carbodiimide method [162].

The nanoparticles prepared with this method were mainly in the form of polycations, polyanions, and polyampholytes and stable in aqueous media at low pH, neutral, and mild alkaline conditions. In the swollen state, the average size of the particles was in the range of 270–370 nm depending on the pH.

4.2 Ionic crosslinking polysaccharide nanoparticles

Similar to the method of covalent crosslinking, ionic crosslinking aims at charged polysaccharides or modified polysaccharides. However, ionic crosslinking has unique advantages against covalent crosslinking, including mild preparation conditions and simple procedures.

For ionic polysaccharides, low MW of polyanions and polycations could act as ionic crosslinkers for polycationic and polyanionic polysaccharides, respectively. To date, the most widely used polyanion crosslinker is tripolyphosphate (TPP), which was first used to crosslink chitosan nanoparticles in 1997 [163, 164]. TPP is nontoxic and has multivalent anions. It can form a gel by ionic interaction between positively charged amino groups of chitosan and negatively charged counterions of TPP [165].

Currently, chitosan is usually replaced by water-soluble chitosan derivatives to prepare nanoparticles by ionic crosslinking method. Compared with chitosan itself, its derivatives can easily dissolve in neutral aqueous media, avoiding the potential toxicity of acids and hence protecting the bioactivity of loaded biomacromolecules. For instance, N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles have been synthesized by ionic crosslinking of N-trimethyl chitosan with TPP and showed an encapsulation efficiency up to 95% and a loading capacity up to 50% (w/w) [159, 166]. Their potential as a carrier system was evaluated for the nasal delivery of proteins, ovalbumin [167]. The following studies indicated the nontoxicity of N-trimethylchitosan/TPP nanoparticles to Calu-3 cells. The absorption properties of N-trimethylchitosan/TPP nanoparticles have also been evaluated by use of in vitro (Caco-2 cells) and ex vivo (excised rat jejunum) models [168].

Besides, some negatively charged polysaccharides (including alginate, pectin and hyaluronic acid) bearing carboxylic groups can be crosslinked by bivalent calcium ion to form nanoparticles. For example, Ca-alginate nanoparticles have been prepared by water-in-oil reverse microemulsion method (~ 80 nm in size) [169] and ion-induced gelification method (235.5nmin size) [170] to deliver gene and drugs, respectively. The relative bioavailabilities of all drugs encapsulated were significantly higher than oral free drugs. In drug delivery system, all drugs (isoniazid, pyrazinamide, rifampicin) were detected in organs (lungs, liver and spleen) above the minimum inhibitory concentration until 15 days post nebulization, whilst free drugs stayed up to day 1. These inhalable nanoparticles could serve as an ideal carrier for the controlled release of antitubercular drugs.

4.3 Polyelectrolyte complexing polysaccharide nanoparticles

Polysaccharide nanoparticles by polyelectrolyte complexation (PEC) are also based on polysaccharides or their derivatives with charge. PEC has received increasing attention compared with other nanoparticle preparation techniques, because PEC-based nanoparticles have several characteristics favorable for cellular uptake and colloidal stability, including suitable diameter and surface charge, spherical morphology and a low polydispersity index (PdI), and so on [171]. Besides, nanoparticles prepared by this method not only avoid many kinds of aggression in harsh conditions (such as organic solvents and sonication during preparation), but also keep the stability and biological activity of the encapsulated agents in completely aqueous condition and in ambient temperature [172, 173].

As shown in Fig.11, polysaccharides can form PEC with oppositely charged polymers by intermolecular electrostatic interaction. Currently, chitosan is the only natural polycationic polysaccharide to form nanoparticles in this method, for its water-soluble and biocompatible properties [175]. Chitosan-based PEC nanoparticles can be synthesized with many negative polymers, including polysaccharides [176], peptides [177], polyacrylic acid family [178], and so on [179, 180].

Fig. 11: The schematic illustration of the nanoparticles formed by polyelectrolyte complexation [174].
Fig. 11:

The schematic illustration of the nanoparticles formed by polyelectrolyte complexation [174].

4.4 Self-assembly polysaccharide nanoparticles

Self-assembling polysaccharide nanoparticles have moved to the forefront due to their unique advantages, including biocompatibility and stimulus responsiveness. The self-assemblednanoparticles are composed of a core of hydrophobic moieties surrounding by a hydrophilic outer shell, which could serve as protection for the carried hydrophobic agents [181183]. By grafting with hydrophobic segments, polysaccharides can form amphiphilically polymeric micelles which enhance water solubility and decrease the toxicity of hydrophobic drugs [145].

In aqueous environment, polyamphiphiles spontaneously form micelles or micelle-like aggregates via undergoing intra- or intermolecular associations between hydrophobic moieties, in order to minimize interfacial free energy. In recent years, numerous studies have been carried out to investigate the synthesis and the application of polysaccharide-based self-aggregate nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Generally, these hydrophobic molecules can be divided into linear [184, 185], cyclic hydrophobic molecules [186, 187], polyacrylate family [188, 189], etc.

5 Applications of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles

In the design of nanoscale carriers, polysaccharides have received considerable attention for their unique properties, including safety, nontoxicity, bioavailability and biocompatibility. Currently, polysaccharide-based nanoparticles have been investigated and applied in medical and food fields as new promising biomaterials.

5.1 Medical applications

5.1.1 Delivery of peptides and proteins

In recent years, some peptides and proteins have been discovered for therapeutic and antigenic bioactivities and attracted considerable attention [190]. However, most of these biologically derived drugs are limited for in vivo application by their disadvantages like low stability, short biological half-life and the need to cross biological barriers. From this viewpoint, polysaccharide-based nanoparticles can overcome some of the problems of systemic administration. Currently, polysaccharide-based nanoparticles have been prepared and applied for delivery of several protein drugs, including insulin [191, 192], basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) [193, 194] and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antisense (AS) [195]. Meanwhile, bovine serum albumin (BSA) is a normal model in the preparation of nanoparticles based on polysaccharides [196].

Insulin is one of the most widely applied therapeutic peptides for the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The normal problems of oral insulin administration are low bioavailability on acidic gastric pH, the enzymatic barrier of the intestinal tract and the physical barrier made up of the intestinal epithelium. Therefore, polysaccharide-based nanoparticles have been prepared for the inclusion of insulin in various studies by different methods, which show good release control and good results in loading efficacy [192]. Nanoparticles based on alginate-alginate coated with chitosan, alginate-dextran have been prepared by the interaction of carboxylic groups of alginate with amino groups of insulin [197, 198]. Insulin-loaded nanoparticles have also been synthesized by ionic crosslinked method using chitosan as the selected polysaccharide and TPP anions as crosslinker agent [199]. Additionally, PEC between chitosan and different polyanions (alginate, glucomannan, and dextran sulfate) has been prepared for insulin inclusion in some studies and shown ~90% association efficiency values. Self-assembling method was also used to prepare insulin-loaded nanoparticles using cholesterol-bearing pullulan as the selected polysaccharide [106]. These insulin-loaded polysaccharide-based nanoparticles showed excellent behavior in evaluation of physiological activity.

5.1.2 Delivery of anticancer drugs

The main problems of cancer chemotherapy are related with the toxicity caused by anticancer drugs on normal tissues and release control of drugs on the target site [200]. Thus, nanoparticles are being extensively investigated as carriers of anticancer drugs, in order to overcome several problems in cancer chemotherapy, including reducing harmful side effects, enhancing blood circulation time, controlling the release concentration of the drug at the tumor site for a desired time period, thus, increasing therapeutic efficiency. Among the available potential drug carrier systems in nanoscale, polysaccharide-based nanoparticles play an important role and their use with some anticancer drugs shows promising results [201].

Tamoxifen, a drug for hormone dependent breast cancer, has been entrapped into polysaccharide-based nanoparticles to overcome the undesirable side effects and to increase the concentration at the tumor site due to specific recognition for targeting tissue or organ. Tamoxifen-loaded nanoparticles were prepared by Sarmah and coworkers based on guar gum, which is commonly used for colon specific drug delivery in the pharmaceutical industry [111, 202]. As a breast cancer drug, mitoxantrone is positively charged and then has been encapsulated in chitosan-based nanoparticles by ion gelation method using sodium TPP as gelation agent, and obtaining an encapsulation efficacy of 98% [203]. There were also other anticancer drugs delivered by polysaccharide-based nanoparticles, including methotrexate (MTX, a folate antimetabolite) [204], doxorubicin (DOX, an anthracycline ring antibiotic drug) [205], paclitaxel (an anticancer drug) [206], etc.

5.1.3 Nanovectors of nucleic acids and genetic material

Up to now, gene therapy has been applied in many different diseases such as cancer, AIDS, and cardiovascular diseases [207]. Gene therapy aims to transfer genetic materials into specific cells of a patient to repair defective genes responsible for disease development [208]. To transfer the genes to the specific site, genes must escape the processes that affect the disposition of macromolecules and avoid the degradation by serum nuclease.

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) have been employed as a novel tool to block the expression of infectious diseases and cancers. However, siRNA suffers particular problems including poor cellular uptake, rapid degradation as well as limited blood stability. For this reason, chitosan-based nanoparticles have been prepared to transfect small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) by modified ionic gelation method with TPP as crosslinker agent [209]. Besides, PEC between chitosan and different polyanions has been used to prepare nanoparticles in order to include nucleic acids, since chitosan-DNA nanoparticles demonstrated low transfection efficiencies and the incorporation of secondary polymers improved the characteristics of these systems [210]. Recently, a new method has been used to prepare a gene nanocarrier based on triple helical β-glucan [211]. The target DNA sequence was firstly bound to polydeoxyadenylic acid (poly (dA)) by disulfide bonds (poly (dA)–SS–DNA). Lentinan was then used to combine the poly (dA)–SS–DNA chain to form a new triple helical conformation and provide protection of the delivered DNA. The target DNA was then delivered into the cell via endocytosis and released from the delivery system by automatic cleavage disulfide bonds in cytoplasm.

5.2 Food applications

Apart from delivery of drugs and genes, polysaccharide-based nanoparticles have also been studied and applied in delivery systems of food bioactives. Antioxidants, probiotics, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and proteins are common bioactives that can be added to food to improve nutritional value, to prevent diseases and to improve overall health [212]. Nanodelivery of these components may improve their stability [213, 214], solubility [215, 216], functionality [217, 218], cellular uptake [219221], and bioavailability [222224] and may also provide controlled release [225227] for better efficacy of the bioactive.

Nanoparticles formed by polysaccharides can deliver a variety of lipophilic bioactives to the colon, maintain their integrity and are kept impermeable within the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT). It may be necessary to design a nanoparticle or microgel that protects the bioactive component within a food product, but that can release it within the upper GIT so that it can be absorbed. For instance, casein-pectin microgels have been reported to encapsulate polyunsaturated lipids and protect them from oxidation [228], but they will fully dissociate under simulated GIT conditions [229, 230]. In this case, microgel dissociation takes place due to weakening of the electrostatic forces holding them together, as well as digestion of the casein molecules by proteases.

Polysaccharides have also been used as stabilizing agents to stabilize emulsions for providing controlled release, improving entrapment efficiency, and protection from degradation [231, 232]. In this case, the hydrophobic food bioactive is to be dissolved in the internal organic phase of an oil-in-water emulsion, whereas double emulsions are employed for nanodelivery of hydrophilic molecules [233, 234]. Besides, gum arabic maltodextrin was developed to improve the stability and bioavailability of epigallocatechin gallate [235].

6 Conclusions

As reviewed above, so many polysaccharides and their derivatives are employed as one of the most used biomaterials in preparation of nanoparticulate delivery systems. Due to their complex structure, polysaccharides show variability and versatility, which is difficult to reproduce with synthetic polymers. A variety of polysaccharide-based nanoparticles have been obtained by various preparation methods towards three evolution aspects: need for less toxic agents, simplification of the procedures and optimization to improve yield and entrapment efficiency. Now it is possible to choose the best method of preparation and the best suitable polymer to achieve an efficient encapsulation of the drug/gene/food ingredient, taking into account the agent features in this selection. In addition, a variety of novel polysaccharides with specific properties, such as hyperbranched polysaccharides, are being selected to prepared nanoparticles for delivery systems.

Until now, these nanoparticles have been investigated in terms of their physicochemical properties, drug-loading efficiency, in vitro toxicity, and comparatively simple in vivo tests. Deeper studies, such as the specific interaction of these nanoparticles with human organs, tissues, cells, or biomolecules, as well as how the administration of these systems can affect the metabolism, need to be carried out and focused on in the future. A combination of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo studies is required for the safe application of nanoparticle delivery systems in drugs, genes and food.

Acknowledgements

This article is also available in: Luque/Xu, Biomaterials. De Gruyter (2016), isbn 978–3–11–034230–7.

References

[1] Ren L, Perera C, Hemar Y. Antitumor activity of mushroom polysaccharides: A review, Food and Function, 2012, 3 (11), 1118–30.10.1039/c2fo10279jSuche in Google Scholar

[2] Namazi H, Fathi F, Heydari A. Nanoparticles based on modified polysaccharides, in Hashim AA, ed. The delivery of nanoparticles, InTech, 2012, pp. 149–84.10.5772/34795Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Aminabhavi TM, Balundgi RH, Cassidy PE. A review on biodegradable plastics, Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 1990, 29 (3), 235–62.10.1080/03602559008049843Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition, J Dairy Sci, 1991, 74 (10), 3583–97.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Hoover R. Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches: A review, Carbohyd Polym, 2001, 45 (3), 253–67.10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00260-5Suche in Google Scholar

[6] ChadhaMJ. Novel techniques for the characterisation of exopolysaccharides secreted by lactic acid bacteria. 2009, University of Huddersfield: Huddersfield.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Meléndez R, Meléndez-Hevia E, Canela EI. The fractal structure of glycogen: A clever solution to optimize cell metabolism, Biophys J, 1999, 77 (3), 1327–32.10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76982-1Suche in Google Scholar

[8] [8] Astbury WT, Davies MM. Structure of cellulose, Nature, 1944, 154, 84.10.1038/154084b0Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Dweltz NE. The structure of chitin, Biochimica et biophysica acta, 1960, 44, 416–35.10.1016/0006-3002(60)91597-3Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Zhou JS, Preparation of mushroom-source chitin from mushroom root, Peop. Rep. China: CN, 2010, p. 4p.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Zhang M, Cheung PCK, Chiu LCM, Wong EYL, Ooi VEC. Cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in-duction in human breast carcinoma Mcf-7 cells by carboxymethylated β-glucan from the mushroom sclerotia of Pleurotus tuber-regium, Carbohyd Polym, 2006, 66 (4), 455–62.10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.03.031Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Lin Y, Zhang L, Chen L, Jin Y, Zeng F, Jin J, Wan B, Cheung PCK. Molecular mass and antitumor activities of sulfated derivatives of α-glucan from Poria Cocos mycelia, Int J Biol Macromol, 2004, 34 (5), 231–36.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2004.08.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Wasser SP. Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysac-charides, Appl Microbiol Biot, 2002, 60 (3), 258–74.10.1007/s00253-002-1076-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Hamidi M, Azadi A, Rafiei P. Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery, Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 2008, 60 (15), 1638–49.10.1002/9781118311974.ch15Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Colvin VL, Schlamp MC, Alivisatos AP. Light-emitting diodes made from cadmium selenide nanocrystals and a semiconducting polymer, Nature, 1994, 370 (6488), 354–57.10.1038/370354a0Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Dickinson E. Use of nanoparticles and microparticles in the formation and stabilization of food emulsions, Trends Food Sci Tech, 2012, 24 (1), 4–12.10.1016/j.tifs.2011.09.006Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Nitta S, Numata K. Biopolymer-based nanoparticles for drug/gene delivery and tissue engi-neering, Int J Mol Sci, 2013, 14 (1), 1629–54.10.3390/ijms14011629Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Acosta E. Bioavailability of nanoparticles in nutrient and nutraceutical delivery, Curr Opin Colloid In, 2009, 14 (1), 3–15.10.1016/j.cocis.2008.01.002Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Liu Z, Jiao Y, Wang Y, Zhou C, Zhang Z. Polysaccharides-based nanoparticles as drug delivery systems, Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 2008, 60 (15), 1650–62.10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Adjonu R, Doran G, Torley P, Agboola S. Whey protein peptides as components of nanoemul-sions: a review of emulsifying and biological functionalities, J Food Eng, 2014, 122, 15–27.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.08.034Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Borel T, Sabliov CM. Nanodelivery of bioactive components for food applications: types of delivery systems, properties, and their effect on adme profiles and toxicity of nanoparticles, Annu Rev Food Sci Technol, 2014, 5, 197–213.10.1146/annurev-food-030713-092354Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] McClements DJ. Nanoscale nutrient delivery systems for food applications: improving bioac-tive dispersibility, stability, and bioavailability, J Food Sci, 2015, 80 (7), N1602–11.10.1111/1750-3841.12919Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Barratt GM. Therapeutic applications of colloidal drug carriers, Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today, 2000, 3 (5), 163–71.10.1016/S1461-5347(00)00255-8Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Martínez A, Fernández A, Pérez E, Benito M, Teijón JM, Blanco MD. Polysaccharide-based nanoparticles for controlled release formulations, in Hashim A, ed. The delivery of nanoparti-cles, InTech, 2012.10.5772/34156Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Sakamoto J, Annapragada A, Decuzzi P, FerrariM. Antibiological barrier nanovector technol-ogy for cancer applications, Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2007, 4 (4), 359–69.10.1517/17425247.4.4.359Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Romberg B, Hennink WE, Storm G. Sheddable coatings for long-circulating nanoparticles, PHARM Res-DORDR, 2008, 25(1), 55–71.10.1007/s11095-007-9348-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Kang J, Lee MS, Copland Iii JA, Luxon BA, Gorenstein DG. Combinatorial selection of a sin-gle stranded DNA thioaptamer targeting Tgf-B1 protein, Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2008, 18 (6), 1835–39.10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.02.023Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Tasciotti E, Liu X, Bhavane R, Plant K, Leonard AD, Price BK, Cheng MM, Decuzzi P, Tour JM, Robertson F, Ferrari M. Mesoporous silicon particles as a multistage delivery system for imag-ing and therapeutic applications, Nat Nanotechnol, 2008, 3 (3), 151–57.10.1038/nnano.2008.34Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Kratz F. Albumin as a drug carrier: design of prodrugs, drug conjugates and nanoparticles, J Control Release, 2008, 132 (3), 171–83.10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] [30] Gomes BAR, Moreira IES, Rocha S, Coelho M, PereiraMDC. Polysaccharide-based nanoparti-cles for cancer therapy, Journal of Nanopharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, 2013, 1 (4), 335–54.10.1166/jnd.2013.1039Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Kuang HX, Xia YG, Liang J, Yang BY, Wang QH, Wang XG. Structural characteristics of a hy-perbranched acidic polysaccharide from the stems of Ephedra sinica and its effect on T-cell subsets and their cytokines in Dth mice, Carbohyd Polym, 2011, 86 (4), 1705–11.10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.001Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Zhang YF, Structure, chain conformation and functional modification of hyperbranched polysaccharide.Wuhan University:Wuhan, China, 2011, pp. 16–37.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Satoh T. Synthesis and encapsulation-release property of unimolecular inversedmicelle hav-ing hyperbranched polysaccharide core, in. Callaos N, et al., eds. WMSCI, 2006: 10th World Multi-Conference On Systemics, Cybernetics And Informatics, 2006, pp. 15–16.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Namazi H, Mosadegh M. Preparation and properties of starch/nanosilicate layer/polycaprolactone composites, J PolymEnviron, 2011, 19 (4), 980–87.10.1007/s10924-011-0366-5Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Namazi H, Dadkhah A. Convenient method for preparation of hydrophobicallymodified starch nanocrystals with using fatty acids, Carbohyd Polym, 2010, 79 (3), 731–37.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.09.033Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Aumelas A, Serrero A, Durand A, Dellacherie E, Leonard M. Nanoparticles of hydrophobically modified dextrans as potential drug carrier systems, Colloid Surface B, 2007, 59 (1), 74–80.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.04.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Narayanan D, Nair S, Menon D. A systematic evaluation of hydroxyethyl starch as a potential nanocarrier for parenteral drug delivery, Int J Biol Macromol, 2015, 74, 575–84.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.12.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Sivapragasam N, Thavarajah P, Ohm J, Ohm J, Margaret K, Thavarajah D. Novel starch based nano scale enteric coatings from soybean meal for colon-specific delivery, Carbohyd Polym, 2014, 111, 273–79.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.091Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Zhang Z, Shan H, Chen L, He C, Zhuang X, Chen X. Synthesis of ph-responsive starch nanopar-ticles grafted poly (L-glutamic acid) for insulin controlled release, Eur Polym J, 2013, 49 (8), 2082–91.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.04.032Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Amar-Lewis E, Azagury A, Chintakunta R, Goldbart R, Traitel T, Prestwood J, Landesman-Milo D, Peer D, Kost J. Quaternized starch-based carrier for sirna delivery: from cellular uptake to gene silencing, J Control Release, 2014, 185, 109–20.10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.031Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Numata Y, Mazzarino L, Borsali R. A slow-release system of bacterial cellulose gel and nanoparticles for hydrophobic active ingredients, Int J Pharmaceut, 2015, 486 (1–2), 217–25.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.068Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Song Y, Chen L. Effect of net surface charge on physical properties of the cellulose nanoparti-cles and their efficacy for oral protein delivery, Carbohyd Polym, 2015, 121, 10–17.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] Elumalai R, Patil S, Maliyakkal N, Rangarajan A, Kondaiah P, Raichur AM. Protamine-carboxymethyl cellulose magnetic nanocapsules for enhanced delivery of anticancer drugs against drug resistant cancers, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 2015, 11 (4), 969–81.10.1016/j.nano.2015.01.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[44] Gainza G, Villullas S, Pedraz JL, Hernandez RM, Igartua M. Advances in drug delivery systems (DDSs) to release growth factors for wound healing and skin regeneration, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 2015, 11 (6), 1551–73.10.1016/j.nano.2015.03.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Saboktakin MR, Tabatabaie RM, Maharramov A, Ramazanov MA. Synthesis and characteri-zation of ph-dependent glycol chitosan and dextran sulfate nanoparticles for effective brain cancer treatment, Int J Biol Macromol, 2011, 49 (4), 747–51.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.07.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Parraga JE, Zorzi GK, Diebold Y, Seijo BA, Sanchez A. Nanoparticles based on naturally-occurring biopolymers as versatile delivery platforms for delicate bioactive molecules: an application for ocular gene silencing, Int J Pharmaceut, 2014, 477 (1–2), 12–20.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.049Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Anirudhan TS, Divya PL, Nima J. Synthesis and characterization of silane coated magnetic nanoparticles/glycidylmethacrylate-grafted-maleated cyclodextrin composite hydrogel as a drug carrier for the controlled delivery of 5-fluorouracil, Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2015, 55, 471–81.10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.068Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] [48] Kang L, Gao Z, Huang W, Jin M, Wang Q. Nanocarrier-mediated co-delivery of chemothera-peutic drugs and gene agents for cancer treatment, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 2015, 5 (3), 169–75.10.1016/j.apsb.2015.03.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[49] Singh RS, Kaur N, Kennedy JF. Pullulan and pullulan derivatives as promising biomolecules for drug and gene targeting, Carbohyd Polym, 2015, 123, 190–207.10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Dionísio M, Cordeiro C, Remu Án-López C, Seijo BA, Rosa Da Costa AM, Grenha A. Pullulan-based nanoparticles as carriers for transmucosal protein delivery, Eur J PharmSci, 2013, 50 (1), 102–13.10.1016/j.ejps.2013.04.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Lamichhane A, Azegami T, Kiyono H. The mucosal immune system for vaccine development, Vaccine, 2014, 32 (49), 6711–23.10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.089Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Prajapati VD, Jani GK, Khanda SM. Pullulan: An exopolysaccharide and its various applica-tions, Carbohyd Polym, 2013, 95 (1), 540–49.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.082Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Islan GA, Mukherjee A, Castro GR. Development of biopolymer nanocomposite for silver nanoparticles and ciprofloxacin controlled release, Int J Biol Macromol, 2015, 72, 740–50.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.09.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Varum FJ, McConnell EL, Sousa JJ, Veiga F, Basit AW. Mucoadhesion and the gastrointestinal tract, Critical Reviews™in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 2008, 25 (3).10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v25.i3.10Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Opanasopit P, Ngawhirunpat T, Chaidedgumjorn A, Rojanarata T, Apirakaramwong A, Phongy-ing S, Choochottiros C, Chirachanchai S. Incorporation of camptothecin into N-phthaloyl chitosan-g-mpeg self-assembly micellar system, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2006, 64 (3), 269–76.10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.06.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[56] Jain S, Tran T, Amiji M. Macrophage repolarization with targeted alginate nanoparticles con-taining Il-10 plasmid DNA for the treatment of experimental arthritis, Biomaterials, 2015, 61, 162–77.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.028Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[57] Mukhopadhyay P, Chakraborty S, Bhattacharya S, Mishra R, Kundu PP. Ph-Sensitive chi-tosan/alginate core-shell nanoparticles for efficient and safe oral insulin delivery, Int J Biol Macromol, 2015, 72, 640–48.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.08.040Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[58] Bhujbal SV, de Vos P, Niclou SP. Drug and cell encapsulation: alternative delivery options for the treatment of malignant brain tumors, Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 2014, 67–68, 142–53.10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Kim H, Jung G, Yoon J, Han J, Park Y, Kim D, Zhang M, Kim D. Preparation and characterization of nano-sized hydroxyapatite/alginate/chitosan composite scaffolds for bone tissue engi-neering, Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2015, 54, 20–25.10.1016/j.msec.2015.04.033Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[60] Ugurlu T, Turkoglu M, Gurer US, Akarsu BG. Colonic delivery of compression coated nisin tablets using pectin/hpmc polymermixture, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2007, 67 (1), 202–10.10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.01.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Zhang W, Xu P, Zhang H. Pectin in cancer therapy: a review, Trends Food Sci Tech, 2015, 44 (2), 258–71.10.1016/j.tifs.2015.04.001Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Ninan N, Muthiah M, Park I, Kalarikkal N, Elain A, Wui Wong T, Thomas S, Grohens Y. Wound healing analysis of pectin/carboxymethyl cellulose/microfibrillated cellulose based compos-ite scaffolds, Mater Lett, 2014, 132, 34–37.10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.056Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Lee MS, Lee JE, Byun E, Kim NW, Lee K, Lee H, Sim SJ, Lee DS, Jeong JH. Target-specific de-livery of sirna by stabilized calcium phosphate nanoparticles using dopa–hyaluronic acid conjugate, J Control Release, 2014, 192, 122–30.10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.049Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Han HS, Choi KY, Ko H, Jeon J, Saravanakumar G, Suh YD, Lee DS, Park JH. Bioreducible core-crosslinked hyaluronic acid micelle for targeted cancer therapy, J Control Release, 2015, 200, 158–66.10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[65] Rodrigues A, Emeje M. Recent applications of starch derivatives in nanodrug delivery, Carbo-hyd Polym, 2012, 87 (2), 987–94.10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.044Suche in Google Scholar

[66] Dufresne A. Crystalline starch based nanoparticles, Curr Opin Colloid In, 2014, 19 (5), 397–408.10.1016/j.cocis.2014.06.001Suche in Google Scholar

[67] [67] Namazi H, Dadkhah A. Surface modification of starch nanocrystals through ring-opening polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone and investigation of their microstructures, J Appl PolymSci, 2008, 110 (4), 2405–12.10.1002/app.28821Suche in Google Scholar

[68] Le Corre D, Bras J, Dufresne A. Starch nanoparticles: A review, Biomacromolecules, 2010, 11 (5), 1139–53.10.1021/bm901428ySuche in Google Scholar

[69] Simi CK, Abraham TE. Hydrophobic grafted and cross-linked starch nanoparticles for drug delivery, Bioproc Biosyst Eng, 2007, 30 (3), 173–80.10.1007/s00449-007-0112-5Suche in Google Scholar

[70] Thielemans W, Belgacem MN, Dufresne A. Starch nanocrystals with large chain surface modi-fications, Langmuir, 2006, 22 (10), 4804–10.10.1021/la053394mSuche in Google Scholar

[71] Santander-Ortega MJ, Stauner T, Loretz B, Ortega-Vinuesa JL, Bastos-Gonz A Lez D, Wenz G, Schaefer UF, Lehr CM. Nanoparticles made from novel starch derivatives for transdermal drug delivery, J Control Release, 2010, 141 (1), 85–92.10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.08.012Suche in Google Scholar

[72] Dandekar P, Jain R, Stauner T, Loretz B, Koch M, Wenz G, Lehr C. A hydrophobic starch polymer for nanoparticle-mediated delivery of docetaxel, Macromol Biosci, 2012, 12 (2), 184–94. [73] Mohanty AK, MisraM, Hinrichsen G. Biofibres, Biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview, Macromol Mater Eng, 2000, 276 (1), 1–24.10.1002/mabi.201100244Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Mohanty AK MisraM, Hinrichsen G. Biofibres, Biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview Macromol Mater Eng 2000 276 11 2410.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-WSuche in Google Scholar

[74] Riedel U, Nickel JOR. Natural fibre-reinforced biopolymers as construction materials – new discoveries, Die AngewandteMakromolekulare Chemie, 1999, 272 (1), 34–40.10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19991201)272:1<34::AID-APMC34>3.0.CO;2-HSuche in Google Scholar

[75] Bledzki AK, Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres, Prog PolymSci, 1999, 24 (2), 221–74.10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5Suche in Google Scholar

[76] Teramoto Y, Nishio Y. Cellulose diacetate-graft-poly(lactic acid)s: synthesis of wide-ranging compositions and their thermal and mechanical properties, Polymer, 2003, 44 (9), 2701–09.10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00190-3Suche in Google Scholar

[77] Shi RW, Burt HM. Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic hydroxypropylcellulose-graft-poly(epsilon-caprolactone), J Appl PolymSci, 2003, 89 (3), 718–27.10.1002/app.12194Suche in Google Scholar

[78] Teramoto Y, Yoshioka M, Shiraishi N, Nishio Y. Plasticization of cellulose diacetate by graft copolymerization of epsilon-caprolactone and lactic acid, J Appl PolymSci, 2002, 84 (14), 2621–28.10.1002/app.10430Suche in Google Scholar

[79] Cui Z, Mumper RJ. Chitosan-based nanoparticles for topical genetic immunization, J Control Release, 2001, 75 (3), 409–19.10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00407-2Suche in Google Scholar

[80] Misaki A, Torii M, Sawai T, Goldstein IJ. Structure of the dextran of leuconostoc mesenteroides B-1355, Carbohyd Res, 1980, 84 (2), 273–85.10.1016/S0008-6215(00)85557-3Suche in Google Scholar

[81] Prado HJ, Matulewicz MC. Cationization of polysaccharides: A path to greener derivativeswith many industrial applications, Eur PolymJ, 2014, 52, 53–75.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.12.011Suche in Google Scholar

[82] McCurdy RD, Goff HD, Stanley DW, Stone AP. Rheological properties of dextran related to food applications, Food Hydrocolloid, 1994, 8 (6), 609–23.10.1016/S0268-005X(09)80068-4Suche in Google Scholar

[83] Shukla RK, Tiwari A. Carbohydrate Polymers: Applications and recent advances in delivering drugs to the colon, Carbohyd Polym, 2012, 88 (2), 399–416.10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.021Suche in Google Scholar

[84] Bertholon I, Vauthier C, Labarre D. Complement activation by core-shell poly (isobutylcyanoacrylate)-polysaccharide nanoparticles: influences of surface morphology, length, and type of polysaccharide, PharmRes-Dordr, 2006, 23 (6), 1313–23.10.1007/s11095-006-0069-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Durand A, Marie E, Rotureau E, Leonard MEL, Dellacherie E. Amphiphilic polysaccharides: useful tools for the preparation of nanoparticles with controlled surface characteristics, Lang-muir, 2004, 20 (16), 6956–63.10.1021/la0490341Suche in Google Scholar

[86] Rouzes C, Leonard M, Durand A, Dellacherie E. Influence of polymeric surfactants on the prop-erties of drug-loaded Pla nanospheres, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2003, 32 (2), 125–35.10.1016/S0927-7765(03)00152-8Suche in Google Scholar

[87] Larsen KL, Endo T, Ueda H, Zimmermann W. Inclusion complex formation constants of alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta-, epsilon-, zeta-, eta- and theta-cyclodextrins determined with capillary zone electrophoresis, Carbohyd Res, 1998, 309 (2), 153–59.10.1016/S0008-6215(98)00130-XSuche in Google Scholar

[88] [88] Miyazawa I, Ueda H, Nagase H, Endo T, Kobayashi S, Nagai T. Physicochemical properties and inclusion complex-formation of delta-cyclodextrin, Eur J Pharm Sci, 1995, 3 (3), 153–62.10.1016/0928-0987(95)00006-YSuche in Google Scholar

[89] Fujiwara T, Tanaka N, Kobayashi S. Structure of delta-cyclodextrin 13.75H2O, Chem Lett, 1990, 5, 739–42.10.1246/cl.1990.739Suche in Google Scholar

[90] Uekama K, Hirayama F, Irie T. Cyclodextrin drug carrier systems, Chem Rev, 1998, 98 (5), 2045–76.10.1021/cr970025pSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[91] Connors KA. The stability of cyclodextrin complexes in solution, Chem Rev, 1997, 97 (5), 1325–58.10.1021/cr960371rSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[92] Uekama K. Recent aspects of pharmaceutical application of cyclodextrins, J Incl Phenom Macro, 2002, 44 (1–4), 3–07.10.1023/A:1023007032444Suche in Google Scholar

[93] Daoud-Mahammed S, Couvreur P, Bouchemal K, Ch E Ron M, Lebas GEV, Amiel C, Gref R. Cy-clodextrin and polysaccharide-based nanogels: entrapment of two hydrophobicmolecules, benzophenone and tamoxifen, Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10 (3), 547–54.10.1021/bm801206fSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[94] Liu Y, Zhao Y, Zhang H. Recognition-induced supramolecular porous nanosphere formation from cyclodextrin conjugated by cholic acid, Langmuir, 2006, 22 (7), 3434–38.10.1021/la052434jSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[95] Harada A, Kamachi M. Complex formation between poly (ethylene glycol) and α-cyclodextrin, Macromolecules, 1990, 23 (10), 2821–23.10.1021/ma00212a039Suche in Google Scholar

[96] Davis ME. The first targeted delivery of sirna in humans via a self-assembling, cyclodextrin polymer-based nanoparticle: from concept to clinic, Mol Pharmaceut, 2009, 6 (3), 659–68.10.1021/mp900015ySuche in Google Scholar

[97] Glinel K, Huguet J, Muller G. Comparison of the associating behaviour between neutral and anionic alkylperfluorinated pullulan derivatives, Polymer, 1999, 40 (25), 7071–81.10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00085-3Suche in Google Scholar

[98] Bataille I, Huguet J, Muller G, Mocanu G, Carpov A. Associative behaviour of hydrophobically modified carboxymethylpullulan derivatives, Int J Biol Macromol, 1997, 20 (3), 179–91.10.1016/S0141-8130(97)01158-6Suche in Google Scholar

[99] Leathers TD. Biotechnological production and applications of pullulan, Appl Microbiol Biot, 2003, 62 (5-6), 468–73.10.1007/s00253-003-1386-4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Coviello T, Matricardi P, Marianecci C, Alhaique F. Polysaccharide hydrogels for modified re-lease formulations, J Control Release, 2007, 119 (1), 5–24.10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.01.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[101] Rekha MRCP. Pullulan as a promising biomaterial for biomedical applications: a perspective, Trends in Biomaterial & Artificial Organs, 2007, 116.Suche in Google Scholar

[102] Thebaud NEL, Pierron DEE, Bareille R, Le Visage C, Letourneur D, Bordenave L. Human en-dothelial progenitor cell attachment to polysaccharide-based hydrogels: a pre-requisite for vascular tissue engineering, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2007, 18 (2), 339–45.10.1007/s10856-006-0698-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[103] Bae H, Ahari AF, Shin H, Nichol JW, Hutson CB, Masaeli M, Kim S, Aubin H, Yamanlar S, Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden microengineered pullulan methacrylate hydrogels promote cell proliferation and 3D cluster formation, Soft Matter, 2011, 7 (5), 1903–11.10.1039/c0sm00697aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[104] Khanzadi M, Jafari SM, Mirzaei H, Chegini FK, Maghsoudlou Y, Dehnad D. Physical and mechanical properties in biodegradable films of whey protein concentrate–pullulan by ap-plication of beeswax, Carbohyd Polym, 2015, 118, 24–29.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[105] Synowiec A, Gniewosz MG, Kra Niewska K, Przyby JAL, B Czek K, W Glarz Z. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of pullulan film containing sweet basil extract and an evaluation of coating effectiveness in the prolongation of the shelf life of apples stored in refrigeration conditions, Innov Food Sci Emerg, 2014, 23, 171–81.10.1016/j.ifset.2014.03.006Suche in Google Scholar

[106] Akiyoshi K, Kobayashi S, Shichibe S, Mix D, Baudys M, Kim SW, Sunamoto J. Self-assembled hydrogel nanoparticle of cholesterol-bearing pullulan as a carrier of protein drugs: complexa-tion and stabilization of insulin, J Control Release, 1998, 54 (3), 313–20.10.1016/S0168-3659(98)00017-0Suche in Google Scholar

[107] Akiyoshi K, Deguchi S, Moriguchi N, Yamaguchi S, Sunamoto J. Self-aggregates of hy-drophobized polysaccharides in water. Formation and characteristics of nanoparticles, Macromolecules, 1993, 26 (12), 3062–68.10.1021/ma00064a011Suche in Google Scholar

[108] [108] Jung SW, Jeong YL, Kim YH, Kim SH. Self-assembled polymeric nanoparticles of poly(ethylene glycol) grafted pullulan acetate as a novel drug carrier, Arch Pharm Res, 2004, 27 (5), 562–69.10.1007/BF02980132Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[109] Zhang HZ, Gao FP, Liu LR, Li XM, Zhou ZM, Yang XD, Zhang QQ. Pullulan acetate nanoparticles prepared by solvent diffusion method for epirubicin chemotherapy, Colloids & Surfaces B Biointerfaces, 2009, 71 (1), 19–26.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.12.039Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[110] Park KH, Song HC, Na K, Bom HS, Lee KH, Kim S, Kang D, Lee DH. Ionic strength-sensitive pullulan acetate nanoparticles (pan) for intratumoral administration of radioisotope: ionic strength-dependent aggregation behavior and (99m)technetium retention property, Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2007, 59 (1), 16–23.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.04.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Sarmah JK, RitaM, Saibal Kanti B, Ranadeep M, Angshuman B. Controlled release of tamox-ifen citrate encapsulated in cross-linked guar gum nanoparticles, Int J Biol Macromol, 2011, 49 (3), 390–96.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.05.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[112] Barbucci R, Pasqui D, Favaloro R, Panariello G. A thixotropic hydrogel from chemically cross-linked guar gum: synthesis, characterization and rheological behaviour, Carbohyd Res, 2008, 343 (18), 3058–65.10.1016/j.carres.2008.08.029Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[113] Tiraferri A, Kai LC, Sethi R, Elimelech M. Reduced aggregation and sedimentation of zero-valent iron nanoparticles in the presence of guar gum, Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2008, 324 (1–2), 71–79.10.1016/j.jcis.2008.04.064Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[114] Soumya RS, Ghosh S, Abraham ET. Preparation and characterization of guar gum nanoparti-cles, Int J Biol Macromol, 2010, 46 (2), 267–69.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.11.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[115] Kean T, Thanou M, Roth S. Trimethylated chitosans as non-viral gene delivery vectors: cyto-toxicity and transfection efficiency, J Control Release, 2005, 103 (103), 643–53.10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.01.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[116] Ramesh HP, Tharanathan RN. Carbohydrates – the renewable raw materials of high biotech-nological value, Crit Rev Biotechnol, 2003, 23 (2), 149–73.10.1080/713609312Suche in Google Scholar

[117] Yuan Z. Study on the synthesis and catalyst oxidation properties of chitosan bound nickel(II) complexes, Chemical Industry Times, 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

[118] Muzzarelli RAA, Muzzarelli C. Chitosan chemistry: relevance to the biomedical sciences, Polysaccharides I, 2005, 151–209.10.1007/b136820Suche in Google Scholar

[119] Guerrero S, Teijón C, Mu Iz E, Teijón JM, Blanco MD. Characterization and in vivo evaluation of ketotifen-loaded chitosan microspheres, Carbohyd Polym, 2010, 79 (4), 1006–13.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.034Suche in Google Scholar

[120] Sinha VR, Singla AK, Wadhawan S, Kaushik R, Kumria R, Bansal K, Dhawan S. Chitosan micro-spheres as a potential carrier for drugs, Int J Pharm, 2004, 274 (1–2), 1–33.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.12.026Suche in Google Scholar

[121] Yoo HS, Lee JE, Chung H, Kwon IC, Jeong SY. Self-assembled nanoparticles containing hy-drophobically modified glycol chitosan for gene delivery, J Control Release, 2005, 103 (1), 235–43.10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.11.033Suche in Google Scholar

[122] Yang J, Xie Y, He W. Research progress on chemical modification of alginate: a review, Carbo-hyd Polym, 2011, 84 (1), 33–39.10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.048Suche in Google Scholar

[123] Rinaudo M. Biomaterials based on a natural polysaccharide: alginate, Tip, 2014, 17 (1), 92–96. [124] Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials, Prog PolymSci, 2007, 32 (8–9), 762–98.10.1016/S1405-888X(14)70322-5Suche in Google Scholar

[124] Nair LS Laurencin CT Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials Prog PolymSci 2007 32 (8–9) 762 9810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017Suche in Google Scholar

[125] BarbosaMA, Granja PL, Barrias CC, Amaral IF. Polysaccharides as scaffolds for bone regenera-tion, Itbm-Rbm, 2005, 26 (3), 212–17.10.1016/j.rbmret.2005.04.006Suche in Google Scholar

[126] Pandey R, Ahmad Z. Nanomedicine and experimental tuberculosis: facts, flaws, and future, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 2011, 7 (3), 259–72.10.1016/j.nano.2011.01.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[127] Posé S, Kirby AR, Paniagua C, Waldron KW, Morris VJ, Quesada MA, Mercado JA. The nanos-tructural characterization of strawberry pectins in pectate lyase or polygalacturonase silenced fruits elucidates their role in softening, Carbohyd Polym, 2015, 132, 134–45.10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.018Suche in Google Scholar

[128] Liu L, Fishman ML, Kost J, Hicks KB. Pectin-based systems for colon-specific drug delivery via oral route, Biomaterials, 2003, 24 (19), 3333–43.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00213-8Suche in Google Scholar

[129] [129] Yang L, Chu JS, Fix JA. Colon-specific drug delivery: new approaches and in vitro/in vivo evalu-ation, Int J Pharmaceut, 2002, 235 (1–2), 1–15.10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00004-2Suche in Google Scholar

[130] Sinha VR, Kumria R. Polysaccharides in colon-specific drug delivery, Int J Pharmaceut, 2001, 224 (1–2), 19–38.10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00720-7Suche in Google Scholar

[131] Perera G, Barthelmes J, Bernkop-Schn U Rch A. Novel pectin-4-aminothiophenole conjugate microparticles for colon-specific drug delivery, J Control Release, 2010, 145 (3), 240–46.10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.04.024Suche in Google Scholar

[132] Fernandez-Hervas MJ, Fell JT. Pectin/chitosan mixtures as coatings for colon-specific drug delivery: an in vitro evaluation, Int J Pharmaceut, 1998, 169 (1), 115–19.10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00114-8Suche in Google Scholar

[133] Pliszczak DEE, Bourgeois S, Bordes C, Valour J, Mazoyer MEE, Orecchioni AM, Nakache E, Lant E, Ri P. Improvement of an encapsulation process for the preparation of pro-and prebiotics-loaded bioadhesive microparticles by using experimental design, Eur J Pharm Sci, 2011, 44 (1), 83–92.10.1016/j.ejps.2011.06.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[134] Liu L, Won YJ, Cooke PH, Coffin DR, Fishman ML, Hicks KB, Ma PX. Pectin/poly (lactide-co-glycolide) composite matrices for biomedical applications, Biomaterials, 2004, 25 (16), 3201–10.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.036Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[135] Cafaggi S, Russo E, Stefani R, Parodi B, Caviglioli G, Sillo G, Bisio A, Aiello C, Viale M. Preparation, characterisation and preliminary antitumour activity evaluation of a novel nanoparticulate system based on a cisplatin-hyaluronate complex and N-trimethyl chitosan, Invest New Drug, 2011, 29 (3), 443–55.10.1007/s10637-009-9373-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Leach JB, Schmidt CE. Characterization of protein release from photocrosslinkable hyaluronic acid-polyethylene glycol hydrogel tissue engineering scaffolds, Biomaterials, 2005, 26 (2), 125–35.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[137] Oh EJ, Park K, Kim KS, Kim J, Yang J, Kong J, Lee MY, Hoffman AS, Hahn SK. Target specific and long-acting delivery of protein, peptide, and nucleotide therapeutics using hyaluronic acid derivatives, J Control Release, 2010, 141 (1), 2–12.10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.09.010Suche in Google Scholar

[138] Yip GW, Smollich M, Götte M. Therapeutic value of glycosaminoglycans in cancer, Mol Cancer Ther, 2006, 5 (9), 2139–48.10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0082Suche in Google Scholar

[139] Ito T, Iida-Tanaka N, Niidome T, Kawano T, Kubo K, Yoshikawa K, Sato T, Yang Z, Koyama Y. Hyaluronic acid and its derivative as a multi-functional gene expression enhancer: protection from non-specific interactions, adhesion to targeted cells, and transcriptional activation, J Control Release, 2006, 112 (3), 382–88.10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.03.013Suche in Google Scholar

[140] Zhou B, McGary CT, Weigel JA, Saxena A, Weigel PH. Purification and molecular identification of the human hyaluronan receptor for endocytosis, Glycobiology, 2003, 13 (5), 339–49.10.1093/glycob/cwg029Suche in Google Scholar

[141] Satoh T, Kakuchi T. Synthesis of hyperbranched carbohydrate polymers by ring-opening multibranching polymerization of anhydro sugar, Macromol Biosci, 2007, 7 (8), 999–1009.10.1002/mabi.200700057Suche in Google Scholar

[142] Satoh T, Ishihara H, Maeda T, Kaga H, Kakuchi T. Synthesis of hyperbranched polysaccharide by thermally induced cationic polymerization of 1,6-anhydro sugar, Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 2002, 224, U359.10.1021/ma034643lSuche in Google Scholar

[143] Kadokawa J, Tagaya H. Architecture of polysaccharides with specific structures: synthesis of hyperbranched polysaccharides, Polym Advan Technol, 2000, 11 (3), 122–26.10.1002/1099-1581(200003)11:3<122::AID-PAT953>3.0.CO;2-NSuche in Google Scholar

[144] Tao YZ, Zhang LN, Yan F, Wu XJ. Chain conformation of water-insoluble hyperbranched polysaccharide from fungus, Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8 (7), 2321–28.10.1021/bm070335+Suche in Google Scholar

[145] Kitajyo Y, Imai T, Sakai Y, Tamaki M, Tani H, Takahashi K, Narumi A, Kaga H, Kaneko N, Satoh T, Kakuchi T. Encapsulation-release property of amphiphilic hyperbranched D-glucan as a unimolecular reversemicelle, Polymer, 2007, 48 (5), 1237–44.10.1016/j.polymer.2007.01.028Suche in Google Scholar

[146] Kitajyo Y, Sakai Y, Imai T, Satoh T, Kaga H, Kakuchi T. Capsulation-release property of am-phiphilic hyperbranched polysaccharide for hydrophilic guest molecules, Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 2004, 227, U372–73.Suche in Google Scholar

[147] [147] Zhou YF, Yang B, Ren XY, Liu ZZ, Deng Z, Chen LM, Deng YB, Zhang LM, Yang LQ. Hyper-branched cationic amylopectin derivatives for gene delivery, Biomaterials, 2012, 33 (18), 4731–40.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.014Suche in Google Scholar

[148] Hoai NT, Sasaki A, Sasaki M, Kaga H, Kakuchi T, Satoh T. Synthesis, characterization, and lectin recognition of hyperbranched polysaccharide obtained from 1,6-anhydro-D-hexofuranose, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12 (5), 1891–99.10.1021/bm2002413Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[149] Huang ZP, Zhang LN, Duan XB, Liao ZQ, Ding H, Cheung PCK. Novel highly branched water-soluble heteropolysaccharides as immunopotentiators to inhibit s-180 tumor cell growth in Balb/C mice, Carbohyd Polym, 2012, 87 (1), 427–34.10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[150] Tao YZ, Yan Y, Xu WL. Shrinking factors of hyperbranched polysaccharide from fungus, Carbo-hyd Res, 2009, 344 (11), 1311–18.10.1016/j.carres.2009.05.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[151] Tao YZ, XuWL. Microwave-assisted solubilization and solution properties of hyperbranched polysaccharide, Carbohyd Res, 2008, 343 (18), 3071–78.10.1016/j.carres.2008.09.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[152] Tao YZ, Zhang LN. Determination of molecular size and shape of hyperbranched polysaccha-ride in solution, Biopolymers, 2006, 83 (4), 414–23.10.1002/bip.20572Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[153] Li S, Zhang Y, Xu X, Zhang L. Triple helical polysaccharide-induced good dispersion of silver nanoparticles in water, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12 (8), 2864–71.10.1021/bm2001439Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[154] Abdel-Mohsen AM, Abdel-Rahman RM, Fouda MMG, Vojtova L, Uhrova L, Hassan AF, Al-Deyab SS, El-Shamy IE, Jancar J. Preparation, characterization and cytotoxicity of schizophyl-lan/silver nanoparticle composite, Carbohyd Polym, 2014, 102, 238–45.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.040Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[155] Ma X, Yuan S, Yang L, Li L, Zhang X, Su C, Wang K. Fabrication and potential applications of CaCO3-lentinan hybrid materials with hierarchical composite pore structure obtained by self-assembly of nanoparticles, Crystengcomm, 2013, 15 (41), 8288–99.10.1039/c3ce41275jSuche in Google Scholar

[156] François NJ, Rojas AM, Daraio ME. Rheological and drug-release behaviour of a scleroglucan gel matrix at different drug loadings, PolymInt, 2005, 54 (12), 1613–19.10.1002/pi.1889Suche in Google Scholar

[157] François NJ, Allo S, Jacobo SE, Daraio ME. Composites of polymeric gels and magnetic nanoparticles: preparation and drug release behavior, J Appl PolymSci, 2007, 105 (2), 647–55.10.1002/app.26321Suche in Google Scholar

[158] Kadam AA, Lee DS. Glutaraldehyde cross-linked magnetic chitosan nanocomposites: re-duction precipitation synthesis, characterization, and application for removal of hazardous textile dyes, Bioresource Technol, 2015, 193, 563–67.10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.148Suche in Google Scholar

[159] Anitha A, Sowmya S, Kumar PTS, Deepthi S, Chennazhi KP, Ehrlich H, Tsurkan M, Jayakumar R. Chitin and chitosan in selected biomedical applications, Prog PolymSci, 2014, 39 (9), 1644–67.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.008Suche in Google Scholar

[160] Yin L, Ding J, He C, Cui L, Tang C, Yin C. Drug permeability and mucoadhesion properties of thiolated trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles in oral insulin delivery, Biomaterials, 2009, 30 (29), 5691–700.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.055Suche in Google Scholar

[161] Bodn A R M, Hartmann JF, BORBELY J. Nanoparticles from chitosan, Polymer Preprints, Ameri-can Chemical Society, Division of Polymer Chemistry, 2004, 45 (2), 307–08.Suche in Google Scholar

[162] Saravanakumar G, Choi KY, Yoon HY, Kim K, Park JH, Kwon IC, Park K. Hydrotropic hyaluronic acid conjugates: synthesis, characterization, and implications as a carrier of paclitaxel, Int J Pharmaceut, 2010, 394 (1–2), 154–61.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.04.041Suche in Google Scholar

[163] Calvo P, Remunan-Lopez C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers, J Appl PolymSci, 1997, 63 (1), 125–32.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970103)63:1<125::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-4Suche in Google Scholar

[164] Calvo P, Remu N An-L O Pez C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MIAJ. Chitosan and chitosan/ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer nanoparticles as novel carriers for proteins and vac-cines, Pharm Res-Dordr, 1997, 14 (10), 1431–36.10.1023/A:1012128907225Suche in Google Scholar

[165] Jain D, Banerjee R. Comparison of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride-loaded protein, lipid, and chitosan nanoparticles for drug delivery, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2008, 86 (1), 105–12.10.1002/jbm.b.30994Suche in Google Scholar

[166] [166] Martins AF, Facchi SP, Monteiro JP, Nocchi SR, Silva CTP, Nakamura CV, Girotto EM, Rubira AF, Muniz EC. Preparation and cytotoxicity of N,N,N-trimethyl chitosan/alginate beads containing gold nanoparticles, Int J Biol Macromol, 2015, 72, 466–71.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.08.020Suche in Google Scholar

[167] Amidi M, Romeijn SG, Borchard G, Junginger HE, Hennink WE, Jiskoot W. Preparation and characterization of protein-loaded N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles as nasal delivery sys-tem, J Control Release, 2006, 111 (1), 107–16.10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.11.014Suche in Google Scholar

[168] Sandri G, Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, Ferrari F, Gibin S, Zambito Y, Di Colo G, Caramella C. Nanoparticles Based On N-trimethylchitosan: evaluation of absorption properties using in vitro (caco-2 cells) and ex vivo (excised rat jejunum) models, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2007, 65 (1), 68–77.10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.07.016Suche in Google Scholar

[169] You J, Peng C. Calcium-alginate nanoparticles formed by reverse microemulsion as gene carri-ers, Wiley Online Library, 2005, pp. 147–53.10.1002/masy.200550113Suche in Google Scholar

[170] Zahoor A, Sharma S, Khuller GK. Inhalable alginate nanoparticles as antitubercular drug carriers against experimental tuberculosis, Int J Antimicrob Ag, 2005, 26 (4), 298–303.10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.07.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[171] Boddohi S, Moore N, Johnson PA, Kipper MJ. Polysaccharide-based polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles from chitosan, heparin, and hyaluronan, Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10 (6), 1402–09.10.1021/bm801513eSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[172] Luo Y, Wang Q. Recent development of chitosan-based polyelectrolyte complexes with natural polysaccharides for drug delivery, Int J Biol Macromol, 2014, 64, 353–67.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.12.017Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[173] Hou R, Nie L, Du G, Xiong X, Fu J. Natural polysaccharides promote chondrocyte adhesion and proliferation on magnetic nanoparticle/PVA composite hydrogels, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2015, 132, 146–54.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.05.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[174] Hu Y, Yang T, Hu X. Novel polysaccharides-based nanoparticle carriers prepared by polyelec-trolyte complexation for protein drug delivery, PolymBull, 2012, 68 (4), 1183–99.10.1007/s00289-011-0683-9Suche in Google Scholar

[175] Silva DA, Maciel JS, Feitosa J, Paula H, De Paula R. Polysaccharide-based nanoparticles forma-tion by polyeletrolyte complexation of carboxymethylated cashew gum and chitosan, J Mater Sci, 2010, 45 (20), 5605–10.10.1007/s10853-010-4625-ySuche in Google Scholar

[176] Li T, Shi X, Du Y, Tang Y. Quaternized chitosan/alginate nanoparticles for protein delivery, J Biomed Mater Res A, 2007, 83 (2), 383–90.10.1002/jbm.a.31322Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[177] Lee P, Peng S, Su C, Mi F, Chen H, Wei M, Lin H, Sung H. The use of biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles in combination with a low-pressure gene gun for transdermal DNA delivery, Biomaterials, 2008, 29 (6), 742–51.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.034Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[178] Sajeesh S, Sharma CP. Novel pH responsive polymethacrylic acid-chitosan-polyethylene gly-col nanoparticles for oral peptide delivery, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2006, 76 (2), 298–305.10.1002/jbm.b.30372Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[179] Jayakumar R, Chennazhi KP, Muzzarelli RAA, Tamura H, Nair SV, Selvamurugan N. Chitosan conjugated DNA nanoparticles in gene therapy, Carbohyd Polym, 2010, 79 (1), 1–8.10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.08.026Suche in Google Scholar

[180] Guo C, Gemeinhart RA. Understanding the adsorption mechanism of chitosan onto poly(lactide-co-glycolide) particles, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2008, 70 (2), 597–604.10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.06.008Suche in Google Scholar

[181] Lee KY, Jo WH, Kwon IC, Kim Y, Jeong SY. Structural determination and interior polarity of self-aggregates prepared from deoxycholic acid-modified chitosan in water, Macromolecules, 1998, 31 (2), 378–83.10.1021/ma9711304Suche in Google Scholar

[182] Nishikawa T, Akiyoshi K, Sunamoto J. Macromolecular complexation between bovine serum albumin and the self-assembled hydrogel nanoparticle of hydrophobized polysaccharides, J Am Chem Soc, 1996, 118 (26), 6110–15.10.1021/ja953843cSuche in Google Scholar

[183] Ouchi T, Nishizawa H, Ohya Y. Aggregation phenomenon of PEG-grafted chitosan in aqueous solution, Polymer, 1998, 39 (21), 5171–75.10.1016/S0032-3861(97)10020-9Suche in Google Scholar

[184] [184] Yoksan R, Matsusaki M, Akashi M, Chirachanchai S. Controlled hydrophobic/hydrophilic chitosan: colloidal phenomena and nanosphere formation, Colloid PolymSci, 2004, 282 (4), 337–42.10.1007/s00396-003-0933-ySuche in Google Scholar

[185] Choisnard L, Geze A, Putaux J, Wong Y, Wouessidjewe D. Nanoparticles of β-cyclodextrin es-ters obtained by self-assembling of biotransesterified β-cyclodextrins, Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7 (2), 515–20.10.1021/bm0507655Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[186] Wang Y, Liu L, Jiang Q, Zhang Q. Self-aggregated nanoparticles of cholesterol-modified chi-tosan conjugate as a novel carrier of epirubicin, Eur PolymJ, 2007, 43 (1), 43–51.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.09.007Suche in Google Scholar

[187] Park K, Kim J, Nam YS, Lee S, Nam HY, Kim K, Park JH, Kim I, Choi K, Kim SY, Others. Effect of polymer molecular weight on the tumor targeting characteristics of self-assembled glycol chitosan nanoparticles, J Control Release, 2007, 122 (3), 305–14.10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.04.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[188] Bravo-Osuna I, Millotti G, Vauthier C, Ponchel G. In vitro evaluation of calcium binding capac-ity of chitosan and thiolated chitosan poly (isobutyl cyanoacrylate) core-shell nanoparticles, Int J Pharmaceut, 2007, 338 (1), 284–90.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.01.039Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[189] Bravo-Osuna I, Ponchel G, Vauthier C. Tuning of shell and core characteristics of chitosan-decorated acrylic nanoparticles, Eur J Pharm Sci, 2007, 30 (2), 143–54.10.1016/j.ejps.2006.10.007Suche in Google Scholar

[190] Vila A, Sánchez A, Tob O M, Calvo P, Alonso MJ. Design of biodegradable particles for protein delivery, J Control Release, 2002, 78 (1–3), 15–24.10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00486-2Suche in Google Scholar

[191] Singnurkar PS, Gidwani SK. Evaluation of hydrophobicnanoparticulate delivery system for insulin, Indian J Pharm Sci, 2008, 70 (6), 721.10.4103/0250-474X.49091Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[192] Reis CP, Ribeiro AONJ, Houng S, Veiga F, Neufeld RJ. Nanoparticulate delivery system for in-sulin: design, characterization and in vitro/in vivo bioactivity, Eur J PharmSci, 2007, 30 (5), 392–97.10.1016/j.ejps.2006.12.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[193] Cetin M, Aktas Y, Vural I, Capan Y, Dogan LA, Duman M, Dalkara T. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of bfgf-loaded chitosan nanoparticles, Drug Deliv, 2007, 14 (8), 525–29.10.1080/10717540701606483Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[194] Li Y, Nagira T, Tsuchiya T. The effect of hyaluronic acid on insulin secretion in Hit-T15 cells through the enhancement of gap-junctional intercellular communications, Biomaterials, 2006, 27 (8), 1437–43.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[195] Azizi E, Namazi A, Haririan I, Fouladdel S, Khoshayand MR, Shotorbani PY, Nomani A, Gazori T. Release profile and stability evaluation of optimized chitosan/alginate nanoparticles as egfr antisense vector, Int J Nanomed, 2010, 5, 455.10.2147/IJN.S9551Suche in Google Scholar

[196] Elzoghby AO, Samy WM, Elgindy NA. Albumin-based nanoparticles as potential controlled release drug delivery systems, J Control Release, 2012, 157 (2), 168–82.10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.031Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[197] Reis CP, Ribeiro AONJ, Veiga F, Neufeld RJ, Damg E C. Polyelectrolyte biomaterial interactions provide nanoparticulate carrier for oral insulin delivery, Drug Deliv, 2008, 15 (2), 127–39.10.1080/10717540801905165Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[198] Sarmento B, Martins S, Ribeiro AON, Veiga F, Neufeld R, Ferreira D. Development and compar-ison of different nanoparticulate polyelectrolyte complexes as insulin carriers, Int J Pept Res Ther, 2006, 12 (2), 131–38.10.1007/s10989-005-9010-3Suche in Google Scholar

[199] Pan Y, Li Y, Zhao H, Zheng J, Xu H, Wei G, Hao J, Others. Bioadhesive polysaccharide in protein delivery system: chitosan nanoparticles improve the intestinal absorption of insulin in vivo, Int J Pharmaceut, 2002, 249 (1), 139–47.10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00486-6Suche in Google Scholar

[200] Myrick JM, Vendra VK, Krishnan S. Self-assembled polysaccharide nanostructures for controlled-release applications, Nanotechnology Reviews, 2014, f3(4), 319–46.10.1515/ntrev-2012-0050Suche in Google Scholar

[201] Na K, Bum Lee T, Park K, Shin E, Lee Y, Choi H. Self-assembled nanoparticles of hydrophobically-modified polysaccharide bearing vitamin h as a targeted anti-cancer drug delivery system, Eur J Pharm Sci, 2003, 18 (2), 165–73.10.1016/S0928-0987(02)00257-9Suche in Google Scholar

[202] Sarmah JK, Bhattacharjee SK, Mahanta R, Mahanta R. Preparation of cross-linked guar gum nanospheres containing tamoxifen citrate by single step emulsion in situ polymer cross-linking method, J Incl PhenomMacro, 2009, 65 (3–4), 329–34.10.1007/s10847-009-9589-7Suche in Google Scholar

[203] [203] Lu B, Xiong S, Yang H, Yin X, Zhao R. Mitoxantrone-loaded BSA nanospheres and chitosan nanospheres for local injection against breast cancer and its lymph node metastases: I: for-mulation and in vitro characterization, Int J Pharmaceut, 2006, 307 (2), 168–74.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.09.037Suche in Google Scholar

[204] Yang X, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Chen H, Zhang H, Gao F, Liu L. Self-aggregated nanoparticles from methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-modified chitosan: synthesis; characterization; aggrega-tion and methotrexate release in vitro, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2008, 61 (2), 125–31.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.07.012Suche in Google Scholar

[205] Zhang J, Chen XG, Li YY, Liu CS. Self-assembled nanoparticles based on hydrophobically modified chitosan as carriers for doxorubicin, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 2007, 3 (4), 258–65.10.1016/j.nano.2007.08.002Suche in Google Scholar

[206] Hu F, Ren G, Yuan H, Du Y, Zeng S. Shell cross-linked stearic acid grafted chitosan oligosac-charide self-aggregated micelles for controlled release of paclitaxel, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2006, 50 (2), 97–103.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.04.009Suche in Google Scholar

[207] Di Gioia S, Trapani A, Castellani S, Carbone A, Belgiovine G, Craparo EF, Puglisi G, Cavallaro G, Trapani G, Conese M. Nanocomplexes for gene therapy of respiratory diseases: targeting and overcoming the mucus barrier, Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2015, 34, 8–24.10.1016/j.pupt.2015.07.003Suche in Google Scholar

[208] Mansouri S, Lavigne P, Corsi K, Benderdour M, Beaumont E, Fernandes JC. Chitosan-DNA nanoparticles as non-viral vectors in gene therapy: strategies to improve transfection effi-cacy, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2004, 57 (1), 1–08.10.1016/S0939-6411(03)00155-3Suche in Google Scholar

[209] Katas H, Alpar HO. Development and characterisation of chitosan nanoparticles for sirna delivery, J Control Release, 2006, 115 (2), 216–25.10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.07.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[210] Kaul G, Amiji M. Long-circulating poly(ethylene glycol)-modified gelatin nanoparticles for intracellular delivery, Pharm Res, 2002, 19 (7), 1061–67.10.1023/A:1016486910719Suche in Google Scholar

[211] Liu Q, Wang C, Cao Y, Xu X, Zhang L. A novel gene carrier prepared from triple helical β-glucan and polydeoxyadenylic acid, J Mater Chem B, 2014, 2 (8), 933–44.10.1039/c3tb21195aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[212] Jiménez-Colmenero F. Potential applications of multiple emulsions in the development of healthy and functional foods, Food Res Int, 2013, 52 (1), 64–74.10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.040Suche in Google Scholar

[213] Jeddi-Tehrani M, Mahmoudi AR, Sabzvari A, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R. Stabilization of monoclonal antibody upon encapsulation in polymeric nanoparticles by double emulsion technique, J Control Release, 2013, 172 (1), e62–63.10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.129Suche in Google Scholar

[214] Trombino S, Cassano R, Muzzalupo R, Pingitore A, Cione E, Picci N. Stearyl Ferulate-based solid lipid nanoparticles for the encapsulation and stabilization of β-carotene and α-tocopherol, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2009, 72 (2), 181–87.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.03.032Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[215] Koudelka S, Turanek Knotigova P, Masek J, Prochazka L, Lukac R, Miller AD, Neuzil J, Turanek J. Liposomal delivery systems for anti-cancer analogues of vitamin E, J Control Release, 2015, 207, 59–69.10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.04.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[216] Polyakov NE, Kispert LD. Water soluble biocompatible vesicles based on polysaccharides and oligosaccharides inclusion complexes for carotenoid delivery, Carbohyd Polym, 2015, 128, 207–19.10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[217] Wicki A, Witzigmann D, Balasubramanian V, Huwyler JR. Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications, J Control Release, 2015, 200, 138–57.10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.030Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[218] Voordouw J, Antonides G, Cornelisse-Vermaat JR, Pfaff S, Niemietz D, Frewer LJ. Optimising the delivery of food allergy information. an assessment of food allergic consumer preferences for different information delivery formats, Food Qual Prefer, 2012, 23 (1), 71–78.10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

[219] Liu X, Liu C, Zhang W, Xie C, Wei G, Lu W. Oligoarginine-modified biodegradable nanoparticles improve the intestinal absorption of insulin, Int J Pharmaceut, 2013, 448 (1), 159–67.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.03.033Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[220] Gaumet M, Gurny R, Delie F. Interaction of biodegradable nanoparticles with intestinal cells: the effect of surface hydrophilicity, Int J Pharmaceut, 2010, 390 (1), 45–52.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.10.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[221] [221] Hu B, Ting Y, Zeng X, Huang Q. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of chitosan– caseinophosphopeptides nanocomplexes loaded with epigallocatechin gallate, Carbohyd Polym, 2012, 89 (2), 362–70.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[222] Xiao J, Nian S, Huang Q. Assembly of kafirin/carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles to en-hance the cellular uptake of curcumin, Food Hydrocolloid, 2015, 51, 166–75.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.012Suche in Google Scholar

[223] Anand P, Nair HB, Sung B, Kunnumakkara AB, Yadav VR, Tekmal RR, Aggarwal BB. Design of curcumin-loaded plga nanoparticles formulation with enhanced cellular uptake, and in-creased bioactivity in vitro and superior bioavailability in vivo, Biochem Pharmacol, 2010, 79 (3), 330–38.10.1016/j.bcp.2009.09.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[224] Amidi M, Mastrobattista E, Jiskoot W, Hennink WE. Chitosan-based delivery systems for pro-tein therapeutics and antigens, Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 2010, 62 (1), 59–82.10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[225] Rhim J, Park H, Ha C. Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications, Prog PolymSci, 2013, 38 (10–11), 1629–52.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.008Suche in Google Scholar

[226] Sorrentino A, Gorrasi G, Vittoria V. Potential perspectives of bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications, Trends Food Sci Tech, 2007, 18 (2), 84–95.10.1016/j.tifs.2006.09.004Suche in Google Scholar

[227] Kumari A, Yadav SK, Pakade YB, Singh B, Yadav SC. Development of biodegradable nanoparti-cles for delivery of quercetin, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2010, 80 (2), 184–92.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.06.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[228] Matalanis A, Decker EA, McClements DJ. Inhibition of lipid oxidation by encapsulation of emulsion droplets within hydrogelmicrospheres, Food Chem, 2012, 132 (2), 766–72. [229] Matalanis A, McClements DJ. Hydrogel microspheres for encapsulation of lipophilic compo-nents: optimization of fabrication & performance, Food Hydrocolloid, 2013, 31 (1), 15–25.10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.11.034Suche in Google Scholar

[229] Matalanis A McClements DJ Hydrogel microspheres for encapsulation of lipophilic compo-nents: optimization of fabrication & performance Food Hydrocolloid 2013 31 1 15 2510.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.09.012Suche in Google Scholar

[230] Chiu C, Lin J. Self-assembly behavior of polymer-assisted clays, Prog PolymSci, 2012, 37 (3), 406–44.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

[231] Mun S, Kim Y, Shin M, McClements DJ. Control of lipid digestion and nutraceutical bioacces-sibility using starch-based filled hydrogels: influence of starch and surfactant type, Food Hydrocolloid, 2015, 44, 380–89.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.10.013Suche in Google Scholar

[232] McClements DJ, Li Y. Structured emulsion-based delivery systems: controlling the digestion and release of lipophilic food components, Adv Colloid Interfac, 2010, 159 (2), 213–28. [233] Matos M, Timgren A, Sj M, Dejmek P, Rayner M. Preparation and encapsulation properties of double pickering emulsions stabilized by quinoa starch granules, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2013, 423, 147–53.10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[233] Matos M Timgren A Sj M Dejmek P Rayner M Preparation and encapsulation properties of double pickering emulsions stabilized by quinoa starch granules Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2013 423 147 5310.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.060Suche in Google Scholar

[234] Sapei L, Naqvi MA, Rousseau D. Stability and release properties of double emulsions for food applications, Food Hydrocolloid, 2012, 27 (2), 316–23.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.10.008Suche in Google Scholar

[235] Peres I, Rocha S, Gomes J, Morais S, Pereira MC, Coelho M. Preservation of catechin antioxi-dant properties loaded in carbohydrate nanoparticles, Carbohyd Polym, 2011, 86 (1), 147–53.10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.029Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-8-25
Published in Print: 2016-8-31

© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 2.2.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2016-0053/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen